Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests
- Autores
- Schwartz, Naomi B.; Aide, T. Mitchell; Graesser, Jordan; Grau, Hector Ricardo; Uriarte, María
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Carbon sequestration through tropical reforestation and natural regeneration could make an important contribution to climate change mitigation, given that forest cover in many tropical regions increased during the early part of the 21st century. The size of this carbon sink will depend on the degree to which second-growth forests are permanent and protected from re-clearing. Yet few studies have assessed permanence of reforestation, especially not at a large spatial scale. Here, we analyzed a 14-year time series (2001–2014) of remotely sensed land-cover data, covering all tropical Latin America and the Caribbean, to quantify the extent of second-growth forest permanence. Our results show that in many cases, reforestation in Latin America and the Caribbean during the early 21st century reversed by 2014, limiting carbon sequestration. In fact, reversals of reforestation, in which some or all gains in forest cover in the early 2000s were subsequently lost, were ten times more common than sustained increases in forest cover. Had reversals of reforestation been avoided, forests could have sequestered 0.58 Pg C, over four times more carbon than we estimate was sequestered after accounting for impermanence (0.14 Pg), representing a loss of 75% of carbon sequestration potential. Differences in the prevalence of reforestation reversals across countries suggest an important role for socio-economic, political, and ecological context, with political transitions and instability increasing the likelihood of reversals. These findings suggest that national commitments to reforestation may fall short of their carbon sequestration goals without provisions to ensure long-term permanence of new forests.
Fil: Schwartz, Naomi B.. University of British Columbia; Canadá
Fil: Aide, T. Mitchell. Universidad de Puerto Rico; Puerto Rico
Fil: Graesser, Jordan. University of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Grau, Hector Ricardo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina
Fil: Uriarte, María. Columbia University; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND STORAGE
DEFORESTATION
FOREST PERSISTENCE
LAND-USE CHANGE
REFORESTATION
SECOND GROWTH FORESTS
TROPICAL FOREST - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/147056
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_9b61021b4e9b89703201e05e3ea87c17 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/147056 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical ForestsSchwartz, Naomi B.Aide, T. MitchellGraesser, JordanGrau, Hector RicardoUriarte, MaríaCARBON SEQUESTRATION AND STORAGEDEFORESTATIONFOREST PERSISTENCELAND-USE CHANGEREFORESTATIONSECOND GROWTH FORESTSTROPICAL FORESThttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Carbon sequestration through tropical reforestation and natural regeneration could make an important contribution to climate change mitigation, given that forest cover in many tropical regions increased during the early part of the 21st century. The size of this carbon sink will depend on the degree to which second-growth forests are permanent and protected from re-clearing. Yet few studies have assessed permanence of reforestation, especially not at a large spatial scale. Here, we analyzed a 14-year time series (2001–2014) of remotely sensed land-cover data, covering all tropical Latin America and the Caribbean, to quantify the extent of second-growth forest permanence. Our results show that in many cases, reforestation in Latin America and the Caribbean during the early 21st century reversed by 2014, limiting carbon sequestration. In fact, reversals of reforestation, in which some or all gains in forest cover in the early 2000s were subsequently lost, were ten times more common than sustained increases in forest cover. Had reversals of reforestation been avoided, forests could have sequestered 0.58 Pg C, over four times more carbon than we estimate was sequestered after accounting for impermanence (0.14 Pg), representing a loss of 75% of carbon sequestration potential. Differences in the prevalence of reforestation reversals across countries suggest an important role for socio-economic, political, and ecological context, with political transitions and instability increasing the likelihood of reversals. These findings suggest that national commitments to reforestation may fall short of their carbon sequestration goals without provisions to ensure long-term permanence of new forests.Fil: Schwartz, Naomi B.. University of British Columbia; CanadáFil: Aide, T. Mitchell. Universidad de Puerto Rico; Puerto RicoFil: Graesser, Jordan. University of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Grau, Hector Ricardo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; ArgentinaFil: Uriarte, María. Columbia University; Estados UnidosFrontiers Media2020-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/147056Schwartz, Naomi B.; Aide, T. Mitchell; Graesser, Jordan; Grau, Hector Ricardo; Uriarte, María; Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Forests and Global Change; 3; 7-2020; 1-102624-893XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00085/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00085info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:31:56Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/147056instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:31:57.147CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests |
title |
Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests |
spellingShingle |
Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests Schwartz, Naomi B. CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND STORAGE DEFORESTATION FOREST PERSISTENCE LAND-USE CHANGE REFORESTATION SECOND GROWTH FORESTS TROPICAL FOREST |
title_short |
Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests |
title_full |
Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests |
title_fullStr |
Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests |
title_sort |
Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Schwartz, Naomi B. Aide, T. Mitchell Graesser, Jordan Grau, Hector Ricardo Uriarte, María |
author |
Schwartz, Naomi B. |
author_facet |
Schwartz, Naomi B. Aide, T. Mitchell Graesser, Jordan Grau, Hector Ricardo Uriarte, María |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Aide, T. Mitchell Graesser, Jordan Grau, Hector Ricardo Uriarte, María |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND STORAGE DEFORESTATION FOREST PERSISTENCE LAND-USE CHANGE REFORESTATION SECOND GROWTH FORESTS TROPICAL FOREST |
topic |
CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND STORAGE DEFORESTATION FOREST PERSISTENCE LAND-USE CHANGE REFORESTATION SECOND GROWTH FORESTS TROPICAL FOREST |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Carbon sequestration through tropical reforestation and natural regeneration could make an important contribution to climate change mitigation, given that forest cover in many tropical regions increased during the early part of the 21st century. The size of this carbon sink will depend on the degree to which second-growth forests are permanent and protected from re-clearing. Yet few studies have assessed permanence of reforestation, especially not at a large spatial scale. Here, we analyzed a 14-year time series (2001–2014) of remotely sensed land-cover data, covering all tropical Latin America and the Caribbean, to quantify the extent of second-growth forest permanence. Our results show that in many cases, reforestation in Latin America and the Caribbean during the early 21st century reversed by 2014, limiting carbon sequestration. In fact, reversals of reforestation, in which some or all gains in forest cover in the early 2000s were subsequently lost, were ten times more common than sustained increases in forest cover. Had reversals of reforestation been avoided, forests could have sequestered 0.58 Pg C, over four times more carbon than we estimate was sequestered after accounting for impermanence (0.14 Pg), representing a loss of 75% of carbon sequestration potential. Differences in the prevalence of reforestation reversals across countries suggest an important role for socio-economic, political, and ecological context, with political transitions and instability increasing the likelihood of reversals. These findings suggest that national commitments to reforestation may fall short of their carbon sequestration goals without provisions to ensure long-term permanence of new forests. Fil: Schwartz, Naomi B.. University of British Columbia; Canadá Fil: Aide, T. Mitchell. Universidad de Puerto Rico; Puerto Rico Fil: Graesser, Jordan. University of Queensland; Australia Fil: Grau, Hector Ricardo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina Fil: Uriarte, María. Columbia University; Estados Unidos |
description |
Carbon sequestration through tropical reforestation and natural regeneration could make an important contribution to climate change mitigation, given that forest cover in many tropical regions increased during the early part of the 21st century. The size of this carbon sink will depend on the degree to which second-growth forests are permanent and protected from re-clearing. Yet few studies have assessed permanence of reforestation, especially not at a large spatial scale. Here, we analyzed a 14-year time series (2001–2014) of remotely sensed land-cover data, covering all tropical Latin America and the Caribbean, to quantify the extent of second-growth forest permanence. Our results show that in many cases, reforestation in Latin America and the Caribbean during the early 21st century reversed by 2014, limiting carbon sequestration. In fact, reversals of reforestation, in which some or all gains in forest cover in the early 2000s were subsequently lost, were ten times more common than sustained increases in forest cover. Had reversals of reforestation been avoided, forests could have sequestered 0.58 Pg C, over four times more carbon than we estimate was sequestered after accounting for impermanence (0.14 Pg), representing a loss of 75% of carbon sequestration potential. Differences in the prevalence of reforestation reversals across countries suggest an important role for socio-economic, political, and ecological context, with political transitions and instability increasing the likelihood of reversals. These findings suggest that national commitments to reforestation may fall short of their carbon sequestration goals without provisions to ensure long-term permanence of new forests. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/147056 Schwartz, Naomi B.; Aide, T. Mitchell; Graesser, Jordan; Grau, Hector Ricardo; Uriarte, María; Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Forests and Global Change; 3; 7-2020; 1-10 2624-893X CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/147056 |
identifier_str_mv |
Schwartz, Naomi B.; Aide, T. Mitchell; Graesser, Jordan; Grau, Hector Ricardo; Uriarte, María; Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Forests and Global Change; 3; 7-2020; 1-10 2624-893X CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00085/full info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00085 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614331954626560 |
score |
13.070432 |