Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support

Autores
Chemisquy, Maria Amelia; Prevosti, Francisco Juan
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The clade size effect refers to a bias that causes middle-sized clades to be less supported than small or large-sized clades. This bias is present in resampling measures of support calculated under maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony and in Bayesian posterior probabilities. Previous analyses indicated that the clade size effect is worst in maximum parsimony, followed by maximum likelihood, while Bayesian inference is the least affected. Homoplasy was interpreted as the main cause of the effect. In this study, we explored the presence of the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support under maximum parsimony: Bremer support and symmetric resampling, expressed as absolute frequencies and frequency differences. Analyses were performed using 50 molecular and morphological matrices. Symmetric resampling showed the same tendency that bootstrap and jackknife did for maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. Few matrices showed a signicant bias using Bremer support, presenting a better performance than resampling measures of support and comparable to Bayesian posterior probabilities. Our results indicate that the problem is not maximum parsimony, but resampling measures of support. We corroborated the role of homoplasy as a possible cause of the clade size effect, increasing the number of random trees during the resampling, which together with the higher chances that medium-sized clades have of being contradicted generates the bias during the perturbation of the original matrix, making it stronger in resampling measures of support.
Fil: Chemisquy, Maria Amelia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Prevosti, Francisco Juan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Departamento de Ciencias Básicas; Argentina
Materia
Branch Support
Clade Size Effect
Maximum Parsimony
Resampling
Bremer Support
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4144

id CONICETDig_9fb574d8c4d8c3d804dec8eb30c537b6
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4144
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch supportChemisquy, Maria AmeliaPrevosti, Francisco JuanBranch SupportClade Size EffectMaximum ParsimonyResamplingBremer Supporthttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The clade size effect refers to a bias that causes middle-sized clades to be less supported than small or large-sized clades. This bias is present in resampling measures of support calculated under maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony and in Bayesian posterior probabilities. Previous analyses indicated that the clade size effect is worst in maximum parsimony, followed by maximum likelihood, while Bayesian inference is the least affected. Homoplasy was interpreted as the main cause of the effect. In this study, we explored the presence of the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support under maximum parsimony: Bremer support and symmetric resampling, expressed as absolute frequencies and frequency differences. Analyses were performed using 50 molecular and morphological matrices. Symmetric resampling showed the same tendency that bootstrap and jackknife did for maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. Few matrices showed a signicant bias using Bremer support, presenting a better performance than resampling measures of support and comparable to Bayesian posterior probabilities. Our results indicate that the problem is not maximum parsimony, but resampling measures of support. We corroborated the role of homoplasy as a possible cause of the clade size effect, increasing the number of random trees during the resampling, which together with the higher chances that medium-sized clades have of being contradicted generates the bias during the perturbation of the original matrix, making it stronger in resampling measures of support.Fil: Chemisquy, Maria Amelia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Prevosti, Francisco Juan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Departamento de Ciencias Básicas; ArgentinaWiley2013-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/4144Chemisquy, Maria Amelia; Prevosti, Francisco Juan; Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support; Wiley; Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research; 51; 4; 11-2013; 260-2730947-5745enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/jzs.12024info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzs.12024/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0947-5745info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:08:13Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4144instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:08:13.312CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support
title Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support
spellingShingle Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support
Chemisquy, Maria Amelia
Branch Support
Clade Size Effect
Maximum Parsimony
Resampling
Bremer Support
title_short Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support
title_full Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support
title_fullStr Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support
title_sort Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Chemisquy, Maria Amelia
Prevosti, Francisco Juan
author Chemisquy, Maria Amelia
author_facet Chemisquy, Maria Amelia
Prevosti, Francisco Juan
author_role author
author2 Prevosti, Francisco Juan
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Branch Support
Clade Size Effect
Maximum Parsimony
Resampling
Bremer Support
topic Branch Support
Clade Size Effect
Maximum Parsimony
Resampling
Bremer Support
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The clade size effect refers to a bias that causes middle-sized clades to be less supported than small or large-sized clades. This bias is present in resampling measures of support calculated under maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony and in Bayesian posterior probabilities. Previous analyses indicated that the clade size effect is worst in maximum parsimony, followed by maximum likelihood, while Bayesian inference is the least affected. Homoplasy was interpreted as the main cause of the effect. In this study, we explored the presence of the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support under maximum parsimony: Bremer support and symmetric resampling, expressed as absolute frequencies and frequency differences. Analyses were performed using 50 molecular and morphological matrices. Symmetric resampling showed the same tendency that bootstrap and jackknife did for maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. Few matrices showed a signicant bias using Bremer support, presenting a better performance than resampling measures of support and comparable to Bayesian posterior probabilities. Our results indicate that the problem is not maximum parsimony, but resampling measures of support. We corroborated the role of homoplasy as a possible cause of the clade size effect, increasing the number of random trees during the resampling, which together with the higher chances that medium-sized clades have of being contradicted generates the bias during the perturbation of the original matrix, making it stronger in resampling measures of support.
Fil: Chemisquy, Maria Amelia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Prevosti, Francisco Juan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Departamento de Ciencias Básicas; Argentina
description The clade size effect refers to a bias that causes middle-sized clades to be less supported than small or large-sized clades. This bias is present in resampling measures of support calculated under maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony and in Bayesian posterior probabilities. Previous analyses indicated that the clade size effect is worst in maximum parsimony, followed by maximum likelihood, while Bayesian inference is the least affected. Homoplasy was interpreted as the main cause of the effect. In this study, we explored the presence of the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support under maximum parsimony: Bremer support and symmetric resampling, expressed as absolute frequencies and frequency differences. Analyses were performed using 50 molecular and morphological matrices. Symmetric resampling showed the same tendency that bootstrap and jackknife did for maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. Few matrices showed a signicant bias using Bremer support, presenting a better performance than resampling measures of support and comparable to Bayesian posterior probabilities. Our results indicate that the problem is not maximum parsimony, but resampling measures of support. We corroborated the role of homoplasy as a possible cause of the clade size effect, increasing the number of random trees during the resampling, which together with the higher chances that medium-sized clades have of being contradicted generates the bias during the perturbation of the original matrix, making it stronger in resampling measures of support.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4144
Chemisquy, Maria Amelia; Prevosti, Francisco Juan; Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support; Wiley; Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research; 51; 4; 11-2013; 260-273
0947-5745
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4144
identifier_str_mv Chemisquy, Maria Amelia; Prevosti, Francisco Juan; Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support; Wiley; Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research; 51; 4; 11-2013; 260-273
0947-5745
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/jzs.12024
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzs.12024/abstract
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0947-5745
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980384290111488
score 12.993085