Is urethane–chloralose anaesthesia appropriate for pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic assessment? Studies with carvedilol

Autores
Bertera, Facundo Martin; Di Verniero, Carla Andrea; Mayer, Marcos Alejandro; Brarmuglia, Guillermo; Taira, Carlos Alberto; Höcht, Christian
Año de publicación
2009
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Introduction: The aim of the work was to establish the impact of urethane?chloralose anaesthesia on pharmacokinetic?pharmacodynamic (PK?PD) properties of carvedilol in control rats and L-NAME hypertensive animals. Methods: Male Wistar Rats were randomly divided into: control (n=12) with tap water to drink and L-NAME rats (n=12) with L-NAME solution (40 mg/kg/day) to drink for 2 weeks. Effects of carvedilol (1 mg kg−1, i.v.) on blood pressure and heart rate were recorded during 3 h in conscious and urethane (500 mg kg−1, i.p.) ? chloralose (50 mg kg−1, i.p.) anaesthetized rats. Carvedilol plasma pharmacokinetics was studied by means of traditional blood sampling. PK?PD modelling of carvedilol was made by means of an effect compartment model.Results: Neither urethane?chloralose nor L-NAMEmodified estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters of carvedilol. Although urethane?chloralose did not modify potency of carvedilol comparing with awake animals in control and hypertensive group, maximal negative chronotropic responsewas significantly greater in anaesthetized L-NAME rats in comparison to awake animals. Conversely, anaesthesia did not modify maximal chronotropic response to carvedilol in control rats. Whilst no differences were found in the estimated potency of carvedilol hypotensiveresponse comparing control and L-NAME rats in both awake and anaesthetized conditions, maximal hypotensive effect of carvedilolwas significantly greater in anaesthetized control andL-NAMEanimals in comparison to conscious rats. L-NAME rats showed a greater maximal hypotensive response comparing to control group Discussion: Urethane?chloralose anaesthesia is an acceptable experimental condition for the evaluation of PK?PD properties of carvedilol, considering that it does not affect the potency of carvedilol for its chronotropic and hypotensive effect. Conclusions obtained from  urethane?chloralose anaesthetized animals, regarding the impact of L-NAME treatment on PK?PD properties of carvedilol, did not differ from those obtained from conscious animals. Anaesthesia did not modify pharmacokinetic behaviour of carvedilol in both normotensive and L-NAME hypertensive rats
Fil: Bertera, Facundo Martin. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina
Fil: Di Verniero, Carla Andrea. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Instituto de Fisiopatología y Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina
Fil: Mayer, Marcos Alejandro. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Instituto de Fisiopatología y Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay; Argentina
Fil: Brarmuglia, Guillermo. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina
Fil: Taira, Carlos Alberto. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Instituto de Fisiopatología y Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay; Argentina
Fil: Höcht, Christian. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Instituto de Fisiopatología y Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina
Materia
CARVEDILOL
PHARMACOKINETIC
URETHANE
CHLORASE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242106
Acceder
id CONICETDig_ae38a993a25cd647193cd4aa7676fc26
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242106
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Is urethane–chloralose anaesthesia appropriate for pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic assessment? Studies with carvedilolBertera, Facundo MartinDi Verniero, Carla AndreaMayer, Marcos AlejandroBrarmuglia, GuillermoTaira, Carlos AlbertoHöcht, ChristianCARVEDILOLPHARMACOKINETICURETHANECHLORASEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Introduction: The aim of the work was to establish the impact of urethane?chloralose anaesthesia on pharmacokinetic?pharmacodynamic (PK?PD) properties of carvedilol in control rats and L-NAME hypertensive animals. Methods: Male Wistar Rats were randomly divided into: control (n=12) with tap water to drink and L-NAME rats (n=12) with L-NAME solution (40 mg/kg/day) to drink for 2 weeks. Effects of carvedilol (1 mg kg−1, i.v.) on blood pressure and heart rate were recorded during 3 h in conscious and urethane (500 mg kg−1, i.p.) ? chloralose (50 mg kg−1, i.p.) anaesthetized rats. Carvedilol plasma pharmacokinetics was studied by means of traditional blood sampling. PK?PD modelling of carvedilol was made by means of an effect compartment model.Results: Neither urethane?chloralose nor L-NAMEmodified estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters of carvedilol. Although urethane?chloralose did not modify potency of carvedilol comparing with awake animals in control and hypertensive group, maximal negative chronotropic responsewas significantly greater in anaesthetized L-NAME rats in comparison to awake animals. Conversely, anaesthesia did not modify maximal chronotropic response to carvedilol in control rats. Whilst no differences were found in the estimated potency of carvedilol hypotensiveresponse comparing control and L-NAME rats in both awake and anaesthetized conditions, maximal hypotensive effect of carvedilolwas significantly greater in anaesthetized control andL-NAMEanimals in comparison to conscious rats. L-NAME rats showed a greater maximal hypotensive response comparing to control group Discussion: Urethane?chloralose anaesthesia is an acceptable experimental condition for the evaluation of PK?PD properties of carvedilol, considering that it does not affect the potency of carvedilol for its chronotropic and hypotensive effect. Conclusions obtained from  urethane?chloralose anaesthetized animals, regarding the impact of L-NAME treatment on PK?PD properties of carvedilol, did not differ from those obtained from conscious animals. Anaesthesia did not modify pharmacokinetic behaviour of carvedilol in both normotensive and L-NAME hypertensive ratsFil: Bertera, Facundo Martin. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; ArgentinaFil: Di Verniero, Carla Andrea. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Instituto de Fisiopatología y Bioquímica Clínica; ArgentinaFil: Mayer, Marcos Alejandro. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Instituto de Fisiopatología y Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay; ArgentinaFil: Brarmuglia, Guillermo. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; ArgentinaFil: Taira, Carlos Alberto. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Instituto de Fisiopatología y Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay; ArgentinaFil: Höcht, Christian. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Instituto de Fisiopatología y Bioquímica Clínica; ArgentinaElsevier2009-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/242106Bertera, Facundo Martin; Di Verniero, Carla Andrea; Mayer, Marcos Alejandro; Brarmuglia, Guillermo; Taira, Carlos Alberto; et al.; Is urethane–chloralose anaesthesia appropriate for pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic assessment? Studies with carvedilol; Elsevier; Journal Of Pharmacological And Toxicological Methods.; 59; 1; 12-2009; 13-201056-8719CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871908002189info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.vascn.2008.10.001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:11:22Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242106instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:11:22.899CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is urethane–chloralose anaesthesia appropriate for pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic assessment? Studies with carvedilol
title Is urethane–chloralose anaesthesia appropriate for pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic assessment? Studies with carvedilol
spellingShingle Is urethane–chloralose anaesthesia appropriate for pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic assessment? Studies with carvedilol
Bertera, Facundo Martin
CARVEDILOL
PHARMACOKINETIC
URETHANE
CHLORASE
title_short Is urethane–chloralose anaesthesia appropriate for pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic assessment? Studies with carvedilol
title_full Is urethane–chloralose anaesthesia appropriate for pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic assessment? Studies with carvedilol
title_fullStr Is urethane–chloralose anaesthesia appropriate for pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic assessment? Studies with carvedilol
title_full_unstemmed Is urethane–chloralose anaesthesia appropriate for pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic assessment? Studies with carvedilol
title_sort Is urethane–chloralose anaesthesia appropriate for pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic assessment? Studies with carvedilol
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bertera, Facundo Martin
Di Verniero, Carla Andrea
Mayer, Marcos Alejandro
Brarmuglia, Guillermo
Taira, Carlos Alberto
Höcht, Christian
author Bertera, Facundo Martin
author_facet Bertera, Facundo Martin
Di Verniero, Carla Andrea
Mayer, Marcos Alejandro
Brarmuglia, Guillermo
Taira, Carlos Alberto
Höcht, Christian
author_role author
author2 Di Verniero, Carla Andrea
Mayer, Marcos Alejandro
Brarmuglia, Guillermo
Taira, Carlos Alberto
Höcht, Christian
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CARVEDILOL
PHARMACOKINETIC
URETHANE
CHLORASE
topic CARVEDILOL
PHARMACOKINETIC
URETHANE
CHLORASE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Introduction: The aim of the work was to establish the impact of urethane?chloralose anaesthesia on pharmacokinetic?pharmacodynamic (PK?PD) properties of carvedilol in control rats and L-NAME hypertensive animals. Methods: Male Wistar Rats were randomly divided into: control (n=12) with tap water to drink and L-NAME rats (n=12) with L-NAME solution (40 mg/kg/day) to drink for 2 weeks. Effects of carvedilol (1 mg kg−1, i.v.) on blood pressure and heart rate were recorded during 3 h in conscious and urethane (500 mg kg−1, i.p.) ? chloralose (50 mg kg−1, i.p.) anaesthetized rats. Carvedilol plasma pharmacokinetics was studied by means of traditional blood sampling. PK?PD modelling of carvedilol was made by means of an effect compartment model.Results: Neither urethane?chloralose nor L-NAMEmodified estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters of carvedilol. Although urethane?chloralose did not modify potency of carvedilol comparing with awake animals in control and hypertensive group, maximal negative chronotropic responsewas significantly greater in anaesthetized L-NAME rats in comparison to awake animals. Conversely, anaesthesia did not modify maximal chronotropic response to carvedilol in control rats. Whilst no differences were found in the estimated potency of carvedilol hypotensiveresponse comparing control and L-NAME rats in both awake and anaesthetized conditions, maximal hypotensive effect of carvedilolwas significantly greater in anaesthetized control andL-NAMEanimals in comparison to conscious rats. L-NAME rats showed a greater maximal hypotensive response comparing to control group Discussion: Urethane?chloralose anaesthesia is an acceptable experimental condition for the evaluation of PK?PD properties of carvedilol, considering that it does not affect the potency of carvedilol for its chronotropic and hypotensive effect. Conclusions obtained from  urethane?chloralose anaesthetized animals, regarding the impact of L-NAME treatment on PK?PD properties of carvedilol, did not differ from those obtained from conscious animals. Anaesthesia did not modify pharmacokinetic behaviour of carvedilol in both normotensive and L-NAME hypertensive rats
Fil: Bertera, Facundo Martin. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina
Fil: Di Verniero, Carla Andrea. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Instituto de Fisiopatología y Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina
Fil: Mayer, Marcos Alejandro. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Instituto de Fisiopatología y Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay; Argentina
Fil: Brarmuglia, Guillermo. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina
Fil: Taira, Carlos Alberto. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Instituto de Fisiopatología y Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay; Argentina
Fil: Höcht, Christian. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Farmacología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Instituto de Fisiopatología y Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina
description Introduction: The aim of the work was to establish the impact of urethane?chloralose anaesthesia on pharmacokinetic?pharmacodynamic (PK?PD) properties of carvedilol in control rats and L-NAME hypertensive animals. Methods: Male Wistar Rats were randomly divided into: control (n=12) with tap water to drink and L-NAME rats (n=12) with L-NAME solution (40 mg/kg/day) to drink for 2 weeks. Effects of carvedilol (1 mg kg−1, i.v.) on blood pressure and heart rate were recorded during 3 h in conscious and urethane (500 mg kg−1, i.p.) ? chloralose (50 mg kg−1, i.p.) anaesthetized rats. Carvedilol plasma pharmacokinetics was studied by means of traditional blood sampling. PK?PD modelling of carvedilol was made by means of an effect compartment model.Results: Neither urethane?chloralose nor L-NAMEmodified estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters of carvedilol. Although urethane?chloralose did not modify potency of carvedilol comparing with awake animals in control and hypertensive group, maximal negative chronotropic responsewas significantly greater in anaesthetized L-NAME rats in comparison to awake animals. Conversely, anaesthesia did not modify maximal chronotropic response to carvedilol in control rats. Whilst no differences were found in the estimated potency of carvedilol hypotensiveresponse comparing control and L-NAME rats in both awake and anaesthetized conditions, maximal hypotensive effect of carvedilolwas significantly greater in anaesthetized control andL-NAMEanimals in comparison to conscious rats. L-NAME rats showed a greater maximal hypotensive response comparing to control group Discussion: Urethane?chloralose anaesthesia is an acceptable experimental condition for the evaluation of PK?PD properties of carvedilol, considering that it does not affect the potency of carvedilol for its chronotropic and hypotensive effect. Conclusions obtained from  urethane?chloralose anaesthetized animals, regarding the impact of L-NAME treatment on PK?PD properties of carvedilol, did not differ from those obtained from conscious animals. Anaesthesia did not modify pharmacokinetic behaviour of carvedilol in both normotensive and L-NAME hypertensive rats
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/242106
Bertera, Facundo Martin; Di Verniero, Carla Andrea; Mayer, Marcos Alejandro; Brarmuglia, Guillermo; Taira, Carlos Alberto; et al.; Is urethane–chloralose anaesthesia appropriate for pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic assessment? Studies with carvedilol; Elsevier; Journal Of Pharmacological And Toxicological Methods.; 59; 1; 12-2009; 13-20
1056-8719
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/242106
identifier_str_mv Bertera, Facundo Martin; Di Verniero, Carla Andrea; Mayer, Marcos Alejandro; Brarmuglia, Guillermo; Taira, Carlos Alberto; et al.; Is urethane–chloralose anaesthesia appropriate for pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic assessment? Studies with carvedilol; Elsevier; Journal Of Pharmacological And Toxicological Methods.; 59; 1; 12-2009; 13-20
1056-8719
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871908002189
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.vascn.2008.10.001
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842270155618385920
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares