The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma
- Autores
- Pedregal, Belén; Degele, Pamela Esther
- Año de publicación
- 2025
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In this paper we present and critically evaluate a participatory mapping project called the Map of Water Conflicts in Andalusia (Spain) led by researchers at the University of Seville from 2017 to 2019. According to the available literature, projects of this nature denote initial enthusiasm, followed by decline and abandonment within a period of approximately five years. At the crossroads of the Map’s disappearance, we critically analyze the project expectations and outcomes while addressing the challenges of sustaining co-production interest and validity over time.Our evaluation uses available information produced throughout the project to contrast the project’s officially defined goals and participant expectations with the project outcomes. The results are then discussed from a process-based perspective in relation to the lifecycle of boundary objects, with particular attention to the role of the researchers as influential actors in contributing to the generation, sustainability, and relevance of co-production projects.Three phases were identified in the project lifecycle, interpretive flexibility, standardization, and infrastructure creation, with critical transitional moments that challenge its sustainability and even pose a “survival dilemma” for the project. We conclude that to awaken from the “collaborative dream,” it is essential to consider the dynamic and conflictive nature of co-production projects and the ongoing self-examination within project teams. Goals and expected outcomes should be designed to align with the project’s transition through different stages, which are, in turn, determined by political-institutional contexts and specific power relations.
Fil: Pedregal, Belén. Facultad de Geografia E Historia ; Universidad de Sevilla;
Fil: Degele, Pamela Esther. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Santa Cruz. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Cruz. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Santa Cruz. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. Centro de Estudios de Innovación Institucional para la Gobernabilidad Democrática; Argentina - Materia
-
BOUNDARY OBJECTS
KNOWLEDGE CO-PRODUCTION
PARTICIPATORY MAPPING
PROJECT LIFE CYCLE
WATER CONFLICTS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/272865
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_f34219929deafed9d9fcaabb214f39ec |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/272865 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemmaPedregal, BelénDegele, Pamela EstherBOUNDARY OBJECTSKNOWLEDGE CO-PRODUCTIONPARTICIPATORY MAPPINGPROJECT LIFE CYCLEWATER CONFLICTShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.7https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5In this paper we present and critically evaluate a participatory mapping project called the Map of Water Conflicts in Andalusia (Spain) led by researchers at the University of Seville from 2017 to 2019. According to the available literature, projects of this nature denote initial enthusiasm, followed by decline and abandonment within a period of approximately five years. At the crossroads of the Map’s disappearance, we critically analyze the project expectations and outcomes while addressing the challenges of sustaining co-production interest and validity over time.Our evaluation uses available information produced throughout the project to contrast the project’s officially defined goals and participant expectations with the project outcomes. The results are then discussed from a process-based perspective in relation to the lifecycle of boundary objects, with particular attention to the role of the researchers as influential actors in contributing to the generation, sustainability, and relevance of co-production projects.Three phases were identified in the project lifecycle, interpretive flexibility, standardization, and infrastructure creation, with critical transitional moments that challenge its sustainability and even pose a “survival dilemma” for the project. We conclude that to awaken from the “collaborative dream,” it is essential to consider the dynamic and conflictive nature of co-production projects and the ongoing self-examination within project teams. Goals and expected outcomes should be designed to align with the project’s transition through different stages, which are, in turn, determined by political-institutional contexts and specific power relations.Fil: Pedregal, Belén. Facultad de Geografia E Historia ; Universidad de Sevilla;Fil: Degele, Pamela Esther. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Santa Cruz. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Cruz. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Santa Cruz. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. Centro de Estudios de Innovación Institucional para la Gobernabilidad Democrática; ArgentinaResilience Alliance2025-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/272865Pedregal, Belén; Degele, Pamela Esther; The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 30; 2; 6-2025; 1-121708-3087CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol30/iss2/art29/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5751/ES-16129-300229info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:26:09Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/272865instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:26:09.711CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma |
title |
The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma |
spellingShingle |
The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma Pedregal, Belén BOUNDARY OBJECTS KNOWLEDGE CO-PRODUCTION PARTICIPATORY MAPPING PROJECT LIFE CYCLE WATER CONFLICTS |
title_short |
The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma |
title_full |
The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma |
title_fullStr |
The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma |
title_full_unstemmed |
The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma |
title_sort |
The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pedregal, Belén Degele, Pamela Esther |
author |
Pedregal, Belén |
author_facet |
Pedregal, Belén Degele, Pamela Esther |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Degele, Pamela Esther |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
BOUNDARY OBJECTS KNOWLEDGE CO-PRODUCTION PARTICIPATORY MAPPING PROJECT LIFE CYCLE WATER CONFLICTS |
topic |
BOUNDARY OBJECTS KNOWLEDGE CO-PRODUCTION PARTICIPATORY MAPPING PROJECT LIFE CYCLE WATER CONFLICTS |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.7 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In this paper we present and critically evaluate a participatory mapping project called the Map of Water Conflicts in Andalusia (Spain) led by researchers at the University of Seville from 2017 to 2019. According to the available literature, projects of this nature denote initial enthusiasm, followed by decline and abandonment within a period of approximately five years. At the crossroads of the Map’s disappearance, we critically analyze the project expectations and outcomes while addressing the challenges of sustaining co-production interest and validity over time.Our evaluation uses available information produced throughout the project to contrast the project’s officially defined goals and participant expectations with the project outcomes. The results are then discussed from a process-based perspective in relation to the lifecycle of boundary objects, with particular attention to the role of the researchers as influential actors in contributing to the generation, sustainability, and relevance of co-production projects.Three phases were identified in the project lifecycle, interpretive flexibility, standardization, and infrastructure creation, with critical transitional moments that challenge its sustainability and even pose a “survival dilemma” for the project. We conclude that to awaken from the “collaborative dream,” it is essential to consider the dynamic and conflictive nature of co-production projects and the ongoing self-examination within project teams. Goals and expected outcomes should be designed to align with the project’s transition through different stages, which are, in turn, determined by political-institutional contexts and specific power relations. Fil: Pedregal, Belén. Facultad de Geografia E Historia ; Universidad de Sevilla; Fil: Degele, Pamela Esther. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Santa Cruz. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Cruz. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Santa Cruz. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. Centro de Estudios de Innovación Institucional para la Gobernabilidad Democrática; Argentina |
description |
In this paper we present and critically evaluate a participatory mapping project called the Map of Water Conflicts in Andalusia (Spain) led by researchers at the University of Seville from 2017 to 2019. According to the available literature, projects of this nature denote initial enthusiasm, followed by decline and abandonment within a period of approximately five years. At the crossroads of the Map’s disappearance, we critically analyze the project expectations and outcomes while addressing the challenges of sustaining co-production interest and validity over time.Our evaluation uses available information produced throughout the project to contrast the project’s officially defined goals and participant expectations with the project outcomes. The results are then discussed from a process-based perspective in relation to the lifecycle of boundary objects, with particular attention to the role of the researchers as influential actors in contributing to the generation, sustainability, and relevance of co-production projects.Three phases were identified in the project lifecycle, interpretive flexibility, standardization, and infrastructure creation, with critical transitional moments that challenge its sustainability and even pose a “survival dilemma” for the project. We conclude that to awaken from the “collaborative dream,” it is essential to consider the dynamic and conflictive nature of co-production projects and the ongoing self-examination within project teams. Goals and expected outcomes should be designed to align with the project’s transition through different stages, which are, in turn, determined by political-institutional contexts and specific power relations. |
publishDate |
2025 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/272865 Pedregal, Belén; Degele, Pamela Esther; The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 30; 2; 6-2025; 1-12 1708-3087 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/272865 |
identifier_str_mv |
Pedregal, Belén; Degele, Pamela Esther; The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 30; 2; 6-2025; 1-12 1708-3087 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol30/iss2/art29/ info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5751/ES-16129-300229 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Resilience Alliance |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Resilience Alliance |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846082703973154816 |
score |
13.22299 |