Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle dung depositions in two Urochloa forage fields with contrasting biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity

Autores
Lombardi, Banira; Loaiza, Sandra; Trujillo, Catalina; Arevalo, Ashly; Vázquez, Eduardo; Arango, Jacobo; Chirinda, Ngonidzashe
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Grazing-based production systems are a source of soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions triggered by excreta depositions. The adoption of Urochloa forages (formerly known as Brachiaria) with biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity is a promising alternative to reduce nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from excreta patches. However, how this forage affects methane (CH4) or carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from excreta patches remains unclear. This study investigated the potential effect of soils under two Urochloa forages with contrasting BNI capacity on GHG emissions from cattle dung deposits. Additionally, the N2O and CH4 emission factors (EF) for cattle dung under tropical conditions were determined. Dung from cattle grazing star grass (without BNI) was deposited on both forage plots: Urochloa hybrid cv. Mulato and Urochloa humidicola cv. Tully, with a respectively low and high BNI capacity. Two trials were conducted for GHG monitoring using the static chamber technique. Soil and dung properties and GHG emissions were monitored in trial 1. In trial 2, water was added to simulate rainfall and evaluate GHG emissions under wetter conditions. Our results showed that beneath dung patches, the forage genotype influenced daily CO2 and cumulative CH4 emissions during the driest conditions. However, no significant effect of the forage genotype was found on mitigating N2O emissions from dung. We attribute the absence of a significant BNI effect on N2O emissions to the limited incorporation of dung-N into the soil and rhizosphere where the BNI effect occurs. The average N2O EFs was 0.14%, close to the IPCC 2019 uncertainty range (0.01–0.13% at 95% confidence level). Moreover, CH4 EFs per unit of volatile solid (VS) averaged 0.31 g CH4 kgVS−1, slightly lower than the 0.6 g CH4 kgVS−1 developed by the IPCC. This implies the need to invest in studies to develop more region-specific Tier 2 EFs, including farm-level studies with animals consuming Urochloa forages to consider the complete implications of forage selection on animal excreta based GHG emissions.
Fil: Lombardi, Banira. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Tandil. Sede Tandil del Centro de Investigaciones En Fisica E Ingenieria del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia
Fil: Loaiza, Sandra. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; Colombia
Fil: Trujillo, Catalina. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia
Fil: Arevalo, Ashly. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia
Fil: Vázquez, Eduardo. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia. University of Bayreuth; Alemania
Fil: Arango, Jacobo. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia
Fil: Chirinda, Ngonidzashe. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia. Mohammed Vi Polytechnic University; Marruecos
Materia
CATTLE DUNG
EMISSION FACTOR
METHANE
NITROUS OXIDE
STATIC CHAMBER TECHNIQUE
TROPICAL FORAGES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/212061
Acceder
id CONICETDig_cbd691d68aaf9a2934c7b1ebd00442b1
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/212061
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle dung depositions in two Urochloa forage fields with contrasting biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacityLombardi, BaniraLoaiza, SandraTrujillo, CatalinaArevalo, AshlyVázquez, EduardoArango, JacoboChirinda, NgonidzasheCATTLE DUNGEMISSION FACTORMETHANENITROUS OXIDESTATIC CHAMBER TECHNIQUETROPICAL FORAGEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Grazing-based production systems are a source of soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions triggered by excreta depositions. The adoption of Urochloa forages (formerly known as Brachiaria) with biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity is a promising alternative to reduce nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from excreta patches. However, how this forage affects methane (CH4) or carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from excreta patches remains unclear. This study investigated the potential effect of soils under two Urochloa forages with contrasting BNI capacity on GHG emissions from cattle dung deposits. Additionally, the N2O and CH4 emission factors (EF) for cattle dung under tropical conditions were determined. Dung from cattle grazing star grass (without BNI) was deposited on both forage plots: Urochloa hybrid cv. Mulato and Urochloa humidicola cv. Tully, with a respectively low and high BNI capacity. Two trials were conducted for GHG monitoring using the static chamber technique. Soil and dung properties and GHG emissions were monitored in trial 1. In trial 2, water was added to simulate rainfall and evaluate GHG emissions under wetter conditions. Our results showed that beneath dung patches, the forage genotype influenced daily CO2 and cumulative CH4 emissions during the driest conditions. However, no significant effect of the forage genotype was found on mitigating N2O emissions from dung. We attribute the absence of a significant BNI effect on N2O emissions to the limited incorporation of dung-N into the soil and rhizosphere where the BNI effect occurs. The average N2O EFs was 0.14%, close to the IPCC 2019 uncertainty range (0.01–0.13% at 95% confidence level). Moreover, CH4 EFs per unit of volatile solid (VS) averaged 0.31 g CH4 kgVS−1, slightly lower than the 0.6 g CH4 kgVS−1 developed by the IPCC. This implies the need to invest in studies to develop more region-specific Tier 2 EFs, including farm-level studies with animals consuming Urochloa forages to consider the complete implications of forage selection on animal excreta based GHG emissions.Fil: Lombardi, Banira. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Tandil. Sede Tandil del Centro de Investigaciones En Fisica E Ingenieria del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; ColombiaFil: Loaiza, Sandra. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; ColombiaFil: Trujillo, Catalina. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; ColombiaFil: Arevalo, Ashly. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; ColombiaFil: Vázquez, Eduardo. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia. University of Bayreuth; AlemaniaFil: Arango, Jacobo. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; ColombiaFil: Chirinda, Ngonidzashe. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia. Mohammed Vi Polytechnic University; MarruecosElsevier Science2022-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/212061Lombardi, Banira; Loaiza, Sandra; Trujillo, Catalina; Arevalo, Ashly; Vázquez, Eduardo; et al.; Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle dung depositions in two Urochloa forage fields with contrasting biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity; Elsevier Science; Geoderma; 406; 1-2022; 1-100016-7061CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/ark/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706121005966info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115516info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:26:45Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/212061instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:26:45.817CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle dung depositions in two Urochloa forage fields with contrasting biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity
title Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle dung depositions in two Urochloa forage fields with contrasting biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity
spellingShingle Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle dung depositions in two Urochloa forage fields with contrasting biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity
Lombardi, Banira
CATTLE DUNG
EMISSION FACTOR
METHANE
NITROUS OXIDE
STATIC CHAMBER TECHNIQUE
TROPICAL FORAGES
title_short Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle dung depositions in two Urochloa forage fields with contrasting biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity
title_full Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle dung depositions in two Urochloa forage fields with contrasting biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity
title_fullStr Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle dung depositions in two Urochloa forage fields with contrasting biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity
title_full_unstemmed Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle dung depositions in two Urochloa forage fields with contrasting biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity
title_sort Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle dung depositions in two Urochloa forage fields with contrasting biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lombardi, Banira
Loaiza, Sandra
Trujillo, Catalina
Arevalo, Ashly
Vázquez, Eduardo
Arango, Jacobo
Chirinda, Ngonidzashe
author Lombardi, Banira
author_facet Lombardi, Banira
Loaiza, Sandra
Trujillo, Catalina
Arevalo, Ashly
Vázquez, Eduardo
Arango, Jacobo
Chirinda, Ngonidzashe
author_role author
author2 Loaiza, Sandra
Trujillo, Catalina
Arevalo, Ashly
Vázquez, Eduardo
Arango, Jacobo
Chirinda, Ngonidzashe
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CATTLE DUNG
EMISSION FACTOR
METHANE
NITROUS OXIDE
STATIC CHAMBER TECHNIQUE
TROPICAL FORAGES
topic CATTLE DUNG
EMISSION FACTOR
METHANE
NITROUS OXIDE
STATIC CHAMBER TECHNIQUE
TROPICAL FORAGES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Grazing-based production systems are a source of soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions triggered by excreta depositions. The adoption of Urochloa forages (formerly known as Brachiaria) with biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity is a promising alternative to reduce nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from excreta patches. However, how this forage affects methane (CH4) or carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from excreta patches remains unclear. This study investigated the potential effect of soils under two Urochloa forages with contrasting BNI capacity on GHG emissions from cattle dung deposits. Additionally, the N2O and CH4 emission factors (EF) for cattle dung under tropical conditions were determined. Dung from cattle grazing star grass (without BNI) was deposited on both forage plots: Urochloa hybrid cv. Mulato and Urochloa humidicola cv. Tully, with a respectively low and high BNI capacity. Two trials were conducted for GHG monitoring using the static chamber technique. Soil and dung properties and GHG emissions were monitored in trial 1. In trial 2, water was added to simulate rainfall and evaluate GHG emissions under wetter conditions. Our results showed that beneath dung patches, the forage genotype influenced daily CO2 and cumulative CH4 emissions during the driest conditions. However, no significant effect of the forage genotype was found on mitigating N2O emissions from dung. We attribute the absence of a significant BNI effect on N2O emissions to the limited incorporation of dung-N into the soil and rhizosphere where the BNI effect occurs. The average N2O EFs was 0.14%, close to the IPCC 2019 uncertainty range (0.01–0.13% at 95% confidence level). Moreover, CH4 EFs per unit of volatile solid (VS) averaged 0.31 g CH4 kgVS−1, slightly lower than the 0.6 g CH4 kgVS−1 developed by the IPCC. This implies the need to invest in studies to develop more region-specific Tier 2 EFs, including farm-level studies with animals consuming Urochloa forages to consider the complete implications of forage selection on animal excreta based GHG emissions.
Fil: Lombardi, Banira. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Tandil. Sede Tandil del Centro de Investigaciones En Fisica E Ingenieria del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia
Fil: Loaiza, Sandra. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; Colombia
Fil: Trujillo, Catalina. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia
Fil: Arevalo, Ashly. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia
Fil: Vázquez, Eduardo. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia. University of Bayreuth; Alemania
Fil: Arango, Jacobo. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia
Fil: Chirinda, Ngonidzashe. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical; Colombia. Mohammed Vi Polytechnic University; Marruecos
description Grazing-based production systems are a source of soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions triggered by excreta depositions. The adoption of Urochloa forages (formerly known as Brachiaria) with biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity is a promising alternative to reduce nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from excreta patches. However, how this forage affects methane (CH4) or carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from excreta patches remains unclear. This study investigated the potential effect of soils under two Urochloa forages with contrasting BNI capacity on GHG emissions from cattle dung deposits. Additionally, the N2O and CH4 emission factors (EF) for cattle dung under tropical conditions were determined. Dung from cattle grazing star grass (without BNI) was deposited on both forage plots: Urochloa hybrid cv. Mulato and Urochloa humidicola cv. Tully, with a respectively low and high BNI capacity. Two trials were conducted for GHG monitoring using the static chamber technique. Soil and dung properties and GHG emissions were monitored in trial 1. In trial 2, water was added to simulate rainfall and evaluate GHG emissions under wetter conditions. Our results showed that beneath dung patches, the forage genotype influenced daily CO2 and cumulative CH4 emissions during the driest conditions. However, no significant effect of the forage genotype was found on mitigating N2O emissions from dung. We attribute the absence of a significant BNI effect on N2O emissions to the limited incorporation of dung-N into the soil and rhizosphere where the BNI effect occurs. The average N2O EFs was 0.14%, close to the IPCC 2019 uncertainty range (0.01–0.13% at 95% confidence level). Moreover, CH4 EFs per unit of volatile solid (VS) averaged 0.31 g CH4 kgVS−1, slightly lower than the 0.6 g CH4 kgVS−1 developed by the IPCC. This implies the need to invest in studies to develop more region-specific Tier 2 EFs, including farm-level studies with animals consuming Urochloa forages to consider the complete implications of forage selection on animal excreta based GHG emissions.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/212061
Lombardi, Banira; Loaiza, Sandra; Trujillo, Catalina; Arevalo, Ashly; Vázquez, Eduardo; et al.; Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle dung depositions in two Urochloa forage fields with contrasting biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity; Elsevier Science; Geoderma; 406; 1-2022; 1-10
0016-7061
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/212061
identifier_str_mv Lombardi, Banira; Loaiza, Sandra; Trujillo, Catalina; Arevalo, Ashly; Vázquez, Eduardo; et al.; Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle dung depositions in two Urochloa forage fields with contrasting biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity; Elsevier Science; Geoderma; 406; 1-2022; 1-10
0016-7061
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/ark/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706121005966
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115516
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082716040167424
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares