Appropriate scales and data to manage seabird-fishery interactions: Comment on Torres et al. (2013)

Autores
Croxall, John; Small, Cleo; Sullivan, Ben; Wanless, Ross; Frere, Esteban; Lascelles, Ben; Ramirez, Ivan; Sato, Mayumi; Yates, Oli
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Torres et al. (2013; Mar Ecol Prog Ser 473:275-289) use fine-scale data on tracked locations of one species of albatross and fishing vessels to make a variety of assertions on interactions between them, especially in relation to risk of bycatch. Some of these assertions are incorrect, and we seek to clarify the issues and perspectives involved. We argue that while a fine-scale approach can provide interesting insights into foraging behaviour, large-scale risk analysis is needed because management measures (e.g. for bycatch mitigation) need to operate across all vessels in a fishery and across all seabird species at risk from the fishing operation. In addition, an estimate of 10% time spent in close proximity to vessels cannot be used to infer low bycatch risk alone: such an inference would need comparison to bycatch rate data. The analysis also does not take into account a number of factors known to affect the nature and duration of the association of albatrosses with fishing vessels, which limits the conclusions that can be drawn. However, fine-scale studies can provide important insight into factors affecting individual bycatch events, and studies at fine and broad scales will be complementary.
Fil: Croxall, John. BirdLife International. Global Seabird Programme; Reino Unido
Fil: Small, Cleo. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; Reino Unido
Fil: Sullivan, Ben. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; Reino Unido
Fil: Wanless, Ross. BirdLife South Africa. Seabird Division; Sudáfrica. University of Cape Town. Percy FitzPatrick Institute; Sudáfrica
Fil: Frere, Esteban. BirdLife International. Global Seabird Programme; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Lascelles, Ben. BirdLife International. Global Seabird Programme; Reino Unido
Fil: Ramirez, Ivan. Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves; Brasil
Fil: Sato, Mayumi. BirdLife International Asia Divison; Japón
Fil: Yates, Oli. BirdLife International. Global Seabird Programme; Chile
Materia
BYCATCH
SATELLITE TRACKING
ALBATROSSES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso embargado
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/25420
Acceder
id CONICETDig_e956a7cf3799584e3bc32cc94db8010e
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/25420
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Appropriate scales and data to manage seabird-fishery interactions: Comment on Torres et al. (2013)Croxall, JohnSmall, CleoSullivan, BenWanless, RossFrere, EstebanLascelles, BenRamirez, IvanSato, MayumiYates, OliBYCATCHSATELLITE TRACKINGALBATROSSEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Torres et al. (2013; Mar Ecol Prog Ser 473:275-289) use fine-scale data on tracked locations of one species of albatross and fishing vessels to make a variety of assertions on interactions between them, especially in relation to risk of bycatch. Some of these assertions are incorrect, and we seek to clarify the issues and perspectives involved. We argue that while a fine-scale approach can provide interesting insights into foraging behaviour, large-scale risk analysis is needed because management measures (e.g. for bycatch mitigation) need to operate across all vessels in a fishery and across all seabird species at risk from the fishing operation. In addition, an estimate of 10% time spent in close proximity to vessels cannot be used to infer low bycatch risk alone: such an inference would need comparison to bycatch rate data. The analysis also does not take into account a number of factors known to affect the nature and duration of the association of albatrosses with fishing vessels, which limits the conclusions that can be drawn. However, fine-scale studies can provide important insight into factors affecting individual bycatch events, and studies at fine and broad scales will be complementary.Fil: Croxall, John. BirdLife International. Global Seabird Programme; Reino UnidoFil: Small, Cleo. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; Reino UnidoFil: Sullivan, Ben. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; Reino UnidoFil: Wanless, Ross. BirdLife South Africa. Seabird Division; Sudáfrica. University of Cape Town. Percy FitzPatrick Institute; SudáfricaFil: Frere, Esteban. BirdLife International. Global Seabird Programme; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Lascelles, Ben. BirdLife International. Global Seabird Programme; Reino UnidoFil: Ramirez, Ivan. Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves; BrasilFil: Sato, Mayumi. BirdLife International Asia Divison; JapónFil: Yates, Oli. BirdLife International. Global Seabird Programme; ChileInter-Research2013-11-20info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/25420Croxall, John; Small, Cleo; Sullivan, Ben; Wanless, Ross; Frere, Esteban; et al.; Appropriate scales and data to manage seabird-fishery interactions: Comment on Torres et al. (2013); Inter-Research; Marine Ecology Progress Series; 493; 20-11-2013; 297-3000171-86301616-1599CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3354/meps10599info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v493/p297-300/info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:36:39Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/25420instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:36:39.718CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Appropriate scales and data to manage seabird-fishery interactions: Comment on Torres et al. (2013)
title Appropriate scales and data to manage seabird-fishery interactions: Comment on Torres et al. (2013)
spellingShingle Appropriate scales and data to manage seabird-fishery interactions: Comment on Torres et al. (2013)
Croxall, John
BYCATCH
SATELLITE TRACKING
ALBATROSSES
title_short Appropriate scales and data to manage seabird-fishery interactions: Comment on Torres et al. (2013)
title_full Appropriate scales and data to manage seabird-fishery interactions: Comment on Torres et al. (2013)
title_fullStr Appropriate scales and data to manage seabird-fishery interactions: Comment on Torres et al. (2013)
title_full_unstemmed Appropriate scales and data to manage seabird-fishery interactions: Comment on Torres et al. (2013)
title_sort Appropriate scales and data to manage seabird-fishery interactions: Comment on Torres et al. (2013)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Croxall, John
Small, Cleo
Sullivan, Ben
Wanless, Ross
Frere, Esteban
Lascelles, Ben
Ramirez, Ivan
Sato, Mayumi
Yates, Oli
author Croxall, John
author_facet Croxall, John
Small, Cleo
Sullivan, Ben
Wanless, Ross
Frere, Esteban
Lascelles, Ben
Ramirez, Ivan
Sato, Mayumi
Yates, Oli
author_role author
author2 Small, Cleo
Sullivan, Ben
Wanless, Ross
Frere, Esteban
Lascelles, Ben
Ramirez, Ivan
Sato, Mayumi
Yates, Oli
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv BYCATCH
SATELLITE TRACKING
ALBATROSSES
topic BYCATCH
SATELLITE TRACKING
ALBATROSSES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Torres et al. (2013; Mar Ecol Prog Ser 473:275-289) use fine-scale data on tracked locations of one species of albatross and fishing vessels to make a variety of assertions on interactions between them, especially in relation to risk of bycatch. Some of these assertions are incorrect, and we seek to clarify the issues and perspectives involved. We argue that while a fine-scale approach can provide interesting insights into foraging behaviour, large-scale risk analysis is needed because management measures (e.g. for bycatch mitigation) need to operate across all vessels in a fishery and across all seabird species at risk from the fishing operation. In addition, an estimate of 10% time spent in close proximity to vessels cannot be used to infer low bycatch risk alone: such an inference would need comparison to bycatch rate data. The analysis also does not take into account a number of factors known to affect the nature and duration of the association of albatrosses with fishing vessels, which limits the conclusions that can be drawn. However, fine-scale studies can provide important insight into factors affecting individual bycatch events, and studies at fine and broad scales will be complementary.
Fil: Croxall, John. BirdLife International. Global Seabird Programme; Reino Unido
Fil: Small, Cleo. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; Reino Unido
Fil: Sullivan, Ben. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; Reino Unido
Fil: Wanless, Ross. BirdLife South Africa. Seabird Division; Sudáfrica. University of Cape Town. Percy FitzPatrick Institute; Sudáfrica
Fil: Frere, Esteban. BirdLife International. Global Seabird Programme; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Lascelles, Ben. BirdLife International. Global Seabird Programme; Reino Unido
Fil: Ramirez, Ivan. Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves; Brasil
Fil: Sato, Mayumi. BirdLife International Asia Divison; Japón
Fil: Yates, Oli. BirdLife International. Global Seabird Programme; Chile
description Torres et al. (2013; Mar Ecol Prog Ser 473:275-289) use fine-scale data on tracked locations of one species of albatross and fishing vessels to make a variety of assertions on interactions between them, especially in relation to risk of bycatch. Some of these assertions are incorrect, and we seek to clarify the issues and perspectives involved. We argue that while a fine-scale approach can provide interesting insights into foraging behaviour, large-scale risk analysis is needed because management measures (e.g. for bycatch mitigation) need to operate across all vessels in a fishery and across all seabird species at risk from the fishing operation. In addition, an estimate of 10% time spent in close proximity to vessels cannot be used to infer low bycatch risk alone: such an inference would need comparison to bycatch rate data. The analysis also does not take into account a number of factors known to affect the nature and duration of the association of albatrosses with fishing vessels, which limits the conclusions that can be drawn. However, fine-scale studies can provide important insight into factors affecting individual bycatch events, and studies at fine and broad scales will be complementary.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-11-20
info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2018-12-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/25420
Croxall, John; Small, Cleo; Sullivan, Ben; Wanless, Ross; Frere, Esteban; et al.; Appropriate scales and data to manage seabird-fishery interactions: Comment on Torres et al. (2013); Inter-Research; Marine Ecology Progress Series; 493; 20-11-2013; 297-300
0171-8630
1616-1599
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/25420
identifier_str_mv Croxall, John; Small, Cleo; Sullivan, Ben; Wanless, Ross; Frere, Esteban; et al.; Appropriate scales and data to manage seabird-fishery interactions: Comment on Torres et al. (2013); Inter-Research; Marine Ecology Progress Series; 493; 20-11-2013; 297-300
0171-8630
1616-1599
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3354/meps10599
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v493/p297-300/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Inter-Research
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Inter-Research
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083489146863616
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares