Legume Overseeding along with P Fertilization Increase Forage Production of Temperate Natural Grasslands

Autores
Rama, Gonzalo; Oyarzabal, Mariano; Cardozo, Gerónimo; Lezama, Felipe; Baeza, Santiago
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Legume overseeding along with P fertilization is a common practice used in natural temperate and subtropical grasslands to increase forage production. This practice has been evaluated at experimental plots but not at the paddocks level of commercial farms. The latter are realistic evaluation units to generate knowledge for livestock management. In this study, the enhanced vegetation index (EVI), a proxy of forage production, was used to evaluate the effect of this practice on grazed paddocks in Uruguay. Twenty paired paddocks under similar grazing conditions were selected with natural grassland (NG) and natural grassland with legume overseeding and P fertilization (NG-LP). Paired paddocks were compared in terms of EVI mean and its temporal variability. After nine years of the intensification practice, mean annual EVI of NG-LP was 4% higher than that of NG, while the mean winter–spring EVI of NG-LP was 7.5% higher. EVI intra- and inter-annual variability of NG-LP was 8–11% higher than that of NG. Additionally, forage production was estimated using a radiative transfer model. Differences between NG-LP and NG were amplified six to seven times. Legume overseeding along with P fertilization increased forage production in pastoral livestock paddocks, particularly in the period of forage deficit, while it also increased intra and inter-annual variability of forage production.
Fil: Rama, Gonzalo. Universidad de la República; Uruguay
Fil: Oyarzabal, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Cardozo, Gerónimo. Universidad de la República; Uruguay
Fil: Lezama, Felipe. Universidad de la República; Uruguay
Fil: Baeza, Santiago. Universidad de la República; Uruguay
Materia
FORAGE PRODUCTION
INTENSIFICATION
NATURAL GRASSLAND
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/214731
Acceder
id CONICETDig_bedcde5aab05c6a29624145b9d8b66e9
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/214731
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Legume Overseeding along with P Fertilization Increase Forage Production of Temperate Natural GrasslandsRama, GonzaloOyarzabal, MarianoCardozo, GerónimoLezama, FelipeBaeza, SantiagoFORAGE PRODUCTIONINTENSIFICATIONNATURAL GRASSLANDhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Legume overseeding along with P fertilization is a common practice used in natural temperate and subtropical grasslands to increase forage production. This practice has been evaluated at experimental plots but not at the paddocks level of commercial farms. The latter are realistic evaluation units to generate knowledge for livestock management. In this study, the enhanced vegetation index (EVI), a proxy of forage production, was used to evaluate the effect of this practice on grazed paddocks in Uruguay. Twenty paired paddocks under similar grazing conditions were selected with natural grassland (NG) and natural grassland with legume overseeding and P fertilization (NG-LP). Paired paddocks were compared in terms of EVI mean and its temporal variability. After nine years of the intensification practice, mean annual EVI of NG-LP was 4% higher than that of NG, while the mean winter–spring EVI of NG-LP was 7.5% higher. EVI intra- and inter-annual variability of NG-LP was 8–11% higher than that of NG. Additionally, forage production was estimated using a radiative transfer model. Differences between NG-LP and NG were amplified six to seven times. Legume overseeding along with P fertilization increased forage production in pastoral livestock paddocks, particularly in the period of forage deficit, while it also increased intra and inter-annual variability of forage production.Fil: Rama, Gonzalo. Universidad de la República; UruguayFil: Oyarzabal, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaFil: Cardozo, Gerónimo. Universidad de la República; UruguayFil: Lezama, Felipe. Universidad de la República; UruguayFil: Baeza, Santiago. Universidad de la República; UruguayMDPI2022-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/214731Rama, Gonzalo; Oyarzabal, Mariano; Cardozo, Gerónimo; Lezama, Felipe; Baeza, Santiago; Legume Overseeding along with P Fertilization Increase Forage Production of Temperate Natural Grasslands; MDPI; Agronomy; 12; 10; 10-2022; 1-172073-4395CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/agronomy12102507info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:44:00Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/214731instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:44:00.489CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Legume Overseeding along with P Fertilization Increase Forage Production of Temperate Natural Grasslands
title Legume Overseeding along with P Fertilization Increase Forage Production of Temperate Natural Grasslands
spellingShingle Legume Overseeding along with P Fertilization Increase Forage Production of Temperate Natural Grasslands
Rama, Gonzalo
FORAGE PRODUCTION
INTENSIFICATION
NATURAL GRASSLAND
title_short Legume Overseeding along with P Fertilization Increase Forage Production of Temperate Natural Grasslands
title_full Legume Overseeding along with P Fertilization Increase Forage Production of Temperate Natural Grasslands
title_fullStr Legume Overseeding along with P Fertilization Increase Forage Production of Temperate Natural Grasslands
title_full_unstemmed Legume Overseeding along with P Fertilization Increase Forage Production of Temperate Natural Grasslands
title_sort Legume Overseeding along with P Fertilization Increase Forage Production of Temperate Natural Grasslands
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rama, Gonzalo
Oyarzabal, Mariano
Cardozo, Gerónimo
Lezama, Felipe
Baeza, Santiago
author Rama, Gonzalo
author_facet Rama, Gonzalo
Oyarzabal, Mariano
Cardozo, Gerónimo
Lezama, Felipe
Baeza, Santiago
author_role author
author2 Oyarzabal, Mariano
Cardozo, Gerónimo
Lezama, Felipe
Baeza, Santiago
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv FORAGE PRODUCTION
INTENSIFICATION
NATURAL GRASSLAND
topic FORAGE PRODUCTION
INTENSIFICATION
NATURAL GRASSLAND
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Legume overseeding along with P fertilization is a common practice used in natural temperate and subtropical grasslands to increase forage production. This practice has been evaluated at experimental plots but not at the paddocks level of commercial farms. The latter are realistic evaluation units to generate knowledge for livestock management. In this study, the enhanced vegetation index (EVI), a proxy of forage production, was used to evaluate the effect of this practice on grazed paddocks in Uruguay. Twenty paired paddocks under similar grazing conditions were selected with natural grassland (NG) and natural grassland with legume overseeding and P fertilization (NG-LP). Paired paddocks were compared in terms of EVI mean and its temporal variability. After nine years of the intensification practice, mean annual EVI of NG-LP was 4% higher than that of NG, while the mean winter–spring EVI of NG-LP was 7.5% higher. EVI intra- and inter-annual variability of NG-LP was 8–11% higher than that of NG. Additionally, forage production was estimated using a radiative transfer model. Differences between NG-LP and NG were amplified six to seven times. Legume overseeding along with P fertilization increased forage production in pastoral livestock paddocks, particularly in the period of forage deficit, while it also increased intra and inter-annual variability of forage production.
Fil: Rama, Gonzalo. Universidad de la República; Uruguay
Fil: Oyarzabal, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Cardozo, Gerónimo. Universidad de la República; Uruguay
Fil: Lezama, Felipe. Universidad de la República; Uruguay
Fil: Baeza, Santiago. Universidad de la República; Uruguay
description Legume overseeding along with P fertilization is a common practice used in natural temperate and subtropical grasslands to increase forage production. This practice has been evaluated at experimental plots but not at the paddocks level of commercial farms. The latter are realistic evaluation units to generate knowledge for livestock management. In this study, the enhanced vegetation index (EVI), a proxy of forage production, was used to evaluate the effect of this practice on grazed paddocks in Uruguay. Twenty paired paddocks under similar grazing conditions were selected with natural grassland (NG) and natural grassland with legume overseeding and P fertilization (NG-LP). Paired paddocks were compared in terms of EVI mean and its temporal variability. After nine years of the intensification practice, mean annual EVI of NG-LP was 4% higher than that of NG, while the mean winter–spring EVI of NG-LP was 7.5% higher. EVI intra- and inter-annual variability of NG-LP was 8–11% higher than that of NG. Additionally, forage production was estimated using a radiative transfer model. Differences between NG-LP and NG were amplified six to seven times. Legume overseeding along with P fertilization increased forage production in pastoral livestock paddocks, particularly in the period of forage deficit, while it also increased intra and inter-annual variability of forage production.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/214731
Rama, Gonzalo; Oyarzabal, Mariano; Cardozo, Gerónimo; Lezama, Felipe; Baeza, Santiago; Legume Overseeding along with P Fertilization Increase Forage Production of Temperate Natural Grasslands; MDPI; Agronomy; 12; 10; 10-2022; 1-17
2073-4395
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/214731
identifier_str_mv Rama, Gonzalo; Oyarzabal, Mariano; Cardozo, Gerónimo; Lezama, Felipe; Baeza, Santiago; Legume Overseeding along with P Fertilization Increase Forage Production of Temperate Natural Grasslands; MDPI; Agronomy; 12; 10; 10-2022; 1-17
2073-4395
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/agronomy12102507
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782133952053248
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares