A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean

Autores
King, LeeAnn; Adusei, Bernard; Stehman, Stephen V.; Potapov, Peter V.; Song, Xiao Peng; Krylov, Alexander; Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo; Loveland, Thomas R.; Johnson, David M.; Hansen, Matthew C.
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Satellite remote sensing data can provide timely, accurate, and objective information on cultivated area by crop type and, in turn, facilitate accurate estimates of crop production. Here, we present a generic multi-resolution approach to sample-based crop type area estimation at the national level using soybean as an example crop type. Historical MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) data were used to stratify growing regions into subsets of low, medium and high soybean cover. A stratified random sample of 20 km × 20 km sample blocks was selected and Landsat data for these sample blocks classified into soybean cover. The Landsat-derived soybean area was used to produce national estimates of soybean area. Current year MODIS-indicated soybean cover served as an auxiliary variable in a stratified regression estimator procedure. To evaluate the approach, we prototyped the method in the USA, where the 2013 USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL) was used as a reference training data set for mapping soybean cover within each sample block. Three individual Landsat images were sufficient to accurately map soybean cover for all blocks, revealing that a rather sparse sample of phenological variation is needed to separate soybean from other cover types. In addition to stacks of images, we also evaluated standard radiometrically normalized Landsat inputs for mapping blocks individually (local-scale) and all at once (national-scale). All tested inputs resulted in area estimates comparable to the official USDA estimate of 30.86 Mha, with lower accuracy and higher standard error for national-scale mapping implementations. The stratified regression estimator incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soy reduced the standard error of the estimated soybean area by over 25% relative to the standard error of the stratified estimator. Finally, the method was ported to Argentina. A stratified random sample of blocks was characterized for soybean cultivated area using stacks of individual Landsat images for the 2013–2014 southern hemisphere growing season. A sub-sample of these blocks was visited on the ground to assess the accuracy of the Landsat-derived soy classification. The stratified regression estimator procedure performed similarly to the US application as it resulted in a reduction in standard error of about 25% relative to the stratified estimator not incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soybean. Our final estimated soybean area was 28% lower than that reported by the USDA, corresponding to a 20% field-based omission error related to underdeveloped fields. Lessons learned from this study can be ported to other regions of comparable field size and management intensity to assess soybean cultivated area. Results for the USA and Argentina may be viewed and downloaded at http://glad.geog.umd.edu/us-analysis and http://glad.geog.umd.edu/argentina-analysis, respectively.
Fil: King, LeeAnn. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Adusei, Bernard. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Stehman, Stephen V.. State University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Potapov, Peter V.. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Song, Xiao Peng. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Krylov, Alexander. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
Fil: Loveland, Thomas R.. United States Geological Survey; Estados Unidos
Fil: Johnson, David M.. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service; Argentina
Fil: Hansen, Matthew C.. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Materia
Agriculture
Area Estimate
Argentina
Landsat
Modis
Sample
Soybean
United States
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/72580

id CONICETDig_d9d4ea3027256379b42db10c10e29e5b
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/72580
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybeanKing, LeeAnnAdusei, BernardStehman, Stephen V.Potapov, Peter V.Song, Xiao PengKrylov, AlexanderDi Bella, Carlos MarceloLoveland, Thomas R.Johnson, David M.Hansen, Matthew C.AgricultureArea EstimateArgentinaLandsatModisSampleSoybeanUnited Stateshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Satellite remote sensing data can provide timely, accurate, and objective information on cultivated area by crop type and, in turn, facilitate accurate estimates of crop production. Here, we present a generic multi-resolution approach to sample-based crop type area estimation at the national level using soybean as an example crop type. Historical MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) data were used to stratify growing regions into subsets of low, medium and high soybean cover. A stratified random sample of 20 km × 20 km sample blocks was selected and Landsat data for these sample blocks classified into soybean cover. The Landsat-derived soybean area was used to produce national estimates of soybean area. Current year MODIS-indicated soybean cover served as an auxiliary variable in a stratified regression estimator procedure. To evaluate the approach, we prototyped the method in the USA, where the 2013 USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL) was used as a reference training data set for mapping soybean cover within each sample block. Three individual Landsat images were sufficient to accurately map soybean cover for all blocks, revealing that a rather sparse sample of phenological variation is needed to separate soybean from other cover types. In addition to stacks of images, we also evaluated standard radiometrically normalized Landsat inputs for mapping blocks individually (local-scale) and all at once (national-scale). All tested inputs resulted in area estimates comparable to the official USDA estimate of 30.86 Mha, with lower accuracy and higher standard error for national-scale mapping implementations. The stratified regression estimator incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soy reduced the standard error of the estimated soybean area by over 25% relative to the standard error of the stratified estimator. Finally, the method was ported to Argentina. A stratified random sample of blocks was characterized for soybean cultivated area using stacks of individual Landsat images for the 2013–2014 southern hemisphere growing season. A sub-sample of these blocks was visited on the ground to assess the accuracy of the Landsat-derived soy classification. The stratified regression estimator procedure performed similarly to the US application as it resulted in a reduction in standard error of about 25% relative to the stratified estimator not incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soybean. Our final estimated soybean area was 28% lower than that reported by the USDA, corresponding to a 20% field-based omission error related to underdeveloped fields. Lessons learned from this study can be ported to other regions of comparable field size and management intensity to assess soybean cultivated area. Results for the USA and Argentina may be viewed and downloaded at http://glad.geog.umd.edu/us-analysis and http://glad.geog.umd.edu/argentina-analysis, respectively.Fil: King, LeeAnn. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Adusei, Bernard. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Stehman, Stephen V.. State University of New York; Estados UnidosFil: Potapov, Peter V.. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Song, Xiao Peng. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Krylov, Alexander. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Clima y Agua; ArgentinaFil: Loveland, Thomas R.. United States Geological Survey; Estados UnidosFil: Johnson, David M.. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service; ArgentinaFil: Hansen, Matthew C.. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosElsevier Science Inc2017-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/72580King, LeeAnn; Adusei, Bernard; Stehman, Stephen V.; Potapov, Peter V.; Song, Xiao Peng; et al.; A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean; Elsevier Science Inc; Remote Sensing of Environment; 195; 6-2017; 13-290034-4257CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.047info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425717301505info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:41:32Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/72580instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:41:33.13CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean
title A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean
spellingShingle A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean
King, LeeAnn
Agriculture
Area Estimate
Argentina
Landsat
Modis
Sample
Soybean
United States
title_short A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean
title_full A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean
title_fullStr A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean
title_full_unstemmed A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean
title_sort A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv King, LeeAnn
Adusei, Bernard
Stehman, Stephen V.
Potapov, Peter V.
Song, Xiao Peng
Krylov, Alexander
Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo
Loveland, Thomas R.
Johnson, David M.
Hansen, Matthew C.
author King, LeeAnn
author_facet King, LeeAnn
Adusei, Bernard
Stehman, Stephen V.
Potapov, Peter V.
Song, Xiao Peng
Krylov, Alexander
Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo
Loveland, Thomas R.
Johnson, David M.
Hansen, Matthew C.
author_role author
author2 Adusei, Bernard
Stehman, Stephen V.
Potapov, Peter V.
Song, Xiao Peng
Krylov, Alexander
Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo
Loveland, Thomas R.
Johnson, David M.
Hansen, Matthew C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Agriculture
Area Estimate
Argentina
Landsat
Modis
Sample
Soybean
United States
topic Agriculture
Area Estimate
Argentina
Landsat
Modis
Sample
Soybean
United States
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Satellite remote sensing data can provide timely, accurate, and objective information on cultivated area by crop type and, in turn, facilitate accurate estimates of crop production. Here, we present a generic multi-resolution approach to sample-based crop type area estimation at the national level using soybean as an example crop type. Historical MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) data were used to stratify growing regions into subsets of low, medium and high soybean cover. A stratified random sample of 20 km × 20 km sample blocks was selected and Landsat data for these sample blocks classified into soybean cover. The Landsat-derived soybean area was used to produce national estimates of soybean area. Current year MODIS-indicated soybean cover served as an auxiliary variable in a stratified regression estimator procedure. To evaluate the approach, we prototyped the method in the USA, where the 2013 USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL) was used as a reference training data set for mapping soybean cover within each sample block. Three individual Landsat images were sufficient to accurately map soybean cover for all blocks, revealing that a rather sparse sample of phenological variation is needed to separate soybean from other cover types. In addition to stacks of images, we also evaluated standard radiometrically normalized Landsat inputs for mapping blocks individually (local-scale) and all at once (national-scale). All tested inputs resulted in area estimates comparable to the official USDA estimate of 30.86 Mha, with lower accuracy and higher standard error for national-scale mapping implementations. The stratified regression estimator incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soy reduced the standard error of the estimated soybean area by over 25% relative to the standard error of the stratified estimator. Finally, the method was ported to Argentina. A stratified random sample of blocks was characterized for soybean cultivated area using stacks of individual Landsat images for the 2013–2014 southern hemisphere growing season. A sub-sample of these blocks was visited on the ground to assess the accuracy of the Landsat-derived soy classification. The stratified regression estimator procedure performed similarly to the US application as it resulted in a reduction in standard error of about 25% relative to the stratified estimator not incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soybean. Our final estimated soybean area was 28% lower than that reported by the USDA, corresponding to a 20% field-based omission error related to underdeveloped fields. Lessons learned from this study can be ported to other regions of comparable field size and management intensity to assess soybean cultivated area. Results for the USA and Argentina may be viewed and downloaded at http://glad.geog.umd.edu/us-analysis and http://glad.geog.umd.edu/argentina-analysis, respectively.
Fil: King, LeeAnn. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Adusei, Bernard. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Stehman, Stephen V.. State University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Potapov, Peter V.. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Song, Xiao Peng. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Krylov, Alexander. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
Fil: Loveland, Thomas R.. United States Geological Survey; Estados Unidos
Fil: Johnson, David M.. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service; Argentina
Fil: Hansen, Matthew C.. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
description Satellite remote sensing data can provide timely, accurate, and objective information on cultivated area by crop type and, in turn, facilitate accurate estimates of crop production. Here, we present a generic multi-resolution approach to sample-based crop type area estimation at the national level using soybean as an example crop type. Historical MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) data were used to stratify growing regions into subsets of low, medium and high soybean cover. A stratified random sample of 20 km × 20 km sample blocks was selected and Landsat data for these sample blocks classified into soybean cover. The Landsat-derived soybean area was used to produce national estimates of soybean area. Current year MODIS-indicated soybean cover served as an auxiliary variable in a stratified regression estimator procedure. To evaluate the approach, we prototyped the method in the USA, where the 2013 USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL) was used as a reference training data set for mapping soybean cover within each sample block. Three individual Landsat images were sufficient to accurately map soybean cover for all blocks, revealing that a rather sparse sample of phenological variation is needed to separate soybean from other cover types. In addition to stacks of images, we also evaluated standard radiometrically normalized Landsat inputs for mapping blocks individually (local-scale) and all at once (national-scale). All tested inputs resulted in area estimates comparable to the official USDA estimate of 30.86 Mha, with lower accuracy and higher standard error for national-scale mapping implementations. The stratified regression estimator incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soy reduced the standard error of the estimated soybean area by over 25% relative to the standard error of the stratified estimator. Finally, the method was ported to Argentina. A stratified random sample of blocks was characterized for soybean cultivated area using stacks of individual Landsat images for the 2013–2014 southern hemisphere growing season. A sub-sample of these blocks was visited on the ground to assess the accuracy of the Landsat-derived soy classification. The stratified regression estimator procedure performed similarly to the US application as it resulted in a reduction in standard error of about 25% relative to the stratified estimator not incorporating current year MODIS-indicated soybean. Our final estimated soybean area was 28% lower than that reported by the USDA, corresponding to a 20% field-based omission error related to underdeveloped fields. Lessons learned from this study can be ported to other regions of comparable field size and management intensity to assess soybean cultivated area. Results for the USA and Argentina may be viewed and downloaded at http://glad.geog.umd.edu/us-analysis and http://glad.geog.umd.edu/argentina-analysis, respectively.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/72580
King, LeeAnn; Adusei, Bernard; Stehman, Stephen V.; Potapov, Peter V.; Song, Xiao Peng; et al.; A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean; Elsevier Science Inc; Remote Sensing of Environment; 195; 6-2017; 13-29
0034-4257
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/72580
identifier_str_mv King, LeeAnn; Adusei, Bernard; Stehman, Stephen V.; Potapov, Peter V.; Song, Xiao Peng; et al.; A multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of soybean; Elsevier Science Inc; Remote Sensing of Environment; 195; 6-2017; 13-29
0034-4257
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.047
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425717301505
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613311242436608
score 13.070432