Trade-offs in water and carbon ecosystem services with land-use changes in grasslands

Autores
Kim, John H.; Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel; Jackson, Robert B.
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Increasing pressures for food, fiber, and fuel continue to drive global land‐use changes. Efforts to optimize ecosystem services under alternative land uses are often hampered by the complex interactions and trade‐offs among them. We examined the effects of land‐use changes on ecosystem carbon storage and groundwater recharge in grasslands of Argentina and the United States to (1) understand the relationships between both services, (2) predict their responses to vegetation shifts across environmental gradients, and (3) explore how market or policy incentives for ecosystem services could affect land‐use changes. A trade‐off of ecosystem services was evident in most cases, with woody encroachment increasing carbon storage (+29 Mg C/ha) but decreasing groundwater recharge (−7.3 mm/yr) and conversions to rain‐fed cultivation driving opposite changes (−32 Mg C/ha vs. +13 mm/yr). In contrast, crops irrigated with ground water tended to reduce both services compared to the natural grasslands they replaced. Combining economic values of the agricultural products together with the services, we highlight potentials for relatively modest financial incentives for ecosystem services to abate land‐use changes and for incentives for carbon to drive land‐use decisions over those of water. Our findings also identify key opportunities and caveats for some win–win and lose–lose land‐use changes for more integrative and sustainable strategies for land management.
Fil: Kim, John H.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi". Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi"; Argentina
Fil: Jackson, Robert B.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Materia
Agriculture
Carbon Sequestration
Ecosystem Service
Land-Use Change
Water Provisioning
Woody Plant Invasion
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/60472
Acceder
id CONICETDig_93c9779dedf5c1a1b5a6c21a1d633616
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/60472
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Trade-offs in water and carbon ecosystem services with land-use changes in grasslandsKim, John H.Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban GabrielJackson, Robert B.AgricultureCarbon SequestrationEcosystem ServiceLand-Use ChangeWater ProvisioningWoody Plant Invasionhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Increasing pressures for food, fiber, and fuel continue to drive global land‐use changes. Efforts to optimize ecosystem services under alternative land uses are often hampered by the complex interactions and trade‐offs among them. We examined the effects of land‐use changes on ecosystem carbon storage and groundwater recharge in grasslands of Argentina and the United States to (1) understand the relationships between both services, (2) predict their responses to vegetation shifts across environmental gradients, and (3) explore how market or policy incentives for ecosystem services could affect land‐use changes. A trade‐off of ecosystem services was evident in most cases, with woody encroachment increasing carbon storage (+29 Mg C/ha) but decreasing groundwater recharge (−7.3 mm/yr) and conversions to rain‐fed cultivation driving opposite changes (−32 Mg C/ha vs. +13 mm/yr). In contrast, crops irrigated with ground water tended to reduce both services compared to the natural grasslands they replaced. Combining economic values of the agricultural products together with the services, we highlight potentials for relatively modest financial incentives for ecosystem services to abate land‐use changes and for incentives for carbon to drive land‐use decisions over those of water. Our findings also identify key opportunities and caveats for some win–win and lose–lose land‐use changes for more integrative and sustainable strategies for land management.Fil: Kim, John H.. University of Duke; Estados UnidosFil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi". Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi"; ArgentinaFil: Jackson, Robert B.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosEcological Society of America2016-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/60472Kim, John H.; Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel; Jackson, Robert B.; Trade-offs in water and carbon ecosystem services with land-use changes in grasslands; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 26; 6; 9-2016; 1633-16441939-5582CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1890/15-0863.1info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/15-0863.1info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:44:03Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/60472instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:44:04.196CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Trade-offs in water and carbon ecosystem services with land-use changes in grasslands
title Trade-offs in water and carbon ecosystem services with land-use changes in grasslands
spellingShingle Trade-offs in water and carbon ecosystem services with land-use changes in grasslands
Kim, John H.
Agriculture
Carbon Sequestration
Ecosystem Service
Land-Use Change
Water Provisioning
Woody Plant Invasion
title_short Trade-offs in water and carbon ecosystem services with land-use changes in grasslands
title_full Trade-offs in water and carbon ecosystem services with land-use changes in grasslands
title_fullStr Trade-offs in water and carbon ecosystem services with land-use changes in grasslands
title_full_unstemmed Trade-offs in water and carbon ecosystem services with land-use changes in grasslands
title_sort Trade-offs in water and carbon ecosystem services with land-use changes in grasslands
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Kim, John H.
Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Jackson, Robert B.
author Kim, John H.
author_facet Kim, John H.
Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Jackson, Robert B.
author_role author
author2 Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Jackson, Robert B.
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Agriculture
Carbon Sequestration
Ecosystem Service
Land-Use Change
Water Provisioning
Woody Plant Invasion
topic Agriculture
Carbon Sequestration
Ecosystem Service
Land-Use Change
Water Provisioning
Woody Plant Invasion
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Increasing pressures for food, fiber, and fuel continue to drive global land‐use changes. Efforts to optimize ecosystem services under alternative land uses are often hampered by the complex interactions and trade‐offs among them. We examined the effects of land‐use changes on ecosystem carbon storage and groundwater recharge in grasslands of Argentina and the United States to (1) understand the relationships between both services, (2) predict their responses to vegetation shifts across environmental gradients, and (3) explore how market or policy incentives for ecosystem services could affect land‐use changes. A trade‐off of ecosystem services was evident in most cases, with woody encroachment increasing carbon storage (+29 Mg C/ha) but decreasing groundwater recharge (−7.3 mm/yr) and conversions to rain‐fed cultivation driving opposite changes (−32 Mg C/ha vs. +13 mm/yr). In contrast, crops irrigated with ground water tended to reduce both services compared to the natural grasslands they replaced. Combining economic values of the agricultural products together with the services, we highlight potentials for relatively modest financial incentives for ecosystem services to abate land‐use changes and for incentives for carbon to drive land‐use decisions over those of water. Our findings also identify key opportunities and caveats for some win–win and lose–lose land‐use changes for more integrative and sustainable strategies for land management.
Fil: Kim, John H.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi". Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi"; Argentina
Fil: Jackson, Robert B.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
description Increasing pressures for food, fiber, and fuel continue to drive global land‐use changes. Efforts to optimize ecosystem services under alternative land uses are often hampered by the complex interactions and trade‐offs among them. We examined the effects of land‐use changes on ecosystem carbon storage and groundwater recharge in grasslands of Argentina and the United States to (1) understand the relationships between both services, (2) predict their responses to vegetation shifts across environmental gradients, and (3) explore how market or policy incentives for ecosystem services could affect land‐use changes. A trade‐off of ecosystem services was evident in most cases, with woody encroachment increasing carbon storage (+29 Mg C/ha) but decreasing groundwater recharge (−7.3 mm/yr) and conversions to rain‐fed cultivation driving opposite changes (−32 Mg C/ha vs. +13 mm/yr). In contrast, crops irrigated with ground water tended to reduce both services compared to the natural grasslands they replaced. Combining economic values of the agricultural products together with the services, we highlight potentials for relatively modest financial incentives for ecosystem services to abate land‐use changes and for incentives for carbon to drive land‐use decisions over those of water. Our findings also identify key opportunities and caveats for some win–win and lose–lose land‐use changes for more integrative and sustainable strategies for land management.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/60472
Kim, John H.; Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel; Jackson, Robert B.; Trade-offs in water and carbon ecosystem services with land-use changes in grasslands; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 26; 6; 9-2016; 1633-1644
1939-5582
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/60472
identifier_str_mv Kim, John H.; Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel; Jackson, Robert B.; Trade-offs in water and carbon ecosystem services with land-use changes in grasslands; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 26; 6; 9-2016; 1633-1644
1939-5582
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1890/15-0863.1
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/15-0863.1
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ecological Society of America
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ecological Society of America
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842268642737127424
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares