Trade-offs between biodiversity and agriculture are moving targets in dynamic landscapes

Autores
Macchi, Leandro; Decarre, Julieta; Goijman, Andrea Paula; Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique; Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo; Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio; Murray, Francisco; Piquer Rodríguez, María; Semper Pascual, Asunción; Kuemmerle, Tobias
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
1. Understanding how biodiversity responds to intensifying agriculture is critical to mitigating the trade-offs between them. These trade-offs are particularly strong in tropical and subtropical deforestation frontiers, yet it remains unclear how changing landscape context in such frontiers alters agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs.2. We focus on the Argentinean Chaco, a global deforestation hotspot, to explore how landscape context shapes trade-off curves between agricultural intensity and avian biodiversity. We use a space-for-time approach and integrate a large field dataset of bird communities (197 species, 234 survey plots), three agricultural intensity metrics (meat yield, energy yield and profit) and a range of environmental covariates in a hierarchical Bayesian occupancy framework.3. Woodland extent in the landscape consistently determines how individual bird species, and the bird community as a whole, respond to agricultural intensity.Many species switch in their fundamental response, from decreasing occupancy with increased agricultural intensity when woodland extent in the landscape is low (loser species), to increasing occupancy with increased agricultural intensity when woodland extent is high (winner species).4. This suggests that landscape context strongly mediates who wins and loses along agricultural intensity gradients. Likewise, where landscapes change, such as in deforestation frontiers, the very nature of the agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs can change as landscapes transformation progresses.5. Synthesis and applications. Schemes to mitigate agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs,such as land sparing or sharing, must consider landscape context. Strategies that are identified based on a snapshot of data risk failure in dynamic landscapes, particularly where agricultural expansion continues to reduce natural habitats. Rather than a single, fixed strategy, adaptive management of agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs is needed in such situations. Here we provide a toolset for considering changing landscape contexts when exploring such trade-offs. This can help to better align agriculture and biodiversity in tropical and subtropical deforestation frontiers.
Fil: Macchi, Leandro. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina
Fil: Decarre, Julieta. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina
Fil: Goijman, Andrea Paula. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina
Fil: Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Laboratorio de Agroecología; Argentina
Fil: Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina
Fil: Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Murray, Francisco. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional La Pampa-San Luis. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Luis. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Luis; Argentina
Fil: Piquer Rodríguez, María. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina
Fil: Semper Pascual, Asunción. Humboldt-universitat Zu Berlin. Geography Department.; Alemania
Fil: Kuemmerle, Tobias. Humboldt-universitat Zu Berlin. Geography Department.; Alemania
Materia
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
BIODIVERSITY LOSS
BIRD ASSEMBLAGES
DEFORESTATION FRONTIERS
GRAN CHACO
LAND-USE INTENSITY
MULTI-SPECIES OCCUPANCY
TROPICAL DRY FORESTS AND SAVANNAS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/147101
Acceder
id CONICETDig_a30e578a3934211956bb6d1f31012781
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/147101
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Trade-offs between biodiversity and agriculture are moving targets in dynamic landscapesMacchi, LeandroDecarre, JulietaGoijman, Andrea PaulaMastrangelo, Matias EnriqueBlendinger, Pedro GerardoGavier Pizarro, GregorioMurray, FranciscoPiquer Rodríguez, MaríaSemper Pascual, AsunciónKuemmerle, TobiasADAPTIVE MANAGEMENTBIODIVERSITY LOSSBIRD ASSEMBLAGESDEFORESTATION FRONTIERSGRAN CHACOLAND-USE INTENSITYMULTI-SPECIES OCCUPANCYTROPICAL DRY FORESTS AND SAVANNAShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/11. Understanding how biodiversity responds to intensifying agriculture is critical to mitigating the trade-offs between them. These trade-offs are particularly strong in tropical and subtropical deforestation frontiers, yet it remains unclear how changing landscape context in such frontiers alters agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs.2. We focus on the Argentinean Chaco, a global deforestation hotspot, to explore how landscape context shapes trade-off curves between agricultural intensity and avian biodiversity. We use a space-for-time approach and integrate a large field dataset of bird communities (197 species, 234 survey plots), three agricultural intensity metrics (meat yield, energy yield and profit) and a range of environmental covariates in a hierarchical Bayesian occupancy framework.3. Woodland extent in the landscape consistently determines how individual bird species, and the bird community as a whole, respond to agricultural intensity.Many species switch in their fundamental response, from decreasing occupancy with increased agricultural intensity when woodland extent in the landscape is low (loser species), to increasing occupancy with increased agricultural intensity when woodland extent is high (winner species).4. This suggests that landscape context strongly mediates who wins and loses along agricultural intensity gradients. Likewise, where landscapes change, such as in deforestation frontiers, the very nature of the agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs can change as landscapes transformation progresses.5. Synthesis and applications. Schemes to mitigate agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs,such as land sparing or sharing, must consider landscape context. Strategies that are identified based on a snapshot of data risk failure in dynamic landscapes, particularly where agricultural expansion continues to reduce natural habitats. Rather than a single, fixed strategy, adaptive management of agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs is needed in such situations. Here we provide a toolset for considering changing landscape contexts when exploring such trade-offs. This can help to better align agriculture and biodiversity in tropical and subtropical deforestation frontiers.Fil: Macchi, Leandro. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; ArgentinaFil: Decarre, Julieta. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; ArgentinaFil: Goijman, Andrea Paula. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; ArgentinaFil: Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Laboratorio de Agroecología; ArgentinaFil: Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; ArgentinaFil: Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Murray, Francisco. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional La Pampa-San Luis. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Luis. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Luis; ArgentinaFil: Piquer Rodríguez, María. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; ArgentinaFil: Semper Pascual, Asunción. Humboldt-universitat Zu Berlin. Geography Department.; AlemaniaFil: Kuemmerle, Tobias. Humboldt-universitat Zu Berlin. Geography Department.; AlemaniaWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2020-07-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/147101Macchi, Leandro; Decarre, Julieta; Goijman, Andrea Paula; Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique; Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo; et al.; Trade-offs between biodiversity and agriculture are moving targets in dynamic landscapes; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Journal of Applied Ecology; 57; 10; 21-7-2020; 2054-20630021-8901CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1365-2664.13699info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.13699info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:26:18Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/147101instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:26:18.758CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Trade-offs between biodiversity and agriculture are moving targets in dynamic landscapes
title Trade-offs between biodiversity and agriculture are moving targets in dynamic landscapes
spellingShingle Trade-offs between biodiversity and agriculture are moving targets in dynamic landscapes
Macchi, Leandro
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
BIODIVERSITY LOSS
BIRD ASSEMBLAGES
DEFORESTATION FRONTIERS
GRAN CHACO
LAND-USE INTENSITY
MULTI-SPECIES OCCUPANCY
TROPICAL DRY FORESTS AND SAVANNAS
title_short Trade-offs between biodiversity and agriculture are moving targets in dynamic landscapes
title_full Trade-offs between biodiversity and agriculture are moving targets in dynamic landscapes
title_fullStr Trade-offs between biodiversity and agriculture are moving targets in dynamic landscapes
title_full_unstemmed Trade-offs between biodiversity and agriculture are moving targets in dynamic landscapes
title_sort Trade-offs between biodiversity and agriculture are moving targets in dynamic landscapes
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Macchi, Leandro
Decarre, Julieta
Goijman, Andrea Paula
Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique
Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo
Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio
Murray, Francisco
Piquer Rodríguez, María
Semper Pascual, Asunción
Kuemmerle, Tobias
author Macchi, Leandro
author_facet Macchi, Leandro
Decarre, Julieta
Goijman, Andrea Paula
Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique
Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo
Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio
Murray, Francisco
Piquer Rodríguez, María
Semper Pascual, Asunción
Kuemmerle, Tobias
author_role author
author2 Decarre, Julieta
Goijman, Andrea Paula
Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique
Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo
Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio
Murray, Francisco
Piquer Rodríguez, María
Semper Pascual, Asunción
Kuemmerle, Tobias
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
BIODIVERSITY LOSS
BIRD ASSEMBLAGES
DEFORESTATION FRONTIERS
GRAN CHACO
LAND-USE INTENSITY
MULTI-SPECIES OCCUPANCY
TROPICAL DRY FORESTS AND SAVANNAS
topic ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
BIODIVERSITY LOSS
BIRD ASSEMBLAGES
DEFORESTATION FRONTIERS
GRAN CHACO
LAND-USE INTENSITY
MULTI-SPECIES OCCUPANCY
TROPICAL DRY FORESTS AND SAVANNAS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv 1. Understanding how biodiversity responds to intensifying agriculture is critical to mitigating the trade-offs between them. These trade-offs are particularly strong in tropical and subtropical deforestation frontiers, yet it remains unclear how changing landscape context in such frontiers alters agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs.2. We focus on the Argentinean Chaco, a global deforestation hotspot, to explore how landscape context shapes trade-off curves between agricultural intensity and avian biodiversity. We use a space-for-time approach and integrate a large field dataset of bird communities (197 species, 234 survey plots), three agricultural intensity metrics (meat yield, energy yield and profit) and a range of environmental covariates in a hierarchical Bayesian occupancy framework.3. Woodland extent in the landscape consistently determines how individual bird species, and the bird community as a whole, respond to agricultural intensity.Many species switch in their fundamental response, from decreasing occupancy with increased agricultural intensity when woodland extent in the landscape is low (loser species), to increasing occupancy with increased agricultural intensity when woodland extent is high (winner species).4. This suggests that landscape context strongly mediates who wins and loses along agricultural intensity gradients. Likewise, where landscapes change, such as in deforestation frontiers, the very nature of the agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs can change as landscapes transformation progresses.5. Synthesis and applications. Schemes to mitigate agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs,such as land sparing or sharing, must consider landscape context. Strategies that are identified based on a snapshot of data risk failure in dynamic landscapes, particularly where agricultural expansion continues to reduce natural habitats. Rather than a single, fixed strategy, adaptive management of agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs is needed in such situations. Here we provide a toolset for considering changing landscape contexts when exploring such trade-offs. This can help to better align agriculture and biodiversity in tropical and subtropical deforestation frontiers.
Fil: Macchi, Leandro. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina
Fil: Decarre, Julieta. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina
Fil: Goijman, Andrea Paula. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina
Fil: Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Laboratorio de Agroecología; Argentina
Fil: Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina
Fil: Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Murray, Francisco. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional La Pampa-San Luis. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Luis. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Luis; Argentina
Fil: Piquer Rodríguez, María. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina
Fil: Semper Pascual, Asunción. Humboldt-universitat Zu Berlin. Geography Department.; Alemania
Fil: Kuemmerle, Tobias. Humboldt-universitat Zu Berlin. Geography Department.; Alemania
description 1. Understanding how biodiversity responds to intensifying agriculture is critical to mitigating the trade-offs between them. These trade-offs are particularly strong in tropical and subtropical deforestation frontiers, yet it remains unclear how changing landscape context in such frontiers alters agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs.2. We focus on the Argentinean Chaco, a global deforestation hotspot, to explore how landscape context shapes trade-off curves between agricultural intensity and avian biodiversity. We use a space-for-time approach and integrate a large field dataset of bird communities (197 species, 234 survey plots), three agricultural intensity metrics (meat yield, energy yield and profit) and a range of environmental covariates in a hierarchical Bayesian occupancy framework.3. Woodland extent in the landscape consistently determines how individual bird species, and the bird community as a whole, respond to agricultural intensity.Many species switch in their fundamental response, from decreasing occupancy with increased agricultural intensity when woodland extent in the landscape is low (loser species), to increasing occupancy with increased agricultural intensity when woodland extent is high (winner species).4. This suggests that landscape context strongly mediates who wins and loses along agricultural intensity gradients. Likewise, where landscapes change, such as in deforestation frontiers, the very nature of the agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs can change as landscapes transformation progresses.5. Synthesis and applications. Schemes to mitigate agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs,such as land sparing or sharing, must consider landscape context. Strategies that are identified based on a snapshot of data risk failure in dynamic landscapes, particularly where agricultural expansion continues to reduce natural habitats. Rather than a single, fixed strategy, adaptive management of agriculture?biodiversity trade?offs is needed in such situations. Here we provide a toolset for considering changing landscape contexts when exploring such trade-offs. This can help to better align agriculture and biodiversity in tropical and subtropical deforestation frontiers.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-21
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/147101
Macchi, Leandro; Decarre, Julieta; Goijman, Andrea Paula; Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique; Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo; et al.; Trade-offs between biodiversity and agriculture are moving targets in dynamic landscapes; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Journal of Applied Ecology; 57; 10; 21-7-2020; 2054-2063
0021-8901
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/147101
identifier_str_mv Macchi, Leandro; Decarre, Julieta; Goijman, Andrea Paula; Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique; Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo; et al.; Trade-offs between biodiversity and agriculture are moving targets in dynamic landscapes; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Journal of Applied Ecology; 57; 10; 21-7-2020; 2054-2063
0021-8901
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1365-2664.13699
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.13699
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082707009830912
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares