Palaeomagnetism of the Mahatta Humaid Group (Cambrian – Early Ordovician, Oman), including a re-interpretation of previous Neoproterozoic palaeomagnetic data

Autores
Vizan, Haroldo; Turner, Peter; Millson, John; Ixer, Rob
Año de publicación
2009
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
We carried out a palaeomagnetic study in the Al-Huqf region (Sultanate of Oman) on rocks that belong to different units of the Cambrian – Ordovician Mahatta Humaid Group. Thirty-nine samples were systematically collected from a succession ca. 520–495 Ma old. Seventeen samples showed characteristic remanent magnetization components with two antipodal polarities carried by hematite. Evidence suggests that these components have a primary origin. A detailed petrographic analysis revealed syntaxial overgrowths parallel to the easy plane of magnetization of the magnetic carriers that has probably enhanced and reinforced the primary magnetization. A palaeopole computed with the mean direction of the 17 characteristic remanent magnetization components was considered alongside previously published Neoproterozoic – early Palaeozoic palaeomagnetic data, which we placed in an updated chronostratigraphic framework for the Neoproterozoic – Cambrian Huqf Supergroup. Two interpretations were considered: (1) Oman was detached from the Arabian-Nubian craton until ca. 660 Ma, and it became attached (or was nearby) to it by ca. 630 Ma. In this interpretation, an apparent polar wander (APW) path of Arabia is proposed between ca. 630 and 500 Ma. The palaeomagnetic directions of Mirbat obtained by Killner et al. (2005) in rocks 720–660 Ma old are therefore assumed as primary, and taking into account that Oman was an independent block of the Arabian-Nubian craton, the corresponding palaeopole is not considered in the proposed segment of the Arabian APW path. (2) The Neoproterozoic data belong to two different tectonic blocks within the Arabian-Nubian craton and were involved in left-lateral, strikeslip movements along NW-trending faults. One block included the localities of Al Jabal al-Akhdar and Al-Huqf and may have rotated counter-clockwise ca. 45° about a vertical axis between ca. 600 and 500 Ma. The other block included the locality of Mirbat and rotated counter-clockwise ca. 25° about a vertical axis between ca. 600 and 550 Ma. These suggested block rotations may have played a role in generating the underlying fabrics for some of the sedimentary basins in Oman. In the second model, the rocks sampled by Killner et al. (2005) in Mirbat were re-magnetized during the intrusion of dike swarms at ca. 615–600 Ma.
Fil: Vizan, Haroldo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Geociencias Básicas, Aplicadas y Ambientales de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Geociencias Básicas, Aplicadas y Ambientales de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Turner, Peter. No especifica;
Fil: Millson, John. No especifica;
Fil: Ixer, Rob. No especifica;
Materia
PALEOMAGNETISM
NEOPROTEROZOIC
CAMBRIAN
TECTONICS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/76631

id CONICETDig_f6208dc4bf56ef86c55712000a6ecfc0
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/76631
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Palaeomagnetism of the Mahatta Humaid Group (Cambrian – Early Ordovician, Oman), including a re-interpretation of previous Neoproterozoic palaeomagnetic dataVizan, HaroldoTurner, PeterMillson, JohnIxer, RobPALEOMAGNETISMNEOPROTEROZOICCAMBRIANTECTONICShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1We carried out a palaeomagnetic study in the Al-Huqf region (Sultanate of Oman) on rocks that belong to different units of the Cambrian – Ordovician Mahatta Humaid Group. Thirty-nine samples were systematically collected from a succession ca. 520–495 Ma old. Seventeen samples showed characteristic remanent magnetization components with two antipodal polarities carried by hematite. Evidence suggests that these components have a primary origin. A detailed petrographic analysis revealed syntaxial overgrowths parallel to the easy plane of magnetization of the magnetic carriers that has probably enhanced and reinforced the primary magnetization. A palaeopole computed with the mean direction of the 17 characteristic remanent magnetization components was considered alongside previously published Neoproterozoic – early Palaeozoic palaeomagnetic data, which we placed in an updated chronostratigraphic framework for the Neoproterozoic – Cambrian Huqf Supergroup. Two interpretations were considered: (1) Oman was detached from the Arabian-Nubian craton until ca. 660 Ma, and it became attached (or was nearby) to it by ca. 630 Ma. In this interpretation, an apparent polar wander (APW) path of Arabia is proposed between ca. 630 and 500 Ma. The palaeomagnetic directions of Mirbat obtained by Killner et al. (2005) in rocks 720–660 Ma old are therefore assumed as primary, and taking into account that Oman was an independent block of the Arabian-Nubian craton, the corresponding palaeopole is not considered in the proposed segment of the Arabian APW path. (2) The Neoproterozoic data belong to two different tectonic blocks within the Arabian-Nubian craton and were involved in left-lateral, strikeslip movements along NW-trending faults. One block included the localities of Al Jabal al-Akhdar and Al-Huqf and may have rotated counter-clockwise ca. 45° about a vertical axis between ca. 600 and 500 Ma. The other block included the locality of Mirbat and rotated counter-clockwise ca. 25° about a vertical axis between ca. 600 and 550 Ma. These suggested block rotations may have played a role in generating the underlying fabrics for some of the sedimentary basins in Oman. In the second model, the rocks sampled by Killner et al. (2005) in Mirbat were re-magnetized during the intrusion of dike swarms at ca. 615–600 Ma.Fil: Vizan, Haroldo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Geociencias Básicas, Aplicadas y Ambientales de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Geociencias Básicas, Aplicadas y Ambientales de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Turner, Peter. No especifica;Fil: Millson, John. No especifica;Fil: Ixer, Rob. No especifica;GeoScienceWorld2009-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/76631Vizan, Haroldo; Turner, Peter; Millson, John; Ixer, Rob; Palaeomagnetism of the Mahatta Humaid Group (Cambrian – Early Ordovician, Oman), including a re-interpretation of previous Neoproterozoic palaeomagnetic data; GeoScienceWorld; Geoarabia; 14; 2; 2-2009; 71-961025-6059CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article/14/2/71/566934/palaeomagnetism-of-the-mahatta-humaid-groupinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:59:02Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/76631instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:59:02.501CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Palaeomagnetism of the Mahatta Humaid Group (Cambrian – Early Ordovician, Oman), including a re-interpretation of previous Neoproterozoic palaeomagnetic data
title Palaeomagnetism of the Mahatta Humaid Group (Cambrian – Early Ordovician, Oman), including a re-interpretation of previous Neoproterozoic palaeomagnetic data
spellingShingle Palaeomagnetism of the Mahatta Humaid Group (Cambrian – Early Ordovician, Oman), including a re-interpretation of previous Neoproterozoic palaeomagnetic data
Vizan, Haroldo
PALEOMAGNETISM
NEOPROTEROZOIC
CAMBRIAN
TECTONICS
title_short Palaeomagnetism of the Mahatta Humaid Group (Cambrian – Early Ordovician, Oman), including a re-interpretation of previous Neoproterozoic palaeomagnetic data
title_full Palaeomagnetism of the Mahatta Humaid Group (Cambrian – Early Ordovician, Oman), including a re-interpretation of previous Neoproterozoic palaeomagnetic data
title_fullStr Palaeomagnetism of the Mahatta Humaid Group (Cambrian – Early Ordovician, Oman), including a re-interpretation of previous Neoproterozoic palaeomagnetic data
title_full_unstemmed Palaeomagnetism of the Mahatta Humaid Group (Cambrian – Early Ordovician, Oman), including a re-interpretation of previous Neoproterozoic palaeomagnetic data
title_sort Palaeomagnetism of the Mahatta Humaid Group (Cambrian – Early Ordovician, Oman), including a re-interpretation of previous Neoproterozoic palaeomagnetic data
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vizan, Haroldo
Turner, Peter
Millson, John
Ixer, Rob
author Vizan, Haroldo
author_facet Vizan, Haroldo
Turner, Peter
Millson, John
Ixer, Rob
author_role author
author2 Turner, Peter
Millson, John
Ixer, Rob
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv PALEOMAGNETISM
NEOPROTEROZOIC
CAMBRIAN
TECTONICS
topic PALEOMAGNETISM
NEOPROTEROZOIC
CAMBRIAN
TECTONICS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We carried out a palaeomagnetic study in the Al-Huqf region (Sultanate of Oman) on rocks that belong to different units of the Cambrian – Ordovician Mahatta Humaid Group. Thirty-nine samples were systematically collected from a succession ca. 520–495 Ma old. Seventeen samples showed characteristic remanent magnetization components with two antipodal polarities carried by hematite. Evidence suggests that these components have a primary origin. A detailed petrographic analysis revealed syntaxial overgrowths parallel to the easy plane of magnetization of the magnetic carriers that has probably enhanced and reinforced the primary magnetization. A palaeopole computed with the mean direction of the 17 characteristic remanent magnetization components was considered alongside previously published Neoproterozoic – early Palaeozoic palaeomagnetic data, which we placed in an updated chronostratigraphic framework for the Neoproterozoic – Cambrian Huqf Supergroup. Two interpretations were considered: (1) Oman was detached from the Arabian-Nubian craton until ca. 660 Ma, and it became attached (or was nearby) to it by ca. 630 Ma. In this interpretation, an apparent polar wander (APW) path of Arabia is proposed between ca. 630 and 500 Ma. The palaeomagnetic directions of Mirbat obtained by Killner et al. (2005) in rocks 720–660 Ma old are therefore assumed as primary, and taking into account that Oman was an independent block of the Arabian-Nubian craton, the corresponding palaeopole is not considered in the proposed segment of the Arabian APW path. (2) The Neoproterozoic data belong to two different tectonic blocks within the Arabian-Nubian craton and were involved in left-lateral, strikeslip movements along NW-trending faults. One block included the localities of Al Jabal al-Akhdar and Al-Huqf and may have rotated counter-clockwise ca. 45° about a vertical axis between ca. 600 and 500 Ma. The other block included the locality of Mirbat and rotated counter-clockwise ca. 25° about a vertical axis between ca. 600 and 550 Ma. These suggested block rotations may have played a role in generating the underlying fabrics for some of the sedimentary basins in Oman. In the second model, the rocks sampled by Killner et al. (2005) in Mirbat were re-magnetized during the intrusion of dike swarms at ca. 615–600 Ma.
Fil: Vizan, Haroldo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Geociencias Básicas, Aplicadas y Ambientales de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Geociencias Básicas, Aplicadas y Ambientales de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Turner, Peter. No especifica;
Fil: Millson, John. No especifica;
Fil: Ixer, Rob. No especifica;
description We carried out a palaeomagnetic study in the Al-Huqf region (Sultanate of Oman) on rocks that belong to different units of the Cambrian – Ordovician Mahatta Humaid Group. Thirty-nine samples were systematically collected from a succession ca. 520–495 Ma old. Seventeen samples showed characteristic remanent magnetization components with two antipodal polarities carried by hematite. Evidence suggests that these components have a primary origin. A detailed petrographic analysis revealed syntaxial overgrowths parallel to the easy plane of magnetization of the magnetic carriers that has probably enhanced and reinforced the primary magnetization. A palaeopole computed with the mean direction of the 17 characteristic remanent magnetization components was considered alongside previously published Neoproterozoic – early Palaeozoic palaeomagnetic data, which we placed in an updated chronostratigraphic framework for the Neoproterozoic – Cambrian Huqf Supergroup. Two interpretations were considered: (1) Oman was detached from the Arabian-Nubian craton until ca. 660 Ma, and it became attached (or was nearby) to it by ca. 630 Ma. In this interpretation, an apparent polar wander (APW) path of Arabia is proposed between ca. 630 and 500 Ma. The palaeomagnetic directions of Mirbat obtained by Killner et al. (2005) in rocks 720–660 Ma old are therefore assumed as primary, and taking into account that Oman was an independent block of the Arabian-Nubian craton, the corresponding palaeopole is not considered in the proposed segment of the Arabian APW path. (2) The Neoproterozoic data belong to two different tectonic blocks within the Arabian-Nubian craton and were involved in left-lateral, strikeslip movements along NW-trending faults. One block included the localities of Al Jabal al-Akhdar and Al-Huqf and may have rotated counter-clockwise ca. 45° about a vertical axis between ca. 600 and 500 Ma. The other block included the locality of Mirbat and rotated counter-clockwise ca. 25° about a vertical axis between ca. 600 and 550 Ma. These suggested block rotations may have played a role in generating the underlying fabrics for some of the sedimentary basins in Oman. In the second model, the rocks sampled by Killner et al. (2005) in Mirbat were re-magnetized during the intrusion of dike swarms at ca. 615–600 Ma.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/76631
Vizan, Haroldo; Turner, Peter; Millson, John; Ixer, Rob; Palaeomagnetism of the Mahatta Humaid Group (Cambrian – Early Ordovician, Oman), including a re-interpretation of previous Neoproterozoic palaeomagnetic data; GeoScienceWorld; Geoarabia; 14; 2; 2-2009; 71-96
1025-6059
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/76631
identifier_str_mv Vizan, Haroldo; Turner, Peter; Millson, John; Ixer, Rob; Palaeomagnetism of the Mahatta Humaid Group (Cambrian – Early Ordovician, Oman), including a re-interpretation of previous Neoproterozoic palaeomagnetic data; GeoScienceWorld; Geoarabia; 14; 2; 2-2009; 71-96
1025-6059
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article/14/2/71/566934/palaeomagnetism-of-the-mahatta-humaid-group
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv GeoScienceWorld
publisher.none.fl_str_mv GeoScienceWorld
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269557214937088
score 13.13397