Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco

Autores
Nanni, Ana Sofía; Ghoddousi, Arash; Romero Muñoz, Alfredo; Baumann, Matthias; Burton, Jamie; Camino, Micaela; Decarre, Julieta; Martello, Felipe; Regolin, André Luis; Kuemmerle, Tobias
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Aim: The persistence of large carnivore populations depends on their survival outside protected areas, where they often impact local livelihoods through livestock depredation. Understanding the impacts of human behaviour on large carnivores in shared landscapes is thus important but is often overlooked in habitat assessments or conservation planning. We employed an integrated approach that considers human behaviour and landscape structure metrics to assess the potential for human-puma (Puma concolor) coexistence in the Chaco region, a global deforestation and defaunation hotspot. Location: Argentine Dry Chaco (~490,000 km2 ). Methods: We identified suitable puma habitat patches and movement areas using occupancy modelling and combined it with a spatial human-puma conflict risk model based on interview data to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ habitat patches. We then used resistance surfaces to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ movement areas, as well as ‘severed’ movement areas where anthropogenic land conversion inhibits movement. Results: Safe puma habitat patches (i.e., suitable and safe) covered 29% of the region, whereas attractive sinks (i.e., suitable but risky) represented 12%. Movement areas corresponded to 60% of the region, while conflict risk and high landscape resistance undermined connectivity: unsafe and severed movement areas covered 10% and 11% of the region, respectively. Nearly 98% of safe habitat and movement areas occurred outside protected areas. Main Conclusions: We provide an integrated conceptual framework and spatial explicit template for a three-pronged conservation strategy to (1) protect safe habitat and movement areas, (2) mitigate livestock depredation in attractive sinks and unsafe movement areas and (3) restore landscape in severed and matrix areas to improve ecological connectivity. This would allow pumas to maintain viable populations while reducing negative impacts on local people. More generally, we show how integrating habitat and conflict risk models can reveal opportunities and challenges for humancarnivore coexistence beyond protected areas.
Fil: Nanni, Ana Sofía. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Ghoddousi, Arash. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania. Wageningen University; Países Bajos
Fil: Romero Muñoz, Alfredo. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Baumann, Matthias. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Burton, Jamie. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Camino, Micaela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste. Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Nordeste. Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral; Argentina
Fil: Decarre, Julieta. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina
Fil: Martello, Felipe. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Regolin, André Luis. Universidade Federal de Goiás; Brasil
Fil: Kuemmerle, Tobias. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Materia
anthropogenic resistance
connectivity
dry woodlands
livestock depredation
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/260553

id CONICETDig_9edeb1f9e82047d111e156fa949e8a5b
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/260553
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry ChacoNanni, Ana SofíaGhoddousi, ArashRomero Muñoz, AlfredoBaumann, MatthiasBurton, JamieCamino, MicaelaDecarre, JulietaMartello, FelipeRegolin, André LuisKuemmerle, Tobiasanthropogenic resistanceconnectivitydry woodlandslivestock depredationhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Aim: The persistence of large carnivore populations depends on their survival outside protected areas, where they often impact local livelihoods through livestock depredation. Understanding the impacts of human behaviour on large carnivores in shared landscapes is thus important but is often overlooked in habitat assessments or conservation planning. We employed an integrated approach that considers human behaviour and landscape structure metrics to assess the potential for human-puma (Puma concolor) coexistence in the Chaco region, a global deforestation and defaunation hotspot. Location: Argentine Dry Chaco (~490,000 km2 ). Methods: We identified suitable puma habitat patches and movement areas using occupancy modelling and combined it with a spatial human-puma conflict risk model based on interview data to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ habitat patches. We then used resistance surfaces to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ movement areas, as well as ‘severed’ movement areas where anthropogenic land conversion inhibits movement. Results: Safe puma habitat patches (i.e., suitable and safe) covered 29% of the region, whereas attractive sinks (i.e., suitable but risky) represented 12%. Movement areas corresponded to 60% of the region, while conflict risk and high landscape resistance undermined connectivity: unsafe and severed movement areas covered 10% and 11% of the region, respectively. Nearly 98% of safe habitat and movement areas occurred outside protected areas. Main Conclusions: We provide an integrated conceptual framework and spatial explicit template for a three-pronged conservation strategy to (1) protect safe habitat and movement areas, (2) mitigate livestock depredation in attractive sinks and unsafe movement areas and (3) restore landscape in severed and matrix areas to improve ecological connectivity. This would allow pumas to maintain viable populations while reducing negative impacts on local people. More generally, we show how integrating habitat and conflict risk models can reveal opportunities and challenges for humancarnivore coexistence beyond protected areas.Fil: Nanni, Ana Sofía. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; AlemaniaFil: Ghoddousi, Arash. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania. Wageningen University; Países BajosFil: Romero Muñoz, Alfredo. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; AlemaniaFil: Baumann, Matthias. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; AlemaniaFil: Burton, Jamie. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; AlemaniaFil: Camino, Micaela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste. Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Nordeste. Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral; ArgentinaFil: Decarre, Julieta. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; ArgentinaFil: Martello, Felipe. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Regolin, André Luis. Universidade Federal de Goiás; BrasilFil: Kuemmerle, Tobias. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; AlemaniaWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2024-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/260553Nanni, Ana Sofía; Ghoddousi, Arash; Romero Muñoz, Alfredo; Baumann, Matthias; Burton, Jamie; et al.; Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Diversity and Distributions; 30; 10; 8-2024; 1-181366-9516CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.13920info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/ddi.13920info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:39Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/260553instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:40.071CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco
title Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco
spellingShingle Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco
Nanni, Ana Sofía
anthropogenic resistance
connectivity
dry woodlands
livestock depredation
title_short Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco
title_full Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco
title_fullStr Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco
title_full_unstemmed Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco
title_sort Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Nanni, Ana Sofía
Ghoddousi, Arash
Romero Muñoz, Alfredo
Baumann, Matthias
Burton, Jamie
Camino, Micaela
Decarre, Julieta
Martello, Felipe
Regolin, André Luis
Kuemmerle, Tobias
author Nanni, Ana Sofía
author_facet Nanni, Ana Sofía
Ghoddousi, Arash
Romero Muñoz, Alfredo
Baumann, Matthias
Burton, Jamie
Camino, Micaela
Decarre, Julieta
Martello, Felipe
Regolin, André Luis
Kuemmerle, Tobias
author_role author
author2 Ghoddousi, Arash
Romero Muñoz, Alfredo
Baumann, Matthias
Burton, Jamie
Camino, Micaela
Decarre, Julieta
Martello, Felipe
Regolin, André Luis
Kuemmerle, Tobias
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv anthropogenic resistance
connectivity
dry woodlands
livestock depredation
topic anthropogenic resistance
connectivity
dry woodlands
livestock depredation
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Aim: The persistence of large carnivore populations depends on their survival outside protected areas, where they often impact local livelihoods through livestock depredation. Understanding the impacts of human behaviour on large carnivores in shared landscapes is thus important but is often overlooked in habitat assessments or conservation planning. We employed an integrated approach that considers human behaviour and landscape structure metrics to assess the potential for human-puma (Puma concolor) coexistence in the Chaco region, a global deforestation and defaunation hotspot. Location: Argentine Dry Chaco (~490,000 km2 ). Methods: We identified suitable puma habitat patches and movement areas using occupancy modelling and combined it with a spatial human-puma conflict risk model based on interview data to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ habitat patches. We then used resistance surfaces to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ movement areas, as well as ‘severed’ movement areas where anthropogenic land conversion inhibits movement. Results: Safe puma habitat patches (i.e., suitable and safe) covered 29% of the region, whereas attractive sinks (i.e., suitable but risky) represented 12%. Movement areas corresponded to 60% of the region, while conflict risk and high landscape resistance undermined connectivity: unsafe and severed movement areas covered 10% and 11% of the region, respectively. Nearly 98% of safe habitat and movement areas occurred outside protected areas. Main Conclusions: We provide an integrated conceptual framework and spatial explicit template for a three-pronged conservation strategy to (1) protect safe habitat and movement areas, (2) mitigate livestock depredation in attractive sinks and unsafe movement areas and (3) restore landscape in severed and matrix areas to improve ecological connectivity. This would allow pumas to maintain viable populations while reducing negative impacts on local people. More generally, we show how integrating habitat and conflict risk models can reveal opportunities and challenges for humancarnivore coexistence beyond protected areas.
Fil: Nanni, Ana Sofía. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Ghoddousi, Arash. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania. Wageningen University; Países Bajos
Fil: Romero Muñoz, Alfredo. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Baumann, Matthias. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Burton, Jamie. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Camino, Micaela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste. Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Nordeste. Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral; Argentina
Fil: Decarre, Julieta. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina
Fil: Martello, Felipe. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Regolin, André Luis. Universidade Federal de Goiás; Brasil
Fil: Kuemmerle, Tobias. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
description Aim: The persistence of large carnivore populations depends on their survival outside protected areas, where they often impact local livelihoods through livestock depredation. Understanding the impacts of human behaviour on large carnivores in shared landscapes is thus important but is often overlooked in habitat assessments or conservation planning. We employed an integrated approach that considers human behaviour and landscape structure metrics to assess the potential for human-puma (Puma concolor) coexistence in the Chaco region, a global deforestation and defaunation hotspot. Location: Argentine Dry Chaco (~490,000 km2 ). Methods: We identified suitable puma habitat patches and movement areas using occupancy modelling and combined it with a spatial human-puma conflict risk model based on interview data to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ habitat patches. We then used resistance surfaces to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ movement areas, as well as ‘severed’ movement areas where anthropogenic land conversion inhibits movement. Results: Safe puma habitat patches (i.e., suitable and safe) covered 29% of the region, whereas attractive sinks (i.e., suitable but risky) represented 12%. Movement areas corresponded to 60% of the region, while conflict risk and high landscape resistance undermined connectivity: unsafe and severed movement areas covered 10% and 11% of the region, respectively. Nearly 98% of safe habitat and movement areas occurred outside protected areas. Main Conclusions: We provide an integrated conceptual framework and spatial explicit template for a three-pronged conservation strategy to (1) protect safe habitat and movement areas, (2) mitigate livestock depredation in attractive sinks and unsafe movement areas and (3) restore landscape in severed and matrix areas to improve ecological connectivity. This would allow pumas to maintain viable populations while reducing negative impacts on local people. More generally, we show how integrating habitat and conflict risk models can reveal opportunities and challenges for humancarnivore coexistence beyond protected areas.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/260553
Nanni, Ana Sofía; Ghoddousi, Arash; Romero Muñoz, Alfredo; Baumann, Matthias; Burton, Jamie; et al.; Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Diversity and Distributions; 30; 10; 8-2024; 1-18
1366-9516
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/260553
identifier_str_mv Nanni, Ana Sofía; Ghoddousi, Arash; Romero Muñoz, Alfredo; Baumann, Matthias; Burton, Jamie; et al.; Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Diversity and Distributions; 30; 10; 8-2024; 1-18
1366-9516
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.13920
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/ddi.13920
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269109230764032
score 13.13397