Luck and tactics in foraging success: the case of the imperial shag
- Autores
- Wilson, Rory P; Holton, Mark; Neate, Andrew; del Caño, María Monserrat; Quintana, Flavio Roberto; Yoda, Ken; Gómez Laich, Agustina Marta
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- It has been proposed that predators searching for prey acquire food according to a probabilistic framework, where success is based on 'luck' and the odds of success vary with prey abundance. If true, this has major ramifications for variation in the rates of energy acquisition within animal populations, which is particularly pertinent in offspring provisioning and breeding success, be - cause smaller animals (the young) cannot starve for as long as the adults. However, despite much general speculation about rates of food acquisition, no study has measured whether food encounter is probabilistic in wild animals. We used animalmounted cameras to document all prey captures by wild imperial shags Leucocarbo atriceps as they hunted underwater and show that, although they mostly do not have inter-prey acquisition time distributions that accord with a 'luck-based' framework assuming a constant probability of finding prey over time, there is no difference in the predicted amount of food captured between models that use the empirical data or theoretical Poissonbased fits of the data. We also noted considerable inter-individual differences in foraging success that far exceeded any differences between empirical and theoretical inter-prey acquisition time distributions. The data were used in a probabilistic for aging model that made explicit the mechanistic link between random prey encounters and fooddependent breeding success, indicating that 'less lucky' individuals could not provision their broods at rates commensurate with normal growth while the 'lucky' birds could do so easily. Given the nature of food encounter in these birds, coupled with substantial inter-individual variation in foraging success, we suggest that more successful individuals are particularly choosey about when, how and where to forage, which results in them operating with higher odds of success.
Fil: Wilson, Rory P. Swansea University. College of Sciences; Reino Unido. Swansea University; Reino Unido
Fil: Holton, Mark. Swansea University. College of Sciences; Reino Unido
Fil: Neate, Andrew. Swansea University. College of Sciences; Reino Unido
Fil: del Caño, María Monserrat. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos; Argentina
Fil: Quintana, Flavio Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos; Argentina
Fil: Yoda, Ken. Nagoya University; Japón
Fil: Gómez Laich, Agustina Marta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina - Materia
-
LEUCOCARBO ATRICEPS
CORMORANT
FORAGING ECOLOGY
GAMBLING
PROBABILITY OF FOOD ENCOUNTER
TACTICS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/204088
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_bd2a3fd500a23849f86825658e4d7bd7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/204088 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Luck and tactics in foraging success: the case of the imperial shagWilson, Rory PHolton, MarkNeate, Andrewdel Caño, María MonserratQuintana, Flavio RobertoYoda, KenGómez Laich, Agustina MartaLEUCOCARBO ATRICEPSCORMORANTFORAGING ECOLOGYGAMBLINGPROBABILITY OF FOOD ENCOUNTERTACTICShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1It has been proposed that predators searching for prey acquire food according to a probabilistic framework, where success is based on 'luck' and the odds of success vary with prey abundance. If true, this has major ramifications for variation in the rates of energy acquisition within animal populations, which is particularly pertinent in offspring provisioning and breeding success, be - cause smaller animals (the young) cannot starve for as long as the adults. However, despite much general speculation about rates of food acquisition, no study has measured whether food encounter is probabilistic in wild animals. We used animalmounted cameras to document all prey captures by wild imperial shags Leucocarbo atriceps as they hunted underwater and show that, although they mostly do not have inter-prey acquisition time distributions that accord with a 'luck-based' framework assuming a constant probability of finding prey over time, there is no difference in the predicted amount of food captured between models that use the empirical data or theoretical Poissonbased fits of the data. We also noted considerable inter-individual differences in foraging success that far exceeded any differences between empirical and theoretical inter-prey acquisition time distributions. The data were used in a probabilistic for aging model that made explicit the mechanistic link between random prey encounters and fooddependent breeding success, indicating that 'less lucky' individuals could not provision their broods at rates commensurate with normal growth while the 'lucky' birds could do so easily. Given the nature of food encounter in these birds, coupled with substantial inter-individual variation in foraging success, we suggest that more successful individuals are particularly choosey about when, how and where to forage, which results in them operating with higher odds of success.Fil: Wilson, Rory P. Swansea University. College of Sciences; Reino Unido. Swansea University; Reino UnidoFil: Holton, Mark. Swansea University. College of Sciences; Reino UnidoFil: Neate, Andrew. Swansea University. College of Sciences; Reino UnidoFil: del Caño, María Monserrat. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos; ArgentinaFil: Quintana, Flavio Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos; ArgentinaFil: Yoda, Ken. Nagoya University; JapónFil: Gómez Laich, Agustina Marta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaInter-Research2022-01-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/204088Wilson, Rory P; Holton, Mark; Neate, Andrew; del Caño, María Monserrat; Quintana, Flavio Roberto; et al.; Luck and tactics in foraging success: the case of the imperial shag; Inter-Research; Marine Ecology Progress Series; 682; 20-1-2022; 1-120171-86301616-1599CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3354/meps13967info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v682/p1-12/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:41:45Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/204088instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:41:46.254CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Luck and tactics in foraging success: the case of the imperial shag |
title |
Luck and tactics in foraging success: the case of the imperial shag |
spellingShingle |
Luck and tactics in foraging success: the case of the imperial shag Wilson, Rory P LEUCOCARBO ATRICEPS CORMORANT FORAGING ECOLOGY GAMBLING PROBABILITY OF FOOD ENCOUNTER TACTICS |
title_short |
Luck and tactics in foraging success: the case of the imperial shag |
title_full |
Luck and tactics in foraging success: the case of the imperial shag |
title_fullStr |
Luck and tactics in foraging success: the case of the imperial shag |
title_full_unstemmed |
Luck and tactics in foraging success: the case of the imperial shag |
title_sort |
Luck and tactics in foraging success: the case of the imperial shag |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Wilson, Rory P Holton, Mark Neate, Andrew del Caño, María Monserrat Quintana, Flavio Roberto Yoda, Ken Gómez Laich, Agustina Marta |
author |
Wilson, Rory P |
author_facet |
Wilson, Rory P Holton, Mark Neate, Andrew del Caño, María Monserrat Quintana, Flavio Roberto Yoda, Ken Gómez Laich, Agustina Marta |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Holton, Mark Neate, Andrew del Caño, María Monserrat Quintana, Flavio Roberto Yoda, Ken Gómez Laich, Agustina Marta |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
LEUCOCARBO ATRICEPS CORMORANT FORAGING ECOLOGY GAMBLING PROBABILITY OF FOOD ENCOUNTER TACTICS |
topic |
LEUCOCARBO ATRICEPS CORMORANT FORAGING ECOLOGY GAMBLING PROBABILITY OF FOOD ENCOUNTER TACTICS |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
It has been proposed that predators searching for prey acquire food according to a probabilistic framework, where success is based on 'luck' and the odds of success vary with prey abundance. If true, this has major ramifications for variation in the rates of energy acquisition within animal populations, which is particularly pertinent in offspring provisioning and breeding success, be - cause smaller animals (the young) cannot starve for as long as the adults. However, despite much general speculation about rates of food acquisition, no study has measured whether food encounter is probabilistic in wild animals. We used animalmounted cameras to document all prey captures by wild imperial shags Leucocarbo atriceps as they hunted underwater and show that, although they mostly do not have inter-prey acquisition time distributions that accord with a 'luck-based' framework assuming a constant probability of finding prey over time, there is no difference in the predicted amount of food captured between models that use the empirical data or theoretical Poissonbased fits of the data. We also noted considerable inter-individual differences in foraging success that far exceeded any differences between empirical and theoretical inter-prey acquisition time distributions. The data were used in a probabilistic for aging model that made explicit the mechanistic link between random prey encounters and fooddependent breeding success, indicating that 'less lucky' individuals could not provision their broods at rates commensurate with normal growth while the 'lucky' birds could do so easily. Given the nature of food encounter in these birds, coupled with substantial inter-individual variation in foraging success, we suggest that more successful individuals are particularly choosey about when, how and where to forage, which results in them operating with higher odds of success. Fil: Wilson, Rory P. Swansea University. College of Sciences; Reino Unido. Swansea University; Reino Unido Fil: Holton, Mark. Swansea University. College of Sciences; Reino Unido Fil: Neate, Andrew. Swansea University. College of Sciences; Reino Unido Fil: del Caño, María Monserrat. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos; Argentina Fil: Quintana, Flavio Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos; Argentina Fil: Yoda, Ken. Nagoya University; Japón Fil: Gómez Laich, Agustina Marta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina |
description |
It has been proposed that predators searching for prey acquire food according to a probabilistic framework, where success is based on 'luck' and the odds of success vary with prey abundance. If true, this has major ramifications for variation in the rates of energy acquisition within animal populations, which is particularly pertinent in offspring provisioning and breeding success, be - cause smaller animals (the young) cannot starve for as long as the adults. However, despite much general speculation about rates of food acquisition, no study has measured whether food encounter is probabilistic in wild animals. We used animalmounted cameras to document all prey captures by wild imperial shags Leucocarbo atriceps as they hunted underwater and show that, although they mostly do not have inter-prey acquisition time distributions that accord with a 'luck-based' framework assuming a constant probability of finding prey over time, there is no difference in the predicted amount of food captured between models that use the empirical data or theoretical Poissonbased fits of the data. We also noted considerable inter-individual differences in foraging success that far exceeded any differences between empirical and theoretical inter-prey acquisition time distributions. The data were used in a probabilistic for aging model that made explicit the mechanistic link between random prey encounters and fooddependent breeding success, indicating that 'less lucky' individuals could not provision their broods at rates commensurate with normal growth while the 'lucky' birds could do so easily. Given the nature of food encounter in these birds, coupled with substantial inter-individual variation in foraging success, we suggest that more successful individuals are particularly choosey about when, how and where to forage, which results in them operating with higher odds of success. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-20 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/204088 Wilson, Rory P; Holton, Mark; Neate, Andrew; del Caño, María Monserrat; Quintana, Flavio Roberto; et al.; Luck and tactics in foraging success: the case of the imperial shag; Inter-Research; Marine Ecology Progress Series; 682; 20-1-2022; 1-12 0171-8630 1616-1599 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/204088 |
identifier_str_mv |
Wilson, Rory P; Holton, Mark; Neate, Andrew; del Caño, María Monserrat; Quintana, Flavio Roberto; et al.; Luck and tactics in foraging success: the case of the imperial shag; Inter-Research; Marine Ecology Progress Series; 682; 20-1-2022; 1-12 0171-8630 1616-1599 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3354/meps13967 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v682/p1-12/ |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Inter-Research |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Inter-Research |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614448951590912 |
score |
13.070432 |