Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field position

Autores
Molina, Gonzalo Alberto Roman; Poggio, Santiago Luis; Ghersa, Claudio Marco
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Trophic guilds of epigeal arthropods regulating insect pest populations may be affected by factors act-ing across spatial scales. Although the influence of landscape factors associated with farming effects onarthropod assemblages has received increasing attention in the last decades, most research was carriedout in fine-grain landscapes by comparing conventional and organic cropping systems. Here, we aimedat identifying the role of fencerows and crop heterogeneity in defining arthropod diversity in intensivelyfarmed, coarse-grain landscapes. Hence, we developed a multi-scale heterogeneity approach based onfitting linear-mixed models to elucidate the effects of three spatial scales (local, neighbouring crop types,and landscape) on arthropod diversity. Mixed models were fitted to arthropod data obtained by pitfalltrap samplings in 22 field pairs. Field position was a major determinant of arthropod species diversityat local scale, due to the contrasting disturbance regimes of fencerows and adjoining field edges. Fencedensity at landscape scale contributed to retain diverse arthropod assemblages in farmland mosaics bysupplying habitats and refuges. In addition, extended fence network may function as corridors for dis-persal, increasing connectivity between dissimilar habitats. Fence habitats, as well as their density in thelandscapes, enhance both richness and abundance of beneficial arthropods. Our findings indicate that theoverall arthropod diversity was benefited by landscape complexity, being the presence and density offencerows key landscape attributes. Contrasting disturbance regimes at different field positions emergedas a major driver modulating arthropod species diversity in intensively managed farmland mosaics. Non-cropped habitats associated with fencerows and field margins play key ecological functions that are ofvital importance for providing ecosystem services in agro-ecosystems. Complex landscapes may help toconserve overall plant diversity in agro-ecosystems, as well as the spillover of arthropod species fromfencerows towards crop fields. Even in heavily intensified landscapes, where crop diversity is the mainsource of heterogeneity, promoting measures intended for both restoring and managing fencerow andnon-cropped habitats through landscape planning will contribute to maintain arthropod richness (almost 70% of total richness) across the entire landscape.
Fil: Molina, Gonzalo Alberto Roman. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomia. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente; Argentina
Fil: Poggio, Santiago Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal; Argentina
Fil: Ghersa, Claudio Marco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomia. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente; Argentina
Materia
Biodiversidad
Landscape Homogenisation
Neighbouring Effects
Rolling Pampas
Spillover
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4179

id CONICETDig_e445d2de7f1fb2baad620d96eb99e0be
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4179
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field positionMolina, Gonzalo Alberto RomanPoggio, Santiago LuisGhersa, Claudio MarcoBiodiversidadLandscape HomogenisationNeighbouring EffectsRolling PampasSpilloverhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Trophic guilds of epigeal arthropods regulating insect pest populations may be affected by factors act-ing across spatial scales. Although the influence of landscape factors associated with farming effects onarthropod assemblages has received increasing attention in the last decades, most research was carriedout in fine-grain landscapes by comparing conventional and organic cropping systems. Here, we aimedat identifying the role of fencerows and crop heterogeneity in defining arthropod diversity in intensivelyfarmed, coarse-grain landscapes. Hence, we developed a multi-scale heterogeneity approach based onfitting linear-mixed models to elucidate the effects of three spatial scales (local, neighbouring crop types,and landscape) on arthropod diversity. Mixed models were fitted to arthropod data obtained by pitfalltrap samplings in 22 field pairs. Field position was a major determinant of arthropod species diversityat local scale, due to the contrasting disturbance regimes of fencerows and adjoining field edges. Fencedensity at landscape scale contributed to retain diverse arthropod assemblages in farmland mosaics bysupplying habitats and refuges. In addition, extended fence network may function as corridors for dis-persal, increasing connectivity between dissimilar habitats. Fence habitats, as well as their density in thelandscapes, enhance both richness and abundance of beneficial arthropods. Our findings indicate that theoverall arthropod diversity was benefited by landscape complexity, being the presence and density offencerows key landscape attributes. Contrasting disturbance regimes at different field positions emergedas a major driver modulating arthropod species diversity in intensively managed farmland mosaics. Non-cropped habitats associated with fencerows and field margins play key ecological functions that are ofvital importance for providing ecosystem services in agro-ecosystems. Complex landscapes may help toconserve overall plant diversity in agro-ecosystems, as well as the spillover of arthropod species fromfencerows towards crop fields. Even in heavily intensified landscapes, where crop diversity is the mainsource of heterogeneity, promoting measures intended for both restoring and managing fencerow andnon-cropped habitats through landscape planning will contribute to maintain arthropod richness (almost 70% of total richness) across the entire landscape.Fil: Molina, Gonzalo Alberto Roman. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomia. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente; ArgentinaFil: Poggio, Santiago Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal; ArgentinaFil: Ghersa, Claudio Marco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomia. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente; ArgentinaElsevier2014-05-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/4179Molina, Gonzalo Alberto Roman; Poggio, Santiago Luis; Ghersa, Claudio Marco; Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field position; Elsevier; Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment; 192; 10-5-2014; 135–1430167-8809enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880914002102info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.agee.2014.04.013info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0167-8809info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:04:46Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4179instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:04:46.947CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field position
title Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field position
spellingShingle Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field position
Molina, Gonzalo Alberto Roman
Biodiversidad
Landscape Homogenisation
Neighbouring Effects
Rolling Pampas
Spillover
title_short Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field position
title_full Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field position
title_fullStr Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field position
title_full_unstemmed Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field position
title_sort Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field position
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Molina, Gonzalo Alberto Roman
Poggio, Santiago Luis
Ghersa, Claudio Marco
author Molina, Gonzalo Alberto Roman
author_facet Molina, Gonzalo Alberto Roman
Poggio, Santiago Luis
Ghersa, Claudio Marco
author_role author
author2 Poggio, Santiago Luis
Ghersa, Claudio Marco
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biodiversidad
Landscape Homogenisation
Neighbouring Effects
Rolling Pampas
Spillover
topic Biodiversidad
Landscape Homogenisation
Neighbouring Effects
Rolling Pampas
Spillover
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Trophic guilds of epigeal arthropods regulating insect pest populations may be affected by factors act-ing across spatial scales. Although the influence of landscape factors associated with farming effects onarthropod assemblages has received increasing attention in the last decades, most research was carriedout in fine-grain landscapes by comparing conventional and organic cropping systems. Here, we aimedat identifying the role of fencerows and crop heterogeneity in defining arthropod diversity in intensivelyfarmed, coarse-grain landscapes. Hence, we developed a multi-scale heterogeneity approach based onfitting linear-mixed models to elucidate the effects of three spatial scales (local, neighbouring crop types,and landscape) on arthropod diversity. Mixed models were fitted to arthropod data obtained by pitfalltrap samplings in 22 field pairs. Field position was a major determinant of arthropod species diversityat local scale, due to the contrasting disturbance regimes of fencerows and adjoining field edges. Fencedensity at landscape scale contributed to retain diverse arthropod assemblages in farmland mosaics bysupplying habitats and refuges. In addition, extended fence network may function as corridors for dis-persal, increasing connectivity between dissimilar habitats. Fence habitats, as well as their density in thelandscapes, enhance both richness and abundance of beneficial arthropods. Our findings indicate that theoverall arthropod diversity was benefited by landscape complexity, being the presence and density offencerows key landscape attributes. Contrasting disturbance regimes at different field positions emergedas a major driver modulating arthropod species diversity in intensively managed farmland mosaics. Non-cropped habitats associated with fencerows and field margins play key ecological functions that are ofvital importance for providing ecosystem services in agro-ecosystems. Complex landscapes may help toconserve overall plant diversity in agro-ecosystems, as well as the spillover of arthropod species fromfencerows towards crop fields. Even in heavily intensified landscapes, where crop diversity is the mainsource of heterogeneity, promoting measures intended for both restoring and managing fencerow andnon-cropped habitats through landscape planning will contribute to maintain arthropod richness (almost 70% of total richness) across the entire landscape.
Fil: Molina, Gonzalo Alberto Roman. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomia. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente; Argentina
Fil: Poggio, Santiago Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal; Argentina
Fil: Ghersa, Claudio Marco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomia. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente; Argentina
description Trophic guilds of epigeal arthropods regulating insect pest populations may be affected by factors act-ing across spatial scales. Although the influence of landscape factors associated with farming effects onarthropod assemblages has received increasing attention in the last decades, most research was carriedout in fine-grain landscapes by comparing conventional and organic cropping systems. Here, we aimedat identifying the role of fencerows and crop heterogeneity in defining arthropod diversity in intensivelyfarmed, coarse-grain landscapes. Hence, we developed a multi-scale heterogeneity approach based onfitting linear-mixed models to elucidate the effects of three spatial scales (local, neighbouring crop types,and landscape) on arthropod diversity. Mixed models were fitted to arthropod data obtained by pitfalltrap samplings in 22 field pairs. Field position was a major determinant of arthropod species diversityat local scale, due to the contrasting disturbance regimes of fencerows and adjoining field edges. Fencedensity at landscape scale contributed to retain diverse arthropod assemblages in farmland mosaics bysupplying habitats and refuges. In addition, extended fence network may function as corridors for dis-persal, increasing connectivity between dissimilar habitats. Fence habitats, as well as their density in thelandscapes, enhance both richness and abundance of beneficial arthropods. Our findings indicate that theoverall arthropod diversity was benefited by landscape complexity, being the presence and density offencerows key landscape attributes. Contrasting disturbance regimes at different field positions emergedas a major driver modulating arthropod species diversity in intensively managed farmland mosaics. Non-cropped habitats associated with fencerows and field margins play key ecological functions that are ofvital importance for providing ecosystem services in agro-ecosystems. Complex landscapes may help toconserve overall plant diversity in agro-ecosystems, as well as the spillover of arthropod species fromfencerows towards crop fields. Even in heavily intensified landscapes, where crop diversity is the mainsource of heterogeneity, promoting measures intended for both restoring and managing fencerow andnon-cropped habitats through landscape planning will contribute to maintain arthropod richness (almost 70% of total richness) across the entire landscape.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-05-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4179
Molina, Gonzalo Alberto Roman; Poggio, Santiago Luis; Ghersa, Claudio Marco; Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field position; Elsevier; Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment; 192; 10-5-2014; 135–143
0167-8809
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4179
identifier_str_mv Molina, Gonzalo Alberto Roman; Poggio, Santiago Luis; Ghersa, Claudio Marco; Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field position; Elsevier; Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment; 192; 10-5-2014; 135–143
0167-8809
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880914002102
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.agee.2014.04.013
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0167-8809
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980162050719744
score 12.993085