Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study
- Autores
- Aruguete, Natalia; Batista, Flavia; Calvo, Ernesto; Guizzo Altube, Matias; Scartascini, Carlos; Ventura, Tiago
- Año de publicación
- 2024
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Previous research has extensively investigated why users spread misinformation online, while less attention has been given to the motivations behind sharing fact-checks. This article reports a four-country survey experiment assessing the infuence of confrmation and refutation frames on engagement with online fact-checks. Respondents randomly received semantically identical content, either afrming accurate information (“It is TRUE that p”) or refuting misinformation (“It is FALSE that not p”). Despite semantic equivalence, confrmation frames elicit higher engagement rates than refutation frames. Additionally, confrmation frames reduce self-reported negative emotions related to polarization. These fndings are crucial for designing policy interventions aiming to amplify factcheck exposure and reduce afective polarization, particularly in critical areas such as health-related misinformation and harmful speech.
Fil: Aruguete, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencias Sociales; Argentina
Fil: Batista, Flavia. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Calvo, Ernesto. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Guizzo Altube, Matias. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados Unidos
Fil: Scartascini, Carlos. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ventura, Tiago. University Of Georgetown; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
FRAMING
FACT CHECKING
PANDEMIA-VACUNAS
CONFIRMACION REFUTACION - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/234130
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_df412fc9742303a1cf517ab8739bb3ba |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/234130 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country studyAruguete, NataliaBatista, FlaviaCalvo, ErnestoGuizzo Altube, MatiasScartascini, CarlosVentura, TiagoFRAMINGFACT CHECKINGPANDEMIA-VACUNASCONFIRMACION REFUTACIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.8https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Previous research has extensively investigated why users spread misinformation online, while less attention has been given to the motivations behind sharing fact-checks. This article reports a four-country survey experiment assessing the infuence of confrmation and refutation frames on engagement with online fact-checks. Respondents randomly received semantically identical content, either afrming accurate information (“It is TRUE that p”) or refuting misinformation (“It is FALSE that not p”). Despite semantic equivalence, confrmation frames elicit higher engagement rates than refutation frames. Additionally, confrmation frames reduce self-reported negative emotions related to polarization. These fndings are crucial for designing policy interventions aiming to amplify factcheck exposure and reduce afective polarization, particularly in critical areas such as health-related misinformation and harmful speech.Fil: Aruguete, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencias Sociales; ArgentinaFil: Batista, Flavia. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Calvo, Ernesto. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Guizzo Altube, Matias. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados UnidosFil: Scartascini, Carlos. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados UnidosFil: Ventura, Tiago. University Of Georgetown; Estados UnidosNature2024-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/234130Aruguete, Natalia; Batista, Flavia; Calvo, Ernesto; Guizzo Altube, Matias; Scartascini, Carlos; et al.; Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study; Nature; Scientific Reports; 14; 1; 4-2024; 1-142045-2322CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-53337-0info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1038/s41598-024-53337-0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:18:35Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/234130instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:18:35.443CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study |
title |
Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study |
spellingShingle |
Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study Aruguete, Natalia FRAMING FACT CHECKING PANDEMIA-VACUNAS CONFIRMACION REFUTACION |
title_short |
Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study |
title_full |
Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study |
title_fullStr |
Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study |
title_sort |
Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Aruguete, Natalia Batista, Flavia Calvo, Ernesto Guizzo Altube, Matias Scartascini, Carlos Ventura, Tiago |
author |
Aruguete, Natalia |
author_facet |
Aruguete, Natalia Batista, Flavia Calvo, Ernesto Guizzo Altube, Matias Scartascini, Carlos Ventura, Tiago |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Batista, Flavia Calvo, Ernesto Guizzo Altube, Matias Scartascini, Carlos Ventura, Tiago |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
FRAMING FACT CHECKING PANDEMIA-VACUNAS CONFIRMACION REFUTACION |
topic |
FRAMING FACT CHECKING PANDEMIA-VACUNAS CONFIRMACION REFUTACION |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.8 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Previous research has extensively investigated why users spread misinformation online, while less attention has been given to the motivations behind sharing fact-checks. This article reports a four-country survey experiment assessing the infuence of confrmation and refutation frames on engagement with online fact-checks. Respondents randomly received semantically identical content, either afrming accurate information (“It is TRUE that p”) or refuting misinformation (“It is FALSE that not p”). Despite semantic equivalence, confrmation frames elicit higher engagement rates than refutation frames. Additionally, confrmation frames reduce self-reported negative emotions related to polarization. These fndings are crucial for designing policy interventions aiming to amplify factcheck exposure and reduce afective polarization, particularly in critical areas such as health-related misinformation and harmful speech. Fil: Aruguete, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencias Sociales; Argentina Fil: Batista, Flavia. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos Fil: Calvo, Ernesto. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos Fil: Guizzo Altube, Matias. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados Unidos Fil: Scartascini, Carlos. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados Unidos Fil: Ventura, Tiago. University Of Georgetown; Estados Unidos |
description |
Previous research has extensively investigated why users spread misinformation online, while less attention has been given to the motivations behind sharing fact-checks. This article reports a four-country survey experiment assessing the infuence of confrmation and refutation frames on engagement with online fact-checks. Respondents randomly received semantically identical content, either afrming accurate information (“It is TRUE that p”) or refuting misinformation (“It is FALSE that not p”). Despite semantic equivalence, confrmation frames elicit higher engagement rates than refutation frames. Additionally, confrmation frames reduce self-reported negative emotions related to polarization. These fndings are crucial for designing policy interventions aiming to amplify factcheck exposure and reduce afective polarization, particularly in critical areas such as health-related misinformation and harmful speech. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-04 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/234130 Aruguete, Natalia; Batista, Flavia; Calvo, Ernesto; Guizzo Altube, Matias; Scartascini, Carlos; et al.; Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study; Nature; Scientific Reports; 14; 1; 4-2024; 1-14 2045-2322 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/234130 |
identifier_str_mv |
Aruguete, Natalia; Batista, Flavia; Calvo, Ernesto; Guizzo Altube, Matias; Scartascini, Carlos; et al.; Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study; Nature; Scientific Reports; 14; 1; 4-2024; 1-14 2045-2322 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-53337-0 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1038/s41598-024-53337-0 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Nature |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Nature |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614149599920128 |
score |
13.070432 |