Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study

Autores
Aruguete, Natalia; Batista, Flavia; Calvo, Ernesto; Guizzo Altube, Matias; Scartascini, Carlos; Ventura, Tiago
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Previous research has extensively investigated why users spread misinformation online, while less attention has been given to the motivations behind sharing fact-checks. This article reports a four-country survey experiment assessing the infuence of confrmation and refutation frames on engagement with online fact-checks. Respondents randomly received semantically identical content, either afrming accurate information (“It is TRUE that p”) or refuting misinformation (“It is FALSE that not p”). Despite semantic equivalence, confrmation frames elicit higher engagement rates than refutation frames. Additionally, confrmation frames reduce self-reported negative emotions related to polarization. These fndings are crucial for designing policy interventions aiming to amplify factcheck exposure and reduce afective polarization, particularly in critical areas such as health-related misinformation and harmful speech.
Fil: Aruguete, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencias Sociales; Argentina
Fil: Batista, Flavia. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Calvo, Ernesto. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Guizzo Altube, Matias. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados Unidos
Fil: Scartascini, Carlos. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ventura, Tiago. University Of Georgetown; Estados Unidos
Materia
FRAMING
FACT CHECKING
PANDEMIA-VACUNAS
CONFIRMACION REFUTACION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/234130
Acceder
id CONICETDig_df412fc9742303a1cf517ab8739bb3ba
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/234130
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country studyAruguete, NataliaBatista, FlaviaCalvo, ErnestoGuizzo Altube, MatiasScartascini, CarlosVentura, TiagoFRAMINGFACT CHECKINGPANDEMIA-VACUNASCONFIRMACION REFUTACIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.8https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Previous research has extensively investigated why users spread misinformation online, while less attention has been given to the motivations behind sharing fact-checks. This article reports a four-country survey experiment assessing the infuence of confrmation and refutation frames on engagement with online fact-checks. Respondents randomly received semantically identical content, either afrming accurate information (“It is TRUE that p”) or refuting misinformation (“It is FALSE that not p”). Despite semantic equivalence, confrmation frames elicit higher engagement rates than refutation frames. Additionally, confrmation frames reduce self-reported negative emotions related to polarization. These fndings are crucial for designing policy interventions aiming to amplify factcheck exposure and reduce afective polarization, particularly in critical areas such as health-related misinformation and harmful speech.Fil: Aruguete, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencias Sociales; ArgentinaFil: Batista, Flavia. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Calvo, Ernesto. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Guizzo Altube, Matias. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados UnidosFil: Scartascini, Carlos. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados UnidosFil: Ventura, Tiago. University Of Georgetown; Estados UnidosNature2024-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/234130Aruguete, Natalia; Batista, Flavia; Calvo, Ernesto; Guizzo Altube, Matias; Scartascini, Carlos; et al.; Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study; Nature; Scientific Reports; 14; 1; 4-2024; 1-142045-2322CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-53337-0info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1038/s41598-024-53337-0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:51:20Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/234130instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:51:20.64CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study
title Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study
spellingShingle Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study
Aruguete, Natalia
FRAMING
FACT CHECKING
PANDEMIA-VACUNAS
CONFIRMACION REFUTACION
title_short Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study
title_full Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study
title_fullStr Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study
title_full_unstemmed Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study
title_sort Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Aruguete, Natalia
Batista, Flavia
Calvo, Ernesto
Guizzo Altube, Matias
Scartascini, Carlos
Ventura, Tiago
author Aruguete, Natalia
author_facet Aruguete, Natalia
Batista, Flavia
Calvo, Ernesto
Guizzo Altube, Matias
Scartascini, Carlos
Ventura, Tiago
author_role author
author2 Batista, Flavia
Calvo, Ernesto
Guizzo Altube, Matias
Scartascini, Carlos
Ventura, Tiago
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv FRAMING
FACT CHECKING
PANDEMIA-VACUNAS
CONFIRMACION REFUTACION
topic FRAMING
FACT CHECKING
PANDEMIA-VACUNAS
CONFIRMACION REFUTACION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.8
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Previous research has extensively investigated why users spread misinformation online, while less attention has been given to the motivations behind sharing fact-checks. This article reports a four-country survey experiment assessing the infuence of confrmation and refutation frames on engagement with online fact-checks. Respondents randomly received semantically identical content, either afrming accurate information (“It is TRUE that p”) or refuting misinformation (“It is FALSE that not p”). Despite semantic equivalence, confrmation frames elicit higher engagement rates than refutation frames. Additionally, confrmation frames reduce self-reported negative emotions related to polarization. These fndings are crucial for designing policy interventions aiming to amplify factcheck exposure and reduce afective polarization, particularly in critical areas such as health-related misinformation and harmful speech.
Fil: Aruguete, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencias Sociales; Argentina
Fil: Batista, Flavia. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Calvo, Ernesto. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Guizzo Altube, Matias. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados Unidos
Fil: Scartascini, Carlos. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ventura, Tiago. University Of Georgetown; Estados Unidos
description Previous research has extensively investigated why users spread misinformation online, while less attention has been given to the motivations behind sharing fact-checks. This article reports a four-country survey experiment assessing the infuence of confrmation and refutation frames on engagement with online fact-checks. Respondents randomly received semantically identical content, either afrming accurate information (“It is TRUE that p”) or refuting misinformation (“It is FALSE that not p”). Despite semantic equivalence, confrmation frames elicit higher engagement rates than refutation frames. Additionally, confrmation frames reduce self-reported negative emotions related to polarization. These fndings are crucial for designing policy interventions aiming to amplify factcheck exposure and reduce afective polarization, particularly in critical areas such as health-related misinformation and harmful speech.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/234130
Aruguete, Natalia; Batista, Flavia; Calvo, Ernesto; Guizzo Altube, Matias; Scartascini, Carlos; et al.; Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study; Nature; Scientific Reports; 14; 1; 4-2024; 1-14
2045-2322
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/234130
identifier_str_mv Aruguete, Natalia; Batista, Flavia; Calvo, Ernesto; Guizzo Altube, Matias; Scartascini, Carlos; et al.; Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study; Nature; Scientific Reports; 14; 1; 4-2024; 1-14
2045-2322
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-53337-0
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1038/s41598-024-53337-0
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Nature
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Nature
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782199160897536
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares