A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)

Autores
Marcussen, Thomas; Ballard, Harvey E.; Danihelka, Jirí; Flores, Ana R.; Nicola, Marcela Viviana; Watson, John M.
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The genus Viola (Violaceae) is among the 40–50 largest genera among angiosperms, yet its taxonomy has not been revised for nearly a century. In the most recent revision, by Wilhelm Becker in 1925, the then-known 400 species were distributed among 14 sections and numerous unranked groups. Here, we provide an updated, comprehensive classification of the genus, based on data from phylogeny, morphology, chromosome counts, and ploidy, and based on modern principles of monophyly. The revision is presented as an annotated global checklist of accepted species of Viola, an updated multigene phylogenetic network and an ITS phylogeny with denser taxon sampling, a brief summary of the taxonomic changes from Becker’s classification and their justification, a morphological binary key to the accepted subgenera, sections and subsections, and an account of each infrageneric subdivision with justifications for delimitation and rank including a description, a list of apomorphies, molecular phylogenies where possible or relevant, a distribution map, and a list of included species. We distribute the 664 species accepted by us into 2 subgenera, 31 sections, and 20 subsections. We erect one new subgenus of Viola (subg. Neoandinium, a replacement name for the illegitimate subg. Andinium), six new sections (sect. Abyssinium, sect. Himalayum, sect. Melvio, sect. Nematocaulon, sect. Spathulidium, sect. Xanthidium), and seven new subsections (subsect. Australasiaticae, subsect. Bulbosae, subsect. Clausenianae, subsect. Cleistogamae, subsect. Dispares, subsect. Formosanae, subsect. Pseudorupestres). Evolution within the genus is discussed in light of biogeography, the fossil record, morphology, and particular traits. Viola is among very few temperate and widespread genera that originated in South America. The biggest identified knowledge gaps for Viola concern the South American taxa, for which basic knowledge from phylogeny, chromosome counts, and fossil data is virtually absent. Viola has also never been subject to comprehensive anatomical study. Studies into seed anatomy and morphology are required to understand the fossil record of the genus.
Fil: Marcussen, Thomas. University of Oslo; Noruega
Fil: Ballard, Harvey E.. Ohio University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Danihelka, Jirí. Masaryk University; República Checa. Czech Academy of Sciences. Institute of Botany; República Checa
Fil: Flores, Ana R.. No especifíca;
Fil: Nicola, Marcela Viviana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion. Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion; Argentina
Fil: Watson, John M.. No especifíca;
Materia
FOSSILS
MONOPHYLETIC
MORPHOLOGY
NOMENCLATURE
PHYLOGENY
POLYPLOIDY
TAXONOMIC REVISION
VIOLA
VIOLACEAE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/213792

id CONICETDig_c15393468b7967fd6df40aac3eb7ba4a
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/213792
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)Marcussen, ThomasBallard, Harvey E.Danihelka, JiríFlores, Ana R.Nicola, Marcela VivianaWatson, John M.FOSSILSMONOPHYLETICMORPHOLOGYNOMENCLATUREPHYLOGENYPOLYPLOIDYTAXONOMIC REVISIONVIOLAVIOLACEAEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The genus Viola (Violaceae) is among the 40–50 largest genera among angiosperms, yet its taxonomy has not been revised for nearly a century. In the most recent revision, by Wilhelm Becker in 1925, the then-known 400 species were distributed among 14 sections and numerous unranked groups. Here, we provide an updated, comprehensive classification of the genus, based on data from phylogeny, morphology, chromosome counts, and ploidy, and based on modern principles of monophyly. The revision is presented as an annotated global checklist of accepted species of Viola, an updated multigene phylogenetic network and an ITS phylogeny with denser taxon sampling, a brief summary of the taxonomic changes from Becker’s classification and their justification, a morphological binary key to the accepted subgenera, sections and subsections, and an account of each infrageneric subdivision with justifications for delimitation and rank including a description, a list of apomorphies, molecular phylogenies where possible or relevant, a distribution map, and a list of included species. We distribute the 664 species accepted by us into 2 subgenera, 31 sections, and 20 subsections. We erect one new subgenus of Viola (subg. Neoandinium, a replacement name for the illegitimate subg. Andinium), six new sections (sect. Abyssinium, sect. Himalayum, sect. Melvio, sect. Nematocaulon, sect. Spathulidium, sect. Xanthidium), and seven new subsections (subsect. Australasiaticae, subsect. Bulbosae, subsect. Clausenianae, subsect. Cleistogamae, subsect. Dispares, subsect. Formosanae, subsect. Pseudorupestres). Evolution within the genus is discussed in light of biogeography, the fossil record, morphology, and particular traits. Viola is among very few temperate and widespread genera that originated in South America. The biggest identified knowledge gaps for Viola concern the South American taxa, for which basic knowledge from phylogeny, chromosome counts, and fossil data is virtually absent. Viola has also never been subject to comprehensive anatomical study. Studies into seed anatomy and morphology are required to understand the fossil record of the genus.Fil: Marcussen, Thomas. University of Oslo; NoruegaFil: Ballard, Harvey E.. Ohio University; Estados UnidosFil: Danihelka, Jirí. Masaryk University; República Checa. Czech Academy of Sciences. Institute of Botany; República ChecaFil: Flores, Ana R.. No especifíca;Fil: Nicola, Marcela Viviana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion. Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion; ArgentinaFil: Watson, John M.. No especifíca;Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute2022-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/213792Marcussen, Thomas; Ballard, Harvey E.; Danihelka, Jirí; Flores, Ana R.; Nicola, Marcela Viviana; et al.; A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae); Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Plants; 11; 17; 8-2022; 1-1502223-7747CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/17/2224info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/plants11172224info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:55:51Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/213792instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:55:51.789CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)
title A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)
spellingShingle A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)
Marcussen, Thomas
FOSSILS
MONOPHYLETIC
MORPHOLOGY
NOMENCLATURE
PHYLOGENY
POLYPLOIDY
TAXONOMIC REVISION
VIOLA
VIOLACEAE
title_short A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)
title_full A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)
title_fullStr A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)
title_full_unstemmed A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)
title_sort A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Marcussen, Thomas
Ballard, Harvey E.
Danihelka, Jirí
Flores, Ana R.
Nicola, Marcela Viviana
Watson, John M.
author Marcussen, Thomas
author_facet Marcussen, Thomas
Ballard, Harvey E.
Danihelka, Jirí
Flores, Ana R.
Nicola, Marcela Viviana
Watson, John M.
author_role author
author2 Ballard, Harvey E.
Danihelka, Jirí
Flores, Ana R.
Nicola, Marcela Viviana
Watson, John M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv FOSSILS
MONOPHYLETIC
MORPHOLOGY
NOMENCLATURE
PHYLOGENY
POLYPLOIDY
TAXONOMIC REVISION
VIOLA
VIOLACEAE
topic FOSSILS
MONOPHYLETIC
MORPHOLOGY
NOMENCLATURE
PHYLOGENY
POLYPLOIDY
TAXONOMIC REVISION
VIOLA
VIOLACEAE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The genus Viola (Violaceae) is among the 40–50 largest genera among angiosperms, yet its taxonomy has not been revised for nearly a century. In the most recent revision, by Wilhelm Becker in 1925, the then-known 400 species were distributed among 14 sections and numerous unranked groups. Here, we provide an updated, comprehensive classification of the genus, based on data from phylogeny, morphology, chromosome counts, and ploidy, and based on modern principles of monophyly. The revision is presented as an annotated global checklist of accepted species of Viola, an updated multigene phylogenetic network and an ITS phylogeny with denser taxon sampling, a brief summary of the taxonomic changes from Becker’s classification and their justification, a morphological binary key to the accepted subgenera, sections and subsections, and an account of each infrageneric subdivision with justifications for delimitation and rank including a description, a list of apomorphies, molecular phylogenies where possible or relevant, a distribution map, and a list of included species. We distribute the 664 species accepted by us into 2 subgenera, 31 sections, and 20 subsections. We erect one new subgenus of Viola (subg. Neoandinium, a replacement name for the illegitimate subg. Andinium), six new sections (sect. Abyssinium, sect. Himalayum, sect. Melvio, sect. Nematocaulon, sect. Spathulidium, sect. Xanthidium), and seven new subsections (subsect. Australasiaticae, subsect. Bulbosae, subsect. Clausenianae, subsect. Cleistogamae, subsect. Dispares, subsect. Formosanae, subsect. Pseudorupestres). Evolution within the genus is discussed in light of biogeography, the fossil record, morphology, and particular traits. Viola is among very few temperate and widespread genera that originated in South America. The biggest identified knowledge gaps for Viola concern the South American taxa, for which basic knowledge from phylogeny, chromosome counts, and fossil data is virtually absent. Viola has also never been subject to comprehensive anatomical study. Studies into seed anatomy and morphology are required to understand the fossil record of the genus.
Fil: Marcussen, Thomas. University of Oslo; Noruega
Fil: Ballard, Harvey E.. Ohio University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Danihelka, Jirí. Masaryk University; República Checa. Czech Academy of Sciences. Institute of Botany; República Checa
Fil: Flores, Ana R.. No especifíca;
Fil: Nicola, Marcela Viviana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion. Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion; Argentina
Fil: Watson, John M.. No especifíca;
description The genus Viola (Violaceae) is among the 40–50 largest genera among angiosperms, yet its taxonomy has not been revised for nearly a century. In the most recent revision, by Wilhelm Becker in 1925, the then-known 400 species were distributed among 14 sections and numerous unranked groups. Here, we provide an updated, comprehensive classification of the genus, based on data from phylogeny, morphology, chromosome counts, and ploidy, and based on modern principles of monophyly. The revision is presented as an annotated global checklist of accepted species of Viola, an updated multigene phylogenetic network and an ITS phylogeny with denser taxon sampling, a brief summary of the taxonomic changes from Becker’s classification and their justification, a morphological binary key to the accepted subgenera, sections and subsections, and an account of each infrageneric subdivision with justifications for delimitation and rank including a description, a list of apomorphies, molecular phylogenies where possible or relevant, a distribution map, and a list of included species. We distribute the 664 species accepted by us into 2 subgenera, 31 sections, and 20 subsections. We erect one new subgenus of Viola (subg. Neoandinium, a replacement name for the illegitimate subg. Andinium), six new sections (sect. Abyssinium, sect. Himalayum, sect. Melvio, sect. Nematocaulon, sect. Spathulidium, sect. Xanthidium), and seven new subsections (subsect. Australasiaticae, subsect. Bulbosae, subsect. Clausenianae, subsect. Cleistogamae, subsect. Dispares, subsect. Formosanae, subsect. Pseudorupestres). Evolution within the genus is discussed in light of biogeography, the fossil record, morphology, and particular traits. Viola is among very few temperate and widespread genera that originated in South America. The biggest identified knowledge gaps for Viola concern the South American taxa, for which basic knowledge from phylogeny, chromosome counts, and fossil data is virtually absent. Viola has also never been subject to comprehensive anatomical study. Studies into seed anatomy and morphology are required to understand the fossil record of the genus.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/213792
Marcussen, Thomas; Ballard, Harvey E.; Danihelka, Jirí; Flores, Ana R.; Nicola, Marcela Viviana; et al.; A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae); Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Plants; 11; 17; 8-2022; 1-150
2223-7747
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/213792
identifier_str_mv Marcussen, Thomas; Ballard, Harvey E.; Danihelka, Jirí; Flores, Ana R.; Nicola, Marcela Viviana; et al.; A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae); Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Plants; 11; 17; 8-2022; 1-150
2223-7747
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/17/2224
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/plants11172224
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269371149320192
score 13.13397