A comparative analysis: impacts and sustainability of rural small wind electrification programmes

Autores
Schaube, Philipp; Sumanik-Leary, Jon; Clementi, Luciana Vanesa
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This paper offers a comparative analysis of two small wind electrification programmes targeted at remote sheep farming households in two of the windiest regions of the world, Argentine Patagonia and the Falkland Islands/Islas Malvinas. In Argentina the research was carried out in different districts of the province of Chubut: Tehuelches, Paso de Indios and Rawson. Chubut is a province in southern Argentina which rural areas are characterised by a significant presence of indigenous communities, a very low population density rate and a lack of social infrastructure and facilities, due to the long distances between settlements.Within the Chubut region following the latest statistical records currently approximately 1.490 households do not have access to electricity. Despite comparable environmental conditions and local livelihoods, the impact of these two electrification programmes in the Argentine Patagonia and the Falkland Islands/Islas Malvinas was vastly different. A sociotechnical systems approach was adopted to gain a deeper understanding of the local context and development dynamics. This study identifies the critical success factors that havecontributed to these two distinct outcomes, drawing out those that can inform the design of future initiatives. The research is based upon a series of semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (households, community leaders, maintenance providers, programme designers, small wind turbine manufacturers and national small wind experts), observational field visits (to remote farms, service centres and local authorities) and the review of project reports. Taking a user centred approach that tailors each energy system to the needs ofthat particular household and establishes ownership was found to be one of the most important considerations, alongside consistent institutional support, a strong and accessible service network and the successful integration of maintenance practices with the local way of life.
Fil: Schaube, Philipp. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Future Energy and Mobility Structures; Alemania
Fil: Sumanik-Leary, Jon. University of Loughborough; Reino Unido
Fil: Clementi, Luciana Vanesa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Humanas. Centro de Estudios Sociales de América Latina; Argentina
Book of Abstracts of the Tropentag 2016: International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development
Viena
Austria
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences
Materia
Argentina
Rural electrification
Small wind
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/280057

id CONICETDig_e7761802c0f3bdadb4a51392b8ad444f
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/280057
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling A comparative analysis: impacts and sustainability of rural small wind electrification programmesSchaube, PhilippSumanik-Leary, JonClementi, Luciana VanesaArgentinaRural electrificationSmall windhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.7https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2This paper offers a comparative analysis of two small wind electrification programmes targeted at remote sheep farming households in two of the windiest regions of the world, Argentine Patagonia and the Falkland Islands/Islas Malvinas. In Argentina the research was carried out in different districts of the province of Chubut: Tehuelches, Paso de Indios and Rawson. Chubut is a province in southern Argentina which rural areas are characterised by a significant presence of indigenous communities, a very low population density rate and a lack of social infrastructure and facilities, due to the long distances between settlements.Within the Chubut region following the latest statistical records currently approximately 1.490 households do not have access to electricity. Despite comparable environmental conditions and local livelihoods, the impact of these two electrification programmes in the Argentine Patagonia and the Falkland Islands/Islas Malvinas was vastly different. A sociotechnical systems approach was adopted to gain a deeper understanding of the local context and development dynamics. This study identifies the critical success factors that havecontributed to these two distinct outcomes, drawing out those that can inform the design of future initiatives. The research is based upon a series of semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (households, community leaders, maintenance providers, programme designers, small wind turbine manufacturers and national small wind experts), observational field visits (to remote farms, service centres and local authorities) and the review of project reports. Taking a user centred approach that tailors each energy system to the needs ofthat particular household and establishes ownership was found to be one of the most important considerations, alongside consistent institutional support, a strong and accessible service network and the successful integration of maintenance practices with the local way of life.Fil: Schaube, Philipp. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Future Energy and Mobility Structures; AlemaniaFil: Sumanik-Leary, Jon. University of Loughborough; Reino UnidoFil: Clementi, Luciana Vanesa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Humanas. Centro de Estudios Sociales de América Latina; ArgentinaBook of Abstracts of the Tropentag 2016: International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural DevelopmentVienaAustriaUniversity of Natural Resources and Life SciencesCuvillier Verlag2016info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectCongresoBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/280057A comparative analysis: impacts and sustainability of rural small wind electrification programmes; Book of Abstracts of the Tropentag 2016: International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development; Viena; Austria; 2016; 545-545978-3-9801686-7-0CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tropentag.de/2016/proceedings/proceedings.pdfInternacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-02-26T10:33:59Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/280057instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-02-26 10:33:59.466CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparative analysis: impacts and sustainability of rural small wind electrification programmes
title A comparative analysis: impacts and sustainability of rural small wind electrification programmes
spellingShingle A comparative analysis: impacts and sustainability of rural small wind electrification programmes
Schaube, Philipp
Argentina
Rural electrification
Small wind
title_short A comparative analysis: impacts and sustainability of rural small wind electrification programmes
title_full A comparative analysis: impacts and sustainability of rural small wind electrification programmes
title_fullStr A comparative analysis: impacts and sustainability of rural small wind electrification programmes
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis: impacts and sustainability of rural small wind electrification programmes
title_sort A comparative analysis: impacts and sustainability of rural small wind electrification programmes
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Schaube, Philipp
Sumanik-Leary, Jon
Clementi, Luciana Vanesa
author Schaube, Philipp
author_facet Schaube, Philipp
Sumanik-Leary, Jon
Clementi, Luciana Vanesa
author_role author
author2 Sumanik-Leary, Jon
Clementi, Luciana Vanesa
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Argentina
Rural electrification
Small wind
topic Argentina
Rural electrification
Small wind
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.7
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This paper offers a comparative analysis of two small wind electrification programmes targeted at remote sheep farming households in two of the windiest regions of the world, Argentine Patagonia and the Falkland Islands/Islas Malvinas. In Argentina the research was carried out in different districts of the province of Chubut: Tehuelches, Paso de Indios and Rawson. Chubut is a province in southern Argentina which rural areas are characterised by a significant presence of indigenous communities, a very low population density rate and a lack of social infrastructure and facilities, due to the long distances between settlements.Within the Chubut region following the latest statistical records currently approximately 1.490 households do not have access to electricity. Despite comparable environmental conditions and local livelihoods, the impact of these two electrification programmes in the Argentine Patagonia and the Falkland Islands/Islas Malvinas was vastly different. A sociotechnical systems approach was adopted to gain a deeper understanding of the local context and development dynamics. This study identifies the critical success factors that havecontributed to these two distinct outcomes, drawing out those that can inform the design of future initiatives. The research is based upon a series of semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (households, community leaders, maintenance providers, programme designers, small wind turbine manufacturers and national small wind experts), observational field visits (to remote farms, service centres and local authorities) and the review of project reports. Taking a user centred approach that tailors each energy system to the needs ofthat particular household and establishes ownership was found to be one of the most important considerations, alongside consistent institutional support, a strong and accessible service network and the successful integration of maintenance practices with the local way of life.
Fil: Schaube, Philipp. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Future Energy and Mobility Structures; Alemania
Fil: Sumanik-Leary, Jon. University of Loughborough; Reino Unido
Fil: Clementi, Luciana Vanesa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Humanas. Centro de Estudios Sociales de América Latina; Argentina
Book of Abstracts of the Tropentag 2016: International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development
Viena
Austria
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences
description This paper offers a comparative analysis of two small wind electrification programmes targeted at remote sheep farming households in two of the windiest regions of the world, Argentine Patagonia and the Falkland Islands/Islas Malvinas. In Argentina the research was carried out in different districts of the province of Chubut: Tehuelches, Paso de Indios and Rawson. Chubut is a province in southern Argentina which rural areas are characterised by a significant presence of indigenous communities, a very low population density rate and a lack of social infrastructure and facilities, due to the long distances between settlements.Within the Chubut region following the latest statistical records currently approximately 1.490 households do not have access to electricity. Despite comparable environmental conditions and local livelihoods, the impact of these two electrification programmes in the Argentine Patagonia and the Falkland Islands/Islas Malvinas was vastly different. A sociotechnical systems approach was adopted to gain a deeper understanding of the local context and development dynamics. This study identifies the critical success factors that havecontributed to these two distinct outcomes, drawing out those that can inform the design of future initiatives. The research is based upon a series of semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (households, community leaders, maintenance providers, programme designers, small wind turbine manufacturers and national small wind experts), observational field visits (to remote farms, service centres and local authorities) and the review of project reports. Taking a user centred approach that tailors each energy system to the needs ofthat particular household and establishes ownership was found to be one of the most important considerations, alongside consistent institutional support, a strong and accessible service network and the successful integration of maintenance practices with the local way of life.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Congreso
Book
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/280057
A comparative analysis: impacts and sustainability of rural small wind electrification programmes; Book of Abstracts of the Tropentag 2016: International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development; Viena; Austria; 2016; 545-545
978-3-9801686-7-0
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/280057
identifier_str_mv A comparative analysis: impacts and sustainability of rural small wind electrification programmes; Book of Abstracts of the Tropentag 2016: International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development; Viena; Austria; 2016; 545-545
978-3-9801686-7-0
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tropentag.de/2016/proceedings/proceedings.pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Internacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cuvillier Verlag
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cuvillier Verlag
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1858306209093779456
score 12.665996