Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener

Autores
Rosenberger, Nick M.; Aizen, Marcelo Adrian; Dickson, Rachel G.; Harder, Lawrence
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
While feeding, foragers can alter their environment. Such alteration constitutes ecological niche construction (ENC) if it enables future benefits for the constructor and conspecific individuals. The environmental modification may also affect non-constructing, bystander species, especially if they share resources with constructor species. If so, ENC could confer the constructor species a competitive advantage by both enhancing its foraging returns and reducing those of bystander species. Expectations – (E1) ENC frequency should vary positively with the recent and current density of the constructor species, and (E2) constructors should use modifications disproportionately. In contrast, bystanders should (E3) experience intensified competition for the affected resource, and (E4) exhibit diverse, possibly mitigating, responses to ENC, depending on opportunity and relative benefits. We investigated these expectations in Argentina for competition for Fuchsia magellanica nectar between an invasive bumble bee Bombus terrestris (terr: putative constructor), which often bites holes at the bases of floral tubes to rob nectar, and native B. dahlbomii (dahl: bystander), which normally accesses Fuchsia nectar through the flower mouth (front visits). Robbing holes constitute ENC, as they persist until the 7-day flowers wilt. The dynamics of the incidence of robbed flowers, abundance of both bees and the number and types of their flower visits (front or robbing) were characterised by alternate-day surveys of plants during 2.5 months. After initially accessing Fuchsia nectar via front visits, terr switched to robbing and its abundance on Fuchsia increased 20-fold within 10 days (E2). Correspondingly, the incidence of robbed flowers varied positively with recent and past terr abundance (E1). In contrast, dahl abundance remained low and varied negatively with the incidence of robbed flowers (E3). When terr ceased visiting Fuchsia, dahl abundance increased sixfold within 10 days (E3), possibly because many dahl previously had avoided competition with terr by feeding on other plant species (E4). While terr was present, dahl on Fuchsia used front visits (tolerance) or used existing robbing holes (adoption: E4). The diverse dahl responses suggest partial compensation for competition with terr. ENC alters competitive asymmetry, favouring constructor species. However, bystander responses can partially offset this advantage, perhaps facilitating coexistence.
Fil: Rosenberger, Nick M.. University of Calgary. Departament of Biological Sciences; Canadá. University of California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Aizen, Marcelo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Dickson, Rachel G.. University of Montana; Estados Unidos. Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory; Estados Unidos
Fil: Harder, Lawrence. University of Calgary. Departament of Biological Sciences; Canadá
Materia
BUMBLE BEE
ECOLOGICAL NICHE CONSTRUCTION
EXPLOITATION COMPETITION
INVASIVE SPECIES
NECTAR ROBBING
SOUTHERN SOUTH AMERICA
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/231254

id CONICETDig_dd5ae7c2cdbb70cff10af73cef32b5fe
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/231254
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congenerRosenberger, Nick M.Aizen, Marcelo AdrianDickson, Rachel G.Harder, LawrenceBUMBLE BEEECOLOGICAL NICHE CONSTRUCTIONEXPLOITATION COMPETITIONINVASIVE SPECIESNECTAR ROBBINGSOUTHERN SOUTH AMERICAhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1While feeding, foragers can alter their environment. Such alteration constitutes ecological niche construction (ENC) if it enables future benefits for the constructor and conspecific individuals. The environmental modification may also affect non-constructing, bystander species, especially if they share resources with constructor species. If so, ENC could confer the constructor species a competitive advantage by both enhancing its foraging returns and reducing those of bystander species. Expectations – (E1) ENC frequency should vary positively with the recent and current density of the constructor species, and (E2) constructors should use modifications disproportionately. In contrast, bystanders should (E3) experience intensified competition for the affected resource, and (E4) exhibit diverse, possibly mitigating, responses to ENC, depending on opportunity and relative benefits. We investigated these expectations in Argentina for competition for Fuchsia magellanica nectar between an invasive bumble bee Bombus terrestris (terr: putative constructor), which often bites holes at the bases of floral tubes to rob nectar, and native B. dahlbomii (dahl: bystander), which normally accesses Fuchsia nectar through the flower mouth (front visits). Robbing holes constitute ENC, as they persist until the 7-day flowers wilt. The dynamics of the incidence of robbed flowers, abundance of both bees and the number and types of their flower visits (front or robbing) were characterised by alternate-day surveys of plants during 2.5 months. After initially accessing Fuchsia nectar via front visits, terr switched to robbing and its abundance on Fuchsia increased 20-fold within 10 days (E2). Correspondingly, the incidence of robbed flowers varied positively with recent and past terr abundance (E1). In contrast, dahl abundance remained low and varied negatively with the incidence of robbed flowers (E3). When terr ceased visiting Fuchsia, dahl abundance increased sixfold within 10 days (E3), possibly because many dahl previously had avoided competition with terr by feeding on other plant species (E4). While terr was present, dahl on Fuchsia used front visits (tolerance) or used existing robbing holes (adoption: E4). The diverse dahl responses suggest partial compensation for competition with terr. ENC alters competitive asymmetry, favouring constructor species. However, bystander responses can partially offset this advantage, perhaps facilitating coexistence.Fil: Rosenberger, Nick M.. University of Calgary. Departament of Biological Sciences; Canadá. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Aizen, Marcelo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; ArgentinaFil: Dickson, Rachel G.. University of Montana; Estados Unidos. Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory; Estados UnidosFil: Harder, Lawrence. University of Calgary. Departament of Biological Sciences; CanadáWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2022-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/231254Rosenberger, Nick M.; Aizen, Marcelo Adrian; Dickson, Rachel G.; Harder, Lawrence; Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Journal Of Animal Ecology; 91; 3; 3-2022; 580-5920021-87901365-2656CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13646info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13646info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:38:58Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/231254instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:38:59.171CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener
title Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener
spellingShingle Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener
Rosenberger, Nick M.
BUMBLE BEE
ECOLOGICAL NICHE CONSTRUCTION
EXPLOITATION COMPETITION
INVASIVE SPECIES
NECTAR ROBBING
SOUTHERN SOUTH AMERICA
title_short Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener
title_full Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener
title_fullStr Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener
title_full_unstemmed Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener
title_sort Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rosenberger, Nick M.
Aizen, Marcelo Adrian
Dickson, Rachel G.
Harder, Lawrence
author Rosenberger, Nick M.
author_facet Rosenberger, Nick M.
Aizen, Marcelo Adrian
Dickson, Rachel G.
Harder, Lawrence
author_role author
author2 Aizen, Marcelo Adrian
Dickson, Rachel G.
Harder, Lawrence
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv BUMBLE BEE
ECOLOGICAL NICHE CONSTRUCTION
EXPLOITATION COMPETITION
INVASIVE SPECIES
NECTAR ROBBING
SOUTHERN SOUTH AMERICA
topic BUMBLE BEE
ECOLOGICAL NICHE CONSTRUCTION
EXPLOITATION COMPETITION
INVASIVE SPECIES
NECTAR ROBBING
SOUTHERN SOUTH AMERICA
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv While feeding, foragers can alter their environment. Such alteration constitutes ecological niche construction (ENC) if it enables future benefits for the constructor and conspecific individuals. The environmental modification may also affect non-constructing, bystander species, especially if they share resources with constructor species. If so, ENC could confer the constructor species a competitive advantage by both enhancing its foraging returns and reducing those of bystander species. Expectations – (E1) ENC frequency should vary positively with the recent and current density of the constructor species, and (E2) constructors should use modifications disproportionately. In contrast, bystanders should (E3) experience intensified competition for the affected resource, and (E4) exhibit diverse, possibly mitigating, responses to ENC, depending on opportunity and relative benefits. We investigated these expectations in Argentina for competition for Fuchsia magellanica nectar between an invasive bumble bee Bombus terrestris (terr: putative constructor), which often bites holes at the bases of floral tubes to rob nectar, and native B. dahlbomii (dahl: bystander), which normally accesses Fuchsia nectar through the flower mouth (front visits). Robbing holes constitute ENC, as they persist until the 7-day flowers wilt. The dynamics of the incidence of robbed flowers, abundance of both bees and the number and types of their flower visits (front or robbing) were characterised by alternate-day surveys of plants during 2.5 months. After initially accessing Fuchsia nectar via front visits, terr switched to robbing and its abundance on Fuchsia increased 20-fold within 10 days (E2). Correspondingly, the incidence of robbed flowers varied positively with recent and past terr abundance (E1). In contrast, dahl abundance remained low and varied negatively with the incidence of robbed flowers (E3). When terr ceased visiting Fuchsia, dahl abundance increased sixfold within 10 days (E3), possibly because many dahl previously had avoided competition with terr by feeding on other plant species (E4). While terr was present, dahl on Fuchsia used front visits (tolerance) or used existing robbing holes (adoption: E4). The diverse dahl responses suggest partial compensation for competition with terr. ENC alters competitive asymmetry, favouring constructor species. However, bystander responses can partially offset this advantage, perhaps facilitating coexistence.
Fil: Rosenberger, Nick M.. University of Calgary. Departament of Biological Sciences; Canadá. University of California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Aizen, Marcelo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Dickson, Rachel G.. University of Montana; Estados Unidos. Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory; Estados Unidos
Fil: Harder, Lawrence. University of Calgary. Departament of Biological Sciences; Canadá
description While feeding, foragers can alter their environment. Such alteration constitutes ecological niche construction (ENC) if it enables future benefits for the constructor and conspecific individuals. The environmental modification may also affect non-constructing, bystander species, especially if they share resources with constructor species. If so, ENC could confer the constructor species a competitive advantage by both enhancing its foraging returns and reducing those of bystander species. Expectations – (E1) ENC frequency should vary positively with the recent and current density of the constructor species, and (E2) constructors should use modifications disproportionately. In contrast, bystanders should (E3) experience intensified competition for the affected resource, and (E4) exhibit diverse, possibly mitigating, responses to ENC, depending on opportunity and relative benefits. We investigated these expectations in Argentina for competition for Fuchsia magellanica nectar between an invasive bumble bee Bombus terrestris (terr: putative constructor), which often bites holes at the bases of floral tubes to rob nectar, and native B. dahlbomii (dahl: bystander), which normally accesses Fuchsia nectar through the flower mouth (front visits). Robbing holes constitute ENC, as they persist until the 7-day flowers wilt. The dynamics of the incidence of robbed flowers, abundance of both bees and the number and types of their flower visits (front or robbing) were characterised by alternate-day surveys of plants during 2.5 months. After initially accessing Fuchsia nectar via front visits, terr switched to robbing and its abundance on Fuchsia increased 20-fold within 10 days (E2). Correspondingly, the incidence of robbed flowers varied positively with recent and past terr abundance (E1). In contrast, dahl abundance remained low and varied negatively with the incidence of robbed flowers (E3). When terr ceased visiting Fuchsia, dahl abundance increased sixfold within 10 days (E3), possibly because many dahl previously had avoided competition with terr by feeding on other plant species (E4). While terr was present, dahl on Fuchsia used front visits (tolerance) or used existing robbing holes (adoption: E4). The diverse dahl responses suggest partial compensation for competition with terr. ENC alters competitive asymmetry, favouring constructor species. However, bystander responses can partially offset this advantage, perhaps facilitating coexistence.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/231254
Rosenberger, Nick M.; Aizen, Marcelo Adrian; Dickson, Rachel G.; Harder, Lawrence; Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Journal Of Animal Ecology; 91; 3; 3-2022; 580-592
0021-8790
1365-2656
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/231254
identifier_str_mv Rosenberger, Nick M.; Aizen, Marcelo Adrian; Dickson, Rachel G.; Harder, Lawrence; Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Journal Of Animal Ecology; 91; 3; 3-2022; 580-592
0021-8790
1365-2656
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13646
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13646
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614413917618176
score 13.070432