On the stapedial anatomy of non-mammaliaform cynodonts

Autores
Gaetano, Leandro Carlos; Abdala, Fernando
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The stapes is known in several non-mammaliaform cynodonts although it has only been cursorily studied. Here we thoroughly analyze the stapedial anatomy of several basal cynodonts in a phylogenetic framework. Non-mammaliaform cynodonts stapes has two crurae and a stapedial foramen. The fused crurae may extend into medial and/or lateral platforms reducing the stapedial foramen relative size. The presence of straight crurae is the basal condition and the most widespread among non-mammaliaform cynodonts; however, variations of this morphology are recognized in the gomphodonts Langbergia, Trirachodon, Exaeretodon, and some specimens of Massetognathus. The anterior crus is more robust than the posterior one in most of the cynodonts analyzed. The opposite situation is registered in Exaeretodon, some specimens of Massetognathus, Probainognathus, and Morganucodon. The crurae are subequal in Scalenodon and some specimens of Galesaurus and Probainognathus. A relatively small stapedial foramen is observed in the basal non-mammaliaform cynodonts Platycraniellus, Procynosuchus, and Progalesaurus whereas it is larger in gomphodonts. The stapedial foramen size is highly variable intraspecifically in Galesaurus and Massetognathus. Procynosuchus and Thrinaxodon only have a lateral platform, whereas the presence of a single medial platform is synapomorphic of a more derived clade including Platycraniellus plus Eucynodontia. Galesaurus, Procynosuchus, and Thrinaxodon share the presence of a lateral ossified portion of the stapes wider than the medial one whereas the opposite situation is synapomorphic of gomphodonts and also observed in Platycraniellus. Anterior and/or posterior projections medially and/or laterally are inconsistently present in some of the cynodonts studied. These projections are not related to the insertion of soft tissues as it has been interpreted. Some of the taxa analyzed (Luangwa, Massetognathus, and Trirachodon) bear a delicate flange-like triangular dorsal process on the dorsal surface of the posterior crus pointing dorsally or dorsomedially. Its presence is variable intraspecifically and among closely related taxa. This process cannot be readily homologized with the tympanic process of more basal synapsids. The morphology of the dorsal process is compatible with the insertion of a small ligament or perhaps the stapedial muscle. The presence of a cartilaginous extrastapes contacting a postquadrate eardrum is not supported by the evidence available. The inclusion of characters provided by the stapes in a total evidence data matrix (including cranial, postcranial, and dental characters), showed that they are phylogenetically informative. Our analysis results in a better understanding of the auditory system in basal cynodonts and its evolution, highlighting the variability of the stapedial anatomy, even intraspecifically.
Fil: Gaetano, Leandro Carlos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Abdala, Fernando. University of the Witwatersrand; Sudáfrica
4th International Palaeontological Congress
Mendoza
Argentina
Asociación Internacional de Paleontología
Materia
STAPES
MIDDLE EAR
CYNODONTS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/265193

id CONICETDig_b02a17ac2b71132b6ba1d912ea76ed79
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/265193
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling On the stapedial anatomy of non-mammaliaform cynodontsGaetano, Leandro CarlosAbdala, FernandoSTAPESMIDDLE EARCYNODONTShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The stapes is known in several non-mammaliaform cynodonts although it has only been cursorily studied. Here we thoroughly analyze the stapedial anatomy of several basal cynodonts in a phylogenetic framework. Non-mammaliaform cynodonts stapes has two crurae and a stapedial foramen. The fused crurae may extend into medial and/or lateral platforms reducing the stapedial foramen relative size. The presence of straight crurae is the basal condition and the most widespread among non-mammaliaform cynodonts; however, variations of this morphology are recognized in the gomphodonts Langbergia, Trirachodon, Exaeretodon, and some specimens of Massetognathus. The anterior crus is more robust than the posterior one in most of the cynodonts analyzed. The opposite situation is registered in Exaeretodon, some specimens of Massetognathus, Probainognathus, and Morganucodon. The crurae are subequal in Scalenodon and some specimens of Galesaurus and Probainognathus. A relatively small stapedial foramen is observed in the basal non-mammaliaform cynodonts Platycraniellus, Procynosuchus, and Progalesaurus whereas it is larger in gomphodonts. The stapedial foramen size is highly variable intraspecifically in Galesaurus and Massetognathus. Procynosuchus and Thrinaxodon only have a lateral platform, whereas the presence of a single medial platform is synapomorphic of a more derived clade including Platycraniellus plus Eucynodontia. Galesaurus, Procynosuchus, and Thrinaxodon share the presence of a lateral ossified portion of the stapes wider than the medial one whereas the opposite situation is synapomorphic of gomphodonts and also observed in Platycraniellus. Anterior and/or posterior projections medially and/or laterally are inconsistently present in some of the cynodonts studied. These projections are not related to the insertion of soft tissues as it has been interpreted. Some of the taxa analyzed (Luangwa, Massetognathus, and Trirachodon) bear a delicate flange-like triangular dorsal process on the dorsal surface of the posterior crus pointing dorsally or dorsomedially. Its presence is variable intraspecifically and among closely related taxa. This process cannot be readily homologized with the tympanic process of more basal synapsids. The morphology of the dorsal process is compatible with the insertion of a small ligament or perhaps the stapedial muscle. The presence of a cartilaginous extrastapes contacting a postquadrate eardrum is not supported by the evidence available. The inclusion of characters provided by the stapes in a total evidence data matrix (including cranial, postcranial, and dental characters), showed that they are phylogenetically informative. Our analysis results in a better understanding of the auditory system in basal cynodonts and its evolution, highlighting the variability of the stapedial anatomy, even intraspecifically.Fil: Gaetano, Leandro Carlos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; ArgentinaFil: Abdala, Fernando. University of the Witwatersrand; Sudáfrica4th International Palaeontological CongressMendozaArgentinaAsociación Internacional de PaleontologíaAsociación Internacional de Paleontología2014info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectCongresoJournalhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/265193On the stapedial anatomy of non-mammaliaform cynodonts; 4th International Palaeontological Congress; Mendoza; Argentina; 2014; 526-526CONICET DigitalCONICETengNacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:29:30Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/265193instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:29:30.827CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On the stapedial anatomy of non-mammaliaform cynodonts
title On the stapedial anatomy of non-mammaliaform cynodonts
spellingShingle On the stapedial anatomy of non-mammaliaform cynodonts
Gaetano, Leandro Carlos
STAPES
MIDDLE EAR
CYNODONTS
title_short On the stapedial anatomy of non-mammaliaform cynodonts
title_full On the stapedial anatomy of non-mammaliaform cynodonts
title_fullStr On the stapedial anatomy of non-mammaliaform cynodonts
title_full_unstemmed On the stapedial anatomy of non-mammaliaform cynodonts
title_sort On the stapedial anatomy of non-mammaliaform cynodonts
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gaetano, Leandro Carlos
Abdala, Fernando
author Gaetano, Leandro Carlos
author_facet Gaetano, Leandro Carlos
Abdala, Fernando
author_role author
author2 Abdala, Fernando
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv STAPES
MIDDLE EAR
CYNODONTS
topic STAPES
MIDDLE EAR
CYNODONTS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The stapes is known in several non-mammaliaform cynodonts although it has only been cursorily studied. Here we thoroughly analyze the stapedial anatomy of several basal cynodonts in a phylogenetic framework. Non-mammaliaform cynodonts stapes has two crurae and a stapedial foramen. The fused crurae may extend into medial and/or lateral platforms reducing the stapedial foramen relative size. The presence of straight crurae is the basal condition and the most widespread among non-mammaliaform cynodonts; however, variations of this morphology are recognized in the gomphodonts Langbergia, Trirachodon, Exaeretodon, and some specimens of Massetognathus. The anterior crus is more robust than the posterior one in most of the cynodonts analyzed. The opposite situation is registered in Exaeretodon, some specimens of Massetognathus, Probainognathus, and Morganucodon. The crurae are subequal in Scalenodon and some specimens of Galesaurus and Probainognathus. A relatively small stapedial foramen is observed in the basal non-mammaliaform cynodonts Platycraniellus, Procynosuchus, and Progalesaurus whereas it is larger in gomphodonts. The stapedial foramen size is highly variable intraspecifically in Galesaurus and Massetognathus. Procynosuchus and Thrinaxodon only have a lateral platform, whereas the presence of a single medial platform is synapomorphic of a more derived clade including Platycraniellus plus Eucynodontia. Galesaurus, Procynosuchus, and Thrinaxodon share the presence of a lateral ossified portion of the stapes wider than the medial one whereas the opposite situation is synapomorphic of gomphodonts and also observed in Platycraniellus. Anterior and/or posterior projections medially and/or laterally are inconsistently present in some of the cynodonts studied. These projections are not related to the insertion of soft tissues as it has been interpreted. Some of the taxa analyzed (Luangwa, Massetognathus, and Trirachodon) bear a delicate flange-like triangular dorsal process on the dorsal surface of the posterior crus pointing dorsally or dorsomedially. Its presence is variable intraspecifically and among closely related taxa. This process cannot be readily homologized with the tympanic process of more basal synapsids. The morphology of the dorsal process is compatible with the insertion of a small ligament or perhaps the stapedial muscle. The presence of a cartilaginous extrastapes contacting a postquadrate eardrum is not supported by the evidence available. The inclusion of characters provided by the stapes in a total evidence data matrix (including cranial, postcranial, and dental characters), showed that they are phylogenetically informative. Our analysis results in a better understanding of the auditory system in basal cynodonts and its evolution, highlighting the variability of the stapedial anatomy, even intraspecifically.
Fil: Gaetano, Leandro Carlos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Abdala, Fernando. University of the Witwatersrand; Sudáfrica
4th International Palaeontological Congress
Mendoza
Argentina
Asociación Internacional de Paleontología
description The stapes is known in several non-mammaliaform cynodonts although it has only been cursorily studied. Here we thoroughly analyze the stapedial anatomy of several basal cynodonts in a phylogenetic framework. Non-mammaliaform cynodonts stapes has two crurae and a stapedial foramen. The fused crurae may extend into medial and/or lateral platforms reducing the stapedial foramen relative size. The presence of straight crurae is the basal condition and the most widespread among non-mammaliaform cynodonts; however, variations of this morphology are recognized in the gomphodonts Langbergia, Trirachodon, Exaeretodon, and some specimens of Massetognathus. The anterior crus is more robust than the posterior one in most of the cynodonts analyzed. The opposite situation is registered in Exaeretodon, some specimens of Massetognathus, Probainognathus, and Morganucodon. The crurae are subequal in Scalenodon and some specimens of Galesaurus and Probainognathus. A relatively small stapedial foramen is observed in the basal non-mammaliaform cynodonts Platycraniellus, Procynosuchus, and Progalesaurus whereas it is larger in gomphodonts. The stapedial foramen size is highly variable intraspecifically in Galesaurus and Massetognathus. Procynosuchus and Thrinaxodon only have a lateral platform, whereas the presence of a single medial platform is synapomorphic of a more derived clade including Platycraniellus plus Eucynodontia. Galesaurus, Procynosuchus, and Thrinaxodon share the presence of a lateral ossified portion of the stapes wider than the medial one whereas the opposite situation is synapomorphic of gomphodonts and also observed in Platycraniellus. Anterior and/or posterior projections medially and/or laterally are inconsistently present in some of the cynodonts studied. These projections are not related to the insertion of soft tissues as it has been interpreted. Some of the taxa analyzed (Luangwa, Massetognathus, and Trirachodon) bear a delicate flange-like triangular dorsal process on the dorsal surface of the posterior crus pointing dorsally or dorsomedially. Its presence is variable intraspecifically and among closely related taxa. This process cannot be readily homologized with the tympanic process of more basal synapsids. The morphology of the dorsal process is compatible with the insertion of a small ligament or perhaps the stapedial muscle. The presence of a cartilaginous extrastapes contacting a postquadrate eardrum is not supported by the evidence available. The inclusion of characters provided by the stapes in a total evidence data matrix (including cranial, postcranial, and dental characters), showed that they are phylogenetically informative. Our analysis results in a better understanding of the auditory system in basal cynodonts and its evolution, highlighting the variability of the stapedial anatomy, even intraspecifically.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Congreso
Journal
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/265193
On the stapedial anatomy of non-mammaliaform cynodonts; 4th International Palaeontological Congress; Mendoza; Argentina; 2014; 526-526
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/265193
identifier_str_mv On the stapedial anatomy of non-mammaliaform cynodonts; 4th International Palaeontological Congress; Mendoza; Argentina; 2014; 526-526
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Nacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Asociación Internacional de Paleontología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Asociación Internacional de Paleontología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083434757226496
score 13.22299