Commentary: Physical time within human time

Autores
Romero, Gustavo Esteban
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Time has always been a source of perplexity and fascination for human beings.Presocratic philosophers initiated the first discussions on the reality of time and its relationto change. Heraclitus presumed that change was a basic and irreducible ingredient of nature.According to him, the world would be a manifold of substances in permanent change.Parmenides, on the contrary, famously denied change. He argued, in what was possiblythe first deductive argument in the history of ontology, that change is impossible because itdemands that what is not, should somehow be. He relentlessly concluded that our image of adynamic universe is a pure illusion: reality is fixed, coming to be and perishing are excludedfrom the cosmos, and whatever exists must be permanent (see Graham, 2006 for a fascinatingaccount of Parmenides’s challenge).The discussion between Heraclitus and Parmenides permeates the entire history ofWestern thought and has ended up reaching our days in the form of a tension between twoevidently irreconcilable conceptions of time: the flowing time and spacetime. The idea thattime somehow flows is closely related to the idea that there is a specific instant called “thepresent” that, through change, is sequentially actualized: old instants no longer exist, so thereis no past but just our memory of what once was. Future instants do not exist yet. Only the“now” is real and is permanently changing. Such a view is usually called “presentism.”
Fil: Romero, Gustavo Esteban. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía; Argentina
Materia
time
temporal experience
present
spacetime
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/218026

id CONICETDig_afa6f59b0ea60a7825c6a58c032e10aa
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/218026
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Commentary: Physical time within human timeRomero, Gustavo Estebantimetemporal experiencepresentspacetimehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Time has always been a source of perplexity and fascination for human beings.Presocratic philosophers initiated the first discussions on the reality of time and its relationto change. Heraclitus presumed that change was a basic and irreducible ingredient of nature.According to him, the world would be a manifold of substances in permanent change.Parmenides, on the contrary, famously denied change. He argued, in what was possiblythe first deductive argument in the history of ontology, that change is impossible because itdemands that what is not, should somehow be. He relentlessly concluded that our image of adynamic universe is a pure illusion: reality is fixed, coming to be and perishing are excludedfrom the cosmos, and whatever exists must be permanent (see Graham, 2006 for a fascinatingaccount of Parmenides’s challenge).The discussion between Heraclitus and Parmenides permeates the entire history ofWestern thought and has ended up reaching our days in the form of a tension between twoevidently irreconcilable conceptions of time: the flowing time and spacetime. The idea thattime somehow flows is closely related to the idea that there is a specific instant called “thepresent” that, through change, is sequentially actualized: old instants no longer exist, so thereis no past but just our memory of what once was. Future instants do not exist yet. Only the“now” is real and is permanently changing. Such a view is usually called “presentism.”Fil: Romero, Gustavo Esteban. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía; ArgentinaInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)2023-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/218026Romero, Gustavo Esteban; Commentary: Physical time within human time; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM); Frontiers in Psychology; 14; 6-2023; 1-31664-1078CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092351/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092351info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:09:11Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/218026instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:09:11.962CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Commentary: Physical time within human time
title Commentary: Physical time within human time
spellingShingle Commentary: Physical time within human time
Romero, Gustavo Esteban
time
temporal experience
present
spacetime
title_short Commentary: Physical time within human time
title_full Commentary: Physical time within human time
title_fullStr Commentary: Physical time within human time
title_full_unstemmed Commentary: Physical time within human time
title_sort Commentary: Physical time within human time
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Romero, Gustavo Esteban
author Romero, Gustavo Esteban
author_facet Romero, Gustavo Esteban
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv time
temporal experience
present
spacetime
topic time
temporal experience
present
spacetime
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Time has always been a source of perplexity and fascination for human beings.Presocratic philosophers initiated the first discussions on the reality of time and its relationto change. Heraclitus presumed that change was a basic and irreducible ingredient of nature.According to him, the world would be a manifold of substances in permanent change.Parmenides, on the contrary, famously denied change. He argued, in what was possiblythe first deductive argument in the history of ontology, that change is impossible because itdemands that what is not, should somehow be. He relentlessly concluded that our image of adynamic universe is a pure illusion: reality is fixed, coming to be and perishing are excludedfrom the cosmos, and whatever exists must be permanent (see Graham, 2006 for a fascinatingaccount of Parmenides’s challenge).The discussion between Heraclitus and Parmenides permeates the entire history ofWestern thought and has ended up reaching our days in the form of a tension between twoevidently irreconcilable conceptions of time: the flowing time and spacetime. The idea thattime somehow flows is closely related to the idea that there is a specific instant called “thepresent” that, through change, is sequentially actualized: old instants no longer exist, so thereis no past but just our memory of what once was. Future instants do not exist yet. Only the“now” is real and is permanently changing. Such a view is usually called “presentism.”
Fil: Romero, Gustavo Esteban. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía; Argentina
description Time has always been a source of perplexity and fascination for human beings.Presocratic philosophers initiated the first discussions on the reality of time and its relationto change. Heraclitus presumed that change was a basic and irreducible ingredient of nature.According to him, the world would be a manifold of substances in permanent change.Parmenides, on the contrary, famously denied change. He argued, in what was possiblythe first deductive argument in the history of ontology, that change is impossible because itdemands that what is not, should somehow be. He relentlessly concluded that our image of adynamic universe is a pure illusion: reality is fixed, coming to be and perishing are excludedfrom the cosmos, and whatever exists must be permanent (see Graham, 2006 for a fascinatingaccount of Parmenides’s challenge).The discussion between Heraclitus and Parmenides permeates the entire history ofWestern thought and has ended up reaching our days in the form of a tension between twoevidently irreconcilable conceptions of time: the flowing time and spacetime. The idea thattime somehow flows is closely related to the idea that there is a specific instant called “thepresent” that, through change, is sequentially actualized: old instants no longer exist, so thereis no past but just our memory of what once was. Future instants do not exist yet. Only the“now” is real and is permanently changing. Such a view is usually called “presentism.”
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/218026
Romero, Gustavo Esteban; Commentary: Physical time within human time; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM); Frontiers in Psychology; 14; 6-2023; 1-3
1664-1078
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/218026
identifier_str_mv Romero, Gustavo Esteban; Commentary: Physical time within human time; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM); Frontiers in Psychology; 14; 6-2023; 1-3
1664-1078
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092351/full
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092351
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842270072850087936
score 13.13397