Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agenda
- Autores
- Guareschi, Simone; Mathers, Kate L; South, Josie; Navarro, Laetitia M; Renals, Trevor; Hiley, Alice; Antonsich, Marco; Bolpagni, Rossano; Bortolus, Alejandro; Genovesi, Piero; Jere, Arthertone; Madzivanzira, Takudzwa C.; Phaka, Fortunate M.; Novoa, Ana; Olden, Julian D.; Saccó, Mattia; Shackleton, Ross T.; Vilà, Montserrat; Wood, Paul J.
- Año de publicación
- 2024
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In a hyperconnected world, framing and managing biological invasions poses complex and contentious challenges, affecting socioeconomic and environmental sectors. This complexity distinguishes the field and fuels polarized debates. In the present article, we synthesize four contentious issues in invasion science that are rarely addressed together: vocabulary usage, the potential benefits of nonnative species,perceptions shifting because of global change, and rewilding practices and biological invasions.Researchers have predominantly focused on single issues; few have addressed multiple components of the debate within or across disciplinary boundaries. Ignoring the interconnected nature of these issues risks overlooking crucial cross-links. We advocate for interdisciplinary approaches that better integrate social and natural sciences. Although they are challenging, interdisciplinary collaborations offer hope to overcome polarization issues in invasion science. These may bridge disagreements, facilitate knowledge exchange, and reshape invasion science narratives. Finally, we present a contemporary agenda to advance future research, management, and constructive dialogue.
Fil: Guareschi, Simone. Università di Torino; Italia. University of Loughborough; Reino Unido
Fil: Mathers, Kate L. University of Loughborough; Reino Unido
Fil: South, Josie. University of Leeds; Reino Unido. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity; Sudáfrica
Fil: Navarro, Laetitia M. Estacion Biologica de Doñana; España
Fil: Renals, Trevor. Environment Agency Of Bristol; Reino Unido
Fil: Hiley, Alice. Environment Agency Of Bristol; Reino Unido
Fil: Antonsich, Marco. University of Loughborough; Reino Unido
Fil: Bolpagni, Rossano. Università di Parma; Italia
Fil: Bortolus, Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales; Argentina
Fil: Genovesi, Piero. Environmental Protection and Research; Italia
Fil: Jere, Arthertone. Kapasa Makasa University; Zambia
Fil: Madzivanzira, Takudzwa C.. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity; Sudáfrica
Fil: Phaka, Fortunate M.. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity; Sudáfrica
Fil: Novoa, Ana. Czech Academy of Sciences; República Checa
Fil: Olden, Julian D.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Saccó, Mattia. Università di Parma; Italia
Fil: Shackleton, Ross T.. Stellenbosch University; Sudáfrica
Fil: Vilà, Montserrat. Universidad de Sevilla; España
Fil: Wood, Paul J.. University of Loughborough; Reino Unido - Materia
-
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
HUMAN WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS
INVASIVE SPECIES
INVASION SCIENCE
NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/248904
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_ba977c42ea9d32555bb671541269afaf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/248904 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agendaGuareschi, SimoneMathers, Kate LSouth, JosieNavarro, Laetitia MRenals, TrevorHiley, AliceAntonsich, MarcoBolpagni, RossanoBortolus, AlejandroGenovesi, PieroJere, ArthertoneMadzivanzira, Takudzwa C.Phaka, Fortunate M.Novoa, AnaOlden, Julian D.Saccó, MattiaShackleton, Ross T.Vilà, MontserratWood, Paul J.CONSERVATION BIOLOGYHUMAN WILDLIFE INTERACTIONSINVASIVE SPECIESINVASION SCIENCENATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENThttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1In a hyperconnected world, framing and managing biological invasions poses complex and contentious challenges, affecting socioeconomic and environmental sectors. This complexity distinguishes the field and fuels polarized debates. In the present article, we synthesize four contentious issues in invasion science that are rarely addressed together: vocabulary usage, the potential benefits of nonnative species,perceptions shifting because of global change, and rewilding practices and biological invasions.Researchers have predominantly focused on single issues; few have addressed multiple components of the debate within or across disciplinary boundaries. Ignoring the interconnected nature of these issues risks overlooking crucial cross-links. We advocate for interdisciplinary approaches that better integrate social and natural sciences. Although they are challenging, interdisciplinary collaborations offer hope to overcome polarization issues in invasion science. These may bridge disagreements, facilitate knowledge exchange, and reshape invasion science narratives. Finally, we present a contemporary agenda to advance future research, management, and constructive dialogue.Fil: Guareschi, Simone. Università di Torino; Italia. University of Loughborough; Reino UnidoFil: Mathers, Kate L. University of Loughborough; Reino UnidoFil: South, Josie. University of Leeds; Reino Unido. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity; SudáfricaFil: Navarro, Laetitia M. Estacion Biologica de Doñana; EspañaFil: Renals, Trevor. Environment Agency Of Bristol; Reino UnidoFil: Hiley, Alice. Environment Agency Of Bristol; Reino UnidoFil: Antonsich, Marco. University of Loughborough; Reino UnidoFil: Bolpagni, Rossano. Università di Parma; ItaliaFil: Bortolus, Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales; ArgentinaFil: Genovesi, Piero. Environmental Protection and Research; ItaliaFil: Jere, Arthertone. Kapasa Makasa University; ZambiaFil: Madzivanzira, Takudzwa C.. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity; SudáfricaFil: Phaka, Fortunate M.. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity; SudáfricaFil: Novoa, Ana. Czech Academy of Sciences; República ChecaFil: Olden, Julian D.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Saccó, Mattia. Università di Parma; ItaliaFil: Shackleton, Ross T.. Stellenbosch University; SudáfricaFil: Vilà, Montserrat. Universidad de Sevilla; EspañaFil: Wood, Paul J.. University of Loughborough; Reino UnidoAmerican Institute of Biological Sciences2024-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/248904Guareschi, Simone; Mathers, Kate L; South, Josie; Navarro, Laetitia M; Renals, Trevor; et al.; Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agenda; American Institute of Biological Sciences; Bioscience; 10-2024; 1-150006-35681525-3244CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/advance-article/doi/10.1093/biosci/biae084/7821000info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/biosci/biae084info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:47:36Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/248904instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:47:36.508CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agenda |
title |
Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agenda |
spellingShingle |
Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agenda Guareschi, Simone CONSERVATION BIOLOGY HUMAN WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS INVASIVE SPECIES INVASION SCIENCE NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT |
title_short |
Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agenda |
title_full |
Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agenda |
title_fullStr |
Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agenda |
title_full_unstemmed |
Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agenda |
title_sort |
Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agenda |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Guareschi, Simone Mathers, Kate L South, Josie Navarro, Laetitia M Renals, Trevor Hiley, Alice Antonsich, Marco Bolpagni, Rossano Bortolus, Alejandro Genovesi, Piero Jere, Arthertone Madzivanzira, Takudzwa C. Phaka, Fortunate M. Novoa, Ana Olden, Julian D. Saccó, Mattia Shackleton, Ross T. Vilà, Montserrat Wood, Paul J. |
author |
Guareschi, Simone |
author_facet |
Guareschi, Simone Mathers, Kate L South, Josie Navarro, Laetitia M Renals, Trevor Hiley, Alice Antonsich, Marco Bolpagni, Rossano Bortolus, Alejandro Genovesi, Piero Jere, Arthertone Madzivanzira, Takudzwa C. Phaka, Fortunate M. Novoa, Ana Olden, Julian D. Saccó, Mattia Shackleton, Ross T. Vilà, Montserrat Wood, Paul J. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mathers, Kate L South, Josie Navarro, Laetitia M Renals, Trevor Hiley, Alice Antonsich, Marco Bolpagni, Rossano Bortolus, Alejandro Genovesi, Piero Jere, Arthertone Madzivanzira, Takudzwa C. Phaka, Fortunate M. Novoa, Ana Olden, Julian D. Saccó, Mattia Shackleton, Ross T. Vilà, Montserrat Wood, Paul J. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY HUMAN WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS INVASIVE SPECIES INVASION SCIENCE NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT |
topic |
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY HUMAN WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS INVASIVE SPECIES INVASION SCIENCE NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In a hyperconnected world, framing and managing biological invasions poses complex and contentious challenges, affecting socioeconomic and environmental sectors. This complexity distinguishes the field and fuels polarized debates. In the present article, we synthesize four contentious issues in invasion science that are rarely addressed together: vocabulary usage, the potential benefits of nonnative species,perceptions shifting because of global change, and rewilding practices and biological invasions.Researchers have predominantly focused on single issues; few have addressed multiple components of the debate within or across disciplinary boundaries. Ignoring the interconnected nature of these issues risks overlooking crucial cross-links. We advocate for interdisciplinary approaches that better integrate social and natural sciences. Although they are challenging, interdisciplinary collaborations offer hope to overcome polarization issues in invasion science. These may bridge disagreements, facilitate knowledge exchange, and reshape invasion science narratives. Finally, we present a contemporary agenda to advance future research, management, and constructive dialogue. Fil: Guareschi, Simone. Università di Torino; Italia. University of Loughborough; Reino Unido Fil: Mathers, Kate L. University of Loughborough; Reino Unido Fil: South, Josie. University of Leeds; Reino Unido. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity; Sudáfrica Fil: Navarro, Laetitia M. Estacion Biologica de Doñana; España Fil: Renals, Trevor. Environment Agency Of Bristol; Reino Unido Fil: Hiley, Alice. Environment Agency Of Bristol; Reino Unido Fil: Antonsich, Marco. University of Loughborough; Reino Unido Fil: Bolpagni, Rossano. Università di Parma; Italia Fil: Bortolus, Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales; Argentina Fil: Genovesi, Piero. Environmental Protection and Research; Italia Fil: Jere, Arthertone. Kapasa Makasa University; Zambia Fil: Madzivanzira, Takudzwa C.. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity; Sudáfrica Fil: Phaka, Fortunate M.. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity; Sudáfrica Fil: Novoa, Ana. Czech Academy of Sciences; República Checa Fil: Olden, Julian D.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos Fil: Saccó, Mattia. Università di Parma; Italia Fil: Shackleton, Ross T.. Stellenbosch University; Sudáfrica Fil: Vilà, Montserrat. Universidad de Sevilla; España Fil: Wood, Paul J.. University of Loughborough; Reino Unido |
description |
In a hyperconnected world, framing and managing biological invasions poses complex and contentious challenges, affecting socioeconomic and environmental sectors. This complexity distinguishes the field and fuels polarized debates. In the present article, we synthesize four contentious issues in invasion science that are rarely addressed together: vocabulary usage, the potential benefits of nonnative species,perceptions shifting because of global change, and rewilding practices and biological invasions.Researchers have predominantly focused on single issues; few have addressed multiple components of the debate within or across disciplinary boundaries. Ignoring the interconnected nature of these issues risks overlooking crucial cross-links. We advocate for interdisciplinary approaches that better integrate social and natural sciences. Although they are challenging, interdisciplinary collaborations offer hope to overcome polarization issues in invasion science. These may bridge disagreements, facilitate knowledge exchange, and reshape invasion science narratives. Finally, we present a contemporary agenda to advance future research, management, and constructive dialogue. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/248904 Guareschi, Simone; Mathers, Kate L; South, Josie; Navarro, Laetitia M; Renals, Trevor; et al.; Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agenda; American Institute of Biological Sciences; Bioscience; 10-2024; 1-15 0006-3568 1525-3244 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/248904 |
identifier_str_mv |
Guareschi, Simone; Mathers, Kate L; South, Josie; Navarro, Laetitia M; Renals, Trevor; et al.; Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agenda; American Institute of Biological Sciences; Bioscience; 10-2024; 1-15 0006-3568 1525-3244 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/advance-article/doi/10.1093/biosci/biae084/7821000 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/biosci/biae084 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Institute of Biological Sciences |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Institute of Biological Sciences |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613482704535552 |
score |
13.070432 |