Assessment of topsoil properties in integrated crop-livestock and continuous cropping systems under zero tillage

Autores
Fernández, Patricia Lilia; Alvarez, Carina Rosa; Taboada, Miguel Angel
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
A regional study was conducted in the northern Pampas of Argentina in order to compare soil quality at proximal cropland sites that are managed under either continuous cropping (CC) (n = 11) or integrated crop-livestock (ICL) (n = 11) systems under zero tillage. In the ICL system, samples were taken in the middle of the agricultural period. Although soil total and resistant organic carbon (TOC, ROC) were significantly higher in silt loam soils than in loam/sandy loam soils, variations in carbon concentration were not associated with differences in soil management. Soil relative compaction was the only property that was significantly (P < 0.05) affected by the soil type-management interaction. Soil relative compaction values were significantly lower with ICL in loam/sandy loam soils, but there were no significant differences in silt loam soils. Structural instability index showed little change from CC to ICL sites, indicating that there was no soil structural damage. Soil penetration resistance was significantly higher in ICL soils within the first 0.075m of soil depth, slightly exceeding the critical threshold (2000 kPa). However, firmer topsoil under ICL was not due to shallow compaction, as evidenced by no increase in soil bulk density.
Fil: Fernández, Patricia Lilia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Alvarez, Carina Rosa. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Taboada, Miguel Angel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
CATTLE TRAMPLING
SOIL COMPACTION
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON FRACTIONS
SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192955
Acceder
id CONICETDig_d69e5950fded4b793927aa1ac03db863
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192955
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Assessment of topsoil properties in integrated crop-livestock and continuous cropping systems under zero tillageFernández, Patricia LiliaAlvarez, Carina RosaTaboada, Miguel AngelCATTLE TRAMPLINGSOIL COMPACTIONSOIL ORGANIC CARBON FRACTIONSSOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4A regional study was conducted in the northern Pampas of Argentina in order to compare soil quality at proximal cropland sites that are managed under either continuous cropping (CC) (n = 11) or integrated crop-livestock (ICL) (n = 11) systems under zero tillage. In the ICL system, samples were taken in the middle of the agricultural period. Although soil total and resistant organic carbon (TOC, ROC) were significantly higher in silt loam soils than in loam/sandy loam soils, variations in carbon concentration were not associated with differences in soil management. Soil relative compaction was the only property that was significantly (P < 0.05) affected by the soil type-management interaction. Soil relative compaction values were significantly lower with ICL in loam/sandy loam soils, but there were no significant differences in silt loam soils. Structural instability index showed little change from CC to ICL sites, indicating that there was no soil structural damage. Soil penetration resistance was significantly higher in ICL soils within the first 0.075m of soil depth, slightly exceeding the critical threshold (2000 kPa). However, firmer topsoil under ICL was not due to shallow compaction, as evidenced by no increase in soil bulk density.Fil: Fernández, Patricia Lilia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Alvarez, Carina Rosa. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Taboada, Miguel Angel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaCsiro Publishing2011-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/192955Fernández, Patricia Lilia; Alvarez, Carina Rosa; Taboada, Miguel Angel; Assessment of topsoil properties in integrated crop-livestock and continuous cropping systems under zero tillage; Csiro Publishing; Australian Journal Of Soil Research; 49; 2; 8-2011; 143-1510004-95731838-675XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1071/SR10086info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:55:49Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192955instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:55:49.881CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of topsoil properties in integrated crop-livestock and continuous cropping systems under zero tillage
title Assessment of topsoil properties in integrated crop-livestock and continuous cropping systems under zero tillage
spellingShingle Assessment of topsoil properties in integrated crop-livestock and continuous cropping systems under zero tillage
Fernández, Patricia Lilia
CATTLE TRAMPLING
SOIL COMPACTION
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON FRACTIONS
SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
title_short Assessment of topsoil properties in integrated crop-livestock and continuous cropping systems under zero tillage
title_full Assessment of topsoil properties in integrated crop-livestock and continuous cropping systems under zero tillage
title_fullStr Assessment of topsoil properties in integrated crop-livestock and continuous cropping systems under zero tillage
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of topsoil properties in integrated crop-livestock and continuous cropping systems under zero tillage
title_sort Assessment of topsoil properties in integrated crop-livestock and continuous cropping systems under zero tillage
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Fernández, Patricia Lilia
Alvarez, Carina Rosa
Taboada, Miguel Angel
author Fernández, Patricia Lilia
author_facet Fernández, Patricia Lilia
Alvarez, Carina Rosa
Taboada, Miguel Angel
author_role author
author2 Alvarez, Carina Rosa
Taboada, Miguel Angel
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CATTLE TRAMPLING
SOIL COMPACTION
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON FRACTIONS
SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
topic CATTLE TRAMPLING
SOIL COMPACTION
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON FRACTIONS
SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv A regional study was conducted in the northern Pampas of Argentina in order to compare soil quality at proximal cropland sites that are managed under either continuous cropping (CC) (n = 11) or integrated crop-livestock (ICL) (n = 11) systems under zero tillage. In the ICL system, samples were taken in the middle of the agricultural period. Although soil total and resistant organic carbon (TOC, ROC) were significantly higher in silt loam soils than in loam/sandy loam soils, variations in carbon concentration were not associated with differences in soil management. Soil relative compaction was the only property that was significantly (P < 0.05) affected by the soil type-management interaction. Soil relative compaction values were significantly lower with ICL in loam/sandy loam soils, but there were no significant differences in silt loam soils. Structural instability index showed little change from CC to ICL sites, indicating that there was no soil structural damage. Soil penetration resistance was significantly higher in ICL soils within the first 0.075m of soil depth, slightly exceeding the critical threshold (2000 kPa). However, firmer topsoil under ICL was not due to shallow compaction, as evidenced by no increase in soil bulk density.
Fil: Fernández, Patricia Lilia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Alvarez, Carina Rosa. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Taboada, Miguel Angel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description A regional study was conducted in the northern Pampas of Argentina in order to compare soil quality at proximal cropland sites that are managed under either continuous cropping (CC) (n = 11) or integrated crop-livestock (ICL) (n = 11) systems under zero tillage. In the ICL system, samples were taken in the middle of the agricultural period. Although soil total and resistant organic carbon (TOC, ROC) were significantly higher in silt loam soils than in loam/sandy loam soils, variations in carbon concentration were not associated with differences in soil management. Soil relative compaction was the only property that was significantly (P < 0.05) affected by the soil type-management interaction. Soil relative compaction values were significantly lower with ICL in loam/sandy loam soils, but there were no significant differences in silt loam soils. Structural instability index showed little change from CC to ICL sites, indicating that there was no soil structural damage. Soil penetration resistance was significantly higher in ICL soils within the first 0.075m of soil depth, slightly exceeding the critical threshold (2000 kPa). However, firmer topsoil under ICL was not due to shallow compaction, as evidenced by no increase in soil bulk density.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192955
Fernández, Patricia Lilia; Alvarez, Carina Rosa; Taboada, Miguel Angel; Assessment of topsoil properties in integrated crop-livestock and continuous cropping systems under zero tillage; Csiro Publishing; Australian Journal Of Soil Research; 49; 2; 8-2011; 143-151
0004-9573
1838-675X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192955
identifier_str_mv Fernández, Patricia Lilia; Alvarez, Carina Rosa; Taboada, Miguel Angel; Assessment of topsoil properties in integrated crop-livestock and continuous cropping systems under zero tillage; Csiro Publishing; Australian Journal Of Soil Research; 49; 2; 8-2011; 143-151
0004-9573
1838-675X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1071/SR10086
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Csiro Publishing
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Csiro Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269368636932096
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares