Commentary: Physical time within human time
- Autores
- Romero, Gustavo Esteban
- Año de publicación
- 2023
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Time has always been a source of perplexity and fascination for human beings.Presocratic philosophers initiated the first discussions on the reality of time and its relationto change. Heraclitus presumed that change was a basic and irreducible ingredient of nature.According to him, the world would be a manifold of substances in permanent change.Parmenides, on the contrary, famously denied change. He argued, in what was possiblythe first deductive argument in the history of ontology, that change is impossible because itdemands that what is not, should somehow be. He relentlessly concluded that our image of adynamic universe is a pure illusion: reality is fixed, coming to be and perishing are excludedfrom the cosmos, and whatever exists must be permanent (see Graham, 2006 for a fascinatingaccount of Parmenides’s challenge).The discussion between Heraclitus and Parmenides permeates the entire history ofWestern thought and has ended up reaching our days in the form of a tension between twoevidently irreconcilable conceptions of time: the flowing time and spacetime. The idea thattime somehow flows is closely related to the idea that there is a specific instant called “thepresent” that, through change, is sequentially actualized: old instants no longer exist, so thereis no past but just our memory of what once was. Future instants do not exist yet. Only the“now” is real and is permanently changing. Such a view is usually called “presentism.”
Fil: Romero, Gustavo Esteban. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía; Argentina - Materia
-
time
temporal experience
present
spacetime - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/218026
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_afa6f59b0ea60a7825c6a58c032e10aa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/218026 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Commentary: Physical time within human timeRomero, Gustavo Estebantimetemporal experiencepresentspacetimehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Time has always been a source of perplexity and fascination for human beings.Presocratic philosophers initiated the first discussions on the reality of time and its relationto change. Heraclitus presumed that change was a basic and irreducible ingredient of nature.According to him, the world would be a manifold of substances in permanent change.Parmenides, on the contrary, famously denied change. He argued, in what was possiblythe first deductive argument in the history of ontology, that change is impossible because itdemands that what is not, should somehow be. He relentlessly concluded that our image of adynamic universe is a pure illusion: reality is fixed, coming to be and perishing are excludedfrom the cosmos, and whatever exists must be permanent (see Graham, 2006 for a fascinatingaccount of Parmenides’s challenge).The discussion between Heraclitus and Parmenides permeates the entire history ofWestern thought and has ended up reaching our days in the form of a tension between twoevidently irreconcilable conceptions of time: the flowing time and spacetime. The idea thattime somehow flows is closely related to the idea that there is a specific instant called “thepresent” that, through change, is sequentially actualized: old instants no longer exist, so thereis no past but just our memory of what once was. Future instants do not exist yet. Only the“now” is real and is permanently changing. Such a view is usually called “presentism.”Fil: Romero, Gustavo Esteban. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía; ArgentinaInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)2023-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/218026Romero, Gustavo Esteban; Commentary: Physical time within human time; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM); Frontiers in Psychology; 14; 6-2023; 1-31664-1078CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092351/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092351info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:09:11Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/218026instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:09:11.962CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Commentary: Physical time within human time |
title |
Commentary: Physical time within human time |
spellingShingle |
Commentary: Physical time within human time Romero, Gustavo Esteban time temporal experience present spacetime |
title_short |
Commentary: Physical time within human time |
title_full |
Commentary: Physical time within human time |
title_fullStr |
Commentary: Physical time within human time |
title_full_unstemmed |
Commentary: Physical time within human time |
title_sort |
Commentary: Physical time within human time |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Romero, Gustavo Esteban |
author |
Romero, Gustavo Esteban |
author_facet |
Romero, Gustavo Esteban |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
time temporal experience present spacetime |
topic |
time temporal experience present spacetime |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Time has always been a source of perplexity and fascination for human beings.Presocratic philosophers initiated the first discussions on the reality of time and its relationto change. Heraclitus presumed that change was a basic and irreducible ingredient of nature.According to him, the world would be a manifold of substances in permanent change.Parmenides, on the contrary, famously denied change. He argued, in what was possiblythe first deductive argument in the history of ontology, that change is impossible because itdemands that what is not, should somehow be. He relentlessly concluded that our image of adynamic universe is a pure illusion: reality is fixed, coming to be and perishing are excludedfrom the cosmos, and whatever exists must be permanent (see Graham, 2006 for a fascinatingaccount of Parmenides’s challenge).The discussion between Heraclitus and Parmenides permeates the entire history ofWestern thought and has ended up reaching our days in the form of a tension between twoevidently irreconcilable conceptions of time: the flowing time and spacetime. The idea thattime somehow flows is closely related to the idea that there is a specific instant called “thepresent” that, through change, is sequentially actualized: old instants no longer exist, so thereis no past but just our memory of what once was. Future instants do not exist yet. Only the“now” is real and is permanently changing. Such a view is usually called “presentism.” Fil: Romero, Gustavo Esteban. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía; Argentina |
description |
Time has always been a source of perplexity and fascination for human beings.Presocratic philosophers initiated the first discussions on the reality of time and its relationto change. Heraclitus presumed that change was a basic and irreducible ingredient of nature.According to him, the world would be a manifold of substances in permanent change.Parmenides, on the contrary, famously denied change. He argued, in what was possiblythe first deductive argument in the history of ontology, that change is impossible because itdemands that what is not, should somehow be. He relentlessly concluded that our image of adynamic universe is a pure illusion: reality is fixed, coming to be and perishing are excludedfrom the cosmos, and whatever exists must be permanent (see Graham, 2006 for a fascinatingaccount of Parmenides’s challenge).The discussion between Heraclitus and Parmenides permeates the entire history ofWestern thought and has ended up reaching our days in the form of a tension between twoevidently irreconcilable conceptions of time: the flowing time and spacetime. The idea thattime somehow flows is closely related to the idea that there is a specific instant called “thepresent” that, through change, is sequentially actualized: old instants no longer exist, so thereis no past but just our memory of what once was. Future instants do not exist yet. Only the“now” is real and is permanently changing. Such a view is usually called “presentism.” |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/218026 Romero, Gustavo Esteban; Commentary: Physical time within human time; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM); Frontiers in Psychology; 14; 6-2023; 1-3 1664-1078 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/218026 |
identifier_str_mv |
Romero, Gustavo Esteban; Commentary: Physical time within human time; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM); Frontiers in Psychology; 14; 6-2023; 1-3 1664-1078 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092351/full info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092351 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842270072850087936 |
score |
13.13397 |