Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?
- Autores
- Breitman, Maria Florencia; Morando, Mariana; Avila, Luciano Javier
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Twenty-one species of lizards are included in the southernmost clade of South America, the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section. There are two hypotheses of species-grouping within this section, one based on morphological similarities and the other based on molecular phylogenetic relationships; although discordant, both are in use. The 'morphological arrangement hypothesis', which sorts the species of the section in three groups, was proposed ~30 years ago; however, despite taxonomic changes and almost doubling the species diversity of this section since then, the hypothesis has never been tested. Here, we (1) present an updated chronological review of taxonomic changes, species descriptions, morphological groups, and genetic clades proposed for the L.lineomaculatus section, and (2) evaluate the accuracy of the 'morphological arrangement hypothesis'. We show that the traditional practice of classifying 11 of these species in two of the three traditional morphological groups of the section (Liolaemus kingii and Liolaemus archeforus), which is not supported by molecular data, is also not supported by morphological data, and therefore should be abandoned; we suggest referring to this group of species as the L.kingii group. We characterized the Liolaemus magellanicus group based on morphology, and extend the previously published morphological characteristics of the L.lineomaculatus group. Finally, we comment on future prospects for studies of sexual dimorphism and its possible ecological implications. This paper provides a critical synthesis of our understanding of the morphological and phylogenetic patterns within the L.lineomaculatus section and presents a useful framework for future tests of taxonomic hypotheses and physiological, behavioural, and evolutionary questions within this section.
Fil: Breitman, Maria Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Morando, Mariana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Avila, Luciano Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina - Materia
-
LIOLAEMUS ARCHEFORUS GROUP
LIOLAEMUS KINGII GROUP
LIOLAEMUS LINEOMACULATUS GROUP
LIOLAEMUS MAGELLANICUS GROUP
LIZARDS
MORPHOLOGY
PATAGONIA
REVIEW
SEXUAL DIMORPHISM - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/3459
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_dff0fa99cc6e8da8598f68fff485b7ce |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/3459 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?Breitman, Maria FlorenciaMorando, MarianaAvila, Luciano JavierLIOLAEMUS ARCHEFORUS GROUPLIOLAEMUS KINGII GROUPLIOLAEMUS LINEOMACULATUS GROUPLIOLAEMUS MAGELLANICUS GROUPLIZARDSMORPHOLOGYPATAGONIAREVIEWSEXUAL DIMORPHISMhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Twenty-one species of lizards are included in the southernmost clade of South America, the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section. There are two hypotheses of species-grouping within this section, one based on morphological similarities and the other based on molecular phylogenetic relationships; although discordant, both are in use. The 'morphological arrangement hypothesis', which sorts the species of the section in three groups, was proposed ~30 years ago; however, despite taxonomic changes and almost doubling the species diversity of this section since then, the hypothesis has never been tested. Here, we (1) present an updated chronological review of taxonomic changes, species descriptions, morphological groups, and genetic clades proposed for the L.lineomaculatus section, and (2) evaluate the accuracy of the 'morphological arrangement hypothesis'. We show that the traditional practice of classifying 11 of these species in two of the three traditional morphological groups of the section (Liolaemus kingii and Liolaemus archeforus), which is not supported by molecular data, is also not supported by morphological data, and therefore should be abandoned; we suggest referring to this group of species as the L.kingii group. We characterized the Liolaemus magellanicus group based on morphology, and extend the previously published morphological characteristics of the L.lineomaculatus group. Finally, we comment on future prospects for studies of sexual dimorphism and its possible ecological implications. This paper provides a critical synthesis of our understanding of the morphological and phylogenetic patterns within the L.lineomaculatus section and presents a useful framework for future tests of taxonomic hypotheses and physiological, behavioural, and evolutionary questions within this section.Fil: Breitman, Maria Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaFil: Morando, Mariana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaFil: Avila, Luciano Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2013-07-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/3459Breitman, Maria Florencia; Morando, Mariana; Avila, Luciano Javier; Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society; 168; 3; 8-7-2013; 612-6680024-4082enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/DOI:10.1111/zoj.12037info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zoj.12037/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:40:15Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/3459instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:40:16.042CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid? |
title |
Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid? |
spellingShingle |
Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid? Breitman, Maria Florencia LIOLAEMUS ARCHEFORUS GROUP LIOLAEMUS KINGII GROUP LIOLAEMUS LINEOMACULATUS GROUP LIOLAEMUS MAGELLANICUS GROUP LIZARDS MORPHOLOGY PATAGONIA REVIEW SEXUAL DIMORPHISM |
title_short |
Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid? |
title_full |
Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid? |
title_fullStr |
Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid? |
title_sort |
Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid? |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Breitman, Maria Florencia Morando, Mariana Avila, Luciano Javier |
author |
Breitman, Maria Florencia |
author_facet |
Breitman, Maria Florencia Morando, Mariana Avila, Luciano Javier |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Morando, Mariana Avila, Luciano Javier |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
LIOLAEMUS ARCHEFORUS GROUP LIOLAEMUS KINGII GROUP LIOLAEMUS LINEOMACULATUS GROUP LIOLAEMUS MAGELLANICUS GROUP LIZARDS MORPHOLOGY PATAGONIA REVIEW SEXUAL DIMORPHISM |
topic |
LIOLAEMUS ARCHEFORUS GROUP LIOLAEMUS KINGII GROUP LIOLAEMUS LINEOMACULATUS GROUP LIOLAEMUS MAGELLANICUS GROUP LIZARDS MORPHOLOGY PATAGONIA REVIEW SEXUAL DIMORPHISM |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Twenty-one species of lizards are included in the southernmost clade of South America, the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section. There are two hypotheses of species-grouping within this section, one based on morphological similarities and the other based on molecular phylogenetic relationships; although discordant, both are in use. The 'morphological arrangement hypothesis', which sorts the species of the section in three groups, was proposed ~30 years ago; however, despite taxonomic changes and almost doubling the species diversity of this section since then, the hypothesis has never been tested. Here, we (1) present an updated chronological review of taxonomic changes, species descriptions, morphological groups, and genetic clades proposed for the L.lineomaculatus section, and (2) evaluate the accuracy of the 'morphological arrangement hypothesis'. We show that the traditional practice of classifying 11 of these species in two of the three traditional morphological groups of the section (Liolaemus kingii and Liolaemus archeforus), which is not supported by molecular data, is also not supported by morphological data, and therefore should be abandoned; we suggest referring to this group of species as the L.kingii group. We characterized the Liolaemus magellanicus group based on morphology, and extend the previously published morphological characteristics of the L.lineomaculatus group. Finally, we comment on future prospects for studies of sexual dimorphism and its possible ecological implications. This paper provides a critical synthesis of our understanding of the morphological and phylogenetic patterns within the L.lineomaculatus section and presents a useful framework for future tests of taxonomic hypotheses and physiological, behavioural, and evolutionary questions within this section. Fil: Breitman, Maria Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina Fil: Morando, Mariana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina Fil: Avila, Luciano Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina |
description |
Twenty-one species of lizards are included in the southernmost clade of South America, the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section. There are two hypotheses of species-grouping within this section, one based on morphological similarities and the other based on molecular phylogenetic relationships; although discordant, both are in use. The 'morphological arrangement hypothesis', which sorts the species of the section in three groups, was proposed ~30 years ago; however, despite taxonomic changes and almost doubling the species diversity of this section since then, the hypothesis has never been tested. Here, we (1) present an updated chronological review of taxonomic changes, species descriptions, morphological groups, and genetic clades proposed for the L.lineomaculatus section, and (2) evaluate the accuracy of the 'morphological arrangement hypothesis'. We show that the traditional practice of classifying 11 of these species in two of the three traditional morphological groups of the section (Liolaemus kingii and Liolaemus archeforus), which is not supported by molecular data, is also not supported by morphological data, and therefore should be abandoned; we suggest referring to this group of species as the L.kingii group. We characterized the Liolaemus magellanicus group based on morphology, and extend the previously published morphological characteristics of the L.lineomaculatus group. Finally, we comment on future prospects for studies of sexual dimorphism and its possible ecological implications. This paper provides a critical synthesis of our understanding of the morphological and phylogenetic patterns within the L.lineomaculatus section and presents a useful framework for future tests of taxonomic hypotheses and physiological, behavioural, and evolutionary questions within this section. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-07-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/3459 Breitman, Maria Florencia; Morando, Mariana; Avila, Luciano Javier; Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society; 168; 3; 8-7-2013; 612-668 0024-4082 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/3459 |
identifier_str_mv |
Breitman, Maria Florencia; Morando, Mariana; Avila, Luciano Javier; Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society; 168; 3; 8-7-2013; 612-668 0024-4082 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/DOI:10.1111/zoj.12037 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zoj.12037/abstract |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613274229800960 |
score |
13.070432 |