Variable, fixed, and hybrid sampling period approach for grid synchronization
- Autores
- Carugati, Ignacio; Orallo, Carlos Martin; Maestri, Sebastian Oscar; Donato, Patricio Gabriel; Carrica, Daniel Oscar
- Año de publicación
- 2017
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Almost all synchronization methods that can be found in the literature are based on a fixed sampling period approach and implemented by the addition of filter stages to the conventional Synchronous Reference Frame Phase Locked Loop (SRF-PLL) structure. A less common approach is the variable sampling period (VSP), used in methods like VSP-PLL. These methods allow implementing a synchronous sampling period which automatically adapts the monitoring and control systems to the grid voltage and current, improving their processing performance. Notwithstanding the advantages of the synchronous sampling period approach, this operation principle is not commonly adopted in the literature since a proper design is required to avoid implementation problems and possible conflicts with other modules. This manuscript reviews the advantages of VSP approach, unveils similarities between VSP-PLL and SRF-PLL that allow improving the understanding of the former by comparing it to the latter, and provides guidelines for a proper implementation of a synchronous sampling method. In addition, a Hybrid Sampling Period (HSP) approach that combines the advantages of SRF-PLL and VSP-PLL is proposed. The three approaches are compared, the advantages of hybrid methods are discussed and the methodology for adopting the VSP and HSP approach in most fixed sampling period method is presented. Finally, the proposal is verified by experimental implementation.
Fil: Carugati, Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; Argentina
Fil: Orallo, Carlos Martin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; Argentina
Fil: Maestri, Sebastian Oscar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; Argentina
Fil: Donato, Patricio Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; Argentina
Fil: Carrica, Daniel Oscar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; Argentina - Materia
-
Phase Locked Loop
Grid Disturbances
Sampling Period - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/34703
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_ade010851f4e54f55bdb35218a6bc820 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/34703 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Variable, fixed, and hybrid sampling period approach for grid synchronizationCarugati, IgnacioOrallo, Carlos MartinMaestri, Sebastian OscarDonato, Patricio GabrielCarrica, Daniel OscarPhase Locked LoopGrid DisturbancesSampling Periodhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2Almost all synchronization methods that can be found in the literature are based on a fixed sampling period approach and implemented by the addition of filter stages to the conventional Synchronous Reference Frame Phase Locked Loop (SRF-PLL) structure. A less common approach is the variable sampling period (VSP), used in methods like VSP-PLL. These methods allow implementing a synchronous sampling period which automatically adapts the monitoring and control systems to the grid voltage and current, improving their processing performance. Notwithstanding the advantages of the synchronous sampling period approach, this operation principle is not commonly adopted in the literature since a proper design is required to avoid implementation problems and possible conflicts with other modules. This manuscript reviews the advantages of VSP approach, unveils similarities between VSP-PLL and SRF-PLL that allow improving the understanding of the former by comparing it to the latter, and provides guidelines for a proper implementation of a synchronous sampling method. In addition, a Hybrid Sampling Period (HSP) approach that combines the advantages of SRF-PLL and VSP-PLL is proposed. The three approaches are compared, the advantages of hybrid methods are discussed and the methodology for adopting the VSP and HSP approach in most fixed sampling period method is presented. Finally, the proposal is verified by experimental implementation.Fil: Carugati, Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; ArgentinaFil: Orallo, Carlos Martin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; ArgentinaFil: Maestri, Sebastian Oscar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; ArgentinaFil: Donato, Patricio Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; ArgentinaFil: Carrica, Daniel Oscar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; ArgentinaElsevier Science Sa2017-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/34703Carugati, Ignacio; Orallo, Carlos Martin; Maestri, Sebastian Oscar; Donato, Patricio Gabriel; Carrica, Daniel Oscar; Variable, fixed, and hybrid sampling period approach for grid synchronization; Elsevier Science Sa; Electric Power Systems Research; 144; 3-2017; 23-310378-7796CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.epsr.2016.10.053info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378779616304606info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:59Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/34703instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:52:00.245CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Variable, fixed, and hybrid sampling period approach for grid synchronization |
title |
Variable, fixed, and hybrid sampling period approach for grid synchronization |
spellingShingle |
Variable, fixed, and hybrid sampling period approach for grid synchronization Carugati, Ignacio Phase Locked Loop Grid Disturbances Sampling Period |
title_short |
Variable, fixed, and hybrid sampling period approach for grid synchronization |
title_full |
Variable, fixed, and hybrid sampling period approach for grid synchronization |
title_fullStr |
Variable, fixed, and hybrid sampling period approach for grid synchronization |
title_full_unstemmed |
Variable, fixed, and hybrid sampling period approach for grid synchronization |
title_sort |
Variable, fixed, and hybrid sampling period approach for grid synchronization |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Carugati, Ignacio Orallo, Carlos Martin Maestri, Sebastian Oscar Donato, Patricio Gabriel Carrica, Daniel Oscar |
author |
Carugati, Ignacio |
author_facet |
Carugati, Ignacio Orallo, Carlos Martin Maestri, Sebastian Oscar Donato, Patricio Gabriel Carrica, Daniel Oscar |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Orallo, Carlos Martin Maestri, Sebastian Oscar Donato, Patricio Gabriel Carrica, Daniel Oscar |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Phase Locked Loop Grid Disturbances Sampling Period |
topic |
Phase Locked Loop Grid Disturbances Sampling Period |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Almost all synchronization methods that can be found in the literature are based on a fixed sampling period approach and implemented by the addition of filter stages to the conventional Synchronous Reference Frame Phase Locked Loop (SRF-PLL) structure. A less common approach is the variable sampling period (VSP), used in methods like VSP-PLL. These methods allow implementing a synchronous sampling period which automatically adapts the monitoring and control systems to the grid voltage and current, improving their processing performance. Notwithstanding the advantages of the synchronous sampling period approach, this operation principle is not commonly adopted in the literature since a proper design is required to avoid implementation problems and possible conflicts with other modules. This manuscript reviews the advantages of VSP approach, unveils similarities between VSP-PLL and SRF-PLL that allow improving the understanding of the former by comparing it to the latter, and provides guidelines for a proper implementation of a synchronous sampling method. In addition, a Hybrid Sampling Period (HSP) approach that combines the advantages of SRF-PLL and VSP-PLL is proposed. The three approaches are compared, the advantages of hybrid methods are discussed and the methodology for adopting the VSP and HSP approach in most fixed sampling period method is presented. Finally, the proposal is verified by experimental implementation. Fil: Carugati, Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; Argentina Fil: Orallo, Carlos Martin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; Argentina Fil: Maestri, Sebastian Oscar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; Argentina Fil: Donato, Patricio Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; Argentina Fil: Carrica, Daniel Oscar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas En Electronica.; Argentina |
description |
Almost all synchronization methods that can be found in the literature are based on a fixed sampling period approach and implemented by the addition of filter stages to the conventional Synchronous Reference Frame Phase Locked Loop (SRF-PLL) structure. A less common approach is the variable sampling period (VSP), used in methods like VSP-PLL. These methods allow implementing a synchronous sampling period which automatically adapts the monitoring and control systems to the grid voltage and current, improving their processing performance. Notwithstanding the advantages of the synchronous sampling period approach, this operation principle is not commonly adopted in the literature since a proper design is required to avoid implementation problems and possible conflicts with other modules. This manuscript reviews the advantages of VSP approach, unveils similarities between VSP-PLL and SRF-PLL that allow improving the understanding of the former by comparing it to the latter, and provides guidelines for a proper implementation of a synchronous sampling method. In addition, a Hybrid Sampling Period (HSP) approach that combines the advantages of SRF-PLL and VSP-PLL is proposed. The three approaches are compared, the advantages of hybrid methods are discussed and the methodology for adopting the VSP and HSP approach in most fixed sampling period method is presented. Finally, the proposal is verified by experimental implementation. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-03 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/34703 Carugati, Ignacio; Orallo, Carlos Martin; Maestri, Sebastian Oscar; Donato, Patricio Gabriel; Carrica, Daniel Oscar; Variable, fixed, and hybrid sampling period approach for grid synchronization; Elsevier Science Sa; Electric Power Systems Research; 144; 3-2017; 23-31 0378-7796 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/34703 |
identifier_str_mv |
Carugati, Ignacio; Orallo, Carlos Martin; Maestri, Sebastian Oscar; Donato, Patricio Gabriel; Carrica, Daniel Oscar; Variable, fixed, and hybrid sampling period approach for grid synchronization; Elsevier Science Sa; Electric Power Systems Research; 144; 3-2017; 23-31 0378-7796 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.epsr.2016.10.053 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378779616304606 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science Sa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science Sa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269129544826880 |
score |
13.13397 |