Comparative overview of lighting credits from WELL environmental assessment method

Autores
Ruiz, Verónica Jimena; Rodriguez, Roberto Germán; Pattini, Andrea Elvira
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Beyond an energy-centric perspective, Building Environmental Assessment Methods (BEAM) may contribute to the achievement of healthier indoor built environments, allowing building sustainability to reach its full potential as a public health transformation tool. The objective of this paper is to characterize WELL V2 by means of two-stage heuristic analysis method (i.e. based on expert criteria): (i) a qualitative screening based on seven dimensions of analysis and (ii) a 0-100 quantitative assessment of nine dimensions of analysis. Our first stage results showed that WELL fulfilled all of the proposed criteria for other more established BEAM. Stage two results showed an overall score of 68, below LEED and BREEAM scores from the literature, and above CASBEE, HK-BEAM, and GREENSTAR. In terms of applicability, WELL lacks of lifecycle related criteria. WELL V2 showed a good comparative performance among BEAMs, placing it as a seminal method for the creation of new and more suitable wellbeing and health labelling systems, mimicking the role BREEAM played at the end of the 20th century. KEYWORDS: Integrative Lighting, Environmental Assessment Method, Overview
Beyond an energy - centric perspective, Building Environmental Assessment Methods (BEAM) may contribute to the achievement of healthier indoor built environments, allowing building sustainability to reach its full potential as a public health transformation too l. The objecti ve of this paper is to characterize WELL V2 by means of two -stage heuristic analysis method (i.e. based on expert criteria): (i) a qualitative screening based on seven dimensions of analysis and (ii) a 0 -100 quantitative assessment of nine dimensions of an alysis. Our first stage results showed that WELL fulfilled all of the proposed criteria for other more established BEAM. Stage two results showed an overall score of 68, below LEED and BREEAM scores from the literature, and above CASBEE, HK-BEAM, and GREEN STAR. In terms of applicability, WELL lack s of lifecycle related criteria. WELL V2 showed a good comparative performance among BEAMs, placing it as a seminal method for the creation of new and more suitable wellbeing and health labelling systems, mimicking the role BREEAM played at the end of the 20th century.
Fil: Ruiz, Verónica Jimena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ambiente, Hábitat y Energía; Argentina
Fil: Rodriguez, Roberto Germán. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ambiente, Hábitat y Energía; Argentina
Fil: Pattini, Andrea Elvira. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ambiente, Hábitat y Energía; Argentina
Passive and Low Energy Architecture: Will cities survive? The future of sustainable buildings and urbanism in the age of emergency
Santiago de Chile
Chile
Passive and Low Energy Architecture
Centro de Desarrollo Urbano Sustentable
Pontífica Universidad Católica de Chile. Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Estudios Urbanos
Universidad de Concepción
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Materia
LIGHTING
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT mETHOD
OVERVIEW
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/231974
Acceder
id CONICETDig_da2c3215a8832267a8bfbcd2eb713a4e
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/231974
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Comparative overview of lighting credits from WELL environmental assessment methodRuiz, Verónica JimenaRodriguez, Roberto GermánPattini, Andrea ElviraLIGHTINGENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT mETHODOVERVIEWhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.11https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2Beyond an energy-centric perspective, Building Environmental Assessment Methods (BEAM) may contribute to the achievement of healthier indoor built environments, allowing building sustainability to reach its full potential as a public health transformation tool. The objective of this paper is to characterize WELL V2 by means of two-stage heuristic analysis method (i.e. based on expert criteria): (i) a qualitative screening based on seven dimensions of analysis and (ii) a 0-100 quantitative assessment of nine dimensions of analysis. Our first stage results showed that WELL fulfilled all of the proposed criteria for other more established BEAM. Stage two results showed an overall score of 68, below LEED and BREEAM scores from the literature, and above CASBEE, HK-BEAM, and GREENSTAR. In terms of applicability, WELL lacks of lifecycle related criteria. WELL V2 showed a good comparative performance among BEAMs, placing it as a seminal method for the creation of new and more suitable wellbeing and health labelling systems, mimicking the role BREEAM played at the end of the 20th century. KEYWORDS: Integrative Lighting, Environmental Assessment Method, OverviewBeyond an energy - centric perspective, Building Environmental Assessment Methods (BEAM) may contribute to the achievement of healthier indoor built environments, allowing building sustainability to reach its full potential as a public health transformation too l. The objecti ve of this paper is to characterize WELL V2 by means of two -stage heuristic analysis method (i.e. based on expert criteria): (i) a qualitative screening based on seven dimensions of analysis and (ii) a 0 -100 quantitative assessment of nine dimensions of an alysis. Our first stage results showed that WELL fulfilled all of the proposed criteria for other more established BEAM. Stage two results showed an overall score of 68, below LEED and BREEAM scores from the literature, and above CASBEE, HK-BEAM, and GREEN STAR. In terms of applicability, WELL lack s of lifecycle related criteria. WELL V2 showed a good comparative performance among BEAMs, placing it as a seminal method for the creation of new and more suitable wellbeing and health labelling systems, mimicking the role BREEAM played at the end of the 20th century.Fil: Ruiz, Verónica Jimena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ambiente, Hábitat y Energía; ArgentinaFil: Rodriguez, Roberto Germán. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ambiente, Hábitat y Energía; ArgentinaFil: Pattini, Andrea Elvira. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ambiente, Hábitat y Energía; ArgentinaPassive and Low Energy Architecture: Will cities survive? The future of sustainable buildings and urbanism in the age of emergencySantiago de ChileChilePassive and Low Energy ArchitectureCentro de Desarrollo Urbano SustentablePontífica Universidad Católica de Chile. Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Estudios UrbanosUniversidad de ConcepciónAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloPassive and Low Energy ArchitectureBustamante, WaldoAndrade, MarianaOrtiz, Pablo E.2022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectConferenciaBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/231974Comparative overview of lighting credits from WELL environmental assessment method; Passive and Low Energy Architecture: Will cities survive? The future of sustainable buildings and urbanism in the age of emergency; Santiago de Chile; Chile; 2022; 768-772978-956-14-3068-6CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://plea2022.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/PROCEEDING-ONLINE-FINAL-MARZO.pdfInternacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:39:12Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/231974instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:39:12.365CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative overview of lighting credits from WELL environmental assessment method
title Comparative overview of lighting credits from WELL environmental assessment method
spellingShingle Comparative overview of lighting credits from WELL environmental assessment method
Ruiz, Verónica Jimena
LIGHTING
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT mETHOD
OVERVIEW
title_short Comparative overview of lighting credits from WELL environmental assessment method
title_full Comparative overview of lighting credits from WELL environmental assessment method
title_fullStr Comparative overview of lighting credits from WELL environmental assessment method
title_full_unstemmed Comparative overview of lighting credits from WELL environmental assessment method
title_sort Comparative overview of lighting credits from WELL environmental assessment method
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ruiz, Verónica Jimena
Rodriguez, Roberto Germán
Pattini, Andrea Elvira
author Ruiz, Verónica Jimena
author_facet Ruiz, Verónica Jimena
Rodriguez, Roberto Germán
Pattini, Andrea Elvira
author_role author
author2 Rodriguez, Roberto Germán
Pattini, Andrea Elvira
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Bustamante, Waldo
Andrade, Mariana
Ortiz, Pablo E.
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv LIGHTING
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT mETHOD
OVERVIEW
topic LIGHTING
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT mETHOD
OVERVIEW
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.11
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Beyond an energy-centric perspective, Building Environmental Assessment Methods (BEAM) may contribute to the achievement of healthier indoor built environments, allowing building sustainability to reach its full potential as a public health transformation tool. The objective of this paper is to characterize WELL V2 by means of two-stage heuristic analysis method (i.e. based on expert criteria): (i) a qualitative screening based on seven dimensions of analysis and (ii) a 0-100 quantitative assessment of nine dimensions of analysis. Our first stage results showed that WELL fulfilled all of the proposed criteria for other more established BEAM. Stage two results showed an overall score of 68, below LEED and BREEAM scores from the literature, and above CASBEE, HK-BEAM, and GREENSTAR. In terms of applicability, WELL lacks of lifecycle related criteria. WELL V2 showed a good comparative performance among BEAMs, placing it as a seminal method for the creation of new and more suitable wellbeing and health labelling systems, mimicking the role BREEAM played at the end of the 20th century. KEYWORDS: Integrative Lighting, Environmental Assessment Method, Overview
Beyond an energy - centric perspective, Building Environmental Assessment Methods (BEAM) may contribute to the achievement of healthier indoor built environments, allowing building sustainability to reach its full potential as a public health transformation too l. The objecti ve of this paper is to characterize WELL V2 by means of two -stage heuristic analysis method (i.e. based on expert criteria): (i) a qualitative screening based on seven dimensions of analysis and (ii) a 0 -100 quantitative assessment of nine dimensions of an alysis. Our first stage results showed that WELL fulfilled all of the proposed criteria for other more established BEAM. Stage two results showed an overall score of 68, below LEED and BREEAM scores from the literature, and above CASBEE, HK-BEAM, and GREEN STAR. In terms of applicability, WELL lack s of lifecycle related criteria. WELL V2 showed a good comparative performance among BEAMs, placing it as a seminal method for the creation of new and more suitable wellbeing and health labelling systems, mimicking the role BREEAM played at the end of the 20th century.
Fil: Ruiz, Verónica Jimena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ambiente, Hábitat y Energía; Argentina
Fil: Rodriguez, Roberto Germán. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ambiente, Hábitat y Energía; Argentina
Fil: Pattini, Andrea Elvira. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ambiente, Hábitat y Energía; Argentina
Passive and Low Energy Architecture: Will cities survive? The future of sustainable buildings and urbanism in the age of emergency
Santiago de Chile
Chile
Passive and Low Energy Architecture
Centro de Desarrollo Urbano Sustentable
Pontífica Universidad Católica de Chile. Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Estudios Urbanos
Universidad de Concepción
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
description Beyond an energy-centric perspective, Building Environmental Assessment Methods (BEAM) may contribute to the achievement of healthier indoor built environments, allowing building sustainability to reach its full potential as a public health transformation tool. The objective of this paper is to characterize WELL V2 by means of two-stage heuristic analysis method (i.e. based on expert criteria): (i) a qualitative screening based on seven dimensions of analysis and (ii) a 0-100 quantitative assessment of nine dimensions of analysis. Our first stage results showed that WELL fulfilled all of the proposed criteria for other more established BEAM. Stage two results showed an overall score of 68, below LEED and BREEAM scores from the literature, and above CASBEE, HK-BEAM, and GREENSTAR. In terms of applicability, WELL lacks of lifecycle related criteria. WELL V2 showed a good comparative performance among BEAMs, placing it as a seminal method for the creation of new and more suitable wellbeing and health labelling systems, mimicking the role BREEAM played at the end of the 20th century. KEYWORDS: Integrative Lighting, Environmental Assessment Method, Overview
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Conferencia
Book
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/231974
Comparative overview of lighting credits from WELL environmental assessment method; Passive and Low Energy Architecture: Will cities survive? The future of sustainable buildings and urbanism in the age of emergency; Santiago de Chile; Chile; 2022; 768-772
978-956-14-3068-6
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/231974
identifier_str_mv Comparative overview of lighting credits from WELL environmental assessment method; Passive and Low Energy Architecture: Will cities survive? The future of sustainable buildings and urbanism in the age of emergency; Santiago de Chile; Chile; 2022; 768-772
978-956-14-3068-6
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://plea2022.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/PROCEEDING-ONLINE-FINAL-MARZO.pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Internacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Passive and Low Energy Architecture
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Passive and Low Energy Architecture
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082875562131456
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares