A meta-analysis contrasting active versus passive restoration practices in dryland agricultural ecosystems

• Autores: Miguel, María Florencia; Butterfield, H. Scott; Lortie, Christopher J.
• Año de publicación: 2020
• Idioma: inglés
• Tipo de recurso: artículo
• Materia: AGRICULTURAL DRYLANDS; DESERTS; HUMAN-MODIFIED ECOSYSTEMS; INTERVENTION; META-ANALYSIS; RESTORATION
• Institución: Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas

Restoration of agricultural drylands globally, here farmlands and grazing lands, is a priority for ecosystem function and biodiversity preservation. Natural areas in drylands are recognized as biodiversity hotspots and face continued human impacts. Global water shortages are driving increased agricultural land retirement providing the opportunity to reclaim some of these lands for natural habitat. We used meta-analysis to contrast different classes of dryland restoration practices. All interventions were categorized as active and passive for the analyses of efficacy in dryland agricultural ecosystems. We evaluated the impact of 19 specific restoration practices from 42 studies on soil, plant, animal, and general habitat targets across 16 countries, for a total of 1,427 independent observations. Passive vegetation restoration and grazing exclusion led to net positive restoration outcomes. Passive restoration practices were more variable and less effective than active restoration practices. Furthermore, passive soil restoration led to net negative restoration outcomes. Active restoration practices consistently led to positive outcomes for soil, plant, and habitat targets. Water supplementation was the most effective restoration practice. These findings suggest that active interventions are necessary and critical in most instances for dryland agricultural ecosystems likely because of severe anthropogenic pressures and concurrent environmental stressors—both past and present.
Fil: Miguel, María Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina
Fil: Butterfield, H. Scott. The Nature Conservancy; Estados Unidos
Fil: Lortie, Christopher J.. York University; Canadá. National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis; Estados Unidos