Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests

Autores
Lencinas, María Vanessa; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Gallo, Emilce Andrea; Cellini, Juan Manuel
Año de publicación
2009
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber management, such as regeneration treatments with different degrees of stand retention, may mitigate negative effects of clear-cutting or shelterwood cuts in forested ecosystems, including changes in old-growth forest bird communities. The aims of this work were: (a) to compare bird species richness and densities among different silvicultural designs with variable retention (dispersed and/or aggregated) and unmanaged primary forests, and (b) to assess temporal changes at community and species levels before and after treatments. A baseline avian survey was conducted prior to harvesting to evaluate canopy gap presence and forest stand site quality influences. Subsequent to harvesting, data on bird species richness and density were collected by point-count sampling during the summer season for 5 consecutive years (4 treatments × 5 years × 6 sampling points × 5 counts). Bird species richness and density (15 species and 9.2 individuals ha-1) did not change significantly with forest site quality of the stands and canopy gap presence in unmanaged forests. However, both variables were significantly modified in managed forests, increasing over time to 18 species and reaching to 39 individuals ha-1. Inside the aggregated retention, bird communities were more similar to unmanaged primary forests than those observed within the dispersed retention or in clear-cuts. Opting for a regeneration method with dispersed and aggregated retention has great potential for managing birds in Nothofagus pumilio forests. This method retained enough vegetation structure in a stand to permit the establishment of early successional birds (at least in dispersed retention), and to maintain the bird species of old-growth forests which could persisted in the retention aggregates.
Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: Gallo, Emilce Andrea. Administración de Parques Nacionales; Argentina
Fil: Cellini, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina
Materia
AGGREGATED RETENTION
BIRD DENSITY
BIRD SPECIES RICHNESS
FOREST MANAGEMENT
IMPACT
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/133993

id CONICETDig_d96e12885b4f79b284728a9e7dcbd610
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/133993
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forestsLencinas, María VanessaMartínez Pastur, Guillermo JoséGallo, Emilce AndreaCellini, Juan ManuelAGGREGATED RETENTIONBIRD DENSITYBIRD SPECIES RICHNESSFOREST MANAGEMENTIMPACThttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber management, such as regeneration treatments with different degrees of stand retention, may mitigate negative effects of clear-cutting or shelterwood cuts in forested ecosystems, including changes in old-growth forest bird communities. The aims of this work were: (a) to compare bird species richness and densities among different silvicultural designs with variable retention (dispersed and/or aggregated) and unmanaged primary forests, and (b) to assess temporal changes at community and species levels before and after treatments. A baseline avian survey was conducted prior to harvesting to evaluate canopy gap presence and forest stand site quality influences. Subsequent to harvesting, data on bird species richness and density were collected by point-count sampling during the summer season for 5 consecutive years (4 treatments × 5 years × 6 sampling points × 5 counts). Bird species richness and density (15 species and 9.2 individuals ha-1) did not change significantly with forest site quality of the stands and canopy gap presence in unmanaged forests. However, both variables were significantly modified in managed forests, increasing over time to 18 species and reaching to 39 individuals ha-1. Inside the aggregated retention, bird communities were more similar to unmanaged primary forests than those observed within the dispersed retention or in clear-cuts. Opting for a regeneration method with dispersed and aggregated retention has great potential for managing birds in Nothofagus pumilio forests. This method retained enough vegetation structure in a stand to permit the establishment of early successional birds (at least in dispersed retention), and to maintain the bird species of old-growth forests which could persisted in the retention aggregates.Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; ArgentinaFil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; ArgentinaFil: Gallo, Emilce Andrea. Administración de Parques Nacionales; ArgentinaFil: Cellini, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; ArgentinaElsevier Science2009-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/133993Lencinas, María Vanessa; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Gallo, Emilce Andrea; Cellini, Juan Manuel; Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests; Elsevier Science; Forest Ecology and Management; 258; 4; 1-2009; 472-4800378-1127CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112709000243?via%3Dihubinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:37:47Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/133993instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:37:48.087CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests
title Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests
spellingShingle Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests
Lencinas, María Vanessa
AGGREGATED RETENTION
BIRD DENSITY
BIRD SPECIES RICHNESS
FOREST MANAGEMENT
IMPACT
title_short Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests
title_full Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests
title_fullStr Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests
title_full_unstemmed Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests
title_sort Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lencinas, María Vanessa
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Gallo, Emilce Andrea
Cellini, Juan Manuel
author Lencinas, María Vanessa
author_facet Lencinas, María Vanessa
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Gallo, Emilce Andrea
Cellini, Juan Manuel
author_role author
author2 Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Gallo, Emilce Andrea
Cellini, Juan Manuel
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv AGGREGATED RETENTION
BIRD DENSITY
BIRD SPECIES RICHNESS
FOREST MANAGEMENT
IMPACT
topic AGGREGATED RETENTION
BIRD DENSITY
BIRD SPECIES RICHNESS
FOREST MANAGEMENT
IMPACT
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber management, such as regeneration treatments with different degrees of stand retention, may mitigate negative effects of clear-cutting or shelterwood cuts in forested ecosystems, including changes in old-growth forest bird communities. The aims of this work were: (a) to compare bird species richness and densities among different silvicultural designs with variable retention (dispersed and/or aggregated) and unmanaged primary forests, and (b) to assess temporal changes at community and species levels before and after treatments. A baseline avian survey was conducted prior to harvesting to evaluate canopy gap presence and forest stand site quality influences. Subsequent to harvesting, data on bird species richness and density were collected by point-count sampling during the summer season for 5 consecutive years (4 treatments × 5 years × 6 sampling points × 5 counts). Bird species richness and density (15 species and 9.2 individuals ha-1) did not change significantly with forest site quality of the stands and canopy gap presence in unmanaged forests. However, both variables were significantly modified in managed forests, increasing over time to 18 species and reaching to 39 individuals ha-1. Inside the aggregated retention, bird communities were more similar to unmanaged primary forests than those observed within the dispersed retention or in clear-cuts. Opting for a regeneration method with dispersed and aggregated retention has great potential for managing birds in Nothofagus pumilio forests. This method retained enough vegetation structure in a stand to permit the establishment of early successional birds (at least in dispersed retention), and to maintain the bird species of old-growth forests which could persisted in the retention aggregates.
Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: Gallo, Emilce Andrea. Administración de Parques Nacionales; Argentina
Fil: Cellini, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina
description Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber management, such as regeneration treatments with different degrees of stand retention, may mitigate negative effects of clear-cutting or shelterwood cuts in forested ecosystems, including changes in old-growth forest bird communities. The aims of this work were: (a) to compare bird species richness and densities among different silvicultural designs with variable retention (dispersed and/or aggregated) and unmanaged primary forests, and (b) to assess temporal changes at community and species levels before and after treatments. A baseline avian survey was conducted prior to harvesting to evaluate canopy gap presence and forest stand site quality influences. Subsequent to harvesting, data on bird species richness and density were collected by point-count sampling during the summer season for 5 consecutive years (4 treatments × 5 years × 6 sampling points × 5 counts). Bird species richness and density (15 species and 9.2 individuals ha-1) did not change significantly with forest site quality of the stands and canopy gap presence in unmanaged forests. However, both variables were significantly modified in managed forests, increasing over time to 18 species and reaching to 39 individuals ha-1. Inside the aggregated retention, bird communities were more similar to unmanaged primary forests than those observed within the dispersed retention or in clear-cuts. Opting for a regeneration method with dispersed and aggregated retention has great potential for managing birds in Nothofagus pumilio forests. This method retained enough vegetation structure in a stand to permit the establishment of early successional birds (at least in dispersed retention), and to maintain the bird species of old-growth forests which could persisted in the retention aggregates.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/133993
Lencinas, María Vanessa; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Gallo, Emilce Andrea; Cellini, Juan Manuel; Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests; Elsevier Science; Forest Ecology and Management; 258; 4; 1-2009; 472-480
0378-1127
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/133993
identifier_str_mv Lencinas, María Vanessa; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Gallo, Emilce Andrea; Cellini, Juan Manuel; Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests; Elsevier Science; Forest Ecology and Management; 258; 4; 1-2009; 472-480
0378-1127
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112709000243?via%3Dihub
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.012
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613191966916608
score 13.070432