Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?

Autores
Breitman, Maria Florencia; Morando, Mariana; Avila, Luciano Javier
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Twenty-one species of lizards are included in the southernmost clade of South America, the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section. There are two hypotheses of species-grouping within this section, one based on morphological similarities and the other based on molecular phylogenetic relationships; although discordant, both are in use. The 'morphological arrangement hypothesis', which sorts the species of the section in three groups, was proposed ~30 years ago; however, despite taxonomic changes and almost doubling the species diversity of this section since then, the hypothesis has never been tested. Here, we (1) present an updated chronological review of taxonomic changes, species descriptions, morphological groups, and genetic clades proposed for the L.lineomaculatus section, and (2) evaluate the accuracy of the 'morphological arrangement hypothesis'. We show that the traditional practice of classifying 11 of these species in two of the three traditional morphological groups of the section (Liolaemus kingii and Liolaemus archeforus), which is not supported by molecular data, is also not supported by morphological data, and therefore should be abandoned; we suggest referring to this group of species as the L.kingii group. We characterized the Liolaemus magellanicus group based on morphology, and extend the previously published morphological characteristics of the L.lineomaculatus group. Finally, we comment on future prospects for studies of sexual dimorphism and its possible ecological implications. This paper provides a critical synthesis of our understanding of the morphological and phylogenetic patterns within the L.lineomaculatus section and presents a useful framework for future tests of taxonomic hypotheses and physiological, behavioural, and evolutionary questions within this section.
Fil: Breitman, Maria Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Morando, Mariana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Avila, Luciano Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Materia
LIOLAEMUS ARCHEFORUS GROUP
LIOLAEMUS KINGII GROUP
LIOLAEMUS LINEOMACULATUS GROUP
LIOLAEMUS MAGELLANICUS GROUP
LIZARDS
MORPHOLOGY
PATAGONIA
REVIEW
SEXUAL DIMORPHISM
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/3459

id CONICETDig_dff0fa99cc6e8da8598f68fff485b7ce
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/3459
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?Breitman, Maria FlorenciaMorando, MarianaAvila, Luciano JavierLIOLAEMUS ARCHEFORUS GROUPLIOLAEMUS KINGII GROUPLIOLAEMUS LINEOMACULATUS GROUPLIOLAEMUS MAGELLANICUS GROUPLIZARDSMORPHOLOGYPATAGONIAREVIEWSEXUAL DIMORPHISMhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Twenty-one species of lizards are included in the southernmost clade of South America, the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section. There are two hypotheses of species-grouping within this section, one based on morphological similarities and the other based on molecular phylogenetic relationships; although discordant, both are in use. The 'morphological arrangement hypothesis', which sorts the species of the section in three groups, was proposed ~30 years ago; however, despite taxonomic changes and almost doubling the species diversity of this section since then, the hypothesis has never been tested. Here, we (1) present an updated chronological review of taxonomic changes, species descriptions, morphological groups, and genetic clades proposed for the L.lineomaculatus section, and (2) evaluate the accuracy of the 'morphological arrangement hypothesis'. We show that the traditional practice of classifying 11 of these species in two of the three traditional morphological groups of the section (Liolaemus kingii and Liolaemus archeforus), which is not supported by molecular data, is also not supported by morphological data, and therefore should be abandoned; we suggest referring to this group of species as the L.kingii group. We characterized the Liolaemus magellanicus group based on morphology, and extend the previously published morphological characteristics of the L.lineomaculatus group. Finally, we comment on future prospects for studies of sexual dimorphism and its possible ecological implications. This paper provides a critical synthesis of our understanding of the morphological and phylogenetic patterns within the L.lineomaculatus section and presents a useful framework for future tests of taxonomic hypotheses and physiological, behavioural, and evolutionary questions within this section.Fil: Breitman, Maria Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaFil: Morando, Mariana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaFil: Avila, Luciano Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2013-07-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/3459Breitman, Maria Florencia; Morando, Mariana; Avila, Luciano Javier; Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society; 168; 3; 8-7-2013; 612-6680024-4082enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/DOI:10.1111/zoj.12037info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zoj.12037/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:40:15Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/3459instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:40:16.042CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?
title Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?
spellingShingle Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?
Breitman, Maria Florencia
LIOLAEMUS ARCHEFORUS GROUP
LIOLAEMUS KINGII GROUP
LIOLAEMUS LINEOMACULATUS GROUP
LIOLAEMUS MAGELLANICUS GROUP
LIZARDS
MORPHOLOGY
PATAGONIA
REVIEW
SEXUAL DIMORPHISM
title_short Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?
title_full Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?
title_fullStr Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?
title_full_unstemmed Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?
title_sort Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Breitman, Maria Florencia
Morando, Mariana
Avila, Luciano Javier
author Breitman, Maria Florencia
author_facet Breitman, Maria Florencia
Morando, Mariana
Avila, Luciano Javier
author_role author
author2 Morando, Mariana
Avila, Luciano Javier
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv LIOLAEMUS ARCHEFORUS GROUP
LIOLAEMUS KINGII GROUP
LIOLAEMUS LINEOMACULATUS GROUP
LIOLAEMUS MAGELLANICUS GROUP
LIZARDS
MORPHOLOGY
PATAGONIA
REVIEW
SEXUAL DIMORPHISM
topic LIOLAEMUS ARCHEFORUS GROUP
LIOLAEMUS KINGII GROUP
LIOLAEMUS LINEOMACULATUS GROUP
LIOLAEMUS MAGELLANICUS GROUP
LIZARDS
MORPHOLOGY
PATAGONIA
REVIEW
SEXUAL DIMORPHISM
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Twenty-one species of lizards are included in the southernmost clade of South America, the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section. There are two hypotheses of species-grouping within this section, one based on morphological similarities and the other based on molecular phylogenetic relationships; although discordant, both are in use. The 'morphological arrangement hypothesis', which sorts the species of the section in three groups, was proposed ~30 years ago; however, despite taxonomic changes and almost doubling the species diversity of this section since then, the hypothesis has never been tested. Here, we (1) present an updated chronological review of taxonomic changes, species descriptions, morphological groups, and genetic clades proposed for the L.lineomaculatus section, and (2) evaluate the accuracy of the 'morphological arrangement hypothesis'. We show that the traditional practice of classifying 11 of these species in two of the three traditional morphological groups of the section (Liolaemus kingii and Liolaemus archeforus), which is not supported by molecular data, is also not supported by morphological data, and therefore should be abandoned; we suggest referring to this group of species as the L.kingii group. We characterized the Liolaemus magellanicus group based on morphology, and extend the previously published morphological characteristics of the L.lineomaculatus group. Finally, we comment on future prospects for studies of sexual dimorphism and its possible ecological implications. This paper provides a critical synthesis of our understanding of the morphological and phylogenetic patterns within the L.lineomaculatus section and presents a useful framework for future tests of taxonomic hypotheses and physiological, behavioural, and evolutionary questions within this section.
Fil: Breitman, Maria Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Morando, Mariana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Avila, Luciano Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
description Twenty-one species of lizards are included in the southernmost clade of South America, the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section. There are two hypotheses of species-grouping within this section, one based on morphological similarities and the other based on molecular phylogenetic relationships; although discordant, both are in use. The 'morphological arrangement hypothesis', which sorts the species of the section in three groups, was proposed ~30 years ago; however, despite taxonomic changes and almost doubling the species diversity of this section since then, the hypothesis has never been tested. Here, we (1) present an updated chronological review of taxonomic changes, species descriptions, morphological groups, and genetic clades proposed for the L.lineomaculatus section, and (2) evaluate the accuracy of the 'morphological arrangement hypothesis'. We show that the traditional practice of classifying 11 of these species in two of the three traditional morphological groups of the section (Liolaemus kingii and Liolaemus archeforus), which is not supported by molecular data, is also not supported by morphological data, and therefore should be abandoned; we suggest referring to this group of species as the L.kingii group. We characterized the Liolaemus magellanicus group based on morphology, and extend the previously published morphological characteristics of the L.lineomaculatus group. Finally, we comment on future prospects for studies of sexual dimorphism and its possible ecological implications. This paper provides a critical synthesis of our understanding of the morphological and phylogenetic patterns within the L.lineomaculatus section and presents a useful framework for future tests of taxonomic hypotheses and physiological, behavioural, and evolutionary questions within this section.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-07-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/3459
Breitman, Maria Florencia; Morando, Mariana; Avila, Luciano Javier; Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society; 168; 3; 8-7-2013; 612-668
0024-4082
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/3459
identifier_str_mv Breitman, Maria Florencia; Morando, Mariana; Avila, Luciano Javier; Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): Is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society; 168; 3; 8-7-2013; 612-668
0024-4082
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/DOI:10.1111/zoj.12037
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zoj.12037/abstract
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613274229800960
score 13.070432