Obstinate rigour: Populism without apologies authors’ reply to critics

Autores
Cadahia, Luciana; Biglieri, Paula Andrea
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In this article we offer a response to each of the authors who participated in the exchange. But instead of responding to each one separately, we decided to organise our writing around three themes. In the first place, we propose an intellectual, militant and biographical description that helps to put the original motivations of our book Seven Essays on Populism into context. Secondly, we offer a reflection on the role of ontology in our text, paying special attention to the critiques made by Barros & Martínez Prado, Bosteels and Marchart. Thirdly, we conclude with a deepening of the link between populism and feminism, paying special attention to the lucid observations of Barros & Martínez Prado and Gunnarsson-Payne.
Fil: Cadahia, Luciana. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile
Fil: Biglieri, Paula Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Estudios e Investigación de América Latina; Argentina
Materia
POPULISM
FEMINISM
ONTOLOGY
ANTAGONISM
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/219605
Acceder
id CONICETDig_d10a411d6593aa3cd5f6c7a6a5b68485
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/219605
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Obstinate rigour: Populism without apologies authors’ reply to criticsCadahia, LucianaBiglieri, Paula AndreaPOPULISMFEMINISMONTOLOGYANTAGONISMhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5In this article we offer a response to each of the authors who participated in the exchange. But instead of responding to each one separately, we decided to organise our writing around three themes. In the first place, we propose an intellectual, militant and biographical description that helps to put the original motivations of our book Seven Essays on Populism into context. Secondly, we offer a reflection on the role of ontology in our text, paying special attention to the critiques made by Barros & Martínez Prado, Bosteels and Marchart. Thirdly, we conclude with a deepening of the link between populism and feminism, paying special attention to the lucid observations of Barros & Martínez Prado and Gunnarsson-Payne.Fil: Cadahia, Luciana. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; ChileFil: Biglieri, Paula Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Estudios e Investigación de América Latina; ArgentinaUniversità degli studi di Trieste. Dipartimento di Filosofia2023-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/219605Cadahia, Luciana; Biglieri, Paula Andrea; Obstinate rigour: Populism without apologies authors’ reply to critics; Università degli studi di Trieste. Dipartimento di Filosofia; Etica & Politica; 25; 2; 7-2023; 299-3271825-5167CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www2.units.it/etica/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www2.units.it/etica/2023_2/CADAHIABIGLIERI.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:02:03Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/219605instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:02:03.81CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Obstinate rigour: Populism without apologies authors’ reply to critics
title Obstinate rigour: Populism without apologies authors’ reply to critics
spellingShingle Obstinate rigour: Populism without apologies authors’ reply to critics
Cadahia, Luciana
POPULISM
FEMINISM
ONTOLOGY
ANTAGONISM
title_short Obstinate rigour: Populism without apologies authors’ reply to critics
title_full Obstinate rigour: Populism without apologies authors’ reply to critics
title_fullStr Obstinate rigour: Populism without apologies authors’ reply to critics
title_full_unstemmed Obstinate rigour: Populism without apologies authors’ reply to critics
title_sort Obstinate rigour: Populism without apologies authors’ reply to critics
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cadahia, Luciana
Biglieri, Paula Andrea
author Cadahia, Luciana
author_facet Cadahia, Luciana
Biglieri, Paula Andrea
author_role author
author2 Biglieri, Paula Andrea
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv POPULISM
FEMINISM
ONTOLOGY
ANTAGONISM
topic POPULISM
FEMINISM
ONTOLOGY
ANTAGONISM
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In this article we offer a response to each of the authors who participated in the exchange. But instead of responding to each one separately, we decided to organise our writing around three themes. In the first place, we propose an intellectual, militant and biographical description that helps to put the original motivations of our book Seven Essays on Populism into context. Secondly, we offer a reflection on the role of ontology in our text, paying special attention to the critiques made by Barros & Martínez Prado, Bosteels and Marchart. Thirdly, we conclude with a deepening of the link between populism and feminism, paying special attention to the lucid observations of Barros & Martínez Prado and Gunnarsson-Payne.
Fil: Cadahia, Luciana. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile
Fil: Biglieri, Paula Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Estudios e Investigación de América Latina; Argentina
description In this article we offer a response to each of the authors who participated in the exchange. But instead of responding to each one separately, we decided to organise our writing around three themes. In the first place, we propose an intellectual, militant and biographical description that helps to put the original motivations of our book Seven Essays on Populism into context. Secondly, we offer a reflection on the role of ontology in our text, paying special attention to the critiques made by Barros & Martínez Prado, Bosteels and Marchart. Thirdly, we conclude with a deepening of the link between populism and feminism, paying special attention to the lucid observations of Barros & Martínez Prado and Gunnarsson-Payne.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/219605
Cadahia, Luciana; Biglieri, Paula Andrea; Obstinate rigour: Populism without apologies authors’ reply to critics; Università degli studi di Trieste. Dipartimento di Filosofia; Etica & Politica; 25; 2; 7-2023; 299-327
1825-5167
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/219605
identifier_str_mv Cadahia, Luciana; Biglieri, Paula Andrea; Obstinate rigour: Populism without apologies authors’ reply to critics; Università degli studi di Trieste. Dipartimento di Filosofia; Etica & Politica; 25; 2; 7-2023; 299-327
1825-5167
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www2.units.it/etica/
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www2.units.it/etica/2023_2/CADAHIABIGLIERI.pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Università degli studi di Trieste. Dipartimento di Filosofia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Università degli studi di Trieste. Dipartimento di Filosofia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613820717203456
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares