Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack

Autores
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian; Tohmé, Fernando Abel
Año de publicación
2009
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The problems that arise from the presence of self-attacking arguments and odd-length cycles of attack within argumentation frameworks are widely recognized in the literature on defeasible argumentation. This paper introduces two simple semantics to capture different intuitions about what kinds of arguments should become justified in such scenarios. These semantics are modeled upon two extensions of argumentation frameworks, which we call sustainable and tolerant. Each one is constructed on the common ground of the powerful concept of admissibility introduced by Dung in [P.M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non-monotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence 77 (1995) 321-357]. The novelty of this approach consists in viewing the admissibility of a subset of arguments as relative to potentially challenging subsets of arguments. Both sustainable and tolerant semantics are more credulous than preferred semantics (i.e. they justify at least the same arguments, and possibly more). Given certain sufficient conditions they coincide among them as well as with other semantics introduced by Dung.
Fil: Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina
Fil: Tohmé, Fernando Abel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Humanidades. Centro de Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia; Argentina
Materia
Argumentation Frameworks
Credulous Semantics
Game-Theory
Lottery Paradox
Odd-Length Cycles of Attack
Self-Attacking Arguments
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/69262
Acceder
id CONICETDig_ca8815eef5ac15dd98b3ceff93aca90d
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/69262
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attackBodanza, Gustavo AdrianTohmé, Fernando AbelArgumentation FrameworksCredulous SemanticsGame-TheoryLottery ParadoxOdd-Length Cycles of AttackSelf-Attacking Argumentshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The problems that arise from the presence of self-attacking arguments and odd-length cycles of attack within argumentation frameworks are widely recognized in the literature on defeasible argumentation. This paper introduces two simple semantics to capture different intuitions about what kinds of arguments should become justified in such scenarios. These semantics are modeled upon two extensions of argumentation frameworks, which we call sustainable and tolerant. Each one is constructed on the common ground of the powerful concept of admissibility introduced by Dung in [P.M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non-monotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence 77 (1995) 321-357]. The novelty of this approach consists in viewing the admissibility of a subset of arguments as relative to potentially challenging subsets of arguments. Both sustainable and tolerant semantics are more credulous than preferred semantics (i.e. they justify at least the same arguments, and possibly more). Given certain sufficient conditions they coincide among them as well as with other semantics introduced by Dung.Fil: Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur; ArgentinaFil: Tohmé, Fernando Abel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Humanidades. Centro de Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia; ArgentinaElsevier Science2009-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/69262Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian; Tohmé, Fernando Abel; Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack; Elsevier Science; Journal of Applied Logic; 7; 4; 12-2009; 403-4201570-8683CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S157086830800027Xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jal.2007.06.012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:42:41Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/69262instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:42:41.5CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
title Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
spellingShingle Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian
Argumentation Frameworks
Credulous Semantics
Game-Theory
Lottery Paradox
Odd-Length Cycles of Attack
Self-Attacking Arguments
title_short Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
title_full Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
title_fullStr Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
title_full_unstemmed Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
title_sort Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian
Tohmé, Fernando Abel
author Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian
author_facet Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian
Tohmé, Fernando Abel
author_role author
author2 Tohmé, Fernando Abel
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Argumentation Frameworks
Credulous Semantics
Game-Theory
Lottery Paradox
Odd-Length Cycles of Attack
Self-Attacking Arguments
topic Argumentation Frameworks
Credulous Semantics
Game-Theory
Lottery Paradox
Odd-Length Cycles of Attack
Self-Attacking Arguments
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The problems that arise from the presence of self-attacking arguments and odd-length cycles of attack within argumentation frameworks are widely recognized in the literature on defeasible argumentation. This paper introduces two simple semantics to capture different intuitions about what kinds of arguments should become justified in such scenarios. These semantics are modeled upon two extensions of argumentation frameworks, which we call sustainable and tolerant. Each one is constructed on the common ground of the powerful concept of admissibility introduced by Dung in [P.M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non-monotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence 77 (1995) 321-357]. The novelty of this approach consists in viewing the admissibility of a subset of arguments as relative to potentially challenging subsets of arguments. Both sustainable and tolerant semantics are more credulous than preferred semantics (i.e. they justify at least the same arguments, and possibly more). Given certain sufficient conditions they coincide among them as well as with other semantics introduced by Dung.
Fil: Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina
Fil: Tohmé, Fernando Abel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Humanidades. Centro de Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia; Argentina
description The problems that arise from the presence of self-attacking arguments and odd-length cycles of attack within argumentation frameworks are widely recognized in the literature on defeasible argumentation. This paper introduces two simple semantics to capture different intuitions about what kinds of arguments should become justified in such scenarios. These semantics are modeled upon two extensions of argumentation frameworks, which we call sustainable and tolerant. Each one is constructed on the common ground of the powerful concept of admissibility introduced by Dung in [P.M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non-monotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence 77 (1995) 321-357]. The novelty of this approach consists in viewing the admissibility of a subset of arguments as relative to potentially challenging subsets of arguments. Both sustainable and tolerant semantics are more credulous than preferred semantics (i.e. they justify at least the same arguments, and possibly more). Given certain sufficient conditions they coincide among them as well as with other semantics introduced by Dung.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/69262
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian; Tohmé, Fernando Abel; Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack; Elsevier Science; Journal of Applied Logic; 7; 4; 12-2009; 403-420
1570-8683
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/69262
identifier_str_mv Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian; Tohmé, Fernando Abel; Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack; Elsevier Science; Journal of Applied Logic; 7; 4; 12-2009; 403-420
1570-8683
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S157086830800027X
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jal.2007.06.012
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082929340448768
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares