Effort rights-based management

• Autores: Squirels, Dale; Mauder, Mark; Allen, Robin; Andersen, Peder; Astorkiza, Kepa; Butterworth, Douglas; Caballero, Gonzalo; Clarke, Raymond; Ellefsen, Hans; Guillotreau, Patrice; Hampton, John; Hannesson, Rognvaldu; Havice, Elizabeth; Helvey, Mark; Herrick, Samuel; Hoydal, Kjartan; Maharaj, Vishwanie; Metzner, Rebecca; Mosqueira, Iago; Parma, Ana María; Prieto Bowen, Ivan; Restrepo, Victor; Sidique, Shaufique Fahmi; Steinsham, Stein Ivar; Thunberg, Eric; del Valle, Ikerne; Vestergaard, Niels
• Año de publicación: 2016
• Idioma: inglés
• Tipo de recurso: artículo
• Materia: Catch Rights; Effort Rights; Fisheries Management; Total Allowable Catch
• Institución: Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas

Effort rights-based fisheries management (RBM) is less widely used than catch rights, whether for groups or individuals. Because RBM on catch or effort necessarily requires a total allowable catch (TAC) or total allowable effort (TAE), RBM isdiscussed in conjunction with issues in assessing fish populations and providing TACs or TAEs. Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages, and there are trade-offs between the two approaches. In a narrow economic sense, catch rights are superior because of the type of incentives created, but once the costs of research to improve stock assessments and the associated risks of determining the TAC and costs of monitoring, control, surveillance and enforcement are taken into consideration, the choice between catch or effort RBM becomes more complex and less clear. The results will be case specific. Hybrid systems based on both catch and effort are increasingly employed to manage marine fisheries to capture the advantages of both approaches. In hybrid systems, catch or effort RBM dominates and controls on the other supplements. RBM using either catch or effort by itself addresses only the target species stock externality and not the remaining externalities associated with by-catch and the ecosystem.
Fil: Squirels, Dale. National Marine Fisheries Service; Estados Unidos
Fil: Mauder, Mark. Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission; Estados Unidos
Fil: Allen, Robin. International Seafood Sustainability Foundation; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Andersen, Peder. Universidad de Copenhagen; Dinamarca
Fil: Astorkiza, Kepa. Universidad del País Vasco; España
Fil: Butterworth, Douglas. University of Cape Town; Sudáfrica
Fil: Caballero, Gonzalo. Universidad de Vigo; España
Fil: Clarke, Raymond. National Marine Fisheries Service; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ellefsen, Hans. University of Faroe Islands; Islas Feroe
Fil: Guillotreau, Patrice. Universite de Nantes; Francia
Fil: Hampton, John. Oceanic Fisheries Programme; Nueva Caledonia
Fil: Hannesson, Rognvaldu. Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration; Noruega
Fil: Havice, Elizabeth. University of North Carolina; Estados Unidos
Fil: Helvey, Mark. San Diego; Estados Unidos
Fil: Herrick, Samuel. No especifíca;
Fil: Hoydal, Kjartan. No especifíca;
Fil: Maharaj, Vishwanie. World Wildlife Fund-Fisheries; Estados Unidos
Fil: Metzner, Rebecca. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Italia
Fil: Mosqueira, Iago. Maritime Affairs Unit of the European Commission Joint Research Center; Italia
Fil: Parma, Ana María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Prieto Bowen, Ivan. No especifíca;
Fil: Restrepo, Victor. International Seafood Sustainability Foundation; España
Fil: Sidique, Shaufique Fahmi. Universiti Putra Malaysia; Malasia
Fil: Steinsham, Stein Ivar. Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration; Noruega
Fil: Thunberg, Eric. National Marine Fisheries Service; Estados Unidos
Fil: del Valle, Ikerne. Universidad del País Vasco; España
Fil: Vestergaard, Niels. University of Southern Denmark; Dinamarca