Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support
- Autores
- Chemisquy, Maria Amelia; Prevosti, Francisco Juan
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The clade size effect refers to a bias that causes middle-sized clades to be less supported than small or large-sized clades. This bias is present in resampling measures of support calculated under maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony and in Bayesian posterior probabilities. Previous analyses indicated that the clade size effect is worst in maximum parsimony, followed by maximum likelihood, while Bayesian inference is the least affected. Homoplasy was interpreted as the main cause of the effect. In this study, we explored the presence of the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support under maximum parsimony: Bremer support and symmetric resampling, expressed as absolute frequencies and frequency differences. Analyses were performed using 50 molecular and morphological matrices. Symmetric resampling showed the same tendency that bootstrap and jackknife did for maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. Few matrices showed a signicant bias using Bremer support, presenting a better performance than resampling measures of support and comparable to Bayesian posterior probabilities. Our results indicate that the problem is not maximum parsimony, but resampling measures of support. We corroborated the role of homoplasy as a possible cause of the clade size effect, increasing the number of random trees during the resampling, which together with the higher chances that medium-sized clades have of being contradicted generates the bias during the perturbation of the original matrix, making it stronger in resampling measures of support.
Fil: Chemisquy, Maria Amelia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Prevosti, Francisco Juan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Departamento de Ciencias Básicas; Argentina - Materia
-
Branch Support
Clade Size Effect
Maximum Parsimony
Resampling
Bremer Support - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4144
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_9fb574d8c4d8c3d804dec8eb30c537b6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4144 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch supportChemisquy, Maria AmeliaPrevosti, Francisco JuanBranch SupportClade Size EffectMaximum ParsimonyResamplingBremer Supporthttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The clade size effect refers to a bias that causes middle-sized clades to be less supported than small or large-sized clades. This bias is present in resampling measures of support calculated under maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony and in Bayesian posterior probabilities. Previous analyses indicated that the clade size effect is worst in maximum parsimony, followed by maximum likelihood, while Bayesian inference is the least affected. Homoplasy was interpreted as the main cause of the effect. In this study, we explored the presence of the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support under maximum parsimony: Bremer support and symmetric resampling, expressed as absolute frequencies and frequency differences. Analyses were performed using 50 molecular and morphological matrices. Symmetric resampling showed the same tendency that bootstrap and jackknife did for maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. Few matrices showed a signicant bias using Bremer support, presenting a better performance than resampling measures of support and comparable to Bayesian posterior probabilities. Our results indicate that the problem is not maximum parsimony, but resampling measures of support. We corroborated the role of homoplasy as a possible cause of the clade size effect, increasing the number of random trees during the resampling, which together with the higher chances that medium-sized clades have of being contradicted generates the bias during the perturbation of the original matrix, making it stronger in resampling measures of support.Fil: Chemisquy, Maria Amelia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Prevosti, Francisco Juan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Departamento de Ciencias Básicas; ArgentinaWiley2013-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/4144Chemisquy, Maria Amelia; Prevosti, Francisco Juan; Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support; Wiley; Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research; 51; 4; 11-2013; 260-2730947-5745enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/jzs.12024info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzs.12024/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0947-5745info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:08:13Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4144instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:08:13.312CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support |
title |
Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support |
spellingShingle |
Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support Chemisquy, Maria Amelia Branch Support Clade Size Effect Maximum Parsimony Resampling Bremer Support |
title_short |
Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support |
title_full |
Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support |
title_sort |
Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Chemisquy, Maria Amelia Prevosti, Francisco Juan |
author |
Chemisquy, Maria Amelia |
author_facet |
Chemisquy, Maria Amelia Prevosti, Francisco Juan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Prevosti, Francisco Juan |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Branch Support Clade Size Effect Maximum Parsimony Resampling Bremer Support |
topic |
Branch Support Clade Size Effect Maximum Parsimony Resampling Bremer Support |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The clade size effect refers to a bias that causes middle-sized clades to be less supported than small or large-sized clades. This bias is present in resampling measures of support calculated under maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony and in Bayesian posterior probabilities. Previous analyses indicated that the clade size effect is worst in maximum parsimony, followed by maximum likelihood, while Bayesian inference is the least affected. Homoplasy was interpreted as the main cause of the effect. In this study, we explored the presence of the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support under maximum parsimony: Bremer support and symmetric resampling, expressed as absolute frequencies and frequency differences. Analyses were performed using 50 molecular and morphological matrices. Symmetric resampling showed the same tendency that bootstrap and jackknife did for maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. Few matrices showed a signicant bias using Bremer support, presenting a better performance than resampling measures of support and comparable to Bayesian posterior probabilities. Our results indicate that the problem is not maximum parsimony, but resampling measures of support. We corroborated the role of homoplasy as a possible cause of the clade size effect, increasing the number of random trees during the resampling, which together with the higher chances that medium-sized clades have of being contradicted generates the bias during the perturbation of the original matrix, making it stronger in resampling measures of support. Fil: Chemisquy, Maria Amelia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; Argentina Fil: Prevosti, Francisco Juan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Departamento de Ciencias Básicas; Argentina |
description |
The clade size effect refers to a bias that causes middle-sized clades to be less supported than small or large-sized clades. This bias is present in resampling measures of support calculated under maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony and in Bayesian posterior probabilities. Previous analyses indicated that the clade size effect is worst in maximum parsimony, followed by maximum likelihood, while Bayesian inference is the least affected. Homoplasy was interpreted as the main cause of the effect. In this study, we explored the presence of the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support under maximum parsimony: Bremer support and symmetric resampling, expressed as absolute frequencies and frequency differences. Analyses were performed using 50 molecular and morphological matrices. Symmetric resampling showed the same tendency that bootstrap and jackknife did for maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. Few matrices showed a signicant bias using Bremer support, presenting a better performance than resampling measures of support and comparable to Bayesian posterior probabilities. Our results indicate that the problem is not maximum parsimony, but resampling measures of support. We corroborated the role of homoplasy as a possible cause of the clade size effect, increasing the number of random trees during the resampling, which together with the higher chances that medium-sized clades have of being contradicted generates the bias during the perturbation of the original matrix, making it stronger in resampling measures of support. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-11 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4144 Chemisquy, Maria Amelia; Prevosti, Francisco Juan; Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support; Wiley; Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research; 51; 4; 11-2013; 260-273 0947-5745 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4144 |
identifier_str_mv |
Chemisquy, Maria Amelia; Prevosti, Francisco Juan; Evaluating the clade size effect in alternative measures of branch support; Wiley; Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research; 51; 4; 11-2013; 260-273 0947-5745 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/jzs.12024 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzs.12024/abstract info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0947-5745 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842980384290111488 |
score |
12.993085 |