Towards an argument interchange format

Autores
Chesñevar, Carlos Iván; McGinnis, Jarred; Modgil, Sanjay; Rahwan, Iyad; Reed, Chris; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; South, Matthew; Vreeswijk, Gerard; Wilmott, Steven
Año de publicación
2006
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The theory of argumentation is a rich, interdisciplinary area of research straddling the fields of artificial intelligence, philosophy, communication studies, linguistics and psychology. In the last few years, significant progress has been made in understanding the theoretical properties of different argumentation logics. However, one major barrier to the development and practical deployment of argumentation systems is the lack of a shared, agreed notation or ‘interchange format’ for argumentation and arguments. In this paper, we describe a draft specification for an argument interchange format (AIF) intended for representation and exchange of data between various argumentation tools and agent-based applications. It represents a consensus ‘abstract model’ established by researchers across fields of argumentation, artificial intelligence and multi-agent systems. In its current form, this specification is intended as a starting point for further discussion and elaboration by the community, rather than an attempt at a definitive, all-encompassing model. However, to demonstrate proof of concept, a use case scenario is briefly described. Moreover, three concrete realizations or ‘reifications’ of the abstract model are illustrated.
Fil: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván. Universidad de Lleida; España. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina
Fil: McGinnis, Jarred. University of Edinburgh; Reino Unido
Fil: Modgil, Sanjay. Cancer Research; Reino Unido
Fil: Rahwan, Iyad. University of Edinburgh; Reino Unido. British University in Dubai; Emiratos Arabes Unidos
Fil: Reed, Chris. University of Dundee; Reino Unido
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina
Fil: South, Matthew. Cancer Research; Reino Unido
Fil: Vreeswijk, Gerard. Universiteit Utrecht; Países Bajos
Fil: Wilmott, Steven. Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya; España
Materia
Argument Interchange
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/82707
Acceder
id CONICETDig_d562dd93f574e62ed8bffca2fae5ed77
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/82707
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Towards an argument interchange formatChesñevar, Carlos IvánMcGinnis, JarredModgil, SanjayRahwan, IyadReed, ChrisSimari, Guillermo RicardoSouth, MatthewVreeswijk, GerardWilmott, StevenArgument Interchangehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.11https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2The theory of argumentation is a rich, interdisciplinary area of research straddling the fields of artificial intelligence, philosophy, communication studies, linguistics and psychology. In the last few years, significant progress has been made in understanding the theoretical properties of different argumentation logics. However, one major barrier to the development and practical deployment of argumentation systems is the lack of a shared, agreed notation or ‘interchange format’ for argumentation and arguments. In this paper, we describe a draft specification for an argument interchange format (AIF) intended for representation and exchange of data between various argumentation tools and agent-based applications. It represents a consensus ‘abstract model’ established by researchers across fields of argumentation, artificial intelligence and multi-agent systems. In its current form, this specification is intended as a starting point for further discussion and elaboration by the community, rather than an attempt at a definitive, all-encompassing model. However, to demonstrate proof of concept, a use case scenario is briefly described. Moreover, three concrete realizations or ‘reifications’ of the abstract model are illustrated.Fil: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván. Universidad de Lleida; España. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; ArgentinaFil: McGinnis, Jarred. University of Edinburgh; Reino UnidoFil: Modgil, Sanjay. Cancer Research; Reino UnidoFil: Rahwan, Iyad. University of Edinburgh; Reino Unido. British University in Dubai; Emiratos Arabes UnidosFil: Reed, Chris. University of Dundee; Reino UnidoFil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; ArgentinaFil: South, Matthew. Cancer Research; Reino UnidoFil: Vreeswijk, Gerard. Universiteit Utrecht; Países BajosFil: Wilmott, Steven. Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya; EspañaCambridge University Press2006-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/82707Chesñevar, Carlos Iván; McGinnis, Jarred; Modgil, Sanjay; Rahwan, Iyad; Reed, Chris; et al.; Towards an argument interchange format; Cambridge University Press; Knowledge Engineering Review; 21; 4; 12-2006; 293-3160269-88891469-8005CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/knowledge-engineering-review/article/towards-an-argument-interchange-format/B5398A5BC5ECB369AF119DE7913558AAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/S0269888906001044info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:46:48Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/82707instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:46:48.912CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Towards an argument interchange format
title Towards an argument interchange format
spellingShingle Towards an argument interchange format
Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
Argument Interchange
title_short Towards an argument interchange format
title_full Towards an argument interchange format
title_fullStr Towards an argument interchange format
title_full_unstemmed Towards an argument interchange format
title_sort Towards an argument interchange format
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
McGinnis, Jarred
Modgil, Sanjay
Rahwan, Iyad
Reed, Chris
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
South, Matthew
Vreeswijk, Gerard
Wilmott, Steven
author Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
author_facet Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
McGinnis, Jarred
Modgil, Sanjay
Rahwan, Iyad
Reed, Chris
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
South, Matthew
Vreeswijk, Gerard
Wilmott, Steven
author_role author
author2 McGinnis, Jarred
Modgil, Sanjay
Rahwan, Iyad
Reed, Chris
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
South, Matthew
Vreeswijk, Gerard
Wilmott, Steven
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Argument Interchange
topic Argument Interchange
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.11
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The theory of argumentation is a rich, interdisciplinary area of research straddling the fields of artificial intelligence, philosophy, communication studies, linguistics and psychology. In the last few years, significant progress has been made in understanding the theoretical properties of different argumentation logics. However, one major barrier to the development and practical deployment of argumentation systems is the lack of a shared, agreed notation or ‘interchange format’ for argumentation and arguments. In this paper, we describe a draft specification for an argument interchange format (AIF) intended for representation and exchange of data between various argumentation tools and agent-based applications. It represents a consensus ‘abstract model’ established by researchers across fields of argumentation, artificial intelligence and multi-agent systems. In its current form, this specification is intended as a starting point for further discussion and elaboration by the community, rather than an attempt at a definitive, all-encompassing model. However, to demonstrate proof of concept, a use case scenario is briefly described. Moreover, three concrete realizations or ‘reifications’ of the abstract model are illustrated.
Fil: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván. Universidad de Lleida; España. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina
Fil: McGinnis, Jarred. University of Edinburgh; Reino Unido
Fil: Modgil, Sanjay. Cancer Research; Reino Unido
Fil: Rahwan, Iyad. University of Edinburgh; Reino Unido. British University in Dubai; Emiratos Arabes Unidos
Fil: Reed, Chris. University of Dundee; Reino Unido
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina
Fil: South, Matthew. Cancer Research; Reino Unido
Fil: Vreeswijk, Gerard. Universiteit Utrecht; Países Bajos
Fil: Wilmott, Steven. Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya; España
description The theory of argumentation is a rich, interdisciplinary area of research straddling the fields of artificial intelligence, philosophy, communication studies, linguistics and psychology. In the last few years, significant progress has been made in understanding the theoretical properties of different argumentation logics. However, one major barrier to the development and practical deployment of argumentation systems is the lack of a shared, agreed notation or ‘interchange format’ for argumentation and arguments. In this paper, we describe a draft specification for an argument interchange format (AIF) intended for representation and exchange of data between various argumentation tools and agent-based applications. It represents a consensus ‘abstract model’ established by researchers across fields of argumentation, artificial intelligence and multi-agent systems. In its current form, this specification is intended as a starting point for further discussion and elaboration by the community, rather than an attempt at a definitive, all-encompassing model. However, to demonstrate proof of concept, a use case scenario is briefly described. Moreover, three concrete realizations or ‘reifications’ of the abstract model are illustrated.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/82707
Chesñevar, Carlos Iván; McGinnis, Jarred; Modgil, Sanjay; Rahwan, Iyad; Reed, Chris; et al.; Towards an argument interchange format; Cambridge University Press; Knowledge Engineering Review; 21; 4; 12-2006; 293-316
0269-8889
1469-8005
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/82707
identifier_str_mv Chesñevar, Carlos Iván; McGinnis, Jarred; Modgil, Sanjay; Rahwan, Iyad; Reed, Chris; et al.; Towards an argument interchange format; Cambridge University Press; Knowledge Engineering Review; 21; 4; 12-2006; 293-316
0269-8889
1469-8005
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/knowledge-engineering-review/article/towards-an-argument-interchange-format/B5398A5BC5ECB369AF119DE7913558AA
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/S0269888906001044
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613460249280512
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares