Micromorphology of marine invertebrate trace fossils and their ethological and ichnotaxonomic implications

Autores
Fernández, Diana Elizabeth; Gutiérrez, Carolina; Arambarric, Gabriel Agustín; Comerio, Marcos; Cuitiño, José Ignacio; Giachetti, Luciana María; Taylor, Colin; Pazos, Pablo Jose
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
It is common for proposed paleobiological models for specific ichnotaxa to blend or associate concepts related to trace fossil production, basic feeding strategy, and biological affinities of the producers. These models persist in the literature as a whole, hindering the separation of partial interpretations (e.g., detailed interpretation of only the feeding strategy, or only the potential tracemaker) achievable through microscale studies of exceptionally preserved samples. Additionally, analyzing numerous specimens of the same ichnotaxon at different scales allows discussion of established ichnotaxobases due to the morphological variety involved, with the intention that morphologically based diagnoses present inferences about the tracemaker [¹]. Micromorphological studies on current and fossil insect traces have yielded excellent results regarding producer behavior and biological affinity, along with ichnotaxonomic implications [2]. However, micromorphological studies on trace fossils produced by marine invertebrates with this scope are much scarcer, and include techniques such as petrography, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray microcomputed tomography, etc. [3-10]. These studies provide insights into the trace fossil production mode, potential tracemakers, substrate modification, and their consequences. For instance, in the case of Nereites MacLeay, some microscale features of analyzed specimens supported a construction differing from the typical worm-like organism model, aligning with other previous ideas, and also suggested an interpretation of an arthropod as tracemaker, a concept explored in previous neoichnological studies [6]. In the case of Bolonia Meunier, backfilling structures were interpreted as produced by the aboral and lateral spines of irregular echinoids, which worked together to compact the sediment anteroposteriorly and moved alternatively [10]. Here we present new results from the same line of research, describing and discussing the internal structure of examples of two other iconic ichnotaxa: Ophiomorpha Lundgren and Dictyodora Weiss. Exceptionally preserved examples of Ophiomorpha from Patagonian units (the Lower Cretaceous Agrio Formation and the Miocene Gaiman and Puerto Madryn formations), and of Dictyodora from the Silurian Gala Group (Scotland), were serially thin-sectioned. Transverse (vertical) and parallel (horizontal) to the bedding plane, or longitudinal and transverse to the main axis (depending on the ichnotaxon) sections were analyzed following previously used methods [3,6,10].Ophiomorpha is one of the most globally recognized ichnogenera in marine deposits of various depths and age. Its ichnospecies are primarily classified based on pellet morphology. Ophiomorpha irregulaire Frey et al. exhibits conical or outwardly acute pellets with non-uniform sizes. The validity of this pellet morphology as diagnostic for O. irregulaire has been debated due to the possibility that these pellets are filled with sand-sized grains, enveloped by a layer of mud and organic material, and the conical appearance may result from an incomplete muddy rim [4,11]. This is supported by our results from Lower Cretaceous Ophiomorpha, where walls with coating rich in clays and organic matter bear pellets that appear flame-like but under microscopic analysis show reoriented grains that allow to infer their original spherical shape (Fig. 1A). Also, two types of organic matter were detected within the wall: discrete, dense organic particles of terrigenous affinity (mostly phytoclasts), and amorphous organic matter, mixed with the inorganic matrix. The presence of fermentation chambers [11] in some sectors is not disregarded. Additionally, the Miocene Ophiomorpha-rich deposits, described as composed by O. nodosa Lundgren, are now thought to include O. nodosa and O. borneensis Keij in intergradation, with a dominance of the latter. This implies the tracemaker was able to produce both type of pellets. The characteristic bilobed morphology of the pellets and its regular distribution is confirmed by what is observed in cross-section (Fig. 1B): the semi-spherical reworking by the tracemaker continues inside the wall, reinforcing the idea that these are originally bilobed pellets and not a taphonomical artifact. This material allows to speculate that O. borneensis might be more common than it is currently represented in the literature.Dictyodora Weiss is a three-dimensional complex trace fossil characteristic of marine Paleozoic deposits recorded since the middle Cambrian. Its micromorphology under optical microscope has been illustrated [12,13] or very briefly described [14,15]; only one study illustrated part of the trace fossil under SEM [16]. Our preliminary results on Silurian samples include a thorough description of the internal structure of the area where the structures referred to as spreite and basal burrow interconnect (Fig. 1C-D). In vertical cross-sections it is observed that the lowermost part of the spreite is surrounded by the uppermost and medial part of the basal burrow, in contrast with previous interpretations [17-19], allowing to discuss one of the possible interpretations of the spreite-producing structure as rigid [17]. The tripartite morphology of the basal burrow occasionally seen in samples [17,18] could be explained by this interconnection (Fig. 1D), supporting the necessity of a future diagnosis amendment [18]. More such studies are needed to challenge aspects of paleobiological/ethological models without necessarily completely discarding all ideas within them, and to discuss ichnotaxobases that do not depend but might rely on functional morphology.
Fil: Fernández, Diana Elizabeth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Gutiérrez, Carolina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Arambarric, Gabriel Agustín. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas; Argentina
Fil: Comerio, Marcos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Cuitiño, José Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico de Geología y Paleontología; Argentina
Fil: Giachetti, Luciana María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico de Geología y Paleontología; Argentina
Fil: Taylor, Colin. University Of Aberdeeen; Reino Unido
Fil: Pazos, Pablo Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
The 5th International Congress on Ichnology
Florianopolis
Brasil
International Ichnological Asociation
Materia
MARINE INVERTEBRATE
TRACE FOSSILS
MICROMORPHOLOGY
ETHOLOGY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/232649

id CONICETDig_a7d44d9bbfff602445bce4ef2ebc115e
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/232649
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Micromorphology of marine invertebrate trace fossils and their ethological and ichnotaxonomic implicationsFernández, Diana ElizabethGutiérrez, CarolinaArambarric, Gabriel AgustínComerio, MarcosCuitiño, José IgnacioGiachetti, Luciana MaríaTaylor, ColinPazos, Pablo JoseMARINE INVERTEBRATETRACE FOSSILSMICROMORPHOLOGYETHOLOGYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1It is common for proposed paleobiological models for specific ichnotaxa to blend or associate concepts related to trace fossil production, basic feeding strategy, and biological affinities of the producers. These models persist in the literature as a whole, hindering the separation of partial interpretations (e.g., detailed interpretation of only the feeding strategy, or only the potential tracemaker) achievable through microscale studies of exceptionally preserved samples. Additionally, analyzing numerous specimens of the same ichnotaxon at different scales allows discussion of established ichnotaxobases due to the morphological variety involved, with the intention that morphologically based diagnoses present inferences about the tracemaker [¹]. Micromorphological studies on current and fossil insect traces have yielded excellent results regarding producer behavior and biological affinity, along with ichnotaxonomic implications [2]. However, micromorphological studies on trace fossils produced by marine invertebrates with this scope are much scarcer, and include techniques such as petrography, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray microcomputed tomography, etc. [3-10]. These studies provide insights into the trace fossil production mode, potential tracemakers, substrate modification, and their consequences. For instance, in the case of Nereites MacLeay, some microscale features of analyzed specimens supported a construction differing from the typical worm-like organism model, aligning with other previous ideas, and also suggested an interpretation of an arthropod as tracemaker, a concept explored in previous neoichnological studies [6]. In the case of Bolonia Meunier, backfilling structures were interpreted as produced by the aboral and lateral spines of irregular echinoids, which worked together to compact the sediment anteroposteriorly and moved alternatively [10]. Here we present new results from the same line of research, describing and discussing the internal structure of examples of two other iconic ichnotaxa: Ophiomorpha Lundgren and Dictyodora Weiss. Exceptionally preserved examples of Ophiomorpha from Patagonian units (the Lower Cretaceous Agrio Formation and the Miocene Gaiman and Puerto Madryn formations), and of Dictyodora from the Silurian Gala Group (Scotland), were serially thin-sectioned. Transverse (vertical) and parallel (horizontal) to the bedding plane, or longitudinal and transverse to the main axis (depending on the ichnotaxon) sections were analyzed following previously used methods [3,6,10].Ophiomorpha is one of the most globally recognized ichnogenera in marine deposits of various depths and age. Its ichnospecies are primarily classified based on pellet morphology. Ophiomorpha irregulaire Frey et al. exhibits conical or outwardly acute pellets with non-uniform sizes. The validity of this pellet morphology as diagnostic for O. irregulaire has been debated due to the possibility that these pellets are filled with sand-sized grains, enveloped by a layer of mud and organic material, and the conical appearance may result from an incomplete muddy rim [4,11]. This is supported by our results from Lower Cretaceous Ophiomorpha, where walls with coating rich in clays and organic matter bear pellets that appear flame-like but under microscopic analysis show reoriented grains that allow to infer their original spherical shape (Fig. 1A). Also, two types of organic matter were detected within the wall: discrete, dense organic particles of terrigenous affinity (mostly phytoclasts), and amorphous organic matter, mixed with the inorganic matrix. The presence of fermentation chambers [11] in some sectors is not disregarded. Additionally, the Miocene Ophiomorpha-rich deposits, described as composed by O. nodosa Lundgren, are now thought to include O. nodosa and O. borneensis Keij in intergradation, with a dominance of the latter. This implies the tracemaker was able to produce both type of pellets. The characteristic bilobed morphology of the pellets and its regular distribution is confirmed by what is observed in cross-section (Fig. 1B): the semi-spherical reworking by the tracemaker continues inside the wall, reinforcing the idea that these are originally bilobed pellets and not a taphonomical artifact. This material allows to speculate that O. borneensis might be more common than it is currently represented in the literature.Dictyodora Weiss is a three-dimensional complex trace fossil characteristic of marine Paleozoic deposits recorded since the middle Cambrian. Its micromorphology under optical microscope has been illustrated [12,13] or very briefly described [14,15]; only one study illustrated part of the trace fossil under SEM [16]. Our preliminary results on Silurian samples include a thorough description of the internal structure of the area where the structures referred to as spreite and basal burrow interconnect (Fig. 1C-D). In vertical cross-sections it is observed that the lowermost part of the spreite is surrounded by the uppermost and medial part of the basal burrow, in contrast with previous interpretations [17-19], allowing to discuss one of the possible interpretations of the spreite-producing structure as rigid [17]. The tripartite morphology of the basal burrow occasionally seen in samples [17,18] could be explained by this interconnection (Fig. 1D), supporting the necessity of a future diagnosis amendment [18]. More such studies are needed to challenge aspects of paleobiological/ethological models without necessarily completely discarding all ideas within them, and to discuss ichnotaxobases that do not depend but might rely on functional morphology.Fil: Fernández, Diana Elizabeth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; ArgentinaFil: Gutiérrez, Carolina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; ArgentinaFil: Arambarric, Gabriel Agustín. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas; ArgentinaFil: Comerio, Marcos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; ArgentinaFil: Cuitiño, José Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico de Geología y Paleontología; ArgentinaFil: Giachetti, Luciana María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico de Geología y Paleontología; ArgentinaFil: Taylor, Colin. University Of Aberdeeen; Reino UnidoFil: Pazos, Pablo Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; ArgentinaThe 5th International Congress on IchnologyFlorianopolisBrasilInternational Ichnological AsociationInternational Ichnological Asociation2024info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectCongresoBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/232649Micromorphology of marine invertebrate trace fossils and their ethological and ichnotaxonomic implications; The 5th International Congress on Ichnology; Florianopolis; Brasil; 2024; 99-101CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ichnia2024.com/Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:45:47Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/232649instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:45:47.441CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Micromorphology of marine invertebrate trace fossils and their ethological and ichnotaxonomic implications
title Micromorphology of marine invertebrate trace fossils and their ethological and ichnotaxonomic implications
spellingShingle Micromorphology of marine invertebrate trace fossils and their ethological and ichnotaxonomic implications
Fernández, Diana Elizabeth
MARINE INVERTEBRATE
TRACE FOSSILS
MICROMORPHOLOGY
ETHOLOGY
title_short Micromorphology of marine invertebrate trace fossils and their ethological and ichnotaxonomic implications
title_full Micromorphology of marine invertebrate trace fossils and their ethological and ichnotaxonomic implications
title_fullStr Micromorphology of marine invertebrate trace fossils and their ethological and ichnotaxonomic implications
title_full_unstemmed Micromorphology of marine invertebrate trace fossils and their ethological and ichnotaxonomic implications
title_sort Micromorphology of marine invertebrate trace fossils and their ethological and ichnotaxonomic implications
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Fernández, Diana Elizabeth
Gutiérrez, Carolina
Arambarric, Gabriel Agustín
Comerio, Marcos
Cuitiño, José Ignacio
Giachetti, Luciana María
Taylor, Colin
Pazos, Pablo Jose
author Fernández, Diana Elizabeth
author_facet Fernández, Diana Elizabeth
Gutiérrez, Carolina
Arambarric, Gabriel Agustín
Comerio, Marcos
Cuitiño, José Ignacio
Giachetti, Luciana María
Taylor, Colin
Pazos, Pablo Jose
author_role author
author2 Gutiérrez, Carolina
Arambarric, Gabriel Agustín
Comerio, Marcos
Cuitiño, José Ignacio
Giachetti, Luciana María
Taylor, Colin
Pazos, Pablo Jose
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv MARINE INVERTEBRATE
TRACE FOSSILS
MICROMORPHOLOGY
ETHOLOGY
topic MARINE INVERTEBRATE
TRACE FOSSILS
MICROMORPHOLOGY
ETHOLOGY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv It is common for proposed paleobiological models for specific ichnotaxa to blend or associate concepts related to trace fossil production, basic feeding strategy, and biological affinities of the producers. These models persist in the literature as a whole, hindering the separation of partial interpretations (e.g., detailed interpretation of only the feeding strategy, or only the potential tracemaker) achievable through microscale studies of exceptionally preserved samples. Additionally, analyzing numerous specimens of the same ichnotaxon at different scales allows discussion of established ichnotaxobases due to the morphological variety involved, with the intention that morphologically based diagnoses present inferences about the tracemaker [¹]. Micromorphological studies on current and fossil insect traces have yielded excellent results regarding producer behavior and biological affinity, along with ichnotaxonomic implications [2]. However, micromorphological studies on trace fossils produced by marine invertebrates with this scope are much scarcer, and include techniques such as petrography, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray microcomputed tomography, etc. [3-10]. These studies provide insights into the trace fossil production mode, potential tracemakers, substrate modification, and their consequences. For instance, in the case of Nereites MacLeay, some microscale features of analyzed specimens supported a construction differing from the typical worm-like organism model, aligning with other previous ideas, and also suggested an interpretation of an arthropod as tracemaker, a concept explored in previous neoichnological studies [6]. In the case of Bolonia Meunier, backfilling structures were interpreted as produced by the aboral and lateral spines of irregular echinoids, which worked together to compact the sediment anteroposteriorly and moved alternatively [10]. Here we present new results from the same line of research, describing and discussing the internal structure of examples of two other iconic ichnotaxa: Ophiomorpha Lundgren and Dictyodora Weiss. Exceptionally preserved examples of Ophiomorpha from Patagonian units (the Lower Cretaceous Agrio Formation and the Miocene Gaiman and Puerto Madryn formations), and of Dictyodora from the Silurian Gala Group (Scotland), were serially thin-sectioned. Transverse (vertical) and parallel (horizontal) to the bedding plane, or longitudinal and transverse to the main axis (depending on the ichnotaxon) sections were analyzed following previously used methods [3,6,10].Ophiomorpha is one of the most globally recognized ichnogenera in marine deposits of various depths and age. Its ichnospecies are primarily classified based on pellet morphology. Ophiomorpha irregulaire Frey et al. exhibits conical or outwardly acute pellets with non-uniform sizes. The validity of this pellet morphology as diagnostic for O. irregulaire has been debated due to the possibility that these pellets are filled with sand-sized grains, enveloped by a layer of mud and organic material, and the conical appearance may result from an incomplete muddy rim [4,11]. This is supported by our results from Lower Cretaceous Ophiomorpha, where walls with coating rich in clays and organic matter bear pellets that appear flame-like but under microscopic analysis show reoriented grains that allow to infer their original spherical shape (Fig. 1A). Also, two types of organic matter were detected within the wall: discrete, dense organic particles of terrigenous affinity (mostly phytoclasts), and amorphous organic matter, mixed with the inorganic matrix. The presence of fermentation chambers [11] in some sectors is not disregarded. Additionally, the Miocene Ophiomorpha-rich deposits, described as composed by O. nodosa Lundgren, are now thought to include O. nodosa and O. borneensis Keij in intergradation, with a dominance of the latter. This implies the tracemaker was able to produce both type of pellets. The characteristic bilobed morphology of the pellets and its regular distribution is confirmed by what is observed in cross-section (Fig. 1B): the semi-spherical reworking by the tracemaker continues inside the wall, reinforcing the idea that these are originally bilobed pellets and not a taphonomical artifact. This material allows to speculate that O. borneensis might be more common than it is currently represented in the literature.Dictyodora Weiss is a three-dimensional complex trace fossil characteristic of marine Paleozoic deposits recorded since the middle Cambrian. Its micromorphology under optical microscope has been illustrated [12,13] or very briefly described [14,15]; only one study illustrated part of the trace fossil under SEM [16]. Our preliminary results on Silurian samples include a thorough description of the internal structure of the area where the structures referred to as spreite and basal burrow interconnect (Fig. 1C-D). In vertical cross-sections it is observed that the lowermost part of the spreite is surrounded by the uppermost and medial part of the basal burrow, in contrast with previous interpretations [17-19], allowing to discuss one of the possible interpretations of the spreite-producing structure as rigid [17]. The tripartite morphology of the basal burrow occasionally seen in samples [17,18] could be explained by this interconnection (Fig. 1D), supporting the necessity of a future diagnosis amendment [18]. More such studies are needed to challenge aspects of paleobiological/ethological models without necessarily completely discarding all ideas within them, and to discuss ichnotaxobases that do not depend but might rely on functional morphology.
Fil: Fernández, Diana Elizabeth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Gutiérrez, Carolina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Arambarric, Gabriel Agustín. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas; Argentina
Fil: Comerio, Marcos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Cuitiño, José Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico de Geología y Paleontología; Argentina
Fil: Giachetti, Luciana María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico de Geología y Paleontología; Argentina
Fil: Taylor, Colin. University Of Aberdeeen; Reino Unido
Fil: Pazos, Pablo Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
The 5th International Congress on Ichnology
Florianopolis
Brasil
International Ichnological Asociation
description It is common for proposed paleobiological models for specific ichnotaxa to blend or associate concepts related to trace fossil production, basic feeding strategy, and biological affinities of the producers. These models persist in the literature as a whole, hindering the separation of partial interpretations (e.g., detailed interpretation of only the feeding strategy, or only the potential tracemaker) achievable through microscale studies of exceptionally preserved samples. Additionally, analyzing numerous specimens of the same ichnotaxon at different scales allows discussion of established ichnotaxobases due to the morphological variety involved, with the intention that morphologically based diagnoses present inferences about the tracemaker [¹]. Micromorphological studies on current and fossil insect traces have yielded excellent results regarding producer behavior and biological affinity, along with ichnotaxonomic implications [2]. However, micromorphological studies on trace fossils produced by marine invertebrates with this scope are much scarcer, and include techniques such as petrography, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray microcomputed tomography, etc. [3-10]. These studies provide insights into the trace fossil production mode, potential tracemakers, substrate modification, and their consequences. For instance, in the case of Nereites MacLeay, some microscale features of analyzed specimens supported a construction differing from the typical worm-like organism model, aligning with other previous ideas, and also suggested an interpretation of an arthropod as tracemaker, a concept explored in previous neoichnological studies [6]. In the case of Bolonia Meunier, backfilling structures were interpreted as produced by the aboral and lateral spines of irregular echinoids, which worked together to compact the sediment anteroposteriorly and moved alternatively [10]. Here we present new results from the same line of research, describing and discussing the internal structure of examples of two other iconic ichnotaxa: Ophiomorpha Lundgren and Dictyodora Weiss. Exceptionally preserved examples of Ophiomorpha from Patagonian units (the Lower Cretaceous Agrio Formation and the Miocene Gaiman and Puerto Madryn formations), and of Dictyodora from the Silurian Gala Group (Scotland), were serially thin-sectioned. Transverse (vertical) and parallel (horizontal) to the bedding plane, or longitudinal and transverse to the main axis (depending on the ichnotaxon) sections were analyzed following previously used methods [3,6,10].Ophiomorpha is one of the most globally recognized ichnogenera in marine deposits of various depths and age. Its ichnospecies are primarily classified based on pellet morphology. Ophiomorpha irregulaire Frey et al. exhibits conical or outwardly acute pellets with non-uniform sizes. The validity of this pellet morphology as diagnostic for O. irregulaire has been debated due to the possibility that these pellets are filled with sand-sized grains, enveloped by a layer of mud and organic material, and the conical appearance may result from an incomplete muddy rim [4,11]. This is supported by our results from Lower Cretaceous Ophiomorpha, where walls with coating rich in clays and organic matter bear pellets that appear flame-like but under microscopic analysis show reoriented grains that allow to infer their original spherical shape (Fig. 1A). Also, two types of organic matter were detected within the wall: discrete, dense organic particles of terrigenous affinity (mostly phytoclasts), and amorphous organic matter, mixed with the inorganic matrix. The presence of fermentation chambers [11] in some sectors is not disregarded. Additionally, the Miocene Ophiomorpha-rich deposits, described as composed by O. nodosa Lundgren, are now thought to include O. nodosa and O. borneensis Keij in intergradation, with a dominance of the latter. This implies the tracemaker was able to produce both type of pellets. The characteristic bilobed morphology of the pellets and its regular distribution is confirmed by what is observed in cross-section (Fig. 1B): the semi-spherical reworking by the tracemaker continues inside the wall, reinforcing the idea that these are originally bilobed pellets and not a taphonomical artifact. This material allows to speculate that O. borneensis might be more common than it is currently represented in the literature.Dictyodora Weiss is a three-dimensional complex trace fossil characteristic of marine Paleozoic deposits recorded since the middle Cambrian. Its micromorphology under optical microscope has been illustrated [12,13] or very briefly described [14,15]; only one study illustrated part of the trace fossil under SEM [16]. Our preliminary results on Silurian samples include a thorough description of the internal structure of the area where the structures referred to as spreite and basal burrow interconnect (Fig. 1C-D). In vertical cross-sections it is observed that the lowermost part of the spreite is surrounded by the uppermost and medial part of the basal burrow, in contrast with previous interpretations [17-19], allowing to discuss one of the possible interpretations of the spreite-producing structure as rigid [17]. The tripartite morphology of the basal burrow occasionally seen in samples [17,18] could be explained by this interconnection (Fig. 1D), supporting the necessity of a future diagnosis amendment [18]. More such studies are needed to challenge aspects of paleobiological/ethological models without necessarily completely discarding all ideas within them, and to discuss ichnotaxobases that do not depend but might rely on functional morphology.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Congreso
Book
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/232649
Micromorphology of marine invertebrate trace fossils and their ethological and ichnotaxonomic implications; The 5th International Congress on Ichnology; Florianopolis; Brasil; 2024; 99-101
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/232649
identifier_str_mv Micromorphology of marine invertebrate trace fossils and their ethological and ichnotaxonomic implications; The 5th International Congress on Ichnology; Florianopolis; Brasil; 2024; 99-101
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ichnia2024.com/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Internacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv International Ichnological Asociation
publisher.none.fl_str_mv International Ichnological Asociation
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842268752907862016
score 13.13397