Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests
- Autores
- Lencinas, María Vanessa; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Gallo, Emilce Andrea; Cellini, Juan Manuel
- Año de publicación
- 2009
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber management, such as regeneration treatments with different degrees of stand retention, may mitigate negative effects of clear-cutting or shelterwood cuts in forested ecosystems, including changes in old-growth forest bird communities. The aims of this work were: (a) to compare bird species richness and densities among different silvicultural designs with variable retention (dispersed and/or aggregated) and unmanaged primary forests, and (b) to assess temporal changes at community and species levels before and after treatments. A baseline avian survey was conducted prior to harvesting to evaluate canopy gap presence and forest stand site quality influences. Subsequent to harvesting, data on bird species richness and density were collected by point-count sampling during the summer season for 5 consecutive years (4 treatments × 5 years × 6 sampling points × 5 counts). Bird species richness and density (15 species and 9.2 individuals ha-1) did not change significantly with forest site quality of the stands and canopy gap presence in unmanaged forests. However, both variables were significantly modified in managed forests, increasing over time to 18 species and reaching to 39 individuals ha-1. Inside the aggregated retention, bird communities were more similar to unmanaged primary forests than those observed within the dispersed retention or in clear-cuts. Opting for a regeneration method with dispersed and aggregated retention has great potential for managing birds in Nothofagus pumilio forests. This method retained enough vegetation structure in a stand to permit the establishment of early successional birds (at least in dispersed retention), and to maintain the bird species of old-growth forests which could persisted in the retention aggregates.
Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: Gallo, Emilce Andrea. Administración de Parques Nacionales; Argentina
Fil: Cellini, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina - Materia
-
AGGREGATED RETENTION
BIRD DENSITY
BIRD SPECIES RICHNESS
FOREST MANAGEMENT
IMPACT - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/133993
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_d96e12885b4f79b284728a9e7dcbd610 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/133993 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forestsLencinas, María VanessaMartínez Pastur, Guillermo JoséGallo, Emilce AndreaCellini, Juan ManuelAGGREGATED RETENTIONBIRD DENSITYBIRD SPECIES RICHNESSFOREST MANAGEMENTIMPACThttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber management, such as regeneration treatments with different degrees of stand retention, may mitigate negative effects of clear-cutting or shelterwood cuts in forested ecosystems, including changes in old-growth forest bird communities. The aims of this work were: (a) to compare bird species richness and densities among different silvicultural designs with variable retention (dispersed and/or aggregated) and unmanaged primary forests, and (b) to assess temporal changes at community and species levels before and after treatments. A baseline avian survey was conducted prior to harvesting to evaluate canopy gap presence and forest stand site quality influences. Subsequent to harvesting, data on bird species richness and density were collected by point-count sampling during the summer season for 5 consecutive years (4 treatments × 5 years × 6 sampling points × 5 counts). Bird species richness and density (15 species and 9.2 individuals ha-1) did not change significantly with forest site quality of the stands and canopy gap presence in unmanaged forests. However, both variables were significantly modified in managed forests, increasing over time to 18 species and reaching to 39 individuals ha-1. Inside the aggregated retention, bird communities were more similar to unmanaged primary forests than those observed within the dispersed retention or in clear-cuts. Opting for a regeneration method with dispersed and aggregated retention has great potential for managing birds in Nothofagus pumilio forests. This method retained enough vegetation structure in a stand to permit the establishment of early successional birds (at least in dispersed retention), and to maintain the bird species of old-growth forests which could persisted in the retention aggregates.Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; ArgentinaFil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; ArgentinaFil: Gallo, Emilce Andrea. Administración de Parques Nacionales; ArgentinaFil: Cellini, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; ArgentinaElsevier Science2009-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/133993Lencinas, María Vanessa; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Gallo, Emilce Andrea; Cellini, Juan Manuel; Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests; Elsevier Science; Forest Ecology and Management; 258; 4; 1-2009; 472-4800378-1127CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112709000243?via%3Dihubinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:37:47Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/133993instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:37:48.087CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests |
title |
Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests |
spellingShingle |
Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests Lencinas, María Vanessa AGGREGATED RETENTION BIRD DENSITY BIRD SPECIES RICHNESS FOREST MANAGEMENT IMPACT |
title_short |
Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests |
title_full |
Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests |
title_fullStr |
Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests |
title_full_unstemmed |
Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests |
title_sort |
Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Lencinas, María Vanessa Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José Gallo, Emilce Andrea Cellini, Juan Manuel |
author |
Lencinas, María Vanessa |
author_facet |
Lencinas, María Vanessa Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José Gallo, Emilce Andrea Cellini, Juan Manuel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José Gallo, Emilce Andrea Cellini, Juan Manuel |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
AGGREGATED RETENTION BIRD DENSITY BIRD SPECIES RICHNESS FOREST MANAGEMENT IMPACT |
topic |
AGGREGATED RETENTION BIRD DENSITY BIRD SPECIES RICHNESS FOREST MANAGEMENT IMPACT |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber management, such as regeneration treatments with different degrees of stand retention, may mitigate negative effects of clear-cutting or shelterwood cuts in forested ecosystems, including changes in old-growth forest bird communities. The aims of this work were: (a) to compare bird species richness and densities among different silvicultural designs with variable retention (dispersed and/or aggregated) and unmanaged primary forests, and (b) to assess temporal changes at community and species levels before and after treatments. A baseline avian survey was conducted prior to harvesting to evaluate canopy gap presence and forest stand site quality influences. Subsequent to harvesting, data on bird species richness and density were collected by point-count sampling during the summer season for 5 consecutive years (4 treatments × 5 years × 6 sampling points × 5 counts). Bird species richness and density (15 species and 9.2 individuals ha-1) did not change significantly with forest site quality of the stands and canopy gap presence in unmanaged forests. However, both variables were significantly modified in managed forests, increasing over time to 18 species and reaching to 39 individuals ha-1. Inside the aggregated retention, bird communities were more similar to unmanaged primary forests than those observed within the dispersed retention or in clear-cuts. Opting for a regeneration method with dispersed and aggregated retention has great potential for managing birds in Nothofagus pumilio forests. This method retained enough vegetation structure in a stand to permit the establishment of early successional birds (at least in dispersed retention), and to maintain the bird species of old-growth forests which could persisted in the retention aggregates. Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina Fil: Gallo, Emilce Andrea. Administración de Parques Nacionales; Argentina Fil: Cellini, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina |
description |
Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber management, such as regeneration treatments with different degrees of stand retention, may mitigate negative effects of clear-cutting or shelterwood cuts in forested ecosystems, including changes in old-growth forest bird communities. The aims of this work were: (a) to compare bird species richness and densities among different silvicultural designs with variable retention (dispersed and/or aggregated) and unmanaged primary forests, and (b) to assess temporal changes at community and species levels before and after treatments. A baseline avian survey was conducted prior to harvesting to evaluate canopy gap presence and forest stand site quality influences. Subsequent to harvesting, data on bird species richness and density were collected by point-count sampling during the summer season for 5 consecutive years (4 treatments × 5 years × 6 sampling points × 5 counts). Bird species richness and density (15 species and 9.2 individuals ha-1) did not change significantly with forest site quality of the stands and canopy gap presence in unmanaged forests. However, both variables were significantly modified in managed forests, increasing over time to 18 species and reaching to 39 individuals ha-1. Inside the aggregated retention, bird communities were more similar to unmanaged primary forests than those observed within the dispersed retention or in clear-cuts. Opting for a regeneration method with dispersed and aggregated retention has great potential for managing birds in Nothofagus pumilio forests. This method retained enough vegetation structure in a stand to permit the establishment of early successional birds (at least in dispersed retention), and to maintain the bird species of old-growth forests which could persisted in the retention aggregates. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/133993 Lencinas, María Vanessa; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Gallo, Emilce Andrea; Cellini, Juan Manuel; Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests; Elsevier Science; Forest Ecology and Management; 258; 4; 1-2009; 472-480 0378-1127 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/133993 |
identifier_str_mv |
Lencinas, María Vanessa; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Gallo, Emilce Andrea; Cellini, Juan Manuel; Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests; Elsevier Science; Forest Ecology and Management; 258; 4; 1-2009; 472-480 0378-1127 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112709000243?via%3Dihub info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.012 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613191966916608 |
score |
13.070432 |