Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes

Autores
Hebets, Eileen A.; Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí; Abdallah, Abdallah; Griger, Seth; McGinley, Rowan; Starrett, James; Bond, Jason E.; Bern, Mitch
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Mate choice is posited to explain the evolution and maintenance of numerous secondary sexual traits, including ornamentation. This study explores the role of ornamentation in the mating success of two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent ornamentation. Mature male Schizocosa crassipalpata lack ornamentation while males of its closest living relative, S. bilineata, express both dark pigmentation and foreleg brushes. Following phenotypic manipulations of foreleg ornamentation – i.e. adding ornamentation in the form of dark pigment to non-ornamented males (S. crassipalpata, Aim 1) and removing ornamentation in varying degrees from highly ornamented males (S. bilineata, Aim 2 – shaving brushes; Aim 3 – shaving brushes and painting over dark pigment in vibration present/absent environments) – we found no evidence that ornamentation alone improves male mating success in either species, regardless of the vibratory signaling environment. In both S. bilineata experiments, however, higher courtship rates resulted in higher mating success, suggesting selection for courtship performance. Furthermore, females were more likely to turn, a presumed receptivity display, in response to males that courted at a higher rate. Also, similar to findings in another relative (S. stridulans), we found indications that ornamentation may function to ease a male’s reliance on courtship performance – i.e., at low courtship rates, only ornamented males can secure a mating. Our phenotypic manipulations also influenced courtship behavior in S. bilineata. Shaved males began courting earlier and courted more often over a longer time than intact males, yet ultimately acquired similar matings. This increased courtship effort likely compensated for reduced ornamentation. Finally, the vibratory environment appears crucial for female–male dialogue in S. bilineata, as vibratory absent environments resulted in increased female attacks and decreased male courtship rates. Together, our data suggest that S. crassipalpata females do not possess a preference for ornamentation and that S. bilineata females do not use ornamentation alone in mating decisions. Instead, our results are consistent with a hypothesis that ornamentation in Schizocosa evolved, and is likely maintained, due to its interactions with dynamic movement displays (i.e. leg movements), which can themselves be plastically altered based on the signaler’s phenotype as well as the signaling environment.
Fil: Hebets, Eileen A.. Universidad de Nebraska - Lincoln; Estados Unidos
Fil: Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal; Argentina
Fil: Abdallah, Abdallah. Universidad de Nebraska - Lincoln; Estados Unidos
Fil: Griger, Seth. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Fil: McGinley, Rowan. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Fil: Starrett, James. University of California at Davis; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bond, Jason E.. University of California at Davis; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bern, Mitch. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Materia
BEHAVIORALSKILLS
COMPENSATORY TRAITS
MATE CHOICE
PLASTICITY
SENSORY BIAS
SENSORY DRIVE
SEXUAL SELECTION
SIGNAL INTERACTIONS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/260375

id CONICETDig_936dcb00e03d926b5baa67199739513d
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/260375
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypesHebets, Eileen A.Oviedo Diego, Mariela AnahíAbdallah, AbdallahGriger, SethMcGinley, RowanStarrett, JamesBond, Jason E.Bern, MitchBEHAVIORALSKILLSCOMPENSATORY TRAITSMATE CHOICEPLASTICITYSENSORY BIASSENSORY DRIVESEXUAL SELECTIONSIGNAL INTERACTIONShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Mate choice is posited to explain the evolution and maintenance of numerous secondary sexual traits, including ornamentation. This study explores the role of ornamentation in the mating success of two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent ornamentation. Mature male Schizocosa crassipalpata lack ornamentation while males of its closest living relative, S. bilineata, express both dark pigmentation and foreleg brushes. Following phenotypic manipulations of foreleg ornamentation – i.e. adding ornamentation in the form of dark pigment to non-ornamented males (S. crassipalpata, Aim 1) and removing ornamentation in varying degrees from highly ornamented males (S. bilineata, Aim 2 – shaving brushes; Aim 3 – shaving brushes and painting over dark pigment in vibration present/absent environments) – we found no evidence that ornamentation alone improves male mating success in either species, regardless of the vibratory signaling environment. In both S. bilineata experiments, however, higher courtship rates resulted in higher mating success, suggesting selection for courtship performance. Furthermore, females were more likely to turn, a presumed receptivity display, in response to males that courted at a higher rate. Also, similar to findings in another relative (S. stridulans), we found indications that ornamentation may function to ease a male’s reliance on courtship performance – i.e., at low courtship rates, only ornamented males can secure a mating. Our phenotypic manipulations also influenced courtship behavior in S. bilineata. Shaved males began courting earlier and courted more often over a longer time than intact males, yet ultimately acquired similar matings. This increased courtship effort likely compensated for reduced ornamentation. Finally, the vibratory environment appears crucial for female–male dialogue in S. bilineata, as vibratory absent environments resulted in increased female attacks and decreased male courtship rates. Together, our data suggest that S. crassipalpata females do not possess a preference for ornamentation and that S. bilineata females do not use ornamentation alone in mating decisions. Instead, our results are consistent with a hypothesis that ornamentation in Schizocosa evolved, and is likely maintained, due to its interactions with dynamic movement displays (i.e. leg movements), which can themselves be plastically altered based on the signaler’s phenotype as well as the signaling environment.Fil: Hebets, Eileen A.. Universidad de Nebraska - Lincoln; Estados UnidosFil: Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal; ArgentinaFil: Abdallah, Abdallah. Universidad de Nebraska - Lincoln; Estados UnidosFil: Griger, Seth. University of Nebraska; Estados UnidosFil: McGinley, Rowan. University of Nebraska; Estados UnidosFil: Starrett, James. University of California at Davis; Estados UnidosFil: Bond, Jason E.. University of California at Davis; Estados UnidosFil: Bern, Mitch. University of Nebraska; Estados UnidosFrontiers Media2024-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/260375Hebets, Eileen A.; Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí; Abdallah, Abdallah; Griger, Seth; McGinley, Rowan; et al.; Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ethology; 3; 8-2024; 1-182813-5091CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fetho.2024.1460323/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fetho.2024.1460323info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:15:57Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/260375instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:15:58.169CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes
title Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes
spellingShingle Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes
Hebets, Eileen A.
BEHAVIORALSKILLS
COMPENSATORY TRAITS
MATE CHOICE
PLASTICITY
SENSORY BIAS
SENSORY DRIVE
SEXUAL SELECTION
SIGNAL INTERACTIONS
title_short Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes
title_full Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes
title_fullStr Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes
title_full_unstemmed Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes
title_sort Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Hebets, Eileen A.
Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí
Abdallah, Abdallah
Griger, Seth
McGinley, Rowan
Starrett, James
Bond, Jason E.
Bern, Mitch
author Hebets, Eileen A.
author_facet Hebets, Eileen A.
Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí
Abdallah, Abdallah
Griger, Seth
McGinley, Rowan
Starrett, James
Bond, Jason E.
Bern, Mitch
author_role author
author2 Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí
Abdallah, Abdallah
Griger, Seth
McGinley, Rowan
Starrett, James
Bond, Jason E.
Bern, Mitch
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv BEHAVIORALSKILLS
COMPENSATORY TRAITS
MATE CHOICE
PLASTICITY
SENSORY BIAS
SENSORY DRIVE
SEXUAL SELECTION
SIGNAL INTERACTIONS
topic BEHAVIORALSKILLS
COMPENSATORY TRAITS
MATE CHOICE
PLASTICITY
SENSORY BIAS
SENSORY DRIVE
SEXUAL SELECTION
SIGNAL INTERACTIONS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Mate choice is posited to explain the evolution and maintenance of numerous secondary sexual traits, including ornamentation. This study explores the role of ornamentation in the mating success of two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent ornamentation. Mature male Schizocosa crassipalpata lack ornamentation while males of its closest living relative, S. bilineata, express both dark pigmentation and foreleg brushes. Following phenotypic manipulations of foreleg ornamentation – i.e. adding ornamentation in the form of dark pigment to non-ornamented males (S. crassipalpata, Aim 1) and removing ornamentation in varying degrees from highly ornamented males (S. bilineata, Aim 2 – shaving brushes; Aim 3 – shaving brushes and painting over dark pigment in vibration present/absent environments) – we found no evidence that ornamentation alone improves male mating success in either species, regardless of the vibratory signaling environment. In both S. bilineata experiments, however, higher courtship rates resulted in higher mating success, suggesting selection for courtship performance. Furthermore, females were more likely to turn, a presumed receptivity display, in response to males that courted at a higher rate. Also, similar to findings in another relative (S. stridulans), we found indications that ornamentation may function to ease a male’s reliance on courtship performance – i.e., at low courtship rates, only ornamented males can secure a mating. Our phenotypic manipulations also influenced courtship behavior in S. bilineata. Shaved males began courting earlier and courted more often over a longer time than intact males, yet ultimately acquired similar matings. This increased courtship effort likely compensated for reduced ornamentation. Finally, the vibratory environment appears crucial for female–male dialogue in S. bilineata, as vibratory absent environments resulted in increased female attacks and decreased male courtship rates. Together, our data suggest that S. crassipalpata females do not possess a preference for ornamentation and that S. bilineata females do not use ornamentation alone in mating decisions. Instead, our results are consistent with a hypothesis that ornamentation in Schizocosa evolved, and is likely maintained, due to its interactions with dynamic movement displays (i.e. leg movements), which can themselves be plastically altered based on the signaler’s phenotype as well as the signaling environment.
Fil: Hebets, Eileen A.. Universidad de Nebraska - Lincoln; Estados Unidos
Fil: Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal; Argentina
Fil: Abdallah, Abdallah. Universidad de Nebraska - Lincoln; Estados Unidos
Fil: Griger, Seth. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Fil: McGinley, Rowan. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Fil: Starrett, James. University of California at Davis; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bond, Jason E.. University of California at Davis; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bern, Mitch. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
description Mate choice is posited to explain the evolution and maintenance of numerous secondary sexual traits, including ornamentation. This study explores the role of ornamentation in the mating success of two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent ornamentation. Mature male Schizocosa crassipalpata lack ornamentation while males of its closest living relative, S. bilineata, express both dark pigmentation and foreleg brushes. Following phenotypic manipulations of foreleg ornamentation – i.e. adding ornamentation in the form of dark pigment to non-ornamented males (S. crassipalpata, Aim 1) and removing ornamentation in varying degrees from highly ornamented males (S. bilineata, Aim 2 – shaving brushes; Aim 3 – shaving brushes and painting over dark pigment in vibration present/absent environments) – we found no evidence that ornamentation alone improves male mating success in either species, regardless of the vibratory signaling environment. In both S. bilineata experiments, however, higher courtship rates resulted in higher mating success, suggesting selection for courtship performance. Furthermore, females were more likely to turn, a presumed receptivity display, in response to males that courted at a higher rate. Also, similar to findings in another relative (S. stridulans), we found indications that ornamentation may function to ease a male’s reliance on courtship performance – i.e., at low courtship rates, only ornamented males can secure a mating. Our phenotypic manipulations also influenced courtship behavior in S. bilineata. Shaved males began courting earlier and courted more often over a longer time than intact males, yet ultimately acquired similar matings. This increased courtship effort likely compensated for reduced ornamentation. Finally, the vibratory environment appears crucial for female–male dialogue in S. bilineata, as vibratory absent environments resulted in increased female attacks and decreased male courtship rates. Together, our data suggest that S. crassipalpata females do not possess a preference for ornamentation and that S. bilineata females do not use ornamentation alone in mating decisions. Instead, our results are consistent with a hypothesis that ornamentation in Schizocosa evolved, and is likely maintained, due to its interactions with dynamic movement displays (i.e. leg movements), which can themselves be plastically altered based on the signaler’s phenotype as well as the signaling environment.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/260375
Hebets, Eileen A.; Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí; Abdallah, Abdallah; Griger, Seth; McGinley, Rowan; et al.; Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ethology; 3; 8-2024; 1-18
2813-5091
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/260375
identifier_str_mv Hebets, Eileen A.; Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí; Abdallah, Abdallah; Griger, Seth; McGinley, Rowan; et al.; Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ethology; 3; 8-2024; 1-18
2813-5091
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fetho.2024.1460323/full
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fetho.2024.1460323
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083307667718144
score 13.22299