Population Sex Ratios: Another Consideration in the Reintroduction – Reinforcement Debate?

Autores
Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin; Carrete, Martina; Speziale, Karina Lilian; Hiraldo, Fernando; Donázar, José Antonio
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Reintroduction or reinforcement (RorR) of wild populations is a common conservation strategy. Many conservation projects involve the release of individuals of poorly studied species. This may lead to inefficient results or negative impacts on the conservation efforts. Here, we provide new insights into the conservation implications and potential consequences of a skew in the sex ratio of released birds and of the number of birds supplemented for the demography of a long-lived dimorphic bird species, the Andean condor (Vultur gryphus). We demonstrate that a RorR conservation program may be less effective in conserving a species if the sex ratios of the releases and the recipient populations are not considered. We also show that releases can reduce population declines but only if carried out over long periods (i.e., several decades). This can mean high costs for release programs and the added challenge of maintaining programs over time. If RorR programs are to be implemented, bearing in mind the importance of properly assessing their effectiveness, we urge conservation researchers and managers to consider the implications of sex ratio biases for wild populations, and particularly for dimorphic species with sexually despotic behaviour.
Fil: Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin. Consejo Nacional de Invest.cientif.y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnol.conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Invest.en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente;
Fil: Carrete, Martina. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas. Estacion Biologica de Doñana. España;
Fil: Speziale, Karina Lilian. Consejo Nacional de Invest.cientif.y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnol.conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Invest.en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente;
Fil: Hiraldo, Fernando. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas. Estacion Biologica de Doñana. España;
Fil: Donázar, José Antonio. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas. Estacion Biologica de Doñana. España;
Materia
ANDEAN CONDOR
REINTRODUCTION
REINFORCEMENT
SEX RATIO
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/558

id CONICETDig_dae248b424dd05973330deed5d4583c1
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/558
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Population Sex Ratios: Another Consideration in the Reintroduction – Reinforcement Debate?Lambertucci, Sergio AgustinCarrete, MartinaSpeziale, Karina LilianHiraldo, FernandoDonázar, José AntonioANDEAN CONDORREINTRODUCTIONREINFORCEMENTSEX RATIOhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6Reintroduction or reinforcement (RorR) of wild populations is a common conservation strategy. Many conservation projects involve the release of individuals of poorly studied species. This may lead to inefficient results or negative impacts on the conservation efforts. Here, we provide new insights into the conservation implications and potential consequences of a skew in the sex ratio of released birds and of the number of birds supplemented for the demography of a long-lived dimorphic bird species, the Andean condor (Vultur gryphus). We demonstrate that a RorR conservation program may be less effective in conserving a species if the sex ratios of the releases and the recipient populations are not considered. We also show that releases can reduce population declines but only if carried out over long periods (i.e., several decades). This can mean high costs for release programs and the added challenge of maintaining programs over time. If RorR programs are to be implemented, bearing in mind the importance of properly assessing their effectiveness, we urge conservation researchers and managers to consider the implications of sex ratio biases for wild populations, and particularly for dimorphic species with sexually despotic behaviour.Fil: Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin. Consejo Nacional de Invest.cientif.y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnol.conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Invest.en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente;Fil: Carrete, Martina. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas. Estacion Biologica de Doñana. España;Fil: Speziale, Karina Lilian. Consejo Nacional de Invest.cientif.y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnol.conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Invest.en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente;Fil: Hiraldo, Fernando. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas. Estacion Biologica de Doñana. España;Fil: Donázar, José Antonio. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas. Estacion Biologica de Doñana. España;Public Library Science2013-09-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/558Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin; Carrete, Martina; Speziale, Karina Lilian; Hiraldo, Fernando; Donázar, José Antonio; Population Sex Ratios: Another Consideration in the Reintroduction – Reinforcement Debate?; Public Library Science; Plos One; 8; 9; 26-9-2013; 1-7;1932-6203enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0075821info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:52:15Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/558instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:52:15.914CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Population Sex Ratios: Another Consideration in the Reintroduction – Reinforcement Debate?
title Population Sex Ratios: Another Consideration in the Reintroduction – Reinforcement Debate?
spellingShingle Population Sex Ratios: Another Consideration in the Reintroduction – Reinforcement Debate?
Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin
ANDEAN CONDOR
REINTRODUCTION
REINFORCEMENT
SEX RATIO
title_short Population Sex Ratios: Another Consideration in the Reintroduction – Reinforcement Debate?
title_full Population Sex Ratios: Another Consideration in the Reintroduction – Reinforcement Debate?
title_fullStr Population Sex Ratios: Another Consideration in the Reintroduction – Reinforcement Debate?
title_full_unstemmed Population Sex Ratios: Another Consideration in the Reintroduction – Reinforcement Debate?
title_sort Population Sex Ratios: Another Consideration in the Reintroduction – Reinforcement Debate?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin
Carrete, Martina
Speziale, Karina Lilian
Hiraldo, Fernando
Donázar, José Antonio
author Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin
author_facet Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin
Carrete, Martina
Speziale, Karina Lilian
Hiraldo, Fernando
Donázar, José Antonio
author_role author
author2 Carrete, Martina
Speziale, Karina Lilian
Hiraldo, Fernando
Donázar, José Antonio
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ANDEAN CONDOR
REINTRODUCTION
REINFORCEMENT
SEX RATIO
topic ANDEAN CONDOR
REINTRODUCTION
REINFORCEMENT
SEX RATIO
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Reintroduction or reinforcement (RorR) of wild populations is a common conservation strategy. Many conservation projects involve the release of individuals of poorly studied species. This may lead to inefficient results or negative impacts on the conservation efforts. Here, we provide new insights into the conservation implications and potential consequences of a skew in the sex ratio of released birds and of the number of birds supplemented for the demography of a long-lived dimorphic bird species, the Andean condor (Vultur gryphus). We demonstrate that a RorR conservation program may be less effective in conserving a species if the sex ratios of the releases and the recipient populations are not considered. We also show that releases can reduce population declines but only if carried out over long periods (i.e., several decades). This can mean high costs for release programs and the added challenge of maintaining programs over time. If RorR programs are to be implemented, bearing in mind the importance of properly assessing their effectiveness, we urge conservation researchers and managers to consider the implications of sex ratio biases for wild populations, and particularly for dimorphic species with sexually despotic behaviour.
Fil: Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin. Consejo Nacional de Invest.cientif.y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnol.conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Invest.en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente;
Fil: Carrete, Martina. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas. Estacion Biologica de Doñana. España;
Fil: Speziale, Karina Lilian. Consejo Nacional de Invest.cientif.y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnol.conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Invest.en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente;
Fil: Hiraldo, Fernando. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas. Estacion Biologica de Doñana. España;
Fil: Donázar, José Antonio. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas. Estacion Biologica de Doñana. España;
description Reintroduction or reinforcement (RorR) of wild populations is a common conservation strategy. Many conservation projects involve the release of individuals of poorly studied species. This may lead to inefficient results or negative impacts on the conservation efforts. Here, we provide new insights into the conservation implications and potential consequences of a skew in the sex ratio of released birds and of the number of birds supplemented for the demography of a long-lived dimorphic bird species, the Andean condor (Vultur gryphus). We demonstrate that a RorR conservation program may be less effective in conserving a species if the sex ratios of the releases and the recipient populations are not considered. We also show that releases can reduce population declines but only if carried out over long periods (i.e., several decades). This can mean high costs for release programs and the added challenge of maintaining programs over time. If RorR programs are to be implemented, bearing in mind the importance of properly assessing their effectiveness, we urge conservation researchers and managers to consider the implications of sex ratio biases for wild populations, and particularly for dimorphic species with sexually despotic behaviour.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-09-26
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/558
Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin; Carrete, Martina; Speziale, Karina Lilian; Hiraldo, Fernando; Donázar, José Antonio; Population Sex Ratios: Another Consideration in the Reintroduction – Reinforcement Debate?; Public Library Science; Plos One; 8; 9; 26-9-2013; 1-7;
1932-6203
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/558
identifier_str_mv Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin; Carrete, Martina; Speziale, Karina Lilian; Hiraldo, Fernando; Donázar, José Antonio; Population Sex Ratios: Another Consideration in the Reintroduction – Reinforcement Debate?; Public Library Science; Plos One; 8; 9; 26-9-2013; 1-7;
1932-6203
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0075821
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269147185020928
score 13.13397