Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that’s ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Ar...

Autores
Lawley, Jonathan W.; Gamero Mora, Edgar; Maronna, Maximiliano Manuel; Chiaverano, Luciano Martin; Stampar, Sérgio N.; Hopcroft, Russell R.; Collins, Allen G.; Morandini, André C.
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This paper serves as a reply to the Commentary by Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590) on our recently published paper on systematics of the moon jellyfish genus Aurelia (Lawley et al. PeerJ 2021;9, e11954)). We emphasise that we are not advocating for the routine use of molecular data alone in taxonomic diagnoses, rather that it is a valid approach in cases where, after detailed analyses, morphological features are shown to be unreliable.
Fil: Lawley, Jonathan W.. Griffith University; Australia
Fil: Gamero Mora, Edgar. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil
Fil: Maronna, Maximiliano Manuel. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil
Fil: Chiaverano, Luciano Martin. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones y Desarrollo Pesquero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Stampar, Sérgio N.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil
Fil: Hopcroft, Russell R.. University of Alaska; Estados Unidos
Fil: Collins, Allen G.. National Ocean And Atmospheric Administration; Estados Unidos
Fil: Morandini, André C.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil
Materia
CRYPTIC SPECIES
JELLYFISH
SPECIES DELIMITATION
SYSTEMATICS
TAXONOMY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/218169
Acceder
id CONICETDig_bc10cf3b965c295dec5be222a633fbaa
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/218169
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that’s ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590)Lawley, Jonathan W.Gamero Mora, EdgarMaronna, Maximiliano ManuelChiaverano, Luciano MartinStampar, Sérgio N.Hopcroft, Russell R.Collins, Allen G.Morandini, André C.CRYPTIC SPECIESJELLYFISHSPECIES DELIMITATIONSYSTEMATICSTAXONOMYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1This paper serves as a reply to the Commentary by Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590) on our recently published paper on systematics of the moon jellyfish genus Aurelia (Lawley et al. PeerJ 2021;9, e11954)). We emphasise that we are not advocating for the routine use of molecular data alone in taxonomic diagnoses, rather that it is a valid approach in cases where, after detailed analyses, morphological features are shown to be unreliable.Fil: Lawley, Jonathan W.. Griffith University; AustraliaFil: Gamero Mora, Edgar. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Maronna, Maximiliano Manuel. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Chiaverano, Luciano Martin. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones y Desarrollo Pesquero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Stampar, Sérgio N.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Hopcroft, Russell R.. University of Alaska; Estados UnidosFil: Collins, Allen G.. National Ocean And Atmospheric Administration; Estados UnidosFil: Morandini, André C.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilAcademy of Science of South Africa2022-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/218169Lawley, Jonathan W.; Gamero Mora, Edgar; Maronna, Maximiliano Manuel; Chiaverano, Luciano Martin; Stampar, Sérgio N.; et al.; Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that’s ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590); Academy of Science of South Africa; South African Journal of Science; 118; 9-10; 9-2022; 1-31996-7489CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://sajs.co.za/article/view/14495info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.17159/sajs.2022/14495info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0038-23532022000600012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:20:35Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/218169instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:20:35.573CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that’s ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590)
title Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that’s ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590)
spellingShingle Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that’s ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590)
Lawley, Jonathan W.
CRYPTIC SPECIES
JELLYFISH
SPECIES DELIMITATION
SYSTEMATICS
TAXONOMY
title_short Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that’s ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590)
title_full Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that’s ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590)
title_fullStr Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that’s ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590)
title_full_unstemmed Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that’s ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590)
title_sort Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that’s ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lawley, Jonathan W.
Gamero Mora, Edgar
Maronna, Maximiliano Manuel
Chiaverano, Luciano Martin
Stampar, Sérgio N.
Hopcroft, Russell R.
Collins, Allen G.
Morandini, André C.
author Lawley, Jonathan W.
author_facet Lawley, Jonathan W.
Gamero Mora, Edgar
Maronna, Maximiliano Manuel
Chiaverano, Luciano Martin
Stampar, Sérgio N.
Hopcroft, Russell R.
Collins, Allen G.
Morandini, André C.
author_role author
author2 Gamero Mora, Edgar
Maronna, Maximiliano Manuel
Chiaverano, Luciano Martin
Stampar, Sérgio N.
Hopcroft, Russell R.
Collins, Allen G.
Morandini, André C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CRYPTIC SPECIES
JELLYFISH
SPECIES DELIMITATION
SYSTEMATICS
TAXONOMY
topic CRYPTIC SPECIES
JELLYFISH
SPECIES DELIMITATION
SYSTEMATICS
TAXONOMY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This paper serves as a reply to the Commentary by Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590) on our recently published paper on systematics of the moon jellyfish genus Aurelia (Lawley et al. PeerJ 2021;9, e11954)). We emphasise that we are not advocating for the routine use of molecular data alone in taxonomic diagnoses, rather that it is a valid approach in cases where, after detailed analyses, morphological features are shown to be unreliable.
Fil: Lawley, Jonathan W.. Griffith University; Australia
Fil: Gamero Mora, Edgar. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil
Fil: Maronna, Maximiliano Manuel. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil
Fil: Chiaverano, Luciano Martin. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones y Desarrollo Pesquero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Stampar, Sérgio N.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil
Fil: Hopcroft, Russell R.. University of Alaska; Estados Unidos
Fil: Collins, Allen G.. National Ocean And Atmospheric Administration; Estados Unidos
Fil: Morandini, André C.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil
description This paper serves as a reply to the Commentary by Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590) on our recently published paper on systematics of the moon jellyfish genus Aurelia (Lawley et al. PeerJ 2021;9, e11954)). We emphasise that we are not advocating for the routine use of molecular data alone in taxonomic diagnoses, rather that it is a valid approach in cases where, after detailed analyses, morphological features are shown to be unreliable.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/218169
Lawley, Jonathan W.; Gamero Mora, Edgar; Maronna, Maximiliano Manuel; Chiaverano, Luciano Martin; Stampar, Sérgio N.; et al.; Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that’s ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590); Academy of Science of South Africa; South African Journal of Science; 118; 9-10; 9-2022; 1-3
1996-7489
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/218169
identifier_str_mv Lawley, Jonathan W.; Gamero Mora, Edgar; Maronna, Maximiliano Manuel; Chiaverano, Luciano Martin; Stampar, Sérgio N.; et al.; Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that’s ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590); Academy of Science of South Africa; South African Journal of Science; 118; 9-10; 9-2022; 1-3
1996-7489
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://sajs.co.za/article/view/14495
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.17159/sajs.2022/14495
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0038-23532022000600012
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academy of Science of South Africa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academy of Science of South Africa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082583014670336
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares