Age, Gender, Body Mass Index, and Foot Loading During Gait

Autores
Castellini, Jorge; Grande Ratti, Maria Florencia; Chan, Mirta Débora
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background: The aim was to analyze changes in normal functional parameters of gait analysis by aging, sex, and body mass index (BMI).Methods: A cross-sectional study with a consecutive sample of asymptomatic subjects was performed between 2014 and 2020. Primary outcomes were time and force parameters (contact time and center of force [CoF] time), in the heel, midfoot, and metatarsal areas, measured using an in-office force platform.Results: A total of 156 subjects (312 feet) were included, including 67% of women with a mean age of 47 years. The mean of total contact time was similar in males and females (P = .695) and across BMI (P = .413). Contact time did not show differences by region (P = .648 heel, P = .286 midfoot, and P = .690 metatarsal). CoF time in the heel and metatarsal areas did not change between males and females (P = .288 and P = .879, respectively); meanwhile, it was different in midfoot (P = .002). Maximum force showed a reduction between sexes in the heel (P = .039) but did not in the midfoot and metatarsal areas. By age, differences were detected in the heel and metatarsal areas in females (P = .002 and P = .001) and the metatarsal area in males (P = .001). According to the age groups, total contact time increased in females (P = .001) but not in males (P = .018), and no differences were detected between foot areas. In females, CoF time did not change either foot areas or age groups. In males, CoF time values increased in the midfoot area in the older group (P = .001).Conclusion: Time variables did not change by foot region, independent of age, sex, and BMI. Heel maximum force decreased in females, probably linked to adaptive phenomena by aging. The midfoot remains stable, and acts as an undamaged "bridge." These parameters could be interpreted as normal in asymptomatic subjects.
Fil: Castellini, Jorge. Hospital Italiano; Argentina
Fil: Grande Ratti, Maria Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Hospital Italiano; Argentina
Fil: Chan, Mirta Débora. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional; Argentina
Materia
Asymptomatic patients
Foot functional parameters
Gait analysis
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/235853

id CONICETDig_e2fca7932083a184bc409a9397293e2d
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/235853
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Age, Gender, Body Mass Index, and Foot Loading During GaitCastellini, JorgeGrande Ratti, Maria FlorenciaChan, Mirta DéboraAsymptomatic patientsFoot functional parametersGait analysishttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Background: The aim was to analyze changes in normal functional parameters of gait analysis by aging, sex, and body mass index (BMI).Methods: A cross-sectional study with a consecutive sample of asymptomatic subjects was performed between 2014 and 2020. Primary outcomes were time and force parameters (contact time and center of force [CoF] time), in the heel, midfoot, and metatarsal areas, measured using an in-office force platform.Results: A total of 156 subjects (312 feet) were included, including 67% of women with a mean age of 47 years. The mean of total contact time was similar in males and females (P = .695) and across BMI (P = .413). Contact time did not show differences by region (P = .648 heel, P = .286 midfoot, and P = .690 metatarsal). CoF time in the heel and metatarsal areas did not change between males and females (P = .288 and P = .879, respectively); meanwhile, it was different in midfoot (P = .002). Maximum force showed a reduction between sexes in the heel (P = .039) but did not in the midfoot and metatarsal areas. By age, differences were detected in the heel and metatarsal areas in females (P = .002 and P = .001) and the metatarsal area in males (P = .001). According to the age groups, total contact time increased in females (P = .001) but not in males (P = .018), and no differences were detected between foot areas. In females, CoF time did not change either foot areas or age groups. In males, CoF time values increased in the midfoot area in the older group (P = .001).Conclusion: Time variables did not change by foot region, independent of age, sex, and BMI. Heel maximum force decreased in females, probably linked to adaptive phenomena by aging. The midfoot remains stable, and acts as an undamaged "bridge." These parameters could be interpreted as normal in asymptomatic subjects.Fil: Castellini, Jorge. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Grande Ratti, Maria Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Chan, Mirta Débora. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional; ArgentinaSAGE Publications2023-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/235853Castellini, Jorge; Grande Ratti, Maria Florencia; Chan, Mirta Débora; Age, Gender, Body Mass Index, and Foot Loading During Gait; SAGE Publications; Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics; 8; 3; 9-2023; 1-112473-0114CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/24730114231198524info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1177/24730114231198524info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:10:21Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/235853instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:10:21.75CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Age, Gender, Body Mass Index, and Foot Loading During Gait
title Age, Gender, Body Mass Index, and Foot Loading During Gait
spellingShingle Age, Gender, Body Mass Index, and Foot Loading During Gait
Castellini, Jorge
Asymptomatic patients
Foot functional parameters
Gait analysis
title_short Age, Gender, Body Mass Index, and Foot Loading During Gait
title_full Age, Gender, Body Mass Index, and Foot Loading During Gait
title_fullStr Age, Gender, Body Mass Index, and Foot Loading During Gait
title_full_unstemmed Age, Gender, Body Mass Index, and Foot Loading During Gait
title_sort Age, Gender, Body Mass Index, and Foot Loading During Gait
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Castellini, Jorge
Grande Ratti, Maria Florencia
Chan, Mirta Débora
author Castellini, Jorge
author_facet Castellini, Jorge
Grande Ratti, Maria Florencia
Chan, Mirta Débora
author_role author
author2 Grande Ratti, Maria Florencia
Chan, Mirta Débora
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Asymptomatic patients
Foot functional parameters
Gait analysis
topic Asymptomatic patients
Foot functional parameters
Gait analysis
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background: The aim was to analyze changes in normal functional parameters of gait analysis by aging, sex, and body mass index (BMI).Methods: A cross-sectional study with a consecutive sample of asymptomatic subjects was performed between 2014 and 2020. Primary outcomes were time and force parameters (contact time and center of force [CoF] time), in the heel, midfoot, and metatarsal areas, measured using an in-office force platform.Results: A total of 156 subjects (312 feet) were included, including 67% of women with a mean age of 47 years. The mean of total contact time was similar in males and females (P = .695) and across BMI (P = .413). Contact time did not show differences by region (P = .648 heel, P = .286 midfoot, and P = .690 metatarsal). CoF time in the heel and metatarsal areas did not change between males and females (P = .288 and P = .879, respectively); meanwhile, it was different in midfoot (P = .002). Maximum force showed a reduction between sexes in the heel (P = .039) but did not in the midfoot and metatarsal areas. By age, differences were detected in the heel and metatarsal areas in females (P = .002 and P = .001) and the metatarsal area in males (P = .001). According to the age groups, total contact time increased in females (P = .001) but not in males (P = .018), and no differences were detected between foot areas. In females, CoF time did not change either foot areas or age groups. In males, CoF time values increased in the midfoot area in the older group (P = .001).Conclusion: Time variables did not change by foot region, independent of age, sex, and BMI. Heel maximum force decreased in females, probably linked to adaptive phenomena by aging. The midfoot remains stable, and acts as an undamaged "bridge." These parameters could be interpreted as normal in asymptomatic subjects.
Fil: Castellini, Jorge. Hospital Italiano; Argentina
Fil: Grande Ratti, Maria Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Hospital Italiano; Argentina
Fil: Chan, Mirta Débora. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional; Argentina
description Background: The aim was to analyze changes in normal functional parameters of gait analysis by aging, sex, and body mass index (BMI).Methods: A cross-sectional study with a consecutive sample of asymptomatic subjects was performed between 2014 and 2020. Primary outcomes were time and force parameters (contact time and center of force [CoF] time), in the heel, midfoot, and metatarsal areas, measured using an in-office force platform.Results: A total of 156 subjects (312 feet) were included, including 67% of women with a mean age of 47 years. The mean of total contact time was similar in males and females (P = .695) and across BMI (P = .413). Contact time did not show differences by region (P = .648 heel, P = .286 midfoot, and P = .690 metatarsal). CoF time in the heel and metatarsal areas did not change between males and females (P = .288 and P = .879, respectively); meanwhile, it was different in midfoot (P = .002). Maximum force showed a reduction between sexes in the heel (P = .039) but did not in the midfoot and metatarsal areas. By age, differences were detected in the heel and metatarsal areas in females (P = .002 and P = .001) and the metatarsal area in males (P = .001). According to the age groups, total contact time increased in females (P = .001) but not in males (P = .018), and no differences were detected between foot areas. In females, CoF time did not change either foot areas or age groups. In males, CoF time values increased in the midfoot area in the older group (P = .001).Conclusion: Time variables did not change by foot region, independent of age, sex, and BMI. Heel maximum force decreased in females, probably linked to adaptive phenomena by aging. The midfoot remains stable, and acts as an undamaged "bridge." These parameters could be interpreted as normal in asymptomatic subjects.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/235853
Castellini, Jorge; Grande Ratti, Maria Florencia; Chan, Mirta Débora; Age, Gender, Body Mass Index, and Foot Loading During Gait; SAGE Publications; Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics; 8; 3; 9-2023; 1-11
2473-0114
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/235853
identifier_str_mv Castellini, Jorge; Grande Ratti, Maria Florencia; Chan, Mirta Débora; Age, Gender, Body Mass Index, and Foot Loading During Gait; SAGE Publications; Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics; 8; 3; 9-2023; 1-11
2473-0114
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/24730114231198524
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1177/24730114231198524
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842270116091265024
score 13.13397