Overweight and obesity prevention in Mexico: An intersectionality-based policy analysis

Autores
Tumas, Natalia; Benach, Joan; Carreño, Paula; de la Vega Avila Tulian, Candela; Getova, Simona; Gutiérrez-Zamora Navarro, Mariana; Pericàs, Juan M.
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Excess weight (i.e., overweight and obesity) is higher among less educated groups, women, ethnic minorities, and in urban areas. Consistent with the intersectionality perspective, excess weight is more frequent in those who experience disadvantages in more than one area of inequity, e.g., women from a low social position. However, greater attention is paid to individual lifestyle factors, recommending behavioural lifestyle shifts rather than addressing social structural and intermediary determinants. Most public policies and interventions have focused on individual lifestyle components, despite evidence revealed that these interventions have a minimal impact and that it is necessary to move the field forward interventions on the contextual social determinants. Mexico is a unique scenario to analyze public policies and interventions to prevent excess weight from an intersectional perspective, given its concomitants features of high prevalence of excess weight (the second highest country in the world, with more than 75% of the adult population with overweight, including 36.1% of obesity), and high degree of social and gender inequality. Previous evidence in Mexico showed that interventions at the individual-level had little impact to prevent excess weight in lower social position groups. On the other hand, population-based strategies, such as the tax on sugar-sweetened beverages, appeared to be beneficial for all population groups, but especially for those at the bottom of the social hierarchy. Intersectionality has emerged as a highly regarded equity-informed tool for analyzing public policy. The Intersectionality-based Policy Analysis (IBPA) framework developed by Hankivsky (2014, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25492385/) could contribute to identify and address multidimensional inequities and could lead to more effective and responsive policy decisions. The objective of this study is to analyze current nationally adult excess weight prevention public policies and interventions in Mexico, from an intersectionality perspective. Governmental websites, academic papers in English or Spanish, international and non-governmental organizations were searched for current strategies at the national level to prevent excess weight. Particular attention was paid to the current policies, interventions and actions to prevent adult obesity considered by the Global Obesity Observatory (https://data.worldobesity.org/). A total of 7 public policies and interventions were selected to develop a documental analysis (content analysis). First, the PROGRESS Plus framework was used to systematize the social axis of inequality mentioned in the public policy and intervention documents. PROGRESS is an acronym that aims to represent 8 dimensions of inequalities: place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socioeconomic status and social capital. Second, the selected documents were e analyzed through the IBPA framework. The questions of the IBPA framework have been adapted to the aims of this study, based on Kakar et al. (2021, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0967070X20309276) research applying the IBPA framework for documental analysis. The selected documents were analyzed in order to disentangle to what extent they mention axes of social inequality, whether intersectionality is considered in framing the problem and or the potential solutions.
Fil: Tumas, Natalia. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad; Argentina
Fil: Benach, Joan. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; España
Fil: Carreño, Paula. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Medicina. Escuela de Nutrición; Argentina
Fil: de la Vega Avila Tulian, Candela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Getova, Simona. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; España
Fil: Gutiérrez-Zamora Navarro, Mariana. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; España
Fil: Pericàs, Juan M.. Vall Dhebron University Hospital; España
European Consortium for Political Research General Conference
Innsbruck
Austria
University of Innsbruck
Materia
EXCESS WEIGHT
PUBLIC POLICIES
INTERSECCIONALITY
MEXICO
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/219418

id CONICETDig_acc51dd5b8b8b3e768361c59226fa5ac
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/219418
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Overweight and obesity prevention in Mexico: An intersectionality-based policy analysisTumas, NataliaBenach, JoanCarreño, Paulade la Vega Avila Tulian, CandelaGetova, SimonaGutiérrez-Zamora Navarro, MarianaPericàs, Juan M.EXCESS WEIGHTPUBLIC POLICIESINTERSECCIONALITYMEXICOhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Excess weight (i.e., overweight and obesity) is higher among less educated groups, women, ethnic minorities, and in urban areas. Consistent with the intersectionality perspective, excess weight is more frequent in those who experience disadvantages in more than one area of inequity, e.g., women from a low social position. However, greater attention is paid to individual lifestyle factors, recommending behavioural lifestyle shifts rather than addressing social structural and intermediary determinants. Most public policies and interventions have focused on individual lifestyle components, despite evidence revealed that these interventions have a minimal impact and that it is necessary to move the field forward interventions on the contextual social determinants. Mexico is a unique scenario to analyze public policies and interventions to prevent excess weight from an intersectional perspective, given its concomitants features of high prevalence of excess weight (the second highest country in the world, with more than 75% of the adult population with overweight, including 36.1% of obesity), and high degree of social and gender inequality. Previous evidence in Mexico showed that interventions at the individual-level had little impact to prevent excess weight in lower social position groups. On the other hand, population-based strategies, such as the tax on sugar-sweetened beverages, appeared to be beneficial for all population groups, but especially for those at the bottom of the social hierarchy. Intersectionality has emerged as a highly regarded equity-informed tool for analyzing public policy. The Intersectionality-based Policy Analysis (IBPA) framework developed by Hankivsky (2014, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25492385/) could contribute to identify and address multidimensional inequities and could lead to more effective and responsive policy decisions. The objective of this study is to analyze current nationally adult excess weight prevention public policies and interventions in Mexico, from an intersectionality perspective. Governmental websites, academic papers in English or Spanish, international and non-governmental organizations were searched for current strategies at the national level to prevent excess weight. Particular attention was paid to the current policies, interventions and actions to prevent adult obesity considered by the Global Obesity Observatory (https://data.worldobesity.org/). A total of 7 public policies and interventions were selected to develop a documental analysis (content analysis). First, the PROGRESS Plus framework was used to systematize the social axis of inequality mentioned in the public policy and intervention documents. PROGRESS is an acronym that aims to represent 8 dimensions of inequalities: place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socioeconomic status and social capital. Second, the selected documents were e analyzed through the IBPA framework. The questions of the IBPA framework have been adapted to the aims of this study, based on Kakar et al. (2021, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0967070X20309276) research applying the IBPA framework for documental analysis. The selected documents were analyzed in order to disentangle to what extent they mention axes of social inequality, whether intersectionality is considered in framing the problem and or the potential solutions.Fil: Tumas, Natalia. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad; ArgentinaFil: Benach, Joan. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; EspañaFil: Carreño, Paula. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Medicina. Escuela de Nutrición; ArgentinaFil: de la Vega Avila Tulian, Candela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Getova, Simona. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; EspañaFil: Gutiérrez-Zamora Navarro, Mariana. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; EspañaFil: Pericàs, Juan M.. Vall Dhebron University Hospital; EspañaEuropean Consortium for Political Research General ConferenceInnsbruckAustriaUniversity of InnsbruckEuropean Consortium for Political Research2022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectConferenciaJournalhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/219418Overweight and obesity prevention in Mexico: An intersectionality-based policy analysis; European Consortium for Political Research General Conference; Innsbruck; Austria; 2022; 1-2CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PaperDetails/65931Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:43:14Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/219418instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:43:14.996CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Overweight and obesity prevention in Mexico: An intersectionality-based policy analysis
title Overweight and obesity prevention in Mexico: An intersectionality-based policy analysis
spellingShingle Overweight and obesity prevention in Mexico: An intersectionality-based policy analysis
Tumas, Natalia
EXCESS WEIGHT
PUBLIC POLICIES
INTERSECCIONALITY
MEXICO
title_short Overweight and obesity prevention in Mexico: An intersectionality-based policy analysis
title_full Overweight and obesity prevention in Mexico: An intersectionality-based policy analysis
title_fullStr Overweight and obesity prevention in Mexico: An intersectionality-based policy analysis
title_full_unstemmed Overweight and obesity prevention in Mexico: An intersectionality-based policy analysis
title_sort Overweight and obesity prevention in Mexico: An intersectionality-based policy analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Tumas, Natalia
Benach, Joan
Carreño, Paula
de la Vega Avila Tulian, Candela
Getova, Simona
Gutiérrez-Zamora Navarro, Mariana
Pericàs, Juan M.
author Tumas, Natalia
author_facet Tumas, Natalia
Benach, Joan
Carreño, Paula
de la Vega Avila Tulian, Candela
Getova, Simona
Gutiérrez-Zamora Navarro, Mariana
Pericàs, Juan M.
author_role author
author2 Benach, Joan
Carreño, Paula
de la Vega Avila Tulian, Candela
Getova, Simona
Gutiérrez-Zamora Navarro, Mariana
Pericàs, Juan M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv EXCESS WEIGHT
PUBLIC POLICIES
INTERSECCIONALITY
MEXICO
topic EXCESS WEIGHT
PUBLIC POLICIES
INTERSECCIONALITY
MEXICO
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Excess weight (i.e., overweight and obesity) is higher among less educated groups, women, ethnic minorities, and in urban areas. Consistent with the intersectionality perspective, excess weight is more frequent in those who experience disadvantages in more than one area of inequity, e.g., women from a low social position. However, greater attention is paid to individual lifestyle factors, recommending behavioural lifestyle shifts rather than addressing social structural and intermediary determinants. Most public policies and interventions have focused on individual lifestyle components, despite evidence revealed that these interventions have a minimal impact and that it is necessary to move the field forward interventions on the contextual social determinants. Mexico is a unique scenario to analyze public policies and interventions to prevent excess weight from an intersectional perspective, given its concomitants features of high prevalence of excess weight (the second highest country in the world, with more than 75% of the adult population with overweight, including 36.1% of obesity), and high degree of social and gender inequality. Previous evidence in Mexico showed that interventions at the individual-level had little impact to prevent excess weight in lower social position groups. On the other hand, population-based strategies, such as the tax on sugar-sweetened beverages, appeared to be beneficial for all population groups, but especially for those at the bottom of the social hierarchy. Intersectionality has emerged as a highly regarded equity-informed tool for analyzing public policy. The Intersectionality-based Policy Analysis (IBPA) framework developed by Hankivsky (2014, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25492385/) could contribute to identify and address multidimensional inequities and could lead to more effective and responsive policy decisions. The objective of this study is to analyze current nationally adult excess weight prevention public policies and interventions in Mexico, from an intersectionality perspective. Governmental websites, academic papers in English or Spanish, international and non-governmental organizations were searched for current strategies at the national level to prevent excess weight. Particular attention was paid to the current policies, interventions and actions to prevent adult obesity considered by the Global Obesity Observatory (https://data.worldobesity.org/). A total of 7 public policies and interventions were selected to develop a documental analysis (content analysis). First, the PROGRESS Plus framework was used to systematize the social axis of inequality mentioned in the public policy and intervention documents. PROGRESS is an acronym that aims to represent 8 dimensions of inequalities: place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socioeconomic status and social capital. Second, the selected documents were e analyzed through the IBPA framework. The questions of the IBPA framework have been adapted to the aims of this study, based on Kakar et al. (2021, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0967070X20309276) research applying the IBPA framework for documental analysis. The selected documents were analyzed in order to disentangle to what extent they mention axes of social inequality, whether intersectionality is considered in framing the problem and or the potential solutions.
Fil: Tumas, Natalia. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad; Argentina
Fil: Benach, Joan. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; España
Fil: Carreño, Paula. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Medicina. Escuela de Nutrición; Argentina
Fil: de la Vega Avila Tulian, Candela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Getova, Simona. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; España
Fil: Gutiérrez-Zamora Navarro, Mariana. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; España
Fil: Pericàs, Juan M.. Vall Dhebron University Hospital; España
European Consortium for Political Research General Conference
Innsbruck
Austria
University of Innsbruck
description Excess weight (i.e., overweight and obesity) is higher among less educated groups, women, ethnic minorities, and in urban areas. Consistent with the intersectionality perspective, excess weight is more frequent in those who experience disadvantages in more than one area of inequity, e.g., women from a low social position. However, greater attention is paid to individual lifestyle factors, recommending behavioural lifestyle shifts rather than addressing social structural and intermediary determinants. Most public policies and interventions have focused on individual lifestyle components, despite evidence revealed that these interventions have a minimal impact and that it is necessary to move the field forward interventions on the contextual social determinants. Mexico is a unique scenario to analyze public policies and interventions to prevent excess weight from an intersectional perspective, given its concomitants features of high prevalence of excess weight (the second highest country in the world, with more than 75% of the adult population with overweight, including 36.1% of obesity), and high degree of social and gender inequality. Previous evidence in Mexico showed that interventions at the individual-level had little impact to prevent excess weight in lower social position groups. On the other hand, population-based strategies, such as the tax on sugar-sweetened beverages, appeared to be beneficial for all population groups, but especially for those at the bottom of the social hierarchy. Intersectionality has emerged as a highly regarded equity-informed tool for analyzing public policy. The Intersectionality-based Policy Analysis (IBPA) framework developed by Hankivsky (2014, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25492385/) could contribute to identify and address multidimensional inequities and could lead to more effective and responsive policy decisions. The objective of this study is to analyze current nationally adult excess weight prevention public policies and interventions in Mexico, from an intersectionality perspective. Governmental websites, academic papers in English or Spanish, international and non-governmental organizations were searched for current strategies at the national level to prevent excess weight. Particular attention was paid to the current policies, interventions and actions to prevent adult obesity considered by the Global Obesity Observatory (https://data.worldobesity.org/). A total of 7 public policies and interventions were selected to develop a documental analysis (content analysis). First, the PROGRESS Plus framework was used to systematize the social axis of inequality mentioned in the public policy and intervention documents. PROGRESS is an acronym that aims to represent 8 dimensions of inequalities: place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socioeconomic status and social capital. Second, the selected documents were e analyzed through the IBPA framework. The questions of the IBPA framework have been adapted to the aims of this study, based on Kakar et al. (2021, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0967070X20309276) research applying the IBPA framework for documental analysis. The selected documents were analyzed in order to disentangle to what extent they mention axes of social inequality, whether intersectionality is considered in framing the problem and or the potential solutions.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Conferencia
Journal
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/219418
Overweight and obesity prevention in Mexico: An intersectionality-based policy analysis; European Consortium for Political Research General Conference; Innsbruck; Austria; 2022; 1-2
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/219418
identifier_str_mv Overweight and obesity prevention in Mexico: An intersectionality-based policy analysis; European Consortium for Political Research General Conference; Innsbruck; Austria; 2022; 1-2
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PaperDetails/65931
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Internacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv European Consortium for Political Research
publisher.none.fl_str_mv European Consortium for Political Research
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613361790091264
score 13.070432