Closing the technological gap of animal and crop production through technical assistance

Autores
Pacín, Fernando; Oesterheld, Martin
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Technical assistance is expected to close the gap between actual and potential agricultural production and increase its inter-annual stability. We here hypothesize that its impact may be greater on complex activities, such as livestock production, than on simpler activities, such as soybean production. To our knowledge, this difference has not been quantified. We gathered livestock and soybean production data from the Argentine Pampas, and contrasted the performance of farmers under high level of technical assistance, in the form of professional advice and feedback from other farmers, against the performance of the rest of the political district, which receive much less technical assistance. The difference in productivity and stability between the two types of farmer was much greater for livestock than for crop production. Livestock production was 96% higher and 70% more stable (lower coefficient of variation of annual output) in farms that received more technical assistance than in the rest of the political district. In contrast, soybean production and stability in farms that received more assistance were similar to the rest of the district. If all farms produced at the level of those under more technical assistance, county-level beef production would increase by 74% and require an increase of employment equivalent to 5.6% of the current working population. These results suggest that extension policies in the region should prioritize animal production because of a greater potential to significantly increase production and lower risk.
Fil: Pacín, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Oesterheld, Martin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Materia
Technology
Adoption
Soybean
Livestock
Employment
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4087

id CONICETDig_9cfb78b98d314b76029ae72c9e406701
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4087
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Closing the technological gap of animal and crop production through technical assistancePacín, FernandoOesterheld, MartinTechnologyAdoptionSoybeanLivestockEmploymenthttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Technical assistance is expected to close the gap between actual and potential agricultural production and increase its inter-annual stability. We here hypothesize that its impact may be greater on complex activities, such as livestock production, than on simpler activities, such as soybean production. To our knowledge, this difference has not been quantified. We gathered livestock and soybean production data from the Argentine Pampas, and contrasted the performance of farmers under high level of technical assistance, in the form of professional advice and feedback from other farmers, against the performance of the rest of the political district, which receive much less technical assistance. The difference in productivity and stability between the two types of farmer was much greater for livestock than for crop production. Livestock production was 96% higher and 70% more stable (lower coefficient of variation of annual output) in farms that received more technical assistance than in the rest of the political district. In contrast, soybean production and stability in farms that received more assistance were similar to the rest of the district. If all farms produced at the level of those under more technical assistance, county-level beef production would increase by 74% and require an increase of employment equivalent to 5.6% of the current working population. These results suggest that extension policies in the region should prioritize animal production because of a greater potential to significantly increase production and lower risk.Fil: Pacín, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaFil: Oesterheld, Martin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaElsevier2015-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/4087Pacín, Fernando; Oesterheld, Martin; Closing the technological gap of animal and crop production through technical assistance; Elsevier; Agricultural Systems; 137; 4-2015; 101-1070308-521Xenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X1500058Xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0308-521Xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.04.007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:44:57Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4087instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:44:57.779CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Closing the technological gap of animal and crop production through technical assistance
title Closing the technological gap of animal and crop production through technical assistance
spellingShingle Closing the technological gap of animal and crop production through technical assistance
Pacín, Fernando
Technology
Adoption
Soybean
Livestock
Employment
title_short Closing the technological gap of animal and crop production through technical assistance
title_full Closing the technological gap of animal and crop production through technical assistance
title_fullStr Closing the technological gap of animal and crop production through technical assistance
title_full_unstemmed Closing the technological gap of animal and crop production through technical assistance
title_sort Closing the technological gap of animal and crop production through technical assistance
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pacín, Fernando
Oesterheld, Martin
author Pacín, Fernando
author_facet Pacín, Fernando
Oesterheld, Martin
author_role author
author2 Oesterheld, Martin
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Technology
Adoption
Soybean
Livestock
Employment
topic Technology
Adoption
Soybean
Livestock
Employment
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Technical assistance is expected to close the gap between actual and potential agricultural production and increase its inter-annual stability. We here hypothesize that its impact may be greater on complex activities, such as livestock production, than on simpler activities, such as soybean production. To our knowledge, this difference has not been quantified. We gathered livestock and soybean production data from the Argentine Pampas, and contrasted the performance of farmers under high level of technical assistance, in the form of professional advice and feedback from other farmers, against the performance of the rest of the political district, which receive much less technical assistance. The difference in productivity and stability between the two types of farmer was much greater for livestock than for crop production. Livestock production was 96% higher and 70% more stable (lower coefficient of variation of annual output) in farms that received more technical assistance than in the rest of the political district. In contrast, soybean production and stability in farms that received more assistance were similar to the rest of the district. If all farms produced at the level of those under more technical assistance, county-level beef production would increase by 74% and require an increase of employment equivalent to 5.6% of the current working population. These results suggest that extension policies in the region should prioritize animal production because of a greater potential to significantly increase production and lower risk.
Fil: Pacín, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Oesterheld, Martin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
description Technical assistance is expected to close the gap between actual and potential agricultural production and increase its inter-annual stability. We here hypothesize that its impact may be greater on complex activities, such as livestock production, than on simpler activities, such as soybean production. To our knowledge, this difference has not been quantified. We gathered livestock and soybean production data from the Argentine Pampas, and contrasted the performance of farmers under high level of technical assistance, in the form of professional advice and feedback from other farmers, against the performance of the rest of the political district, which receive much less technical assistance. The difference in productivity and stability between the two types of farmer was much greater for livestock than for crop production. Livestock production was 96% higher and 70% more stable (lower coefficient of variation of annual output) in farms that received more technical assistance than in the rest of the political district. In contrast, soybean production and stability in farms that received more assistance were similar to the rest of the district. If all farms produced at the level of those under more technical assistance, county-level beef production would increase by 74% and require an increase of employment equivalent to 5.6% of the current working population. These results suggest that extension policies in the region should prioritize animal production because of a greater potential to significantly increase production and lower risk.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4087
Pacín, Fernando; Oesterheld, Martin; Closing the technological gap of animal and crop production through technical assistance; Elsevier; Agricultural Systems; 137; 4-2015; 101-107
0308-521X
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4087
identifier_str_mv Pacín, Fernando; Oesterheld, Martin; Closing the technological gap of animal and crop production through technical assistance; Elsevier; Agricultural Systems; 137; 4-2015; 101-107
0308-521X
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X1500058X
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0308-521X
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.04.007
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082960372006912
score 13.22299