Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c mice
- Autores
- Godoy, Gloria Janet; Paira, Daniela Andrea; Olivera, Carolina; Breser, Maria Laura; Sanchez, Leonardo Rodolfo; Motrich, Ruben Dario; Rivero, Virginia Elena
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Foxp3+ Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are essential for the maintenance of tolerance to self. Therefore, it is expected that lower numbers and/or less than optimal function could impact on the functioning of the immune system, and thereby contributing to the development of autoimmune diseases. In the present report, by comparing Tregs from most frequently used mouse strains in immunological research (C57BL/6 (B6), BALB/c and NOD), we provide evidence showing that the NOD mouse strain, highly predisposed to develop autoimmune responses, exhibit a generalized decreased in Tregs counts with enhanced proportions of CD44hiCD62Llow Tregs when compared with BALB/c mice. No major differences were observed in Helios+ or Helios- Tregs between strains. The expression of CXCR3, CCR5 and CCR6 on Tregs from all strains showed minor proportions of CXCR3+ and CCR5+ cells in NOD Tregs. Naïve CD4+CD25- T cells from NOD mice also showed decreased capacity to induce in vitro iTregs when compared with B6 and BALB/c mice. Lower expression of molecules involved in Treg suppressor mechanisms such as CD25, LAP-1, CD39 and PD-1 was observed both in NOD iTregs and Tregs from lymph nodes of NOD mice. Moreover, in vitro assays showed that Tregs from NOD mice exhibited reduced ability to suppress proliferation of CD4+CD25- responder T cells when compared with B6 and BALB/c mice. Major differences were consistently observed between NOD and BALB/c mice, whereas no major differences were found for many of the analyzed parameters between the NOD and B6 mice, suggesting that highly and mildly autoimmune prone mouse strains may share some Tregs features. On the contrary, BALB/c Tregs were in major quantities, expressed higher levels of Foxp3 and exhibited more potent ability to inhibit effector T cell proliferation, data that could be related to its natural resistance to the induction of different experimental autoimmune conditions. Altogether our results demonstrate a generalized Treg cell dysfunction in NOD mice, a strain characterized by its high predisposition to develop spontaneous and induced autoimmune diseases.
Fil: Godoy, Gloria Janet. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina
Fil: Paira, Daniela Andrea. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina
Fil: Olivera, Carolina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina
Fil: Breser, Maria Laura. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina
Fil: Sanchez, Leonardo Rodolfo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina
Fil: Motrich, Ruben Dario. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina
Fil: Rivero, Virginia Elena. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina - Materia
-
CHEMOKINE RECEPTORS
ITREGS
NAÏVE AND CENTRAL MEMORY TREGS
NOD MICE
REGULATORY T CELLS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/131418
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_e8de995188c792aba8bb7c4a8dbb2253 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/131418 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c miceGodoy, Gloria JanetPaira, Daniela AndreaOlivera, CarolinaBreser, Maria LauraSanchez, Leonardo RodolfoMotrich, Ruben DarioRivero, Virginia ElenaCHEMOKINE RECEPTORSITREGSNAÏVE AND CENTRAL MEMORY TREGSNOD MICEREGULATORY T CELLShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Foxp3+ Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are essential for the maintenance of tolerance to self. Therefore, it is expected that lower numbers and/or less than optimal function could impact on the functioning of the immune system, and thereby contributing to the development of autoimmune diseases. In the present report, by comparing Tregs from most frequently used mouse strains in immunological research (C57BL/6 (B6), BALB/c and NOD), we provide evidence showing that the NOD mouse strain, highly predisposed to develop autoimmune responses, exhibit a generalized decreased in Tregs counts with enhanced proportions of CD44hiCD62Llow Tregs when compared with BALB/c mice. No major differences were observed in Helios+ or Helios- Tregs between strains. The expression of CXCR3, CCR5 and CCR6 on Tregs from all strains showed minor proportions of CXCR3+ and CCR5+ cells in NOD Tregs. Naïve CD4+CD25- T cells from NOD mice also showed decreased capacity to induce in vitro iTregs when compared with B6 and BALB/c mice. Lower expression of molecules involved in Treg suppressor mechanisms such as CD25, LAP-1, CD39 and PD-1 was observed both in NOD iTregs and Tregs from lymph nodes of NOD mice. Moreover, in vitro assays showed that Tregs from NOD mice exhibited reduced ability to suppress proliferation of CD4+CD25- responder T cells when compared with B6 and BALB/c mice. Major differences were consistently observed between NOD and BALB/c mice, whereas no major differences were found for many of the analyzed parameters between the NOD and B6 mice, suggesting that highly and mildly autoimmune prone mouse strains may share some Tregs features. On the contrary, BALB/c Tregs were in major quantities, expressed higher levels of Foxp3 and exhibited more potent ability to inhibit effector T cell proliferation, data that could be related to its natural resistance to the induction of different experimental autoimmune conditions. Altogether our results demonstrate a generalized Treg cell dysfunction in NOD mice, a strain characterized by its high predisposition to develop spontaneous and induced autoimmune diseases.Fil: Godoy, Gloria Janet. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; ArgentinaFil: Paira, Daniela Andrea. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; ArgentinaFil: Olivera, Carolina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; ArgentinaFil: Breser, Maria Laura. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; ArgentinaFil: Sanchez, Leonardo Rodolfo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; ArgentinaFil: Motrich, Ruben Dario. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; ArgentinaFil: Rivero, Virginia Elena. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; ArgentinaElsevier Science2020-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/131418Godoy, Gloria Janet; Paira, Daniela Andrea; Olivera, Carolina; Breser, Maria Laura; Sanchez, Leonardo Rodolfo; et al.; Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c mice; Elsevier Science; Immunology Letters; 223; 7-2020; 17-250165-2478CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165247819305826info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.imlet.2020.04.006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:16:50Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/131418instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:16:50.645CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c mice |
| title |
Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c mice |
| spellingShingle |
Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c mice Godoy, Gloria Janet CHEMOKINE RECEPTORS ITREGS NAÏVE AND CENTRAL MEMORY TREGS NOD MICE REGULATORY T CELLS |
| title_short |
Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c mice |
| title_full |
Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c mice |
| title_fullStr |
Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c mice |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c mice |
| title_sort |
Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c mice |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Godoy, Gloria Janet Paira, Daniela Andrea Olivera, Carolina Breser, Maria Laura Sanchez, Leonardo Rodolfo Motrich, Ruben Dario Rivero, Virginia Elena |
| author |
Godoy, Gloria Janet |
| author_facet |
Godoy, Gloria Janet Paira, Daniela Andrea Olivera, Carolina Breser, Maria Laura Sanchez, Leonardo Rodolfo Motrich, Ruben Dario Rivero, Virginia Elena |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Paira, Daniela Andrea Olivera, Carolina Breser, Maria Laura Sanchez, Leonardo Rodolfo Motrich, Ruben Dario Rivero, Virginia Elena |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
CHEMOKINE RECEPTORS ITREGS NAÏVE AND CENTRAL MEMORY TREGS NOD MICE REGULATORY T CELLS |
| topic |
CHEMOKINE RECEPTORS ITREGS NAÏVE AND CENTRAL MEMORY TREGS NOD MICE REGULATORY T CELLS |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Foxp3+ Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are essential for the maintenance of tolerance to self. Therefore, it is expected that lower numbers and/or less than optimal function could impact on the functioning of the immune system, and thereby contributing to the development of autoimmune diseases. In the present report, by comparing Tregs from most frequently used mouse strains in immunological research (C57BL/6 (B6), BALB/c and NOD), we provide evidence showing that the NOD mouse strain, highly predisposed to develop autoimmune responses, exhibit a generalized decreased in Tregs counts with enhanced proportions of CD44hiCD62Llow Tregs when compared with BALB/c mice. No major differences were observed in Helios+ or Helios- Tregs between strains. The expression of CXCR3, CCR5 and CCR6 on Tregs from all strains showed minor proportions of CXCR3+ and CCR5+ cells in NOD Tregs. Naïve CD4+CD25- T cells from NOD mice also showed decreased capacity to induce in vitro iTregs when compared with B6 and BALB/c mice. Lower expression of molecules involved in Treg suppressor mechanisms such as CD25, LAP-1, CD39 and PD-1 was observed both in NOD iTregs and Tregs from lymph nodes of NOD mice. Moreover, in vitro assays showed that Tregs from NOD mice exhibited reduced ability to suppress proliferation of CD4+CD25- responder T cells when compared with B6 and BALB/c mice. Major differences were consistently observed between NOD and BALB/c mice, whereas no major differences were found for many of the analyzed parameters between the NOD and B6 mice, suggesting that highly and mildly autoimmune prone mouse strains may share some Tregs features. On the contrary, BALB/c Tregs were in major quantities, expressed higher levels of Foxp3 and exhibited more potent ability to inhibit effector T cell proliferation, data that could be related to its natural resistance to the induction of different experimental autoimmune conditions. Altogether our results demonstrate a generalized Treg cell dysfunction in NOD mice, a strain characterized by its high predisposition to develop spontaneous and induced autoimmune diseases. Fil: Godoy, Gloria Janet. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina Fil: Paira, Daniela Andrea. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina Fil: Olivera, Carolina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina Fil: Breser, Maria Laura. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina Fil: Sanchez, Leonardo Rodolfo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina Fil: Motrich, Ruben Dario. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina Fil: Rivero, Virginia Elena. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina |
| description |
Foxp3+ Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are essential for the maintenance of tolerance to self. Therefore, it is expected that lower numbers and/or less than optimal function could impact on the functioning of the immune system, and thereby contributing to the development of autoimmune diseases. In the present report, by comparing Tregs from most frequently used mouse strains in immunological research (C57BL/6 (B6), BALB/c and NOD), we provide evidence showing that the NOD mouse strain, highly predisposed to develop autoimmune responses, exhibit a generalized decreased in Tregs counts with enhanced proportions of CD44hiCD62Llow Tregs when compared with BALB/c mice. No major differences were observed in Helios+ or Helios- Tregs between strains. The expression of CXCR3, CCR5 and CCR6 on Tregs from all strains showed minor proportions of CXCR3+ and CCR5+ cells in NOD Tregs. Naïve CD4+CD25- T cells from NOD mice also showed decreased capacity to induce in vitro iTregs when compared with B6 and BALB/c mice. Lower expression of molecules involved in Treg suppressor mechanisms such as CD25, LAP-1, CD39 and PD-1 was observed both in NOD iTregs and Tregs from lymph nodes of NOD mice. Moreover, in vitro assays showed that Tregs from NOD mice exhibited reduced ability to suppress proliferation of CD4+CD25- responder T cells when compared with B6 and BALB/c mice. Major differences were consistently observed between NOD and BALB/c mice, whereas no major differences were found for many of the analyzed parameters between the NOD and B6 mice, suggesting that highly and mildly autoimmune prone mouse strains may share some Tregs features. On the contrary, BALB/c Tregs were in major quantities, expressed higher levels of Foxp3 and exhibited more potent ability to inhibit effector T cell proliferation, data that could be related to its natural resistance to the induction of different experimental autoimmune conditions. Altogether our results demonstrate a generalized Treg cell dysfunction in NOD mice, a strain characterized by its high predisposition to develop spontaneous and induced autoimmune diseases. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/131418 Godoy, Gloria Janet; Paira, Daniela Andrea; Olivera, Carolina; Breser, Maria Laura; Sanchez, Leonardo Rodolfo; et al.; Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c mice; Elsevier Science; Immunology Letters; 223; 7-2020; 17-25 0165-2478 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/131418 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Godoy, Gloria Janet; Paira, Daniela Andrea; Olivera, Carolina; Breser, Maria Laura; Sanchez, Leonardo Rodolfo; et al.; Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c mice; Elsevier Science; Immunology Letters; 223; 7-2020; 17-25 0165-2478 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165247819305826 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.imlet.2020.04.006 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1846781623632134144 |
| score |
12.982451 |