Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution

Autores
Nicenboim, Bruno; Shravan, Vasishth; Gattei, Carolina Andrea; Sigman, Mariano; Reinhold, Kliegl
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
There is a wealth of evidence showing that increasing the distance between an argument and its head leads to more processing effort, namely, locality effects; these are usually associated with constraints in working memory (DLT: Gibson, 2000; activation-based model: Lewis and Vasishth, 2005). In SOV languages, however, the opposite effect has been found: antilocality (see discussion in Levy et al., 2013). Antilocality effects can be explained by the expectation-based approach as proposed by Levy (2008) or by the activation-based model of sentence processing as proposed by Lewis and Vasishth (2005). We report an eye-tracking and a self-paced reading study with sentences in Spanish together with measures of individual differences to examine the distinction between expectation- and memory-based accounts, and within memory-based accounts the further distinction between DLT and the activation-based model. The experiments show that (i) antilocality effects as predicted by the expectation account appear only for high-capacity readers; (ii) increasing dependency length by interposing material that modifies the head of the dependency (the verb) produces stronger facilitation than increasing dependency length with material that does not modify the head; this is in agreement with the activation-based model but not with the expectation account; and (iii) a possible outcome of memory load on low-capacity readers is the increase in regressive saccades (locality effects as predicted by memory-based accounts) or, surprisingly, a speedup in the self-paced reading task; the latter consistent with good-enough parsing (Ferreira et al., 2002). In sum, the study suggests that individual differences in working memory capacity play a role in dependency resolution, and that some of the aspects of dependency resolution can be best explained with the activation-based model together with a prediction component.
Fil: Nicenboim, Bruno. Universitat Potsdam; Alemania
Fil: Shravan, Vasishth. Universitat Potsdam; Alemania. University of Sheffield; Reino Unido
Fil: Gattei, Carolina Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Negocios; Argentina
Fil: Sigman, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Negocios; Argentina
Fil: Reinhold, Kliegl. Universitat Potsdam; Alemania
Materia
LOCALITY
ANTILOCALITY
WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
SPANISH
ACTIVATION
DLT
EXPECTATION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/46651

id CONICETDig_f8735ce17b927a19f0e1a75e9f895946
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/46651
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolutionNicenboim, BrunoShravan, VasishthGattei, Carolina AndreaSigman, MarianoReinhold, KlieglLOCALITYANTILOCALITYWORKING MEMORY CAPACITYINDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCESSPANISHACTIVATIONDLTEXPECTATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6There is a wealth of evidence showing that increasing the distance between an argument and its head leads to more processing effort, namely, locality effects; these are usually associated with constraints in working memory (DLT: Gibson, 2000; activation-based model: Lewis and Vasishth, 2005). In SOV languages, however, the opposite effect has been found: antilocality (see discussion in Levy et al., 2013). Antilocality effects can be explained by the expectation-based approach as proposed by Levy (2008) or by the activation-based model of sentence processing as proposed by Lewis and Vasishth (2005). We report an eye-tracking and a self-paced reading study with sentences in Spanish together with measures of individual differences to examine the distinction between expectation- and memory-based accounts, and within memory-based accounts the further distinction between DLT and the activation-based model. The experiments show that (i) antilocality effects as predicted by the expectation account appear only for high-capacity readers; (ii) increasing dependency length by interposing material that modifies the head of the dependency (the verb) produces stronger facilitation than increasing dependency length with material that does not modify the head; this is in agreement with the activation-based model but not with the expectation account; and (iii) a possible outcome of memory load on low-capacity readers is the increase in regressive saccades (locality effects as predicted by memory-based accounts) or, surprisingly, a speedup in the self-paced reading task; the latter consistent with good-enough parsing (Ferreira et al., 2002). In sum, the study suggests that individual differences in working memory capacity play a role in dependency resolution, and that some of the aspects of dependency resolution can be best explained with the activation-based model together with a prediction component.Fil: Nicenboim, Bruno. Universitat Potsdam; AlemaniaFil: Shravan, Vasishth. Universitat Potsdam; Alemania. University of Sheffield; Reino UnidoFil: Gattei, Carolina Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Negocios; ArgentinaFil: Sigman, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Negocios; ArgentinaFil: Reinhold, Kliegl. Universitat Potsdam; AlemaniaFrontiers Research Foundation2015-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/46651Nicenboim, Bruno; Shravan, Vasishth; Gattei, Carolina Andrea; Sigman, Mariano; Reinhold, Kliegl; Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution; Frontiers Research Foundation; Frontiers in Psychology; 6; 312; 3-2015; 1-161664-1078CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00312/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00312info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369666/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:19:46Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/46651instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:19:46.51CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution
title Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution
spellingShingle Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution
Nicenboim, Bruno
LOCALITY
ANTILOCALITY
WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
SPANISH
ACTIVATION
DLT
EXPECTATION
title_short Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution
title_full Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution
title_fullStr Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution
title_full_unstemmed Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution
title_sort Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Nicenboim, Bruno
Shravan, Vasishth
Gattei, Carolina Andrea
Sigman, Mariano
Reinhold, Kliegl
author Nicenboim, Bruno
author_facet Nicenboim, Bruno
Shravan, Vasishth
Gattei, Carolina Andrea
Sigman, Mariano
Reinhold, Kliegl
author_role author
author2 Shravan, Vasishth
Gattei, Carolina Andrea
Sigman, Mariano
Reinhold, Kliegl
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv LOCALITY
ANTILOCALITY
WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
SPANISH
ACTIVATION
DLT
EXPECTATION
topic LOCALITY
ANTILOCALITY
WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
SPANISH
ACTIVATION
DLT
EXPECTATION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv There is a wealth of evidence showing that increasing the distance between an argument and its head leads to more processing effort, namely, locality effects; these are usually associated with constraints in working memory (DLT: Gibson, 2000; activation-based model: Lewis and Vasishth, 2005). In SOV languages, however, the opposite effect has been found: antilocality (see discussion in Levy et al., 2013). Antilocality effects can be explained by the expectation-based approach as proposed by Levy (2008) or by the activation-based model of sentence processing as proposed by Lewis and Vasishth (2005). We report an eye-tracking and a self-paced reading study with sentences in Spanish together with measures of individual differences to examine the distinction between expectation- and memory-based accounts, and within memory-based accounts the further distinction between DLT and the activation-based model. The experiments show that (i) antilocality effects as predicted by the expectation account appear only for high-capacity readers; (ii) increasing dependency length by interposing material that modifies the head of the dependency (the verb) produces stronger facilitation than increasing dependency length with material that does not modify the head; this is in agreement with the activation-based model but not with the expectation account; and (iii) a possible outcome of memory load on low-capacity readers is the increase in regressive saccades (locality effects as predicted by memory-based accounts) or, surprisingly, a speedup in the self-paced reading task; the latter consistent with good-enough parsing (Ferreira et al., 2002). In sum, the study suggests that individual differences in working memory capacity play a role in dependency resolution, and that some of the aspects of dependency resolution can be best explained with the activation-based model together with a prediction component.
Fil: Nicenboim, Bruno. Universitat Potsdam; Alemania
Fil: Shravan, Vasishth. Universitat Potsdam; Alemania. University of Sheffield; Reino Unido
Fil: Gattei, Carolina Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Negocios; Argentina
Fil: Sigman, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Negocios; Argentina
Fil: Reinhold, Kliegl. Universitat Potsdam; Alemania
description There is a wealth of evidence showing that increasing the distance between an argument and its head leads to more processing effort, namely, locality effects; these are usually associated with constraints in working memory (DLT: Gibson, 2000; activation-based model: Lewis and Vasishth, 2005). In SOV languages, however, the opposite effect has been found: antilocality (see discussion in Levy et al., 2013). Antilocality effects can be explained by the expectation-based approach as proposed by Levy (2008) or by the activation-based model of sentence processing as proposed by Lewis and Vasishth (2005). We report an eye-tracking and a self-paced reading study with sentences in Spanish together with measures of individual differences to examine the distinction between expectation- and memory-based accounts, and within memory-based accounts the further distinction between DLT and the activation-based model. The experiments show that (i) antilocality effects as predicted by the expectation account appear only for high-capacity readers; (ii) increasing dependency length by interposing material that modifies the head of the dependency (the verb) produces stronger facilitation than increasing dependency length with material that does not modify the head; this is in agreement with the activation-based model but not with the expectation account; and (iii) a possible outcome of memory load on low-capacity readers is the increase in regressive saccades (locality effects as predicted by memory-based accounts) or, surprisingly, a speedup in the self-paced reading task; the latter consistent with good-enough parsing (Ferreira et al., 2002). In sum, the study suggests that individual differences in working memory capacity play a role in dependency resolution, and that some of the aspects of dependency resolution can be best explained with the activation-based model together with a prediction component.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/46651
Nicenboim, Bruno; Shravan, Vasishth; Gattei, Carolina Andrea; Sigman, Mariano; Reinhold, Kliegl; Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution; Frontiers Research Foundation; Frontiers in Psychology; 6; 312; 3-2015; 1-16
1664-1078
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/46651
identifier_str_mv Nicenboim, Bruno; Shravan, Vasishth; Gattei, Carolina Andrea; Sigman, Mariano; Reinhold, Kliegl; Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution; Frontiers Research Foundation; Frontiers in Psychology; 6; 312; 3-2015; 1-16
1664-1078
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00312/full
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00312
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369666/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Research Foundation
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Research Foundation
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842981080972394496
score 12.48226