Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: A conservation scientist perspective

Autores
Giakoumi, Sylvaine; McGowan, Jennifer; Mills, Morena; Beger, Maria; Bustamante, Rodrigo H.; Charles, Anthony; Christie, Patrick; Fox, Matthew; Garcia Borboroglu, Jorge Pablo; Gelcich, Stefan; Guidetti, Paolo; Mackelworth, Peter; Maina, Joseph M.; McCook, Laurence; Micheli, Fiorenza; Morgan, Lance E.; Mumby, Peter J.; Reyes, Laura M.; White, Alan; Grorud Colvert, Kirsten; Possingham, Hugh P.
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Marine protected areas (MPAs) form the cornerstone of marine conservation. Identifying which factors contribute to their success or failure is crucial considering the international conservation targets for 2020 and the limited funds generally available for marine conservation. We identified common factors of success and/or failure of MPA effectiveness using peer-reviewed publications and first-hand expert knowledge for 27 case studies around the world. We found that stakeholder engagement was considered to be the most important factor affecting MPA success, and equally, its absence, was the most important factor influencing failure. Conversely, while some factors were identified as critical for success, their absence was not considered a driver of failure, and vice versa. This mismatch provided the impetus for considering these factors more critically. Bearing in mind that most MPAs have multiple objectives, including non-biological, this highlights the need for the development and adoption of standardized effectiveness metrics, besides biological considerations, to measure factors contributing to the success or failure of MPAs to reach their objectives. Considering our conclusions, we suggest the development of specific protocols for the assessment of stakeholder engagement, the role of leadership, the capacity of enforcement and compliance with MPAs objectives. Moreover, factors defining the success and failure of MPAs should be assessed not only by technical experts and the relevant authorities, but also by other stakeholder groups whose compliance is critical for the successful functioning of an MPA. These factors should be considered along with appropriate ecological, social, and economic data and then incorporated into adaptive management to improve MPA effectiveness.
Fil: Giakoumi, Sylvaine. The University Of Queensland; Australia. University of Queensland; Australia. Université Côte D'azur;
Fil: McGowan, Jennifer. University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Mills, Morena. Imperial College London; Reino Unido. The University Of Queensland; Australia. University of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Beger, Maria. University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; Australia. University Of Leeds;
Fil: Bustamante, Rodrigo H.. Csiro Oceans And Atmosphere; Australia
Fil: Charles, Anthony. Saint Mary's University; Canadá
Fil: Christie, Patrick. University Of Washington, Seattle;
Fil: Fox, Matthew. Conservation International; Indonesia
Fil: Garcia Borboroglu, Jorge Pablo. Global Penguin Society; Argentina. University Of Washington, Seattle; . Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Gelcich, Stefan. Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile
Fil: Guidetti, Paolo. Inter-university National Consortium For Marine Sciences (conisma); . Université Côte D'azur;
Fil: Mackelworth, Peter. Blue World Institute Of Marine Research And Conservation; . University Of Primorska;
Fil: Maina, Joseph M.. University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: McCook, Laurence. Conservation International; Indonesia. South China Seas Institute Of Oceanography Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China. James Cook University; Australia
Fil: Micheli, Fiorenza. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Morgan, Lance E.. Marine Conservation Institute;
Fil: Mumby, Peter J.. University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Reyes, Laura M.. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia "San Juan Bosco"; Argentina. Global Penguin Society; Argentina
Fil: White, Alan. Usaid, Indonesia; Indonesia. Nature Conservancy;
Fil: Grorud-Colvert, Kirsten. State University of Oregon; Estados Unidos
Fil: Possingham, Hugh P.. Nature Conservancy; . University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; Australia
Materia
CONSERVATION SCIENTISTS
EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT
FAILURE
MARINE PROTECTED AREAS
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
SUCCESS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/93292

id CONICETDig_eeec852142f55fe0eb4fed406fde952c
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/93292
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: A conservation scientist perspectiveGiakoumi, SylvaineMcGowan, JenniferMills, MorenaBeger, MariaBustamante, Rodrigo H.Charles, AnthonyChristie, PatrickFox, MatthewGarcia Borboroglu, Jorge PabloGelcich, StefanGuidetti, PaoloMackelworth, PeterMaina, Joseph M.McCook, LaurenceMicheli, FiorenzaMorgan, Lance E.Mumby, Peter J.Reyes, Laura M.White, AlanGrorud Colvert, KirstenPossingham, Hugh P.CONSERVATION SCIENTISTSEFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENTFAILUREMARINE PROTECTED AREASSTAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENTSUCCESShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Marine protected areas (MPAs) form the cornerstone of marine conservation. Identifying which factors contribute to their success or failure is crucial considering the international conservation targets for 2020 and the limited funds generally available for marine conservation. We identified common factors of success and/or failure of MPA effectiveness using peer-reviewed publications and first-hand expert knowledge for 27 case studies around the world. We found that stakeholder engagement was considered to be the most important factor affecting MPA success, and equally, its absence, was the most important factor influencing failure. Conversely, while some factors were identified as critical for success, their absence was not considered a driver of failure, and vice versa. This mismatch provided the impetus for considering these factors more critically. Bearing in mind that most MPAs have multiple objectives, including non-biological, this highlights the need for the development and adoption of standardized effectiveness metrics, besides biological considerations, to measure factors contributing to the success or failure of MPAs to reach their objectives. Considering our conclusions, we suggest the development of specific protocols for the assessment of stakeholder engagement, the role of leadership, the capacity of enforcement and compliance with MPAs objectives. Moreover, factors defining the success and failure of MPAs should be assessed not only by technical experts and the relevant authorities, but also by other stakeholder groups whose compliance is critical for the successful functioning of an MPA. These factors should be considered along with appropriate ecological, social, and economic data and then incorporated into adaptive management to improve MPA effectiveness.Fil: Giakoumi, Sylvaine. The University Of Queensland; Australia. University of Queensland; Australia. Université Côte D'azur;Fil: McGowan, Jennifer. University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Mills, Morena. Imperial College London; Reino Unido. The University Of Queensland; Australia. University of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Beger, Maria. University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; Australia. University Of Leeds;Fil: Bustamante, Rodrigo H.. Csiro Oceans And Atmosphere; AustraliaFil: Charles, Anthony. Saint Mary's University; CanadáFil: Christie, Patrick. University Of Washington, Seattle;Fil: Fox, Matthew. Conservation International; IndonesiaFil: Garcia Borboroglu, Jorge Pablo. Global Penguin Society; Argentina. University Of Washington, Seattle; . Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Gelcich, Stefan. Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; ChileFil: Guidetti, Paolo. Inter-university National Consortium For Marine Sciences (conisma); . Université Côte D'azur;Fil: Mackelworth, Peter. Blue World Institute Of Marine Research And Conservation; . University Of Primorska;Fil: Maina, Joseph M.. University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; AustraliaFil: McCook, Laurence. Conservation International; Indonesia. South China Seas Institute Of Oceanography Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China. James Cook University; AustraliaFil: Micheli, Fiorenza. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Morgan, Lance E.. Marine Conservation Institute;Fil: Mumby, Peter J.. University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Reyes, Laura M.. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia "San Juan Bosco"; Argentina. Global Penguin Society; ArgentinaFil: White, Alan. Usaid, Indonesia; Indonesia. Nature Conservancy;Fil: Grorud-Colvert, Kirsten. State University of Oregon; Estados UnidosFil: Possingham, Hugh P.. Nature Conservancy; . University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; AustraliaFrontiers Research Foundation2018-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/93292Giakoumi, Sylvaine; McGowan, Jennifer; Mills, Morena; Beger, Maria; Bustamante, Rodrigo H.; et al.; Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: A conservation scientist perspective; Frontiers Research Foundation; Frontiers In Marine Science; 5; JUN; 6-2018; 1-52296-7745CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2018.00223/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fmars.2018.00223info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:13:58Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/93292instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:13:59.008CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: A conservation scientist perspective
title Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: A conservation scientist perspective
spellingShingle Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: A conservation scientist perspective
Giakoumi, Sylvaine
CONSERVATION SCIENTISTS
EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT
FAILURE
MARINE PROTECTED AREAS
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
SUCCESS
title_short Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: A conservation scientist perspective
title_full Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: A conservation scientist perspective
title_fullStr Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: A conservation scientist perspective
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: A conservation scientist perspective
title_sort Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: A conservation scientist perspective
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Giakoumi, Sylvaine
McGowan, Jennifer
Mills, Morena
Beger, Maria
Bustamante, Rodrigo H.
Charles, Anthony
Christie, Patrick
Fox, Matthew
Garcia Borboroglu, Jorge Pablo
Gelcich, Stefan
Guidetti, Paolo
Mackelworth, Peter
Maina, Joseph M.
McCook, Laurence
Micheli, Fiorenza
Morgan, Lance E.
Mumby, Peter J.
Reyes, Laura M.
White, Alan
Grorud Colvert, Kirsten
Possingham, Hugh P.
author Giakoumi, Sylvaine
author_facet Giakoumi, Sylvaine
McGowan, Jennifer
Mills, Morena
Beger, Maria
Bustamante, Rodrigo H.
Charles, Anthony
Christie, Patrick
Fox, Matthew
Garcia Borboroglu, Jorge Pablo
Gelcich, Stefan
Guidetti, Paolo
Mackelworth, Peter
Maina, Joseph M.
McCook, Laurence
Micheli, Fiorenza
Morgan, Lance E.
Mumby, Peter J.
Reyes, Laura M.
White, Alan
Grorud Colvert, Kirsten
Possingham, Hugh P.
author_role author
author2 McGowan, Jennifer
Mills, Morena
Beger, Maria
Bustamante, Rodrigo H.
Charles, Anthony
Christie, Patrick
Fox, Matthew
Garcia Borboroglu, Jorge Pablo
Gelcich, Stefan
Guidetti, Paolo
Mackelworth, Peter
Maina, Joseph M.
McCook, Laurence
Micheli, Fiorenza
Morgan, Lance E.
Mumby, Peter J.
Reyes, Laura M.
White, Alan
Grorud Colvert, Kirsten
Possingham, Hugh P.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CONSERVATION SCIENTISTS
EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT
FAILURE
MARINE PROTECTED AREAS
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
SUCCESS
topic CONSERVATION SCIENTISTS
EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT
FAILURE
MARINE PROTECTED AREAS
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
SUCCESS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Marine protected areas (MPAs) form the cornerstone of marine conservation. Identifying which factors contribute to their success or failure is crucial considering the international conservation targets for 2020 and the limited funds generally available for marine conservation. We identified common factors of success and/or failure of MPA effectiveness using peer-reviewed publications and first-hand expert knowledge for 27 case studies around the world. We found that stakeholder engagement was considered to be the most important factor affecting MPA success, and equally, its absence, was the most important factor influencing failure. Conversely, while some factors were identified as critical for success, their absence was not considered a driver of failure, and vice versa. This mismatch provided the impetus for considering these factors more critically. Bearing in mind that most MPAs have multiple objectives, including non-biological, this highlights the need for the development and adoption of standardized effectiveness metrics, besides biological considerations, to measure factors contributing to the success or failure of MPAs to reach their objectives. Considering our conclusions, we suggest the development of specific protocols for the assessment of stakeholder engagement, the role of leadership, the capacity of enforcement and compliance with MPAs objectives. Moreover, factors defining the success and failure of MPAs should be assessed not only by technical experts and the relevant authorities, but also by other stakeholder groups whose compliance is critical for the successful functioning of an MPA. These factors should be considered along with appropriate ecological, social, and economic data and then incorporated into adaptive management to improve MPA effectiveness.
Fil: Giakoumi, Sylvaine. The University Of Queensland; Australia. University of Queensland; Australia. Université Côte D'azur;
Fil: McGowan, Jennifer. University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Mills, Morena. Imperial College London; Reino Unido. The University Of Queensland; Australia. University of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Beger, Maria. University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; Australia. University Of Leeds;
Fil: Bustamante, Rodrigo H.. Csiro Oceans And Atmosphere; Australia
Fil: Charles, Anthony. Saint Mary's University; Canadá
Fil: Christie, Patrick. University Of Washington, Seattle;
Fil: Fox, Matthew. Conservation International; Indonesia
Fil: Garcia Borboroglu, Jorge Pablo. Global Penguin Society; Argentina. University Of Washington, Seattle; . Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Gelcich, Stefan. Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile
Fil: Guidetti, Paolo. Inter-university National Consortium For Marine Sciences (conisma); . Université Côte D'azur;
Fil: Mackelworth, Peter. Blue World Institute Of Marine Research And Conservation; . University Of Primorska;
Fil: Maina, Joseph M.. University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: McCook, Laurence. Conservation International; Indonesia. South China Seas Institute Of Oceanography Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China. James Cook University; Australia
Fil: Micheli, Fiorenza. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Morgan, Lance E.. Marine Conservation Institute;
Fil: Mumby, Peter J.. University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Reyes, Laura M.. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia "San Juan Bosco"; Argentina. Global Penguin Society; Argentina
Fil: White, Alan. Usaid, Indonesia; Indonesia. Nature Conservancy;
Fil: Grorud-Colvert, Kirsten. State University of Oregon; Estados Unidos
Fil: Possingham, Hugh P.. Nature Conservancy; . University of Queensland; Australia. The University Of Queensland; Australia
description Marine protected areas (MPAs) form the cornerstone of marine conservation. Identifying which factors contribute to their success or failure is crucial considering the international conservation targets for 2020 and the limited funds generally available for marine conservation. We identified common factors of success and/or failure of MPA effectiveness using peer-reviewed publications and first-hand expert knowledge for 27 case studies around the world. We found that stakeholder engagement was considered to be the most important factor affecting MPA success, and equally, its absence, was the most important factor influencing failure. Conversely, while some factors were identified as critical for success, their absence was not considered a driver of failure, and vice versa. This mismatch provided the impetus for considering these factors more critically. Bearing in mind that most MPAs have multiple objectives, including non-biological, this highlights the need for the development and adoption of standardized effectiveness metrics, besides biological considerations, to measure factors contributing to the success or failure of MPAs to reach their objectives. Considering our conclusions, we suggest the development of specific protocols for the assessment of stakeholder engagement, the role of leadership, the capacity of enforcement and compliance with MPAs objectives. Moreover, factors defining the success and failure of MPAs should be assessed not only by technical experts and the relevant authorities, but also by other stakeholder groups whose compliance is critical for the successful functioning of an MPA. These factors should be considered along with appropriate ecological, social, and economic data and then incorporated into adaptive management to improve MPA effectiveness.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/93292
Giakoumi, Sylvaine; McGowan, Jennifer; Mills, Morena; Beger, Maria; Bustamante, Rodrigo H.; et al.; Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: A conservation scientist perspective; Frontiers Research Foundation; Frontiers In Marine Science; 5; JUN; 6-2018; 1-5
2296-7745
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/93292
identifier_str_mv Giakoumi, Sylvaine; McGowan, Jennifer; Mills, Morena; Beger, Maria; Bustamante, Rodrigo H.; et al.; Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: A conservation scientist perspective; Frontiers Research Foundation; Frontiers In Marine Science; 5; JUN; 6-2018; 1-5
2296-7745
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2018.00223/full
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fmars.2018.00223
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Research Foundation
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Research Foundation
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980743702118400
score 12.993085