William James’ conception of religion in Josiah Royce’s mature thought: three approaches

Autores
Viale, Claudio Marcelo
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
A person who only reads Josiah Royce’s (1995 [1908]) The Philosophy of Loyalty and (2011 [1913]) The Problem of Christianity could easily assume that William James’ philosophy takes opposite views to Roycean ones on every fundamental issue with which they deal. Absolutism, on the Roycean hand, and individualism, on the Jamesian hand, are the labels that seems to articulate two contrary approaches to philosophy: the stress on the “eternal truths” and “the Community of Interpretation” within Royce’s approach, the emphasis on “provisional truths” and “individuals’ experience” for James’ view. However, consideration of Royce’s insightful works after James’ death challenges this assumption. After 1910 Royce acknowledges the unambiguous influence of James on his thought as well as the role of Jamesian philosophy for the development of his own idealism.
Fil: Viale, Claudio Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba. Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades; Argentina
Materia
Josiah Royce
William James
Classical Pragmatism
Religion
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/14755
Acceder
id CONICETDig_efe29a303571d55d064b0848fec10215
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/14755
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling William James’ conception of religion in Josiah Royce’s mature thought: three approachesViale, Claudio MarceloJosiah RoyceWilliam JamesClassical PragmatismReligionhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6A person who only reads Josiah Royce’s (1995 [1908]) The Philosophy of Loyalty and (2011 [1913]) The Problem of Christianity could easily assume that William James’ philosophy takes opposite views to Roycean ones on every fundamental issue with which they deal. Absolutism, on the Roycean hand, and individualism, on the Jamesian hand, are the labels that seems to articulate two contrary approaches to philosophy: the stress on the “eternal truths” and “the Community of Interpretation” within Royce’s approach, the emphasis on “provisional truths” and “individuals’ experience” for James’ view. However, consideration of Royce’s insightful works after James’ death challenges this assumption. After 1910 Royce acknowledges the unambiguous influence of James on his thought as well as the role of Jamesian philosophy for the development of his own idealism.Fil: Viale, Claudio Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba. Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades; ArgentinaCentral European Pragmatist Forum2013-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/14755Viale, Claudio Marcelo; William James’ conception of religion in Josiah Royce’s mature thought: three approaches; Central European Pragmatist Forum; Pragmatism Today; 4; 2; 12-2013; 47-571338-2799enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.pragmatismtoday.eu/winter2013/06%20Viale.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:06:16Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/14755instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:06:17.013CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv William James’ conception of religion in Josiah Royce’s mature thought: three approaches
title William James’ conception of religion in Josiah Royce’s mature thought: three approaches
spellingShingle William James’ conception of religion in Josiah Royce’s mature thought: three approaches
Viale, Claudio Marcelo
Josiah Royce
William James
Classical Pragmatism
Religion
title_short William James’ conception of religion in Josiah Royce’s mature thought: three approaches
title_full William James’ conception of religion in Josiah Royce’s mature thought: three approaches
title_fullStr William James’ conception of religion in Josiah Royce’s mature thought: three approaches
title_full_unstemmed William James’ conception of religion in Josiah Royce’s mature thought: three approaches
title_sort William James’ conception of religion in Josiah Royce’s mature thought: three approaches
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Viale, Claudio Marcelo
author Viale, Claudio Marcelo
author_facet Viale, Claudio Marcelo
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Josiah Royce
William James
Classical Pragmatism
Religion
topic Josiah Royce
William James
Classical Pragmatism
Religion
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv A person who only reads Josiah Royce’s (1995 [1908]) The Philosophy of Loyalty and (2011 [1913]) The Problem of Christianity could easily assume that William James’ philosophy takes opposite views to Roycean ones on every fundamental issue with which they deal. Absolutism, on the Roycean hand, and individualism, on the Jamesian hand, are the labels that seems to articulate two contrary approaches to philosophy: the stress on the “eternal truths” and “the Community of Interpretation” within Royce’s approach, the emphasis on “provisional truths” and “individuals’ experience” for James’ view. However, consideration of Royce’s insightful works after James’ death challenges this assumption. After 1910 Royce acknowledges the unambiguous influence of James on his thought as well as the role of Jamesian philosophy for the development of his own idealism.
Fil: Viale, Claudio Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba. Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades; Argentina
description A person who only reads Josiah Royce’s (1995 [1908]) The Philosophy of Loyalty and (2011 [1913]) The Problem of Christianity could easily assume that William James’ philosophy takes opposite views to Roycean ones on every fundamental issue with which they deal. Absolutism, on the Roycean hand, and individualism, on the Jamesian hand, are the labels that seems to articulate two contrary approaches to philosophy: the stress on the “eternal truths” and “the Community of Interpretation” within Royce’s approach, the emphasis on “provisional truths” and “individuals’ experience” for James’ view. However, consideration of Royce’s insightful works after James’ death challenges this assumption. After 1910 Royce acknowledges the unambiguous influence of James on his thought as well as the role of Jamesian philosophy for the development of his own idealism.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/14755
Viale, Claudio Marcelo; William James’ conception of religion in Josiah Royce’s mature thought: three approaches; Central European Pragmatist Forum; Pragmatism Today; 4; 2; 12-2013; 47-57
1338-2799
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/14755
identifier_str_mv Viale, Claudio Marcelo; William James’ conception of religion in Josiah Royce’s mature thought: three approaches; Central European Pragmatist Forum; Pragmatism Today; 4; 2; 12-2013; 47-57
1338-2799
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.pragmatismtoday.eu/winter2013/06%20Viale.pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Central European Pragmatist Forum
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Central European Pragmatist Forum
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269951047499776
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares