Reply to "comment on 'Classical description of H(1s) and H∗(n=2) for cross-section calculations relevant to charge-exchange diagnostics'"

Autores
Cariatore, Nelson Daniel; Otranto, Sebastián; Olson, R.
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In reply to the Comment of Jorge et al. [Phys. Rev. A 93, 066701 (2016)], we agree and reconfirm that the alternative classical trajectory Monte Carlo method (called hydrogenic-Z-CTMC) radial distributions for H∗(n = 2) we recently published are not stable in time. However, we show that such lack of stability which is more noticeable for H(2s) than for H(2p) is due to the initialization procedure employed and not to the hydrogenic-Z-CTMC method itself. A new set of completely stable hydrogenic-Z-CTMC calculations for H∗(n = 2) is introduced and found in very good agreement with standard microcanonical results reinforcing our previous findings. A second criticism of Jorge et al. concerning the number of components in hydrogenic-ZCTMC with n > 1 for H(1s) is shown not to have a significant impact on relative (n,l) populations in the final state.
Fil: Cariatore, Nelson Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Física del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Física. Instituto de Física del Sur; Argentina
Fil: Otranto, Sebastián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Física del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Física. Instituto de Física del Sur; Argentina
Fil: Olson, R.. University of Missouri; Estados Unidos
Materia
Charge Exchange
Line Emission Cross Sections
Ctmc
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/62270
Acceder
id CONICETDig_cdfc862aaa166b928c7eee2ca0c23d9a
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/62270
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Reply to "comment on 'Classical description of H(1s) and H∗(n=2) for cross-section calculations relevant to charge-exchange diagnostics'"Cariatore, Nelson DanielOtranto, SebastiánOlson, R.Charge ExchangeLine Emission Cross SectionsCtmchttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1In reply to the Comment of Jorge et al. [Phys. Rev. A 93, 066701 (2016)], we agree and reconfirm that the alternative classical trajectory Monte Carlo method (called hydrogenic-Z-CTMC) radial distributions for H∗(n = 2) we recently published are not stable in time. However, we show that such lack of stability which is more noticeable for H(2s) than for H(2p) is due to the initialization procedure employed and not to the hydrogenic-Z-CTMC method itself. A new set of completely stable hydrogenic-Z-CTMC calculations for H∗(n = 2) is introduced and found in very good agreement with standard microcanonical results reinforcing our previous findings. A second criticism of Jorge et al. concerning the number of components in hydrogenic-ZCTMC with n > 1 for H(1s) is shown not to have a significant impact on relative (n,l) populations in the final state.Fil: Cariatore, Nelson Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Física del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Física. Instituto de Física del Sur; ArgentinaFil: Otranto, Sebastián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Física del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Física. Instituto de Física del Sur; ArgentinaFil: Olson, R.. University of Missouri; Estados UnidosAmerican Physical Society2016-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/62270Cariatore, Nelson Daniel; Otranto, Sebastián; Olson, R.; Reply to "comment on 'Classical description of H(1s) and H∗(n=2) for cross-section calculations relevant to charge-exchange diagnostics'"; American Physical Society; Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics; 93; 6; 6-2016; 667021-6670251050-2947CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.066702info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.066702info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:30:27Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/62270instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:30:28.028CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reply to "comment on 'Classical description of H(1s) and H∗(n=2) for cross-section calculations relevant to charge-exchange diagnostics'"
title Reply to "comment on 'Classical description of H(1s) and H∗(n=2) for cross-section calculations relevant to charge-exchange diagnostics'"
spellingShingle Reply to "comment on 'Classical description of H(1s) and H∗(n=2) for cross-section calculations relevant to charge-exchange diagnostics'"
Cariatore, Nelson Daniel
Charge Exchange
Line Emission Cross Sections
Ctmc
title_short Reply to "comment on 'Classical description of H(1s) and H∗(n=2) for cross-section calculations relevant to charge-exchange diagnostics'"
title_full Reply to "comment on 'Classical description of H(1s) and H∗(n=2) for cross-section calculations relevant to charge-exchange diagnostics'"
title_fullStr Reply to "comment on 'Classical description of H(1s) and H∗(n=2) for cross-section calculations relevant to charge-exchange diagnostics'"
title_full_unstemmed Reply to "comment on 'Classical description of H(1s) and H∗(n=2) for cross-section calculations relevant to charge-exchange diagnostics'"
title_sort Reply to "comment on 'Classical description of H(1s) and H∗(n=2) for cross-section calculations relevant to charge-exchange diagnostics'"
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cariatore, Nelson Daniel
Otranto, Sebastián
Olson, R.
author Cariatore, Nelson Daniel
author_facet Cariatore, Nelson Daniel
Otranto, Sebastián
Olson, R.
author_role author
author2 Otranto, Sebastián
Olson, R.
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Charge Exchange
Line Emission Cross Sections
Ctmc
topic Charge Exchange
Line Emission Cross Sections
Ctmc
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In reply to the Comment of Jorge et al. [Phys. Rev. A 93, 066701 (2016)], we agree and reconfirm that the alternative classical trajectory Monte Carlo method (called hydrogenic-Z-CTMC) radial distributions for H∗(n = 2) we recently published are not stable in time. However, we show that such lack of stability which is more noticeable for H(2s) than for H(2p) is due to the initialization procedure employed and not to the hydrogenic-Z-CTMC method itself. A new set of completely stable hydrogenic-Z-CTMC calculations for H∗(n = 2) is introduced and found in very good agreement with standard microcanonical results reinforcing our previous findings. A second criticism of Jorge et al. concerning the number of components in hydrogenic-ZCTMC with n > 1 for H(1s) is shown not to have a significant impact on relative (n,l) populations in the final state.
Fil: Cariatore, Nelson Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Física del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Física. Instituto de Física del Sur; Argentina
Fil: Otranto, Sebastián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Física del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Física. Instituto de Física del Sur; Argentina
Fil: Olson, R.. University of Missouri; Estados Unidos
description In reply to the Comment of Jorge et al. [Phys. Rev. A 93, 066701 (2016)], we agree and reconfirm that the alternative classical trajectory Monte Carlo method (called hydrogenic-Z-CTMC) radial distributions for H∗(n = 2) we recently published are not stable in time. However, we show that such lack of stability which is more noticeable for H(2s) than for H(2p) is due to the initialization procedure employed and not to the hydrogenic-Z-CTMC method itself. A new set of completely stable hydrogenic-Z-CTMC calculations for H∗(n = 2) is introduced and found in very good agreement with standard microcanonical results reinforcing our previous findings. A second criticism of Jorge et al. concerning the number of components in hydrogenic-ZCTMC with n > 1 for H(1s) is shown not to have a significant impact on relative (n,l) populations in the final state.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/62270
Cariatore, Nelson Daniel; Otranto, Sebastián; Olson, R.; Reply to "comment on 'Classical description of H(1s) and H∗(n=2) for cross-section calculations relevant to charge-exchange diagnostics'"; American Physical Society; Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics; 93; 6; 6-2016; 667021-667025
1050-2947
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/62270
identifier_str_mv Cariatore, Nelson Daniel; Otranto, Sebastián; Olson, R.; Reply to "comment on 'Classical description of H(1s) and H∗(n=2) for cross-section calculations relevant to charge-exchange diagnostics'"; American Physical Society; Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics; 93; 6; 6-2016; 667021-667025
1050-2947
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.066702
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.066702
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Physical Society
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Physical Society
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614312813920256
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares