Reply to comment: Prey perception in feeding-current feeding copepods

Autores
Kiørboe, Thomas; Gonçalves, Rodrigo Javier; Couespel, Damien; van Someren Gréve, Hans; Saiz, Enric; Tiselius, Peter
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
We reply to the comments of Paffenhöfer and Jiang (2016) who argues that remote chemical prey perception is necessary for feeding‐current feeding copepods to fulfill their nutritional requirements in a dilute ocean, that remote chemical prey detection may only be observed at very low prey concentrations, and that chemical prey perception is feasible if prey cells release dissolved organic material in short‐lasting but intense bursts. We demonstrate that mechanoreception at a very short range is sufficient to sustain a living, even in a dilute ocean. Further, if chemoreception requires that prey cells have short intense leakage burst, only a very small fraction of prey cells would be available to the copepod at any instance in time and, thus would be inefficient at low prey concentration. Finally, we report a few new observations of prey capture in two species of copepods, Temora longicornis and Centropages hamatus, offered a 45‐μm sized dinoflagellate at very low concentration. The observed short prey detection distances, up to a few prey cell radii, are consistent with mechanoreception and we argue briefly that near‐field mechanoreception is the most likely and common prey perception mechanism in calanoid copepods.
Fil: Kiørboe, Thomas. Technical University of Denmark; Dinamarca
Fil: Gonçalves, Rodrigo Javier. Fundación Playa Unión. Estación de Fotobiología Playa Unión; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Couespel, Damien. Universite de Paris VI; Francia
Fil: van Someren Gréve, Hans. Technical University of Denmark; Dinamarca
Fil: Saiz, Enric. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto de Ciencias del Mar; España
Fil: Tiselius, Peter. University Goteborg; Suecia
Materia
Zooplankton
Copepod
Trophic Ecology
Prey Detection
Prey Capture
Feeding Currents
Motility
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/44376
Acceder
id CONICETDig_b3e8232d95b61b2f3f18c73e8bf4f8d1
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/44376
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Reply to comment: Prey perception in feeding-current feeding copepodsKiørboe, ThomasGonçalves, Rodrigo JavierCouespel, Damienvan Someren Gréve, HansSaiz, EnricTiselius, PeterZooplanktonCopepodTrophic EcologyPrey DetectionPrey CaptureFeeding CurrentsMotilityhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1We reply to the comments of Paffenhöfer and Jiang (2016) who argues that remote chemical prey perception is necessary for feeding‐current feeding copepods to fulfill their nutritional requirements in a dilute ocean, that remote chemical prey detection may only be observed at very low prey concentrations, and that chemical prey perception is feasible if prey cells release dissolved organic material in short‐lasting but intense bursts. We demonstrate that mechanoreception at a very short range is sufficient to sustain a living, even in a dilute ocean. Further, if chemoreception requires that prey cells have short intense leakage burst, only a very small fraction of prey cells would be available to the copepod at any instance in time and, thus would be inefficient at low prey concentration. Finally, we report a few new observations of prey capture in two species of copepods, Temora longicornis and Centropages hamatus, offered a 45‐μm sized dinoflagellate at very low concentration. The observed short prey detection distances, up to a few prey cell radii, are consistent with mechanoreception and we argue briefly that near‐field mechanoreception is the most likely and common prey perception mechanism in calanoid copepods.Fil: Kiørboe, Thomas. Technical University of Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Gonçalves, Rodrigo Javier. Fundación Playa Unión. Estación de Fotobiología Playa Unión; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Couespel, Damien. Universite de Paris VI; FranciaFil: van Someren Gréve, Hans. Technical University of Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Saiz, Enric. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto de Ciencias del Mar; EspañaFil: Tiselius, Peter. University Goteborg; SueciaAmer Soc Limnology Oceanography2016-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/44376Kiørboe, Thomas; Gonçalves, Rodrigo Javier; Couespel, Damien; van Someren Gréve, Hans; Saiz, Enric; et al.; Reply to comment: Prey perception in feeding-current feeding copepods; Amer Soc Limnology Oceanography; Limnology and Oceanography; 61; 4; 7-2016; 1169-11710024-3590CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/lno.10293info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/lno.10293info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:14:31Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/44376instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:14:31.67CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reply to comment: Prey perception in feeding-current feeding copepods
title Reply to comment: Prey perception in feeding-current feeding copepods
spellingShingle Reply to comment: Prey perception in feeding-current feeding copepods
Kiørboe, Thomas
Zooplankton
Copepod
Trophic Ecology
Prey Detection
Prey Capture
Feeding Currents
Motility
title_short Reply to comment: Prey perception in feeding-current feeding copepods
title_full Reply to comment: Prey perception in feeding-current feeding copepods
title_fullStr Reply to comment: Prey perception in feeding-current feeding copepods
title_full_unstemmed Reply to comment: Prey perception in feeding-current feeding copepods
title_sort Reply to comment: Prey perception in feeding-current feeding copepods
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Kiørboe, Thomas
Gonçalves, Rodrigo Javier
Couespel, Damien
van Someren Gréve, Hans
Saiz, Enric
Tiselius, Peter
author Kiørboe, Thomas
author_facet Kiørboe, Thomas
Gonçalves, Rodrigo Javier
Couespel, Damien
van Someren Gréve, Hans
Saiz, Enric
Tiselius, Peter
author_role author
author2 Gonçalves, Rodrigo Javier
Couespel, Damien
van Someren Gréve, Hans
Saiz, Enric
Tiselius, Peter
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Zooplankton
Copepod
Trophic Ecology
Prey Detection
Prey Capture
Feeding Currents
Motility
topic Zooplankton
Copepod
Trophic Ecology
Prey Detection
Prey Capture
Feeding Currents
Motility
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We reply to the comments of Paffenhöfer and Jiang (2016) who argues that remote chemical prey perception is necessary for feeding‐current feeding copepods to fulfill their nutritional requirements in a dilute ocean, that remote chemical prey detection may only be observed at very low prey concentrations, and that chemical prey perception is feasible if prey cells release dissolved organic material in short‐lasting but intense bursts. We demonstrate that mechanoreception at a very short range is sufficient to sustain a living, even in a dilute ocean. Further, if chemoreception requires that prey cells have short intense leakage burst, only a very small fraction of prey cells would be available to the copepod at any instance in time and, thus would be inefficient at low prey concentration. Finally, we report a few new observations of prey capture in two species of copepods, Temora longicornis and Centropages hamatus, offered a 45‐μm sized dinoflagellate at very low concentration. The observed short prey detection distances, up to a few prey cell radii, are consistent with mechanoreception and we argue briefly that near‐field mechanoreception is the most likely and common prey perception mechanism in calanoid copepods.
Fil: Kiørboe, Thomas. Technical University of Denmark; Dinamarca
Fil: Gonçalves, Rodrigo Javier. Fundación Playa Unión. Estación de Fotobiología Playa Unión; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Couespel, Damien. Universite de Paris VI; Francia
Fil: van Someren Gréve, Hans. Technical University of Denmark; Dinamarca
Fil: Saiz, Enric. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto de Ciencias del Mar; España
Fil: Tiselius, Peter. University Goteborg; Suecia
description We reply to the comments of Paffenhöfer and Jiang (2016) who argues that remote chemical prey perception is necessary for feeding‐current feeding copepods to fulfill their nutritional requirements in a dilute ocean, that remote chemical prey detection may only be observed at very low prey concentrations, and that chemical prey perception is feasible if prey cells release dissolved organic material in short‐lasting but intense bursts. We demonstrate that mechanoreception at a very short range is sufficient to sustain a living, even in a dilute ocean. Further, if chemoreception requires that prey cells have short intense leakage burst, only a very small fraction of prey cells would be available to the copepod at any instance in time and, thus would be inefficient at low prey concentration. Finally, we report a few new observations of prey capture in two species of copepods, Temora longicornis and Centropages hamatus, offered a 45‐μm sized dinoflagellate at very low concentration. The observed short prey detection distances, up to a few prey cell radii, are consistent with mechanoreception and we argue briefly that near‐field mechanoreception is the most likely and common prey perception mechanism in calanoid copepods.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/44376
Kiørboe, Thomas; Gonçalves, Rodrigo Javier; Couespel, Damien; van Someren Gréve, Hans; Saiz, Enric; et al.; Reply to comment: Prey perception in feeding-current feeding copepods; Amer Soc Limnology Oceanography; Limnology and Oceanography; 61; 4; 7-2016; 1169-1171
0024-3590
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/44376
identifier_str_mv Kiørboe, Thomas; Gonçalves, Rodrigo Javier; Couespel, Damien; van Someren Gréve, Hans; Saiz, Enric; et al.; Reply to comment: Prey perception in feeding-current feeding copepods; Amer Soc Limnology Oceanography; Limnology and Oceanography; 61; 4; 7-2016; 1169-1171
0024-3590
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/lno.10293
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/lno.10293
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Amer Soc Limnology Oceanography
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Amer Soc Limnology Oceanography
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614073541459968
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares