Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement

Autores
Vickers, Peter; Adamo, Ludovica; Alfano, Mark; Clark, Cory; Cresto, Eleonora Beatriz; Cui, He; Dang, Haixin; Dellsén, Finnur; Dupin, Nathalie; Gradowski, Laura; Graf, Simon; Guevara, Aline; Hallap, Mark; Hamilton, Jesse; Hardey, Mariann; Helm, Paula; Landrum, Asheley; Levy, Neil; Machery, Edouard; Mills, Sarah; Muller, Seán; Sheppard, Joanne; N. K., Shinod; Slater, Matthew; Stegenga, Jacob; Strandin, Henning; Stuart, Michael T.; Sweet, David; Tasdan, Ufuk; Taylor, Henry; Towler, Owen; Tulodziecki, Dana; Tworek, Heidi; Wallbank, Rebecca; Wiltsche, Harald; Mitchell Finnigan, Samantha
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world’s scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a ‘10 second survey’, where the participant is presented with a single statement to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields.
Fil: Vickers, Peter. Durham University; Reino Unido
Fil: Adamo, Ludovica. University of Leeds; Reino Unido
Fil: Alfano, Mark. Macquarie University; Australia
Fil: Clark, Cory. University of Pennsylvania; Estados Unidos
Fil: Cresto, Eleonora Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
Fil: Cui, He. Durham University; Reino Unido
Fil: Dang, Haixin. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Fil: Dellsén, Finnur. University of Oslo; Noruega. University of Iceland; Islandia. Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences; Irlanda
Fil: Dupin, Nathalie. University of Edinburgh; Reino Unido
Fil: Gradowski, Laura. University of Pittsburgh; Estados Unidos
Fil: Graf, Simon. University of Leeds; Reino Unido
Fil: Guevara, Aline. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
Fil: Hallap, Mark. University of Toronto; Canadá
Fil: Hamilton, Jesse. University of Pennsylvania; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hardey, Mariann. Durham University; Reino Unido
Fil: Helm, Paula. University of Amsterdam; Países Bajos
Fil: Landrum, Asheley. Arizona State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Levy, Neil. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Machery, Edouard. University of Pittsburgh; Estados Unidos
Fil: Mills, Sarah. Durham University; Reino Unido
Fil: Muller, Seán. University of Johannesburg; Sudáfrica
Fil: Sheppard, Joanne. Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Estados Unidos
Fil: N. K., Shinod. University of Hyderabad; India
Fil: Slater, Matthew. Bucknell University.; Estados Unidos
Fil: Stegenga, Jacob. Nanyang Technological University; Singapur
Fil: Strandin, Henning. Stockholms Universitet; Suecia
Fil: Stuart, Michael T.. University of York; Reino Unido
Fil: Sweet, David. University of British Columbia; Canadá
Fil: Tasdan, Ufuk. Durham University; Reino Unido
Fil: Taylor, Henry. University Of Birmingham;
Fil: Towler, Owen. Durham University; Reino Unido
Fil: Tulodziecki, Dana. Purdue University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Tworek, Heidi. University of British Columbia; Canadá
Fil: Wallbank, Rebecca. Uppsala Universitet; Suecia
Fil: Wiltsche, Harald. Linköping University; Suecia
Fil: Mitchell Finnigan, Samantha. Durham University; Reino Unido
Materia
Scientific consensus
Sociology of Science
Opinion pool
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/265428

id CONICETDig_e98e55f484cf88cb2a110f4767093db9
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/265428
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreementVickers, PeterAdamo, LudovicaAlfano, MarkClark, CoryCresto, Eleonora BeatrizCui, HeDang, HaixinDellsén, FinnurDupin, NathalieGradowski, LauraGraf, SimonGuevara, AlineHallap, MarkHamilton, JesseHardey, MariannHelm, PaulaLandrum, AsheleyLevy, NeilMachery, EdouardMills, SarahMuller, SeánSheppard, JoanneN. K., ShinodSlater, MatthewStegenga, JacobStrandin, HenningStuart, Michael T.Sweet, DavidTasdan, UfukTaylor, HenryTowler, OwenTulodziecki, DanaTworek, HeidiWallbank, RebeccaWiltsche, HaraldMitchell Finnigan, SamanthaScientific consensusSociology of ScienceOpinion poolhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world’s scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a ‘10 second survey’, where the participant is presented with a single statement to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields.Fil: Vickers, Peter. Durham University; Reino UnidoFil: Adamo, Ludovica. University of Leeds; Reino UnidoFil: Alfano, Mark. Macquarie University; AustraliaFil: Clark, Cory. University of Pennsylvania; Estados UnidosFil: Cresto, Eleonora Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; ArgentinaFil: Cui, He. Durham University; Reino UnidoFil: Dang, Haixin. University of Nebraska; Estados UnidosFil: Dellsén, Finnur. University of Oslo; Noruega. University of Iceland; Islandia. Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences; IrlandaFil: Dupin, Nathalie. University of Edinburgh; Reino UnidoFil: Gradowski, Laura. University of Pittsburgh; Estados UnidosFil: Graf, Simon. University of Leeds; Reino UnidoFil: Guevara, Aline. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoFil: Hallap, Mark. University of Toronto; CanadáFil: Hamilton, Jesse. University of Pennsylvania; Estados UnidosFil: Hardey, Mariann. Durham University; Reino UnidoFil: Helm, Paula. University of Amsterdam; Países BajosFil: Landrum, Asheley. Arizona State University; Estados UnidosFil: Levy, Neil. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Machery, Edouard. University of Pittsburgh; Estados UnidosFil: Mills, Sarah. Durham University; Reino UnidoFil: Muller, Seán. University of Johannesburg; SudáfricaFil: Sheppard, Joanne. Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Estados UnidosFil: N. K., Shinod. University of Hyderabad; IndiaFil: Slater, Matthew. Bucknell University.; Estados UnidosFil: Stegenga, Jacob. Nanyang Technological University; SingapurFil: Strandin, Henning. Stockholms Universitet; SueciaFil: Stuart, Michael T.. University of York; Reino UnidoFil: Sweet, David. University of British Columbia; CanadáFil: Tasdan, Ufuk. Durham University; Reino UnidoFil: Taylor, Henry. University Of Birmingham;Fil: Towler, Owen. Durham University; Reino UnidoFil: Tulodziecki, Dana. Purdue University; Estados UnidosFil: Tworek, Heidi. University of British Columbia; CanadáFil: Wallbank, Rebecca. Uppsala Universitet; SueciaFil: Wiltsche, Harald. Linköping University; SueciaFil: Mitchell Finnigan, Samantha. Durham University; Reino UnidoPublic Library of Science2024-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/265428Vickers, Peter; Adamo, Ludovica; Alfano, Mark; Clark, Cory; Cresto, Eleonora Beatriz; et al.; Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 19; 12; 12-2024; 1-241932-6203CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0313541info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:35:28Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/265428instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:35:28.436CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement
title Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement
spellingShingle Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement
Vickers, Peter
Scientific consensus
Sociology of Science
Opinion pool
title_short Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement
title_full Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement
title_fullStr Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement
title_full_unstemmed Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement
title_sort Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vickers, Peter
Adamo, Ludovica
Alfano, Mark
Clark, Cory
Cresto, Eleonora Beatriz
Cui, He
Dang, Haixin
Dellsén, Finnur
Dupin, Nathalie
Gradowski, Laura
Graf, Simon
Guevara, Aline
Hallap, Mark
Hamilton, Jesse
Hardey, Mariann
Helm, Paula
Landrum, Asheley
Levy, Neil
Machery, Edouard
Mills, Sarah
Muller, Seán
Sheppard, Joanne
N. K., Shinod
Slater, Matthew
Stegenga, Jacob
Strandin, Henning
Stuart, Michael T.
Sweet, David
Tasdan, Ufuk
Taylor, Henry
Towler, Owen
Tulodziecki, Dana
Tworek, Heidi
Wallbank, Rebecca
Wiltsche, Harald
Mitchell Finnigan, Samantha
author Vickers, Peter
author_facet Vickers, Peter
Adamo, Ludovica
Alfano, Mark
Clark, Cory
Cresto, Eleonora Beatriz
Cui, He
Dang, Haixin
Dellsén, Finnur
Dupin, Nathalie
Gradowski, Laura
Graf, Simon
Guevara, Aline
Hallap, Mark
Hamilton, Jesse
Hardey, Mariann
Helm, Paula
Landrum, Asheley
Levy, Neil
Machery, Edouard
Mills, Sarah
Muller, Seán
Sheppard, Joanne
N. K., Shinod
Slater, Matthew
Stegenga, Jacob
Strandin, Henning
Stuart, Michael T.
Sweet, David
Tasdan, Ufuk
Taylor, Henry
Towler, Owen
Tulodziecki, Dana
Tworek, Heidi
Wallbank, Rebecca
Wiltsche, Harald
Mitchell Finnigan, Samantha
author_role author
author2 Adamo, Ludovica
Alfano, Mark
Clark, Cory
Cresto, Eleonora Beatriz
Cui, He
Dang, Haixin
Dellsén, Finnur
Dupin, Nathalie
Gradowski, Laura
Graf, Simon
Guevara, Aline
Hallap, Mark
Hamilton, Jesse
Hardey, Mariann
Helm, Paula
Landrum, Asheley
Levy, Neil
Machery, Edouard
Mills, Sarah
Muller, Seán
Sheppard, Joanne
N. K., Shinod
Slater, Matthew
Stegenga, Jacob
Strandin, Henning
Stuart, Michael T.
Sweet, David
Tasdan, Ufuk
Taylor, Henry
Towler, Owen
Tulodziecki, Dana
Tworek, Heidi
Wallbank, Rebecca
Wiltsche, Harald
Mitchell Finnigan, Samantha
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Scientific consensus
Sociology of Science
Opinion pool
topic Scientific consensus
Sociology of Science
Opinion pool
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world’s scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a ‘10 second survey’, where the participant is presented with a single statement to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields.
Fil: Vickers, Peter. Durham University; Reino Unido
Fil: Adamo, Ludovica. University of Leeds; Reino Unido
Fil: Alfano, Mark. Macquarie University; Australia
Fil: Clark, Cory. University of Pennsylvania; Estados Unidos
Fil: Cresto, Eleonora Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
Fil: Cui, He. Durham University; Reino Unido
Fil: Dang, Haixin. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Fil: Dellsén, Finnur. University of Oslo; Noruega. University of Iceland; Islandia. Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences; Irlanda
Fil: Dupin, Nathalie. University of Edinburgh; Reino Unido
Fil: Gradowski, Laura. University of Pittsburgh; Estados Unidos
Fil: Graf, Simon. University of Leeds; Reino Unido
Fil: Guevara, Aline. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
Fil: Hallap, Mark. University of Toronto; Canadá
Fil: Hamilton, Jesse. University of Pennsylvania; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hardey, Mariann. Durham University; Reino Unido
Fil: Helm, Paula. University of Amsterdam; Países Bajos
Fil: Landrum, Asheley. Arizona State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Levy, Neil. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Machery, Edouard. University of Pittsburgh; Estados Unidos
Fil: Mills, Sarah. Durham University; Reino Unido
Fil: Muller, Seán. University of Johannesburg; Sudáfrica
Fil: Sheppard, Joanne. Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Estados Unidos
Fil: N. K., Shinod. University of Hyderabad; India
Fil: Slater, Matthew. Bucknell University.; Estados Unidos
Fil: Stegenga, Jacob. Nanyang Technological University; Singapur
Fil: Strandin, Henning. Stockholms Universitet; Suecia
Fil: Stuart, Michael T.. University of York; Reino Unido
Fil: Sweet, David. University of British Columbia; Canadá
Fil: Tasdan, Ufuk. Durham University; Reino Unido
Fil: Taylor, Henry. University Of Birmingham;
Fil: Towler, Owen. Durham University; Reino Unido
Fil: Tulodziecki, Dana. Purdue University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Tworek, Heidi. University of British Columbia; Canadá
Fil: Wallbank, Rebecca. Uppsala Universitet; Suecia
Fil: Wiltsche, Harald. Linköping University; Suecia
Fil: Mitchell Finnigan, Samantha. Durham University; Reino Unido
description We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world’s scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a ‘10 second survey’, where the participant is presented with a single statement to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/265428
Vickers, Peter; Adamo, Ludovica; Alfano, Mark; Clark, Cory; Cresto, Eleonora Beatriz; et al.; Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 19; 12; 12-2024; 1-24
1932-6203
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/265428
identifier_str_mv Vickers, Peter; Adamo, Ludovica; Alfano, Mark; Clark, Cory; Cresto, Eleonora Beatriz; et al.; Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 19; 12; 12-2024; 1-24
1932-6203
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0313541
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library of Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library of Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082814466850816
score 13.22299