Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution
- Autores
- Nicenboim, Bruno; Shravan, Vasishth; Gattei, Carolina Andrea; Sigman, Mariano; Reinhold, Kliegl
- Año de publicación
- 2015
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- There is a wealth of evidence showing that increasing the distance between an argument and its head leads to more processing effort, namely, locality effects; these are usually associated with constraints in working memory (DLT: Gibson, 2000; activation-based model: Lewis and Vasishth, 2005). In SOV languages, however, the opposite effect has been found: antilocality (see discussion in Levy et al., 2013). Antilocality effects can be explained by the expectation-based approach as proposed by Levy (2008) or by the activation-based model of sentence processing as proposed by Lewis and Vasishth (2005). We report an eye-tracking and a self-paced reading study with sentences in Spanish together with measures of individual differences to examine the distinction between expectation- and memory-based accounts, and within memory-based accounts the further distinction between DLT and the activation-based model. The experiments show that (i) antilocality effects as predicted by the expectation account appear only for high-capacity readers; (ii) increasing dependency length by interposing material that modifies the head of the dependency (the verb) produces stronger facilitation than increasing dependency length with material that does not modify the head; this is in agreement with the activation-based model but not with the expectation account; and (iii) a possible outcome of memory load on low-capacity readers is the increase in regressive saccades (locality effects as predicted by memory-based accounts) or, surprisingly, a speedup in the self-paced reading task; the latter consistent with good-enough parsing (Ferreira et al., 2002). In sum, the study suggests that individual differences in working memory capacity play a role in dependency resolution, and that some of the aspects of dependency resolution can be best explained with the activation-based model together with a prediction component.
Fil: Nicenboim, Bruno. Universitat Potsdam; Alemania
Fil: Shravan, Vasishth. Universitat Potsdam; Alemania. University of Sheffield; Reino Unido
Fil: Gattei, Carolina Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Negocios; Argentina
Fil: Sigman, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Negocios; Argentina
Fil: Reinhold, Kliegl. Universitat Potsdam; Alemania - Materia
-
LOCALITY
ANTILOCALITY
WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
SPANISH
ACTIVATION
DLT
EXPECTATION - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/46651
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_f8735ce17b927a19f0e1a75e9f895946 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/46651 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolutionNicenboim, BrunoShravan, VasishthGattei, Carolina AndreaSigman, MarianoReinhold, KlieglLOCALITYANTILOCALITYWORKING MEMORY CAPACITYINDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCESSPANISHACTIVATIONDLTEXPECTATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6There is a wealth of evidence showing that increasing the distance between an argument and its head leads to more processing effort, namely, locality effects; these are usually associated with constraints in working memory (DLT: Gibson, 2000; activation-based model: Lewis and Vasishth, 2005). In SOV languages, however, the opposite effect has been found: antilocality (see discussion in Levy et al., 2013). Antilocality effects can be explained by the expectation-based approach as proposed by Levy (2008) or by the activation-based model of sentence processing as proposed by Lewis and Vasishth (2005). We report an eye-tracking and a self-paced reading study with sentences in Spanish together with measures of individual differences to examine the distinction between expectation- and memory-based accounts, and within memory-based accounts the further distinction between DLT and the activation-based model. The experiments show that (i) antilocality effects as predicted by the expectation account appear only for high-capacity readers; (ii) increasing dependency length by interposing material that modifies the head of the dependency (the verb) produces stronger facilitation than increasing dependency length with material that does not modify the head; this is in agreement with the activation-based model but not with the expectation account; and (iii) a possible outcome of memory load on low-capacity readers is the increase in regressive saccades (locality effects as predicted by memory-based accounts) or, surprisingly, a speedup in the self-paced reading task; the latter consistent with good-enough parsing (Ferreira et al., 2002). In sum, the study suggests that individual differences in working memory capacity play a role in dependency resolution, and that some of the aspects of dependency resolution can be best explained with the activation-based model together with a prediction component.Fil: Nicenboim, Bruno. Universitat Potsdam; AlemaniaFil: Shravan, Vasishth. Universitat Potsdam; Alemania. University of Sheffield; Reino UnidoFil: Gattei, Carolina Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Negocios; ArgentinaFil: Sigman, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Negocios; ArgentinaFil: Reinhold, Kliegl. Universitat Potsdam; AlemaniaFrontiers Research Foundation2015-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/46651Nicenboim, Bruno; Shravan, Vasishth; Gattei, Carolina Andrea; Sigman, Mariano; Reinhold, Kliegl; Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution; Frontiers Research Foundation; Frontiers in Psychology; 6; 312; 3-2015; 1-161664-1078CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00312/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00312info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369666/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:19:46Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/46651instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:19:46.51CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution |
title |
Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution |
spellingShingle |
Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution Nicenboim, Bruno LOCALITY ANTILOCALITY WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES SPANISH ACTIVATION DLT EXPECTATION |
title_short |
Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution |
title_full |
Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution |
title_fullStr |
Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution |
title_full_unstemmed |
Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution |
title_sort |
Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Nicenboim, Bruno Shravan, Vasishth Gattei, Carolina Andrea Sigman, Mariano Reinhold, Kliegl |
author |
Nicenboim, Bruno |
author_facet |
Nicenboim, Bruno Shravan, Vasishth Gattei, Carolina Andrea Sigman, Mariano Reinhold, Kliegl |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Shravan, Vasishth Gattei, Carolina Andrea Sigman, Mariano Reinhold, Kliegl |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
LOCALITY ANTILOCALITY WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES SPANISH ACTIVATION DLT EXPECTATION |
topic |
LOCALITY ANTILOCALITY WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES SPANISH ACTIVATION DLT EXPECTATION |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
There is a wealth of evidence showing that increasing the distance between an argument and its head leads to more processing effort, namely, locality effects; these are usually associated with constraints in working memory (DLT: Gibson, 2000; activation-based model: Lewis and Vasishth, 2005). In SOV languages, however, the opposite effect has been found: antilocality (see discussion in Levy et al., 2013). Antilocality effects can be explained by the expectation-based approach as proposed by Levy (2008) or by the activation-based model of sentence processing as proposed by Lewis and Vasishth (2005). We report an eye-tracking and a self-paced reading study with sentences in Spanish together with measures of individual differences to examine the distinction between expectation- and memory-based accounts, and within memory-based accounts the further distinction between DLT and the activation-based model. The experiments show that (i) antilocality effects as predicted by the expectation account appear only for high-capacity readers; (ii) increasing dependency length by interposing material that modifies the head of the dependency (the verb) produces stronger facilitation than increasing dependency length with material that does not modify the head; this is in agreement with the activation-based model but not with the expectation account; and (iii) a possible outcome of memory load on low-capacity readers is the increase in regressive saccades (locality effects as predicted by memory-based accounts) or, surprisingly, a speedup in the self-paced reading task; the latter consistent with good-enough parsing (Ferreira et al., 2002). In sum, the study suggests that individual differences in working memory capacity play a role in dependency resolution, and that some of the aspects of dependency resolution can be best explained with the activation-based model together with a prediction component. Fil: Nicenboim, Bruno. Universitat Potsdam; Alemania Fil: Shravan, Vasishth. Universitat Potsdam; Alemania. University of Sheffield; Reino Unido Fil: Gattei, Carolina Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Negocios; Argentina Fil: Sigman, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Negocios; Argentina Fil: Reinhold, Kliegl. Universitat Potsdam; Alemania |
description |
There is a wealth of evidence showing that increasing the distance between an argument and its head leads to more processing effort, namely, locality effects; these are usually associated with constraints in working memory (DLT: Gibson, 2000; activation-based model: Lewis and Vasishth, 2005). In SOV languages, however, the opposite effect has been found: antilocality (see discussion in Levy et al., 2013). Antilocality effects can be explained by the expectation-based approach as proposed by Levy (2008) or by the activation-based model of sentence processing as proposed by Lewis and Vasishth (2005). We report an eye-tracking and a self-paced reading study with sentences in Spanish together with measures of individual differences to examine the distinction between expectation- and memory-based accounts, and within memory-based accounts the further distinction between DLT and the activation-based model. The experiments show that (i) antilocality effects as predicted by the expectation account appear only for high-capacity readers; (ii) increasing dependency length by interposing material that modifies the head of the dependency (the verb) produces stronger facilitation than increasing dependency length with material that does not modify the head; this is in agreement with the activation-based model but not with the expectation account; and (iii) a possible outcome of memory load on low-capacity readers is the increase in regressive saccades (locality effects as predicted by memory-based accounts) or, surprisingly, a speedup in the self-paced reading task; the latter consistent with good-enough parsing (Ferreira et al., 2002). In sum, the study suggests that individual differences in working memory capacity play a role in dependency resolution, and that some of the aspects of dependency resolution can be best explained with the activation-based model together with a prediction component. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-03 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/46651 Nicenboim, Bruno; Shravan, Vasishth; Gattei, Carolina Andrea; Sigman, Mariano; Reinhold, Kliegl; Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution; Frontiers Research Foundation; Frontiers in Psychology; 6; 312; 3-2015; 1-16 1664-1078 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/46651 |
identifier_str_mv |
Nicenboim, Bruno; Shravan, Vasishth; Gattei, Carolina Andrea; Sigman, Mariano; Reinhold, Kliegl; Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution; Frontiers Research Foundation; Frontiers in Psychology; 6; 312; 3-2015; 1-16 1664-1078 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00312/full info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00312 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369666/ |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Research Foundation |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Research Foundation |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842981080972394496 |
score |
12.48226 |