Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener
- Autores
- Rosenberger, Nick M.; Aizen, Marcelo Adrian; Dickson, Rachel G.; Harder, Lawrence
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- While feeding, foragers can alter their environment. Such alteration constitutes ecological niche construction (ENC) if it enables future benefits for the constructor and conspecific individuals. The environmental modification may also affect non-constructing, bystander species, especially if they share resources with constructor species. If so, ENC could confer the constructor species a competitive advantage by both enhancing its foraging returns and reducing those of bystander species. Expectations – (E1) ENC frequency should vary positively with the recent and current density of the constructor species, and (E2) constructors should use modifications disproportionately. In contrast, bystanders should (E3) experience intensified competition for the affected resource, and (E4) exhibit diverse, possibly mitigating, responses to ENC, depending on opportunity and relative benefits. We investigated these expectations in Argentina for competition for Fuchsia magellanica nectar between an invasive bumble bee Bombus terrestris (terr: putative constructor), which often bites holes at the bases of floral tubes to rob nectar, and native B. dahlbomii (dahl: bystander), which normally accesses Fuchsia nectar through the flower mouth (front visits). Robbing holes constitute ENC, as they persist until the 7-day flowers wilt. The dynamics of the incidence of robbed flowers, abundance of both bees and the number and types of their flower visits (front or robbing) were characterised by alternate-day surveys of plants during 2.5 months. After initially accessing Fuchsia nectar via front visits, terr switched to robbing and its abundance on Fuchsia increased 20-fold within 10 days (E2). Correspondingly, the incidence of robbed flowers varied positively with recent and past terr abundance (E1). In contrast, dahl abundance remained low and varied negatively with the incidence of robbed flowers (E3). When terr ceased visiting Fuchsia, dahl abundance increased sixfold within 10 days (E3), possibly because many dahl previously had avoided competition with terr by feeding on other plant species (E4). While terr was present, dahl on Fuchsia used front visits (tolerance) or used existing robbing holes (adoption: E4). The diverse dahl responses suggest partial compensation for competition with terr. ENC alters competitive asymmetry, favouring constructor species. However, bystander responses can partially offset this advantage, perhaps facilitating coexistence.
Fil: Rosenberger, Nick M.. University of Calgary. Departament of Biological Sciences; Canadá. University of California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Aizen, Marcelo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Dickson, Rachel G.. University of Montana; Estados Unidos. Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory; Estados Unidos
Fil: Harder, Lawrence. University of Calgary. Departament of Biological Sciences; Canadá - Materia
-
BUMBLE BEE
ECOLOGICAL NICHE CONSTRUCTION
EXPLOITATION COMPETITION
INVASIVE SPECIES
NECTAR ROBBING
SOUTHERN SOUTH AMERICA - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/231254
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_dd5ae7c2cdbb70cff10af73cef32b5fe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/231254 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congenerRosenberger, Nick M.Aizen, Marcelo AdrianDickson, Rachel G.Harder, LawrenceBUMBLE BEEECOLOGICAL NICHE CONSTRUCTIONEXPLOITATION COMPETITIONINVASIVE SPECIESNECTAR ROBBINGSOUTHERN SOUTH AMERICAhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1While feeding, foragers can alter their environment. Such alteration constitutes ecological niche construction (ENC) if it enables future benefits for the constructor and conspecific individuals. The environmental modification may also affect non-constructing, bystander species, especially if they share resources with constructor species. If so, ENC could confer the constructor species a competitive advantage by both enhancing its foraging returns and reducing those of bystander species. Expectations – (E1) ENC frequency should vary positively with the recent and current density of the constructor species, and (E2) constructors should use modifications disproportionately. In contrast, bystanders should (E3) experience intensified competition for the affected resource, and (E4) exhibit diverse, possibly mitigating, responses to ENC, depending on opportunity and relative benefits. We investigated these expectations in Argentina for competition for Fuchsia magellanica nectar between an invasive bumble bee Bombus terrestris (terr: putative constructor), which often bites holes at the bases of floral tubes to rob nectar, and native B. dahlbomii (dahl: bystander), which normally accesses Fuchsia nectar through the flower mouth (front visits). Robbing holes constitute ENC, as they persist until the 7-day flowers wilt. The dynamics of the incidence of robbed flowers, abundance of both bees and the number and types of their flower visits (front or robbing) were characterised by alternate-day surveys of plants during 2.5 months. After initially accessing Fuchsia nectar via front visits, terr switched to robbing and its abundance on Fuchsia increased 20-fold within 10 days (E2). Correspondingly, the incidence of robbed flowers varied positively with recent and past terr abundance (E1). In contrast, dahl abundance remained low and varied negatively with the incidence of robbed flowers (E3). When terr ceased visiting Fuchsia, dahl abundance increased sixfold within 10 days (E3), possibly because many dahl previously had avoided competition with terr by feeding on other plant species (E4). While terr was present, dahl on Fuchsia used front visits (tolerance) or used existing robbing holes (adoption: E4). The diverse dahl responses suggest partial compensation for competition with terr. ENC alters competitive asymmetry, favouring constructor species. However, bystander responses can partially offset this advantage, perhaps facilitating coexistence.Fil: Rosenberger, Nick M.. University of Calgary. Departament of Biological Sciences; Canadá. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Aizen, Marcelo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; ArgentinaFil: Dickson, Rachel G.. University of Montana; Estados Unidos. Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory; Estados UnidosFil: Harder, Lawrence. University of Calgary. Departament of Biological Sciences; CanadáWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2022-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/231254Rosenberger, Nick M.; Aizen, Marcelo Adrian; Dickson, Rachel G.; Harder, Lawrence; Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Journal Of Animal Ecology; 91; 3; 3-2022; 580-5920021-87901365-2656CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13646info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13646info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:38:58Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/231254instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:38:59.171CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener |
title |
Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener |
spellingShingle |
Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener Rosenberger, Nick M. BUMBLE BEE ECOLOGICAL NICHE CONSTRUCTION EXPLOITATION COMPETITION INVASIVE SPECIES NECTAR ROBBING SOUTHERN SOUTH AMERICA |
title_short |
Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener |
title_full |
Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener |
title_fullStr |
Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener |
title_full_unstemmed |
Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener |
title_sort |
Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Rosenberger, Nick M. Aizen, Marcelo Adrian Dickson, Rachel G. Harder, Lawrence |
author |
Rosenberger, Nick M. |
author_facet |
Rosenberger, Nick M. Aizen, Marcelo Adrian Dickson, Rachel G. Harder, Lawrence |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Aizen, Marcelo Adrian Dickson, Rachel G. Harder, Lawrence |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
BUMBLE BEE ECOLOGICAL NICHE CONSTRUCTION EXPLOITATION COMPETITION INVASIVE SPECIES NECTAR ROBBING SOUTHERN SOUTH AMERICA |
topic |
BUMBLE BEE ECOLOGICAL NICHE CONSTRUCTION EXPLOITATION COMPETITION INVASIVE SPECIES NECTAR ROBBING SOUTHERN SOUTH AMERICA |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
While feeding, foragers can alter their environment. Such alteration constitutes ecological niche construction (ENC) if it enables future benefits for the constructor and conspecific individuals. The environmental modification may also affect non-constructing, bystander species, especially if they share resources with constructor species. If so, ENC could confer the constructor species a competitive advantage by both enhancing its foraging returns and reducing those of bystander species. Expectations – (E1) ENC frequency should vary positively with the recent and current density of the constructor species, and (E2) constructors should use modifications disproportionately. In contrast, bystanders should (E3) experience intensified competition for the affected resource, and (E4) exhibit diverse, possibly mitigating, responses to ENC, depending on opportunity and relative benefits. We investigated these expectations in Argentina for competition for Fuchsia magellanica nectar between an invasive bumble bee Bombus terrestris (terr: putative constructor), which often bites holes at the bases of floral tubes to rob nectar, and native B. dahlbomii (dahl: bystander), which normally accesses Fuchsia nectar through the flower mouth (front visits). Robbing holes constitute ENC, as they persist until the 7-day flowers wilt. The dynamics of the incidence of robbed flowers, abundance of both bees and the number and types of their flower visits (front or robbing) were characterised by alternate-day surveys of plants during 2.5 months. After initially accessing Fuchsia nectar via front visits, terr switched to robbing and its abundance on Fuchsia increased 20-fold within 10 days (E2). Correspondingly, the incidence of robbed flowers varied positively with recent and past terr abundance (E1). In contrast, dahl abundance remained low and varied negatively with the incidence of robbed flowers (E3). When terr ceased visiting Fuchsia, dahl abundance increased sixfold within 10 days (E3), possibly because many dahl previously had avoided competition with terr by feeding on other plant species (E4). While terr was present, dahl on Fuchsia used front visits (tolerance) or used existing robbing holes (adoption: E4). The diverse dahl responses suggest partial compensation for competition with terr. ENC alters competitive asymmetry, favouring constructor species. However, bystander responses can partially offset this advantage, perhaps facilitating coexistence. Fil: Rosenberger, Nick M.. University of Calgary. Departament of Biological Sciences; Canadá. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Aizen, Marcelo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina Fil: Dickson, Rachel G.. University of Montana; Estados Unidos. Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory; Estados Unidos Fil: Harder, Lawrence. University of Calgary. Departament of Biological Sciences; Canadá |
description |
While feeding, foragers can alter their environment. Such alteration constitutes ecological niche construction (ENC) if it enables future benefits for the constructor and conspecific individuals. The environmental modification may also affect non-constructing, bystander species, especially if they share resources with constructor species. If so, ENC could confer the constructor species a competitive advantage by both enhancing its foraging returns and reducing those of bystander species. Expectations – (E1) ENC frequency should vary positively with the recent and current density of the constructor species, and (E2) constructors should use modifications disproportionately. In contrast, bystanders should (E3) experience intensified competition for the affected resource, and (E4) exhibit diverse, possibly mitigating, responses to ENC, depending on opportunity and relative benefits. We investigated these expectations in Argentina for competition for Fuchsia magellanica nectar between an invasive bumble bee Bombus terrestris (terr: putative constructor), which often bites holes at the bases of floral tubes to rob nectar, and native B. dahlbomii (dahl: bystander), which normally accesses Fuchsia nectar through the flower mouth (front visits). Robbing holes constitute ENC, as they persist until the 7-day flowers wilt. The dynamics of the incidence of robbed flowers, abundance of both bees and the number and types of their flower visits (front or robbing) were characterised by alternate-day surveys of plants during 2.5 months. After initially accessing Fuchsia nectar via front visits, terr switched to robbing and its abundance on Fuchsia increased 20-fold within 10 days (E2). Correspondingly, the incidence of robbed flowers varied positively with recent and past terr abundance (E1). In contrast, dahl abundance remained low and varied negatively with the incidence of robbed flowers (E3). When terr ceased visiting Fuchsia, dahl abundance increased sixfold within 10 days (E3), possibly because many dahl previously had avoided competition with terr by feeding on other plant species (E4). While terr was present, dahl on Fuchsia used front visits (tolerance) or used existing robbing holes (adoption: E4). The diverse dahl responses suggest partial compensation for competition with terr. ENC alters competitive asymmetry, favouring constructor species. However, bystander responses can partially offset this advantage, perhaps facilitating coexistence. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/231254 Rosenberger, Nick M.; Aizen, Marcelo Adrian; Dickson, Rachel G.; Harder, Lawrence; Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Journal Of Animal Ecology; 91; 3; 3-2022; 580-592 0021-8790 1365-2656 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/231254 |
identifier_str_mv |
Rosenberger, Nick M.; Aizen, Marcelo Adrian; Dickson, Rachel G.; Harder, Lawrence; Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Journal Of Animal Ecology; 91; 3; 3-2022; 580-592 0021-8790 1365-2656 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13646 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13646 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614413917618176 |
score |
13.070432 |