Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests

Autores
Schwartz, Naomi B.; Aide, T. Mitchell; Graesser, Jordan; Grau, Hector Ricardo; Uriarte, María
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Carbon sequestration through tropical reforestation and natural regeneration could make an important contribution to climate change mitigation, given that forest cover in many tropical regions increased during the early part of the 21st century. The size of this carbon sink will depend on the degree to which second-growth forests are permanent and protected from re-clearing. Yet few studies have assessed permanence of reforestation, especially not at a large spatial scale. Here, we analyzed a 14-year time series (2001–2014) of remotely sensed land-cover data, covering all tropical Latin America and the Caribbean, to quantify the extent of second-growth forest permanence. Our results show that in many cases, reforestation in Latin America and the Caribbean during the early 21st century reversed by 2014, limiting carbon sequestration. In fact, reversals of reforestation, in which some or all gains in forest cover in the early 2000s were subsequently lost, were ten times more common than sustained increases in forest cover. Had reversals of reforestation been avoided, forests could have sequestered 0.58 Pg C, over four times more carbon than we estimate was sequestered after accounting for impermanence (0.14 Pg), representing a loss of 75% of carbon sequestration potential. Differences in the prevalence of reforestation reversals across countries suggest an important role for socio-economic, political, and ecological context, with political transitions and instability increasing the likelihood of reversals. These findings suggest that national commitments to reforestation may fall short of their carbon sequestration goals without provisions to ensure long-term permanence of new forests.
Fil: Schwartz, Naomi B.. University of British Columbia; Canadá
Fil: Aide, T. Mitchell. Universidad de Puerto Rico; Puerto Rico
Fil: Graesser, Jordan. University of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Grau, Hector Ricardo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina
Fil: Uriarte, María. Columbia University; Estados Unidos
Materia
CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND STORAGE
DEFORESTATION
FOREST PERSISTENCE
LAND-USE CHANGE
REFORESTATION
SECOND GROWTH FORESTS
TROPICAL FOREST
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/147056

id CONICETDig_9b61021b4e9b89703201e05e3ea87c17
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/147056
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical ForestsSchwartz, Naomi B.Aide, T. MitchellGraesser, JordanGrau, Hector RicardoUriarte, MaríaCARBON SEQUESTRATION AND STORAGEDEFORESTATIONFOREST PERSISTENCELAND-USE CHANGEREFORESTATIONSECOND GROWTH FORESTSTROPICAL FORESThttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Carbon sequestration through tropical reforestation and natural regeneration could make an important contribution to climate change mitigation, given that forest cover in many tropical regions increased during the early part of the 21st century. The size of this carbon sink will depend on the degree to which second-growth forests are permanent and protected from re-clearing. Yet few studies have assessed permanence of reforestation, especially not at a large spatial scale. Here, we analyzed a 14-year time series (2001–2014) of remotely sensed land-cover data, covering all tropical Latin America and the Caribbean, to quantify the extent of second-growth forest permanence. Our results show that in many cases, reforestation in Latin America and the Caribbean during the early 21st century reversed by 2014, limiting carbon sequestration. In fact, reversals of reforestation, in which some or all gains in forest cover in the early 2000s were subsequently lost, were ten times more common than sustained increases in forest cover. Had reversals of reforestation been avoided, forests could have sequestered 0.58 Pg C, over four times more carbon than we estimate was sequestered after accounting for impermanence (0.14 Pg), representing a loss of 75% of carbon sequestration potential. Differences in the prevalence of reforestation reversals across countries suggest an important role for socio-economic, political, and ecological context, with political transitions and instability increasing the likelihood of reversals. These findings suggest that national commitments to reforestation may fall short of their carbon sequestration goals without provisions to ensure long-term permanence of new forests.Fil: Schwartz, Naomi B.. University of British Columbia; CanadáFil: Aide, T. Mitchell. Universidad de Puerto Rico; Puerto RicoFil: Graesser, Jordan. University of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Grau, Hector Ricardo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; ArgentinaFil: Uriarte, María. Columbia University; Estados UnidosFrontiers Media2020-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/147056Schwartz, Naomi B.; Aide, T. Mitchell; Graesser, Jordan; Grau, Hector Ricardo; Uriarte, María; Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Forests and Global Change; 3; 7-2020; 1-102624-893XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00085/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00085info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:31:56Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/147056instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:31:57.147CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests
title Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests
spellingShingle Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests
Schwartz, Naomi B.
CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND STORAGE
DEFORESTATION
FOREST PERSISTENCE
LAND-USE CHANGE
REFORESTATION
SECOND GROWTH FORESTS
TROPICAL FOREST
title_short Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests
title_full Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests
title_fullStr Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests
title_full_unstemmed Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests
title_sort Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Schwartz, Naomi B.
Aide, T. Mitchell
Graesser, Jordan
Grau, Hector Ricardo
Uriarte, María
author Schwartz, Naomi B.
author_facet Schwartz, Naomi B.
Aide, T. Mitchell
Graesser, Jordan
Grau, Hector Ricardo
Uriarte, María
author_role author
author2 Aide, T. Mitchell
Graesser, Jordan
Grau, Hector Ricardo
Uriarte, María
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND STORAGE
DEFORESTATION
FOREST PERSISTENCE
LAND-USE CHANGE
REFORESTATION
SECOND GROWTH FORESTS
TROPICAL FOREST
topic CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND STORAGE
DEFORESTATION
FOREST PERSISTENCE
LAND-USE CHANGE
REFORESTATION
SECOND GROWTH FORESTS
TROPICAL FOREST
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Carbon sequestration through tropical reforestation and natural regeneration could make an important contribution to climate change mitigation, given that forest cover in many tropical regions increased during the early part of the 21st century. The size of this carbon sink will depend on the degree to which second-growth forests are permanent and protected from re-clearing. Yet few studies have assessed permanence of reforestation, especially not at a large spatial scale. Here, we analyzed a 14-year time series (2001–2014) of remotely sensed land-cover data, covering all tropical Latin America and the Caribbean, to quantify the extent of second-growth forest permanence. Our results show that in many cases, reforestation in Latin America and the Caribbean during the early 21st century reversed by 2014, limiting carbon sequestration. In fact, reversals of reforestation, in which some or all gains in forest cover in the early 2000s were subsequently lost, were ten times more common than sustained increases in forest cover. Had reversals of reforestation been avoided, forests could have sequestered 0.58 Pg C, over four times more carbon than we estimate was sequestered after accounting for impermanence (0.14 Pg), representing a loss of 75% of carbon sequestration potential. Differences in the prevalence of reforestation reversals across countries suggest an important role for socio-economic, political, and ecological context, with political transitions and instability increasing the likelihood of reversals. These findings suggest that national commitments to reforestation may fall short of their carbon sequestration goals without provisions to ensure long-term permanence of new forests.
Fil: Schwartz, Naomi B.. University of British Columbia; Canadá
Fil: Aide, T. Mitchell. Universidad de Puerto Rico; Puerto Rico
Fil: Graesser, Jordan. University of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Grau, Hector Ricardo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina
Fil: Uriarte, María. Columbia University; Estados Unidos
description Carbon sequestration through tropical reforestation and natural regeneration could make an important contribution to climate change mitigation, given that forest cover in many tropical regions increased during the early part of the 21st century. The size of this carbon sink will depend on the degree to which second-growth forests are permanent and protected from re-clearing. Yet few studies have assessed permanence of reforestation, especially not at a large spatial scale. Here, we analyzed a 14-year time series (2001–2014) of remotely sensed land-cover data, covering all tropical Latin America and the Caribbean, to quantify the extent of second-growth forest permanence. Our results show that in many cases, reforestation in Latin America and the Caribbean during the early 21st century reversed by 2014, limiting carbon sequestration. In fact, reversals of reforestation, in which some or all gains in forest cover in the early 2000s were subsequently lost, were ten times more common than sustained increases in forest cover. Had reversals of reforestation been avoided, forests could have sequestered 0.58 Pg C, over four times more carbon than we estimate was sequestered after accounting for impermanence (0.14 Pg), representing a loss of 75% of carbon sequestration potential. Differences in the prevalence of reforestation reversals across countries suggest an important role for socio-economic, political, and ecological context, with political transitions and instability increasing the likelihood of reversals. These findings suggest that national commitments to reforestation may fall short of their carbon sequestration goals without provisions to ensure long-term permanence of new forests.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/147056
Schwartz, Naomi B.; Aide, T. Mitchell; Graesser, Jordan; Grau, Hector Ricardo; Uriarte, María; Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Forests and Global Change; 3; 7-2020; 1-10
2624-893X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/147056
identifier_str_mv Schwartz, Naomi B.; Aide, T. Mitchell; Graesser, Jordan; Grau, Hector Ricardo; Uriarte, María; Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Forests and Global Change; 3; 7-2020; 1-10
2624-893X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00085/full
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00085
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614331954626560
score 13.070432