Behavioural responses of freshwater zooplankton vary according to the different alarm signals of their invertebrate predators
- Autores
- Gutierrez, Marìa Florencia; Rojas Molina, Florencia Mercedes; de Azevedo Carvalho, Debora
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Single behavioural interactions between two freshwater planktonic crustaceans and invertebrate predators from different zones of the common environment were studied. The planktonic prey organisms were the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia and the copepod Notodiaptomus conifer. The three invertebrate predators were the shrimp Macrobrachium borellii, the crab Trichodactylus borellianus and the larva of the dipteran midge Chaoborus. Feeding experiments were first performed to document the effects of exposure time and prey density on predation. All the selected predators fed on C. dubia and N. conifer, and predation rates were dependent on prey density and exposure time. The ability of microcrustaceans to modify their swimming and avoidance behaviour when faced with cues from each predator was then analysed. The cladoceran was more vulnerable to decapod predation, whereas the prey microcrustaceans were taken equally by the dipteran larvae. The analysis showed that the microcrustaceans detected the presence of at least one invertebrate predator through the predator alarm signals. The cladoceran responded to chemical signals from the three predators but copepods modified their behaviour only in the presence of infochemicals of M. borellii. The different outcomes suggest that macrocrustaceans have different vulnerabilities when faced with the same predator and so have evolved specific and different strategies to reduce invertebrate predation.
Fil: Gutierrez, Marìa Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; Argentina
Fil: Rojas Molina, Florencia Mercedes. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; Argentina
Fil: de Azevedo Carvalho, Debora. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; Argentina - Materia
-
Behavioural Experiments
Ceriodaphnia
Chaoborus
Infochemicals
Macrobrachium
Notodiaptomus
Predator-Prey Interactions
Predators
Prey
Trichodactylus
Zooplankton - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/73485
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_a4db5648d2480dc7cf78611b6f1b08c3 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/73485 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Behavioural responses of freshwater zooplankton vary according to the different alarm signals of their invertebrate predatorsGutierrez, Marìa FlorenciaRojas Molina, Florencia Mercedesde Azevedo Carvalho, DeboraBehavioural ExperimentsCeriodaphniaChaoborusInfochemicalsMacrobrachiumNotodiaptomusPredator-Prey InteractionsPredatorsPreyTrichodactylusZooplanktonhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Single behavioural interactions between two freshwater planktonic crustaceans and invertebrate predators from different zones of the common environment were studied. The planktonic prey organisms were the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia and the copepod Notodiaptomus conifer. The three invertebrate predators were the shrimp Macrobrachium borellii, the crab Trichodactylus borellianus and the larva of the dipteran midge Chaoborus. Feeding experiments were first performed to document the effects of exposure time and prey density on predation. All the selected predators fed on C. dubia and N. conifer, and predation rates were dependent on prey density and exposure time. The ability of microcrustaceans to modify their swimming and avoidance behaviour when faced with cues from each predator was then analysed. The cladoceran was more vulnerable to decapod predation, whereas the prey microcrustaceans were taken equally by the dipteran larvae. The analysis showed that the microcrustaceans detected the presence of at least one invertebrate predator through the predator alarm signals. The cladoceran responded to chemical signals from the three predators but copepods modified their behaviour only in the presence of infochemicals of M. borellii. The different outcomes suggest that macrocrustaceans have different vulnerabilities when faced with the same predator and so have evolved specific and different strategies to reduce invertebrate predation.Fil: Gutierrez, Marìa Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; ArgentinaFil: Rojas Molina, Florencia Mercedes. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; ArgentinaFil: de Azevedo Carvalho, Debora. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; ArgentinaTaylor & Francis2013-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/73485Gutierrez, Marìa Florencia; Rojas Molina, Florencia Mercedes; de Azevedo Carvalho, Debora; Behavioural responses of freshwater zooplankton vary according to the different alarm signals of their invertebrate predators; Taylor & Francis; Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology; 45; 5; 9-2013; 317-3310091-181XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/10236244.2012.737697info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10236244.2012.737697info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:19:29Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/73485instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:19:29.834CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Behavioural responses of freshwater zooplankton vary according to the different alarm signals of their invertebrate predators |
| title |
Behavioural responses of freshwater zooplankton vary according to the different alarm signals of their invertebrate predators |
| spellingShingle |
Behavioural responses of freshwater zooplankton vary according to the different alarm signals of their invertebrate predators Gutierrez, Marìa Florencia Behavioural Experiments Ceriodaphnia Chaoborus Infochemicals Macrobrachium Notodiaptomus Predator-Prey Interactions Predators Prey Trichodactylus Zooplankton |
| title_short |
Behavioural responses of freshwater zooplankton vary according to the different alarm signals of their invertebrate predators |
| title_full |
Behavioural responses of freshwater zooplankton vary according to the different alarm signals of their invertebrate predators |
| title_fullStr |
Behavioural responses of freshwater zooplankton vary according to the different alarm signals of their invertebrate predators |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Behavioural responses of freshwater zooplankton vary according to the different alarm signals of their invertebrate predators |
| title_sort |
Behavioural responses of freshwater zooplankton vary according to the different alarm signals of their invertebrate predators |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Gutierrez, Marìa Florencia Rojas Molina, Florencia Mercedes de Azevedo Carvalho, Debora |
| author |
Gutierrez, Marìa Florencia |
| author_facet |
Gutierrez, Marìa Florencia Rojas Molina, Florencia Mercedes de Azevedo Carvalho, Debora |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Rojas Molina, Florencia Mercedes de Azevedo Carvalho, Debora |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Behavioural Experiments Ceriodaphnia Chaoborus Infochemicals Macrobrachium Notodiaptomus Predator-Prey Interactions Predators Prey Trichodactylus Zooplankton |
| topic |
Behavioural Experiments Ceriodaphnia Chaoborus Infochemicals Macrobrachium Notodiaptomus Predator-Prey Interactions Predators Prey Trichodactylus Zooplankton |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Single behavioural interactions between two freshwater planktonic crustaceans and invertebrate predators from different zones of the common environment were studied. The planktonic prey organisms were the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia and the copepod Notodiaptomus conifer. The three invertebrate predators were the shrimp Macrobrachium borellii, the crab Trichodactylus borellianus and the larva of the dipteran midge Chaoborus. Feeding experiments were first performed to document the effects of exposure time and prey density on predation. All the selected predators fed on C. dubia and N. conifer, and predation rates were dependent on prey density and exposure time. The ability of microcrustaceans to modify their swimming and avoidance behaviour when faced with cues from each predator was then analysed. The cladoceran was more vulnerable to decapod predation, whereas the prey microcrustaceans were taken equally by the dipteran larvae. The analysis showed that the microcrustaceans detected the presence of at least one invertebrate predator through the predator alarm signals. The cladoceran responded to chemical signals from the three predators but copepods modified their behaviour only in the presence of infochemicals of M. borellii. The different outcomes suggest that macrocrustaceans have different vulnerabilities when faced with the same predator and so have evolved specific and different strategies to reduce invertebrate predation. Fil: Gutierrez, Marìa Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; Argentina Fil: Rojas Molina, Florencia Mercedes. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; Argentina Fil: de Azevedo Carvalho, Debora. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; Argentina |
| description |
Single behavioural interactions between two freshwater planktonic crustaceans and invertebrate predators from different zones of the common environment were studied. The planktonic prey organisms were the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia and the copepod Notodiaptomus conifer. The three invertebrate predators were the shrimp Macrobrachium borellii, the crab Trichodactylus borellianus and the larva of the dipteran midge Chaoborus. Feeding experiments were first performed to document the effects of exposure time and prey density on predation. All the selected predators fed on C. dubia and N. conifer, and predation rates were dependent on prey density and exposure time. The ability of microcrustaceans to modify their swimming and avoidance behaviour when faced with cues from each predator was then analysed. The cladoceran was more vulnerable to decapod predation, whereas the prey microcrustaceans were taken equally by the dipteran larvae. The analysis showed that the microcrustaceans detected the presence of at least one invertebrate predator through the predator alarm signals. The cladoceran responded to chemical signals from the three predators but copepods modified their behaviour only in the presence of infochemicals of M. borellii. The different outcomes suggest that macrocrustaceans have different vulnerabilities when faced with the same predator and so have evolved specific and different strategies to reduce invertebrate predation. |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-09 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/73485 Gutierrez, Marìa Florencia; Rojas Molina, Florencia Mercedes; de Azevedo Carvalho, Debora; Behavioural responses of freshwater zooplankton vary according to the different alarm signals of their invertebrate predators; Taylor & Francis; Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology; 45; 5; 9-2013; 317-331 0091-181X CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/73485 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Gutierrez, Marìa Florencia; Rojas Molina, Florencia Mercedes; de Azevedo Carvalho, Debora; Behavioural responses of freshwater zooplankton vary according to the different alarm signals of their invertebrate predators; Taylor & Francis; Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology; 45; 5; 9-2013; 317-331 0091-181X CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/10236244.2012.737697 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10236244.2012.737697 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1846781673036840960 |
| score |
12.982451 |