Clinical efficacy assessment of the albendazole-ivermectin combination in lambs parasitized with resistant nematodes
- Autores
- Entrocasso, Carlos; Alvarez, Luis Ignacio; Manazza, Jorge Alberto; Lifschitz, Adrian Luis; Borda, Bernardino; Virkel, Guillermo Leon; Mottier, Maria de Lourdes; Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo
- Año de publicación
- 2008
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Combination of anthelmintic drugs from different chemical groups has been proposed as alternative parasite control strategies where failure of individual drugs is documented. The main goal of the current trial was to compare the clinical anthelmintic efficacy of albendazole (ABZ) and ivermectin (IVM) given either separately or co-administered to lambs naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes resistant to both molecules. Seventy (70) Corriedale lambs naturally infected with multiple resistant gastrointestinal nematodes were involved in the efficacy trial: the animals were allocated into 7 experimental groups (n = 10) and treated with either ABZ intravenously (iv) (ABZIV), IVMIV, ABZIV + IVMIV, ABZ intraruminally (ir) (ABZIR), IVM subcutaneously (sc) (IVMSC) and ABZIR + IVMSC or kept as untreated controls. The indirect estimation of the efficacy of the different treatments was performed by the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). Additionally, four animals randomly chosen from the untreated control and ABZIV, IVMIV and ABZIV + IVMIV experimental groups were sacrificed 15 days post-treatment to evaluate the efficacy against different adult resistant nematode parasites. The results were statistically compared by a non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis test). The following egg output reduction values were obtained: 73.4% (ABZIV), 79.0% (IVMIV), 91.9% (ABZIV + IVMIV), 43.5% (ABZIR), 79.8% (IVMSC) and 70.8% (ABZIR + IVMSC). The efficacy against Haemonchus spp. was 95.1 (ABZIV), 99.3 (IVMIV) and 99.9% (ABZIV + IVMIV), while the efficacy against Trichostrongylus colubriformis for the same treatment groups was 79.6, 100 and 99.9%. The data obtained on the assessment of the ABZ-IVM combination indicates that no potentiation synergism is observed. This work is complementary to a parallel study that demonstrated the lack of negative pharmacokinetic interactions between the two anthelmintics acting by different mode of action. Thus, an additive effect may be achieved against nematodes resistant to both compounds. Further work is required to understand the implications of potential pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interactions between anthelmintics before drug combined formulations are developed to be introduced into the pharmaceutical market.
Fil: Entrocasso, Carlos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Área de Investigación en Producción y Sanidad Animal; Argentina
Fil: Alvarez, Luis Ignacio. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Manazza, Jorge Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Área de Investigación en Producción y Sanidad Animal; Argentina
Fil: Lifschitz, Adrian Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina
Fil: Borda, Bernardino. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Área de Investigación en Producción y Sanidad Animal; Argentina
Fil: Virkel, Guillermo Leon. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina
Fil: Mottier, Maria de Lourdes. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina
Fil: Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina - Materia
-
ALBENDAZOLE
DRUG COMBINATION
EFFICACY
IVERMECTIN
RESISTANCE - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/94855
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_9be03178a626ddfdac47dd5d52f4ccaf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/94855 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Clinical efficacy assessment of the albendazole-ivermectin combination in lambs parasitized with resistant nematodesEntrocasso, CarlosAlvarez, Luis IgnacioManazza, Jorge AlbertoLifschitz, Adrian LuisBorda, BernardinoVirkel, Guillermo LeonMottier, Maria de LourdesLanusse, Carlos EdmundoALBENDAZOLEDRUG COMBINATIONEFFICACYIVERMECTINRESISTANCEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Combination of anthelmintic drugs from different chemical groups has been proposed as alternative parasite control strategies where failure of individual drugs is documented. The main goal of the current trial was to compare the clinical anthelmintic efficacy of albendazole (ABZ) and ivermectin (IVM) given either separately or co-administered to lambs naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes resistant to both molecules. Seventy (70) Corriedale lambs naturally infected with multiple resistant gastrointestinal nematodes were involved in the efficacy trial: the animals were allocated into 7 experimental groups (n = 10) and treated with either ABZ intravenously (iv) (ABZIV), IVMIV, ABZIV + IVMIV, ABZ intraruminally (ir) (ABZIR), IVM subcutaneously (sc) (IVMSC) and ABZIR + IVMSC or kept as untreated controls. The indirect estimation of the efficacy of the different treatments was performed by the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). Additionally, four animals randomly chosen from the untreated control and ABZIV, IVMIV and ABZIV + IVMIV experimental groups were sacrificed 15 days post-treatment to evaluate the efficacy against different adult resistant nematode parasites. The results were statistically compared by a non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis test). The following egg output reduction values were obtained: 73.4% (ABZIV), 79.0% (IVMIV), 91.9% (ABZIV + IVMIV), 43.5% (ABZIR), 79.8% (IVMSC) and 70.8% (ABZIR + IVMSC). The efficacy against Haemonchus spp. was 95.1 (ABZIV), 99.3 (IVMIV) and 99.9% (ABZIV + IVMIV), while the efficacy against Trichostrongylus colubriformis for the same treatment groups was 79.6, 100 and 99.9%. The data obtained on the assessment of the ABZ-IVM combination indicates that no potentiation synergism is observed. This work is complementary to a parallel study that demonstrated the lack of negative pharmacokinetic interactions between the two anthelmintics acting by different mode of action. Thus, an additive effect may be achieved against nematodes resistant to both compounds. Further work is required to understand the implications of potential pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interactions between anthelmintics before drug combined formulations are developed to be introduced into the pharmaceutical market.Fil: Entrocasso, Carlos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Área de Investigación en Producción y Sanidad Animal; ArgentinaFil: Alvarez, Luis Ignacio. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Manazza, Jorge Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Área de Investigación en Producción y Sanidad Animal; ArgentinaFil: Lifschitz, Adrian Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Borda, Bernardino. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Área de Investigación en Producción y Sanidad Animal; ArgentinaFil: Virkel, Guillermo Leon. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Mottier, Maria de Lourdes. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaElsevier Science2008-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/94855Entrocasso, Carlos; Alvarez, Luis Ignacio; Manazza, Jorge Alberto; Lifschitz, Adrian Luis; Borda, Bernardino; et al.; Clinical efficacy assessment of the albendazole-ivermectin combination in lambs parasitized with resistant nematodes; Elsevier Science; Veterinary Parasitology; 155; 3-4; 8-2008; 249-2560304-4017CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401708002380info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.04.015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:19Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/94855instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:19.999CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical efficacy assessment of the albendazole-ivermectin combination in lambs parasitized with resistant nematodes |
title |
Clinical efficacy assessment of the albendazole-ivermectin combination in lambs parasitized with resistant nematodes |
spellingShingle |
Clinical efficacy assessment of the albendazole-ivermectin combination in lambs parasitized with resistant nematodes Entrocasso, Carlos ALBENDAZOLE DRUG COMBINATION EFFICACY IVERMECTIN RESISTANCE |
title_short |
Clinical efficacy assessment of the albendazole-ivermectin combination in lambs parasitized with resistant nematodes |
title_full |
Clinical efficacy assessment of the albendazole-ivermectin combination in lambs parasitized with resistant nematodes |
title_fullStr |
Clinical efficacy assessment of the albendazole-ivermectin combination in lambs parasitized with resistant nematodes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical efficacy assessment of the albendazole-ivermectin combination in lambs parasitized with resistant nematodes |
title_sort |
Clinical efficacy assessment of the albendazole-ivermectin combination in lambs parasitized with resistant nematodes |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Entrocasso, Carlos Alvarez, Luis Ignacio Manazza, Jorge Alberto Lifschitz, Adrian Luis Borda, Bernardino Virkel, Guillermo Leon Mottier, Maria de Lourdes Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo |
author |
Entrocasso, Carlos |
author_facet |
Entrocasso, Carlos Alvarez, Luis Ignacio Manazza, Jorge Alberto Lifschitz, Adrian Luis Borda, Bernardino Virkel, Guillermo Leon Mottier, Maria de Lourdes Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alvarez, Luis Ignacio Manazza, Jorge Alberto Lifschitz, Adrian Luis Borda, Bernardino Virkel, Guillermo Leon Mottier, Maria de Lourdes Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
ALBENDAZOLE DRUG COMBINATION EFFICACY IVERMECTIN RESISTANCE |
topic |
ALBENDAZOLE DRUG COMBINATION EFFICACY IVERMECTIN RESISTANCE |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Combination of anthelmintic drugs from different chemical groups has been proposed as alternative parasite control strategies where failure of individual drugs is documented. The main goal of the current trial was to compare the clinical anthelmintic efficacy of albendazole (ABZ) and ivermectin (IVM) given either separately or co-administered to lambs naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes resistant to both molecules. Seventy (70) Corriedale lambs naturally infected with multiple resistant gastrointestinal nematodes were involved in the efficacy trial: the animals were allocated into 7 experimental groups (n = 10) and treated with either ABZ intravenously (iv) (ABZIV), IVMIV, ABZIV + IVMIV, ABZ intraruminally (ir) (ABZIR), IVM subcutaneously (sc) (IVMSC) and ABZIR + IVMSC or kept as untreated controls. The indirect estimation of the efficacy of the different treatments was performed by the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). Additionally, four animals randomly chosen from the untreated control and ABZIV, IVMIV and ABZIV + IVMIV experimental groups were sacrificed 15 days post-treatment to evaluate the efficacy against different adult resistant nematode parasites. The results were statistically compared by a non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis test). The following egg output reduction values were obtained: 73.4% (ABZIV), 79.0% (IVMIV), 91.9% (ABZIV + IVMIV), 43.5% (ABZIR), 79.8% (IVMSC) and 70.8% (ABZIR + IVMSC). The efficacy against Haemonchus spp. was 95.1 (ABZIV), 99.3 (IVMIV) and 99.9% (ABZIV + IVMIV), while the efficacy against Trichostrongylus colubriformis for the same treatment groups was 79.6, 100 and 99.9%. The data obtained on the assessment of the ABZ-IVM combination indicates that no potentiation synergism is observed. This work is complementary to a parallel study that demonstrated the lack of negative pharmacokinetic interactions between the two anthelmintics acting by different mode of action. Thus, an additive effect may be achieved against nematodes resistant to both compounds. Further work is required to understand the implications of potential pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interactions between anthelmintics before drug combined formulations are developed to be introduced into the pharmaceutical market. Fil: Entrocasso, Carlos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Área de Investigación en Producción y Sanidad Animal; Argentina Fil: Alvarez, Luis Ignacio. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Manazza, Jorge Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Área de Investigación en Producción y Sanidad Animal; Argentina Fil: Lifschitz, Adrian Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina Fil: Borda, Bernardino. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Área de Investigación en Producción y Sanidad Animal; Argentina Fil: Virkel, Guillermo Leon. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina Fil: Mottier, Maria de Lourdes. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina Fil: Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina |
description |
Combination of anthelmintic drugs from different chemical groups has been proposed as alternative parasite control strategies where failure of individual drugs is documented. The main goal of the current trial was to compare the clinical anthelmintic efficacy of albendazole (ABZ) and ivermectin (IVM) given either separately or co-administered to lambs naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes resistant to both molecules. Seventy (70) Corriedale lambs naturally infected with multiple resistant gastrointestinal nematodes were involved in the efficacy trial: the animals were allocated into 7 experimental groups (n = 10) and treated with either ABZ intravenously (iv) (ABZIV), IVMIV, ABZIV + IVMIV, ABZ intraruminally (ir) (ABZIR), IVM subcutaneously (sc) (IVMSC) and ABZIR + IVMSC or kept as untreated controls. The indirect estimation of the efficacy of the different treatments was performed by the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). Additionally, four animals randomly chosen from the untreated control and ABZIV, IVMIV and ABZIV + IVMIV experimental groups were sacrificed 15 days post-treatment to evaluate the efficacy against different adult resistant nematode parasites. The results were statistically compared by a non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis test). The following egg output reduction values were obtained: 73.4% (ABZIV), 79.0% (IVMIV), 91.9% (ABZIV + IVMIV), 43.5% (ABZIR), 79.8% (IVMSC) and 70.8% (ABZIR + IVMSC). The efficacy against Haemonchus spp. was 95.1 (ABZIV), 99.3 (IVMIV) and 99.9% (ABZIV + IVMIV), while the efficacy against Trichostrongylus colubriformis for the same treatment groups was 79.6, 100 and 99.9%. The data obtained on the assessment of the ABZ-IVM combination indicates that no potentiation synergism is observed. This work is complementary to a parallel study that demonstrated the lack of negative pharmacokinetic interactions between the two anthelmintics acting by different mode of action. Thus, an additive effect may be achieved against nematodes resistant to both compounds. Further work is required to understand the implications of potential pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interactions between anthelmintics before drug combined formulations are developed to be introduced into the pharmaceutical market. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/94855 Entrocasso, Carlos; Alvarez, Luis Ignacio; Manazza, Jorge Alberto; Lifschitz, Adrian Luis; Borda, Bernardino; et al.; Clinical efficacy assessment of the albendazole-ivermectin combination in lambs parasitized with resistant nematodes; Elsevier Science; Veterinary Parasitology; 155; 3-4; 8-2008; 249-256 0304-4017 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/94855 |
identifier_str_mv |
Entrocasso, Carlos; Alvarez, Luis Ignacio; Manazza, Jorge Alberto; Lifschitz, Adrian Luis; Borda, Bernardino; et al.; Clinical efficacy assessment of the albendazole-ivermectin combination in lambs parasitized with resistant nematodes; Elsevier Science; Veterinary Parasitology; 155; 3-4; 8-2008; 249-256 0304-4017 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401708002380 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.04.015 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269088283361280 |
score |
13.13397 |