A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean
- Autores
- King, LeeAnn; Adusei, Bernard; Stehman, Stephen V.; Potapov, Peter V.; Song, Xiao Peng; Krylov, Alexander; Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo; Loveland, Thomas R.; Johnson, David M.; Hansen, Matthew C.
- Año de publicación
- 2017
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Satellite remote sensing data can provide timely, accurate, and objective information on cultivated area by crop type and, in turn, facilitate accurate estimates of crop production. Here, we present a generic multi-resolution approach to sample-based crop type area estimation at the national level using soybean as an example crop type. Historical MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) data were used to stratify growing regions into subsets of low, medium and high soybean cover. A stratified random sample of 20 km × 20 km sample blocks was selected and Landsat data for these sample blocks classified into soybean cover. The Landsat-derived soybean area was used to produce national estimates of soybean area. Current year MODIS-indicated soybean cover served as an auxiliary variable in a stratified regression estimator procedure. To evaluate the approach, we prototyped the method in the USA, where the 2013 USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL) was used as a reference training data set for mapping soybean cover within each sample block. Three individual Landsat images were sufficient to accurately map soybean cover for all blocks, revealing that a rather sparse sample of phenological variation is needed to separate soybean from other cover types. In addition to stacks of images, we also evaluated standard radiometrically normalized Landsat inputs for mapping blocks individually (local-scale) and all at once (national-scale). All tested inputs resulted in area estimates comparable to the official USDA estimate of 30.86 Mha, with lower accuracy and higher standard error for national-scale mapping implementations. The stratified regression estimator incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soy reduced the standard error of the estimated soybean area by over 25% relative to the standard error of the stratified estimator. Finally, the method was ported to Argentina. A stratified random sample of blocks was characterized for soybean cultivated area using stacks of individual Landsat images for the 2013–2014 southern hemisphere growing season. A sub-sample of these blocks was visited on the ground to assess the accuracy of the Landsat-derived soy classification. The stratified regression estimator procedure performed similarly to the US application as it resulted in a reduction in standard error of about 25% relative to the stratified estimator not incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soybean. Our final estimated soybean area was 28% lower than that reported by the USDA, corresponding to a 20% field-based omission error related to underdeveloped fields. Lessons learned from this study can be ported to other regions of comparable field size and management intensity to assess soybean cultivated area. Results for the USA and Argentina may be viewed and downloaded at http://glad.geog.umd.edu/us-analysis and http://glad.geog.umd.edu/argentina-analysis, respectively.
Fil: King, LeeAnn. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Adusei, Bernard. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Stehman, Stephen V.. State University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Potapov, Peter V.. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Song, Xiao Peng. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Krylov, Alexander. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
Fil: Loveland, Thomas R.. United States Geological Survey; Estados Unidos
Fil: Johnson, David M.. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service; Argentina
Fil: Hansen, Matthew C.. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
Agriculture
Area Estimate
Argentina
Landsat
Modis
Sample
Soybean
United States - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/72580
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_d9d4ea3027256379b42db10c10e29e5b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/72580 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybeanKing, LeeAnnAdusei, BernardStehman, Stephen V.Potapov, Peter V.Song, Xiao PengKrylov, AlexanderDi Bella, Carlos MarceloLoveland, Thomas R.Johnson, David M.Hansen, Matthew C.AgricultureArea EstimateArgentinaLandsatModisSampleSoybeanUnited Stateshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Satellite remote sensing data can provide timely, accurate, and objective information on cultivated area by crop type and, in turn, facilitate accurate estimates of crop production. Here, we present a generic multi-resolution approach to sample-based crop type area estimation at the national level using soybean as an example crop type. Historical MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) data were used to stratify growing regions into subsets of low, medium and high soybean cover. A stratified random sample of 20 km × 20 km sample blocks was selected and Landsat data for these sample blocks classified into soybean cover. The Landsat-derived soybean area was used to produce national estimates of soybean area. Current year MODIS-indicated soybean cover served as an auxiliary variable in a stratified regression estimator procedure. To evaluate the approach, we prototyped the method in the USA, where the 2013 USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL) was used as a reference training data set for mapping soybean cover within each sample block. Three individual Landsat images were sufficient to accurately map soybean cover for all blocks, revealing that a rather sparse sample of phenological variation is needed to separate soybean from other cover types. In addition to stacks of images, we also evaluated standard radiometrically normalized Landsat inputs for mapping blocks individually (local-scale) and all at once (national-scale). All tested inputs resulted in area estimates comparable to the official USDA estimate of 30.86 Mha, with lower accuracy and higher standard error for national-scale mapping implementations. The stratified regression estimator incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soy reduced the standard error of the estimated soybean area by over 25% relative to the standard error of the stratified estimator. Finally, the method was ported to Argentina. A stratified random sample of blocks was characterized for soybean cultivated area using stacks of individual Landsat images for the 2013–2014 southern hemisphere growing season. A sub-sample of these blocks was visited on the ground to assess the accuracy of the Landsat-derived soy classification. The stratified regression estimator procedure performed similarly to the US application as it resulted in a reduction in standard error of about 25% relative to the stratified estimator not incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soybean. Our final estimated soybean area was 28% lower than that reported by the USDA, corresponding to a 20% field-based omission error related to underdeveloped fields. Lessons learned from this study can be ported to other regions of comparable field size and management intensity to assess soybean cultivated area. Results for the USA and Argentina may be viewed and downloaded at http://glad.geog.umd.edu/us-analysis and http://glad.geog.umd.edu/argentina-analysis, respectively.Fil: King, LeeAnn. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Adusei, Bernard. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Stehman, Stephen V.. State University of New York; Estados UnidosFil: Potapov, Peter V.. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Song, Xiao Peng. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Krylov, Alexander. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Clima y Agua; ArgentinaFil: Loveland, Thomas R.. United States Geological Survey; Estados UnidosFil: Johnson, David M.. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service; ArgentinaFil: Hansen, Matthew C.. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosElsevier Science Inc2017-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/72580King, LeeAnn; Adusei, Bernard; Stehman, Stephen V.; Potapov, Peter V.; Song, Xiao Peng; et al.; A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean; Elsevier Science Inc; Remote Sensing of Environment; 195; 6-2017; 13-290034-4257CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.047info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425717301505info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:41:32Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/72580instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:41:33.13CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean |
title |
A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean |
spellingShingle |
A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean King, LeeAnn Agriculture Area Estimate Argentina Landsat Modis Sample Soybean United States |
title_short |
A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean |
title_full |
A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean |
title_fullStr |
A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean |
title_full_unstemmed |
A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean |
title_sort |
A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
King, LeeAnn Adusei, Bernard Stehman, Stephen V. Potapov, Peter V. Song, Xiao Peng Krylov, Alexander Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo Loveland, Thomas R. Johnson, David M. Hansen, Matthew C. |
author |
King, LeeAnn |
author_facet |
King, LeeAnn Adusei, Bernard Stehman, Stephen V. Potapov, Peter V. Song, Xiao Peng Krylov, Alexander Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo Loveland, Thomas R. Johnson, David M. Hansen, Matthew C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Adusei, Bernard Stehman, Stephen V. Potapov, Peter V. Song, Xiao Peng Krylov, Alexander Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo Loveland, Thomas R. Johnson, David M. Hansen, Matthew C. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Agriculture Area Estimate Argentina Landsat Modis Sample Soybean United States |
topic |
Agriculture Area Estimate Argentina Landsat Modis Sample Soybean United States |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Satellite remote sensing data can provide timely, accurate, and objective information on cultivated area by crop type and, in turn, facilitate accurate estimates of crop production. Here, we present a generic multi-resolution approach to sample-based crop type area estimation at the national level using soybean as an example crop type. Historical MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) data were used to stratify growing regions into subsets of low, medium and high soybean cover. A stratified random sample of 20 km × 20 km sample blocks was selected and Landsat data for these sample blocks classified into soybean cover. The Landsat-derived soybean area was used to produce national estimates of soybean area. Current year MODIS-indicated soybean cover served as an auxiliary variable in a stratified regression estimator procedure. To evaluate the approach, we prototyped the method in the USA, where the 2013 USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL) was used as a reference training data set for mapping soybean cover within each sample block. Three individual Landsat images were sufficient to accurately map soybean cover for all blocks, revealing that a rather sparse sample of phenological variation is needed to separate soybean from other cover types. In addition to stacks of images, we also evaluated standard radiometrically normalized Landsat inputs for mapping blocks individually (local-scale) and all at once (national-scale). All tested inputs resulted in area estimates comparable to the official USDA estimate of 30.86 Mha, with lower accuracy and higher standard error for national-scale mapping implementations. The stratified regression estimator incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soy reduced the standard error of the estimated soybean area by over 25% relative to the standard error of the stratified estimator. Finally, the method was ported to Argentina. A stratified random sample of blocks was characterized for soybean cultivated area using stacks of individual Landsat images for the 2013–2014 southern hemisphere growing season. A sub-sample of these blocks was visited on the ground to assess the accuracy of the Landsat-derived soy classification. The stratified regression estimator procedure performed similarly to the US application as it resulted in a reduction in standard error of about 25% relative to the stratified estimator not incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soybean. Our final estimated soybean area was 28% lower than that reported by the USDA, corresponding to a 20% field-based omission error related to underdeveloped fields. Lessons learned from this study can be ported to other regions of comparable field size and management intensity to assess soybean cultivated area. Results for the USA and Argentina may be viewed and downloaded at http://glad.geog.umd.edu/us-analysis and http://glad.geog.umd.edu/argentina-analysis, respectively. Fil: King, LeeAnn. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos Fil: Adusei, Bernard. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos Fil: Stehman, Stephen V.. State University of New York; Estados Unidos Fil: Potapov, Peter V.. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos Fil: Song, Xiao Peng. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos Fil: Krylov, Alexander. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos Fil: Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina Fil: Loveland, Thomas R.. United States Geological Survey; Estados Unidos Fil: Johnson, David M.. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service; Argentina Fil: Hansen, Matthew C.. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos |
description |
Satellite remote sensing data can provide timely, accurate, and objective information on cultivated area by crop type and, in turn, facilitate accurate estimates of crop production. Here, we present a generic multi-resolution approach to sample-based crop type area estimation at the national level using soybean as an example crop type. Historical MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) data were used to stratify growing regions into subsets of low, medium and high soybean cover. A stratified random sample of 20 km × 20 km sample blocks was selected and Landsat data for these sample blocks classified into soybean cover. The Landsat-derived soybean area was used to produce national estimates of soybean area. Current year MODIS-indicated soybean cover served as an auxiliary variable in a stratified regression estimator procedure. To evaluate the approach, we prototyped the method in the USA, where the 2013 USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL) was used as a reference training data set for mapping soybean cover within each sample block. Three individual Landsat images were sufficient to accurately map soybean cover for all blocks, revealing that a rather sparse sample of phenological variation is needed to separate soybean from other cover types. In addition to stacks of images, we also evaluated standard radiometrically normalized Landsat inputs for mapping blocks individually (local-scale) and all at once (national-scale). All tested inputs resulted in area estimates comparable to the official USDA estimate of 30.86 Mha, with lower accuracy and higher standard error for national-scale mapping implementations. The stratified regression estimator incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soy reduced the standard error of the estimated soybean area by over 25% relative to the standard error of the stratified estimator. Finally, the method was ported to Argentina. A stratified random sample of blocks was characterized for soybean cultivated area using stacks of individual Landsat images for the 2013–2014 southern hemisphere growing season. A sub-sample of these blocks was visited on the ground to assess the accuracy of the Landsat-derived soy classification. The stratified regression estimator procedure performed similarly to the US application as it resulted in a reduction in standard error of about 25% relative to the stratified estimator not incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soybean. Our final estimated soybean area was 28% lower than that reported by the USDA, corresponding to a 20% field-based omission error related to underdeveloped fields. Lessons learned from this study can be ported to other regions of comparable field size and management intensity to assess soybean cultivated area. Results for the USA and Argentina may be viewed and downloaded at http://glad.geog.umd.edu/us-analysis and http://glad.geog.umd.edu/argentina-analysis, respectively. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/72580 King, LeeAnn; Adusei, Bernard; Stehman, Stephen V.; Potapov, Peter V.; Song, Xiao Peng; et al.; A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean; Elsevier Science Inc; Remote Sensing of Environment; 195; 6-2017; 13-29 0034-4257 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/72580 |
identifier_str_mv |
King, LeeAnn; Adusei, Bernard; Stehman, Stephen V.; Potapov, Peter V.; Song, Xiao Peng; et al.; A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean; Elsevier Science Inc; Remote Sensing of Environment; 195; 6-2017; 13-29 0034-4257 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.047 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425717301505 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613311242436608 |
score |
13.070432 |