A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide

Autores
Pierce, Simon; Negreiros, Daniel; Cerabolini, Bruno E. L.; Kattge, Jens; Díaz, Sandra Myrna; Grime, John Philip; Thompson, Ken; Hunt, Roderick; Wilson, Peter J.; Buffa, Gabriella; Nyakunga, Oliver C.; Reich, Peter B.; Caccianiga, Marco; Mangili, Federico; Ceriani, Roberta M.; Luzzaro, Alessandra; Brusa, Guido; Siefert, Andrew; Barbosa, Newton P. U.; Chapin III, Francis Stuart; Cornwell, William K.; Fang, Jingyun; Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson; Garnier, Eric; Le Stradic, Soizig; Peñuelas, Josep; Melo, Felipe P. L.; Slaviero, Antonio; Tabarelli, Marcelo; Tampucci, Duccio
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Competitor, stress‐tolerator, ruderal (CSR) theory is a prominent plant functional strategy scheme previously applied to local floras. Globally, the wide geographic and phylogenetic coverage of available values of leaf area (LA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and specific leaf area (SLA) (representing, respectively, interspecific variation in plant size and conservative vs. acquisitive resource economics) promises the general application of CSR strategies across biomes, including the tropical forests hosting a large proportion of Earth´s diversity.We used trait variation for 3068 tracheophytes (representing 198 families, six continents and 14 biomes) to create a globally calibrated CSR strategy calculator tool and investigate strategy?environment relationships across biomes world‐wide.Due to disparity in trait availability globally, co‐inertia analysis was used to check correspondence between a ?wide geographic coverage, few traits? data set and a ?restricted coverage, many traits? subset of 371 species for which 14 whole‐plant, flowering, seed and leaf traits (including leaf nitrogen content) were available. CSR strategy/environment relationships within biomes were investigated using fourth‐corner and RLQ analyses to determine strategy/climate specializations.Strong, significant concordance (RV = 0·597; P < 0·0001) was evident between the 14 trait multivariate space and when only LA, LDMC and SLA were used.Biomes such as tropical moist broadleaf forests exhibited strategy convergence (i.e. clustered around a CS/CSR median; C:S:R = 43:42:15%), with CS‐selection associated with warm, stable situations (lesser temperature seasonality), with greater annual precipitation and potential evapotranspiration. Other biomes were characterized by strategy divergence: for example, deserts varied between xeromorphic perennials such as Larrea divaricata, classified as S‐selected (C:S:R = 1:99:0%) and broadly R‐selected annual herbs (e.g. Claytonia perfoliata; R/CR‐selected; C:S:R = 21:0:79%). Strategy convergence was evident for several growth habits (e.g. trees) but not others (forbs).The CSR strategies of vascular plants can now be compared quantitatively within and between biomes at the global scale. Through known linkages between underlying leaf traits and growth rates, herbivory and decomposition rates, this method and the strategy?environment relationships it elucidates will help to predict which kinds of species may assemble in response to changes in biogeochemical cycles, climate and land use.
Fil: Pierce, Simon. University Of Milan; Italia
Fil: Negreiros, Daniel. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Brasil
Fil: Cerabolini, Bruno E. L.. Universidad de Insubria; Italia
Fil: Kattge, Jens. 1max Planck Institute For Biogeochemistr; Alemania
Fil: Díaz, Sandra Myrna. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal; Argentina
Fil: Grime, John Philip. University of Sheffield; Reino Unido
Fil: Thompson, Ken. University of Sheffield; Reino Unido
Fil: Hunt, Roderick. University of Exeter; Reino Unido
Fil: Wilson, Peter J.. University of Sheffield; Reino Unido
Fil: Buffa, Gabriella. University Ca’Foscari of Venice; Italia
Fil: Nyakunga, Oliver C.. University Ca’Foscari of Venice; Italia
Fil: Reich, Peter B.. University of Minnesota; Estados Unidos
Fil: Caccianiga, Marco. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia
Fil: Mangili, Federico. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia
Fil: Ceriani, Roberta M.. The Native Flora Centre; Italia. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia
Fil: Luzzaro, Alessandra. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia
Fil: Brusa, Guido. University of Insubria; Italia
Fil: Siefert, Andrew. University of California at Davis; Estados Unidos
Fil: Barbosa, Newton P. U.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Brasil
Fil: Chapin III, Francis Stuart. University Of Alaska; Estados Unidos
Fil: Cornwell, William K.. University of New South Wales; Australia
Fil: Fang, Jingyun. The Chinese Academy of Sciences; China
Fil: Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Brasil
Fil: Garnier, Eric. Centre d’Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive; Francia
Fil: Le Stradic, Soizig. Université de Liège; Bélgica
Fil: Peñuelas, Josep. Global Ecology Unit; España
Fil: Melo, Felipe P. L.. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Brasil
Fil: Slaviero, Antonio. University Ca’Foscari of Venice; Italia
Fil: Tabarelli, Marcelo. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Brasil
Fil: Tampucci, Duccio. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia
Materia
Csr
Ecological Strategies
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/52011

id CONICETDig_d2ba791300a540b5b3315340e88261a8
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/52011
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-widePierce, SimonNegreiros, DanielCerabolini, Bruno E. L.Kattge, JensDíaz, Sandra MyrnaGrime, John PhilipThompson, KenHunt, RoderickWilson, Peter J.Buffa, GabriellaNyakunga, Oliver C.Reich, Peter B.Caccianiga, MarcoMangili, FedericoCeriani, Roberta M.Luzzaro, AlessandraBrusa, GuidoSiefert, AndrewBarbosa, Newton P. U.Chapin III, Francis StuartCornwell, William K.Fang, JingyunFernandes, Geraldo WilsonGarnier, EricLe Stradic, SoizigPeñuelas, JosepMelo, Felipe P. L.Slaviero, AntonioTabarelli, MarceloTampucci, DuccioCsrEcological Strategieshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Competitor, stress‐tolerator, ruderal (CSR) theory is a prominent plant functional strategy scheme previously applied to local floras. Globally, the wide geographic and phylogenetic coverage of available values of leaf area (LA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and specific leaf area (SLA) (representing, respectively, interspecific variation in plant size and conservative vs. acquisitive resource economics) promises the general application of CSR strategies across biomes, including the tropical forests hosting a large proportion of Earth´s diversity.We used trait variation for 3068 tracheophytes (representing 198 families, six continents and 14 biomes) to create a globally calibrated CSR strategy calculator tool and investigate strategy?environment relationships across biomes world‐wide.Due to disparity in trait availability globally, co‐inertia analysis was used to check correspondence between a ?wide geographic coverage, few traits? data set and a ?restricted coverage, many traits? subset of 371 species for which 14 whole‐plant, flowering, seed and leaf traits (including leaf nitrogen content) were available. CSR strategy/environment relationships within biomes were investigated using fourth‐corner and RLQ analyses to determine strategy/climate specializations.Strong, significant concordance (RV = 0·597; P < 0·0001) was evident between the 14 trait multivariate space and when only LA, LDMC and SLA were used.Biomes such as tropical moist broadleaf forests exhibited strategy convergence (i.e. clustered around a CS/CSR median; C:S:R = 43:42:15%), with CS‐selection associated with warm, stable situations (lesser temperature seasonality), with greater annual precipitation and potential evapotranspiration. Other biomes were characterized by strategy divergence: for example, deserts varied between xeromorphic perennials such as Larrea divaricata, classified as S‐selected (C:S:R = 1:99:0%) and broadly R‐selected annual herbs (e.g. Claytonia perfoliata; R/CR‐selected; C:S:R = 21:0:79%). Strategy convergence was evident for several growth habits (e.g. trees) but not others (forbs).The CSR strategies of vascular plants can now be compared quantitatively within and between biomes at the global scale. Through known linkages between underlying leaf traits and growth rates, herbivory and decomposition rates, this method and the strategy?environment relationships it elucidates will help to predict which kinds of species may assemble in response to changes in biogeochemical cycles, climate and land use.Fil: Pierce, Simon. University Of Milan; ItaliaFil: Negreiros, Daniel. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; BrasilFil: Cerabolini, Bruno E. L.. Universidad de Insubria; ItaliaFil: Kattge, Jens. 1max Planck Institute For Biogeochemistr; AlemaniaFil: Díaz, Sandra Myrna. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal; ArgentinaFil: Grime, John Philip. University of Sheffield; Reino UnidoFil: Thompson, Ken. University of Sheffield; Reino UnidoFil: Hunt, Roderick. University of Exeter; Reino UnidoFil: Wilson, Peter J.. University of Sheffield; Reino UnidoFil: Buffa, Gabriella. University Ca’Foscari of Venice; ItaliaFil: Nyakunga, Oliver C.. University Ca’Foscari of Venice; ItaliaFil: Reich, Peter B.. University of Minnesota; Estados UnidosFil: Caccianiga, Marco. Università degli Studi di Milano; ItaliaFil: Mangili, Federico. Università degli Studi di Milano; ItaliaFil: Ceriani, Roberta M.. The Native Flora Centre; Italia. Università degli Studi di Milano; ItaliaFil: Luzzaro, Alessandra. Università degli Studi di Milano; ItaliaFil: Brusa, Guido. University of Insubria; ItaliaFil: Siefert, Andrew. University of California at Davis; Estados UnidosFil: Barbosa, Newton P. U.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; BrasilFil: Chapin III, Francis Stuart. University Of Alaska; Estados UnidosFil: Cornwell, William K.. University of New South Wales; AustraliaFil: Fang, Jingyun. The Chinese Academy of Sciences; ChinaFil: Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; BrasilFil: Garnier, Eric. Centre d’Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive; FranciaFil: Le Stradic, Soizig. Université de Liège; BélgicaFil: Peñuelas, Josep. Global Ecology Unit; EspañaFil: Melo, Felipe P. L.. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; BrasilFil: Slaviero, Antonio. University Ca’Foscari of Venice; ItaliaFil: Tabarelli, Marcelo. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; BrasilFil: Tampucci, Duccio. Università degli Studi di Milano; ItaliaWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2016-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/52011Pierce, Simon; Negreiros, Daniel; Cerabolini, Bruno E. L.; Kattge, Jens; Díaz, Sandra Myrna; et al.; A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Functional Ecology; 31; 8-2016; 444-4570269-84631365-2435CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/1365-2435info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2435.12722info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:50:12Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/52011instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:50:13.106CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide
title A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide
spellingShingle A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide
Pierce, Simon
Csr
Ecological Strategies
title_short A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide
title_full A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide
title_fullStr A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide
title_full_unstemmed A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide
title_sort A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pierce, Simon
Negreiros, Daniel
Cerabolini, Bruno E. L.
Kattge, Jens
Díaz, Sandra Myrna
Grime, John Philip
Thompson, Ken
Hunt, Roderick
Wilson, Peter J.
Buffa, Gabriella
Nyakunga, Oliver C.
Reich, Peter B.
Caccianiga, Marco
Mangili, Federico
Ceriani, Roberta M.
Luzzaro, Alessandra
Brusa, Guido
Siefert, Andrew
Barbosa, Newton P. U.
Chapin III, Francis Stuart
Cornwell, William K.
Fang, Jingyun
Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson
Garnier, Eric
Le Stradic, Soizig
Peñuelas, Josep
Melo, Felipe P. L.
Slaviero, Antonio
Tabarelli, Marcelo
Tampucci, Duccio
author Pierce, Simon
author_facet Pierce, Simon
Negreiros, Daniel
Cerabolini, Bruno E. L.
Kattge, Jens
Díaz, Sandra Myrna
Grime, John Philip
Thompson, Ken
Hunt, Roderick
Wilson, Peter J.
Buffa, Gabriella
Nyakunga, Oliver C.
Reich, Peter B.
Caccianiga, Marco
Mangili, Federico
Ceriani, Roberta M.
Luzzaro, Alessandra
Brusa, Guido
Siefert, Andrew
Barbosa, Newton P. U.
Chapin III, Francis Stuart
Cornwell, William K.
Fang, Jingyun
Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson
Garnier, Eric
Le Stradic, Soizig
Peñuelas, Josep
Melo, Felipe P. L.
Slaviero, Antonio
Tabarelli, Marcelo
Tampucci, Duccio
author_role author
author2 Negreiros, Daniel
Cerabolini, Bruno E. L.
Kattge, Jens
Díaz, Sandra Myrna
Grime, John Philip
Thompson, Ken
Hunt, Roderick
Wilson, Peter J.
Buffa, Gabriella
Nyakunga, Oliver C.
Reich, Peter B.
Caccianiga, Marco
Mangili, Federico
Ceriani, Roberta M.
Luzzaro, Alessandra
Brusa, Guido
Siefert, Andrew
Barbosa, Newton P. U.
Chapin III, Francis Stuart
Cornwell, William K.
Fang, Jingyun
Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson
Garnier, Eric
Le Stradic, Soizig
Peñuelas, Josep
Melo, Felipe P. L.
Slaviero, Antonio
Tabarelli, Marcelo
Tampucci, Duccio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Csr
Ecological Strategies
topic Csr
Ecological Strategies
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Competitor, stress‐tolerator, ruderal (CSR) theory is a prominent plant functional strategy scheme previously applied to local floras. Globally, the wide geographic and phylogenetic coverage of available values of leaf area (LA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and specific leaf area (SLA) (representing, respectively, interspecific variation in plant size and conservative vs. acquisitive resource economics) promises the general application of CSR strategies across biomes, including the tropical forests hosting a large proportion of Earth´s diversity.We used trait variation for 3068 tracheophytes (representing 198 families, six continents and 14 biomes) to create a globally calibrated CSR strategy calculator tool and investigate strategy?environment relationships across biomes world‐wide.Due to disparity in trait availability globally, co‐inertia analysis was used to check correspondence between a ?wide geographic coverage, few traits? data set and a ?restricted coverage, many traits? subset of 371 species for which 14 whole‐plant, flowering, seed and leaf traits (including leaf nitrogen content) were available. CSR strategy/environment relationships within biomes were investigated using fourth‐corner and RLQ analyses to determine strategy/climate specializations.Strong, significant concordance (RV = 0·597; P < 0·0001) was evident between the 14 trait multivariate space and when only LA, LDMC and SLA were used.Biomes such as tropical moist broadleaf forests exhibited strategy convergence (i.e. clustered around a CS/CSR median; C:S:R = 43:42:15%), with CS‐selection associated with warm, stable situations (lesser temperature seasonality), with greater annual precipitation and potential evapotranspiration. Other biomes were characterized by strategy divergence: for example, deserts varied between xeromorphic perennials such as Larrea divaricata, classified as S‐selected (C:S:R = 1:99:0%) and broadly R‐selected annual herbs (e.g. Claytonia perfoliata; R/CR‐selected; C:S:R = 21:0:79%). Strategy convergence was evident for several growth habits (e.g. trees) but not others (forbs).The CSR strategies of vascular plants can now be compared quantitatively within and between biomes at the global scale. Through known linkages between underlying leaf traits and growth rates, herbivory and decomposition rates, this method and the strategy?environment relationships it elucidates will help to predict which kinds of species may assemble in response to changes in biogeochemical cycles, climate and land use.
Fil: Pierce, Simon. University Of Milan; Italia
Fil: Negreiros, Daniel. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Brasil
Fil: Cerabolini, Bruno E. L.. Universidad de Insubria; Italia
Fil: Kattge, Jens. 1max Planck Institute For Biogeochemistr; Alemania
Fil: Díaz, Sandra Myrna. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal; Argentina
Fil: Grime, John Philip. University of Sheffield; Reino Unido
Fil: Thompson, Ken. University of Sheffield; Reino Unido
Fil: Hunt, Roderick. University of Exeter; Reino Unido
Fil: Wilson, Peter J.. University of Sheffield; Reino Unido
Fil: Buffa, Gabriella. University Ca’Foscari of Venice; Italia
Fil: Nyakunga, Oliver C.. University Ca’Foscari of Venice; Italia
Fil: Reich, Peter B.. University of Minnesota; Estados Unidos
Fil: Caccianiga, Marco. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia
Fil: Mangili, Federico. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia
Fil: Ceriani, Roberta M.. The Native Flora Centre; Italia. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia
Fil: Luzzaro, Alessandra. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia
Fil: Brusa, Guido. University of Insubria; Italia
Fil: Siefert, Andrew. University of California at Davis; Estados Unidos
Fil: Barbosa, Newton P. U.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Brasil
Fil: Chapin III, Francis Stuart. University Of Alaska; Estados Unidos
Fil: Cornwell, William K.. University of New South Wales; Australia
Fil: Fang, Jingyun. The Chinese Academy of Sciences; China
Fil: Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Brasil
Fil: Garnier, Eric. Centre d’Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive; Francia
Fil: Le Stradic, Soizig. Université de Liège; Bélgica
Fil: Peñuelas, Josep. Global Ecology Unit; España
Fil: Melo, Felipe P. L.. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Brasil
Fil: Slaviero, Antonio. University Ca’Foscari of Venice; Italia
Fil: Tabarelli, Marcelo. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Brasil
Fil: Tampucci, Duccio. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia
description Competitor, stress‐tolerator, ruderal (CSR) theory is a prominent plant functional strategy scheme previously applied to local floras. Globally, the wide geographic and phylogenetic coverage of available values of leaf area (LA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and specific leaf area (SLA) (representing, respectively, interspecific variation in plant size and conservative vs. acquisitive resource economics) promises the general application of CSR strategies across biomes, including the tropical forests hosting a large proportion of Earth´s diversity.We used trait variation for 3068 tracheophytes (representing 198 families, six continents and 14 biomes) to create a globally calibrated CSR strategy calculator tool and investigate strategy?environment relationships across biomes world‐wide.Due to disparity in trait availability globally, co‐inertia analysis was used to check correspondence between a ?wide geographic coverage, few traits? data set and a ?restricted coverage, many traits? subset of 371 species for which 14 whole‐plant, flowering, seed and leaf traits (including leaf nitrogen content) were available. CSR strategy/environment relationships within biomes were investigated using fourth‐corner and RLQ analyses to determine strategy/climate specializations.Strong, significant concordance (RV = 0·597; P < 0·0001) was evident between the 14 trait multivariate space and when only LA, LDMC and SLA were used.Biomes such as tropical moist broadleaf forests exhibited strategy convergence (i.e. clustered around a CS/CSR median; C:S:R = 43:42:15%), with CS‐selection associated with warm, stable situations (lesser temperature seasonality), with greater annual precipitation and potential evapotranspiration. Other biomes were characterized by strategy divergence: for example, deserts varied between xeromorphic perennials such as Larrea divaricata, classified as S‐selected (C:S:R = 1:99:0%) and broadly R‐selected annual herbs (e.g. Claytonia perfoliata; R/CR‐selected; C:S:R = 21:0:79%). Strategy convergence was evident for several growth habits (e.g. trees) but not others (forbs).The CSR strategies of vascular plants can now be compared quantitatively within and between biomes at the global scale. Through known linkages between underlying leaf traits and growth rates, herbivory and decomposition rates, this method and the strategy?environment relationships it elucidates will help to predict which kinds of species may assemble in response to changes in biogeochemical cycles, climate and land use.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/52011
Pierce, Simon; Negreiros, Daniel; Cerabolini, Bruno E. L.; Kattge, Jens; Díaz, Sandra Myrna; et al.; A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Functional Ecology; 31; 8-2016; 444-457
0269-8463
1365-2435
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/52011
identifier_str_mv Pierce, Simon; Negreiros, Daniel; Cerabolini, Bruno E. L.; Kattge, Jens; Díaz, Sandra Myrna; et al.; A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Functional Ecology; 31; 8-2016; 444-457
0269-8463
1365-2435
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/1365-2435
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2435.12722
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613549107707904
score 13.070432