Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes
- Autores
- Hebets, Eileen A.; Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí; Abdallah, Abdallah; Griger, Seth; McGinley, Rowan; Starrett, James; Bond, Jason E.; Bern, Mitch
- Año de publicación
- 2024
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Mate choice is posited to explain the evolution and maintenance of numerous secondary sexual traits, including ornamentation. This study explores the role of ornamentation in the mating success of two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent ornamentation. Mature male Schizocosa crassipalpata lack ornamentation while males of its closest living relative, S. bilineata, express both dark pigmentation and foreleg brushes. Following phenotypic manipulations of foreleg ornamentation – i.e. adding ornamentation in the form of dark pigment to non-ornamented males (S. crassipalpata, Aim 1) and removing ornamentation in varying degrees from highly ornamented males (S. bilineata, Aim 2 – shaving brushes; Aim 3 – shaving brushes and painting over dark pigment in vibration present/absent environments) – we found no evidence that ornamentation alone improves male mating success in either species, regardless of the vibratory signaling environment. In both S. bilineata experiments, however, higher courtship rates resulted in higher mating success, suggesting selection for courtship performance. Furthermore, females were more likely to turn, a presumed receptivity display, in response to males that courted at a higher rate. Also, similar to findings in another relative (S. stridulans), we found indications that ornamentation may function to ease a male’s reliance on courtship performance – i.e., at low courtship rates, only ornamented males can secure a mating. Our phenotypic manipulations also influenced courtship behavior in S. bilineata. Shaved males began courting earlier and courted more often over a longer time than intact males, yet ultimately acquired similar matings. This increased courtship effort likely compensated for reduced ornamentation. Finally, the vibratory environment appears crucial for female–male dialogue in S. bilineata, as vibratory absent environments resulted in increased female attacks and decreased male courtship rates. Together, our data suggest that S. crassipalpata females do not possess a preference for ornamentation and that S. bilineata females do not use ornamentation alone in mating decisions. Instead, our results are consistent with a hypothesis that ornamentation in Schizocosa evolved, and is likely maintained, due to its interactions with dynamic movement displays (i.e. leg movements), which can themselves be plastically altered based on the signaler’s phenotype as well as the signaling environment.
Fil: Hebets, Eileen A.. Universidad de Nebraska - Lincoln; Estados Unidos
Fil: Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal; Argentina
Fil: Abdallah, Abdallah. Universidad de Nebraska - Lincoln; Estados Unidos
Fil: Griger, Seth. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Fil: McGinley, Rowan. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Fil: Starrett, James. University of California at Davis; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bond, Jason E.. University of California at Davis; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bern, Mitch. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
BEHAVIORALSKILLS
COMPENSATORY TRAITS
MATE CHOICE
PLASTICITY
SENSORY BIAS
SENSORY DRIVE
SEXUAL SELECTION
SIGNAL INTERACTIONS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/260375
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_936dcb00e03d926b5baa67199739513d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/260375 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypesHebets, Eileen A.Oviedo Diego, Mariela AnahíAbdallah, AbdallahGriger, SethMcGinley, RowanStarrett, JamesBond, Jason E.Bern, MitchBEHAVIORALSKILLSCOMPENSATORY TRAITSMATE CHOICEPLASTICITYSENSORY BIASSENSORY DRIVESEXUAL SELECTIONSIGNAL INTERACTIONShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Mate choice is posited to explain the evolution and maintenance of numerous secondary sexual traits, including ornamentation. This study explores the role of ornamentation in the mating success of two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent ornamentation. Mature male Schizocosa crassipalpata lack ornamentation while males of its closest living relative, S. bilineata, express both dark pigmentation and foreleg brushes. Following phenotypic manipulations of foreleg ornamentation – i.e. adding ornamentation in the form of dark pigment to non-ornamented males (S. crassipalpata, Aim 1) and removing ornamentation in varying degrees from highly ornamented males (S. bilineata, Aim 2 – shaving brushes; Aim 3 – shaving brushes and painting over dark pigment in vibration present/absent environments) – we found no evidence that ornamentation alone improves male mating success in either species, regardless of the vibratory signaling environment. In both S. bilineata experiments, however, higher courtship rates resulted in higher mating success, suggesting selection for courtship performance. Furthermore, females were more likely to turn, a presumed receptivity display, in response to males that courted at a higher rate. Also, similar to findings in another relative (S. stridulans), we found indications that ornamentation may function to ease a male’s reliance on courtship performance – i.e., at low courtship rates, only ornamented males can secure a mating. Our phenotypic manipulations also influenced courtship behavior in S. bilineata. Shaved males began courting earlier and courted more often over a longer time than intact males, yet ultimately acquired similar matings. This increased courtship effort likely compensated for reduced ornamentation. Finally, the vibratory environment appears crucial for female–male dialogue in S. bilineata, as vibratory absent environments resulted in increased female attacks and decreased male courtship rates. Together, our data suggest that S. crassipalpata females do not possess a preference for ornamentation and that S. bilineata females do not use ornamentation alone in mating decisions. Instead, our results are consistent with a hypothesis that ornamentation in Schizocosa evolved, and is likely maintained, due to its interactions with dynamic movement displays (i.e. leg movements), which can themselves be plastically altered based on the signaler’s phenotype as well as the signaling environment.Fil: Hebets, Eileen A.. Universidad de Nebraska - Lincoln; Estados UnidosFil: Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal; ArgentinaFil: Abdallah, Abdallah. Universidad de Nebraska - Lincoln; Estados UnidosFil: Griger, Seth. University of Nebraska; Estados UnidosFil: McGinley, Rowan. University of Nebraska; Estados UnidosFil: Starrett, James. University of California at Davis; Estados UnidosFil: Bond, Jason E.. University of California at Davis; Estados UnidosFil: Bern, Mitch. University of Nebraska; Estados UnidosFrontiers Media2024-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/260375Hebets, Eileen A.; Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí; Abdallah, Abdallah; Griger, Seth; McGinley, Rowan; et al.; Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ethology; 3; 8-2024; 1-182813-5091CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fetho.2024.1460323/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fetho.2024.1460323info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:15:57Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/260375instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:15:58.169CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes |
title |
Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes |
spellingShingle |
Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes Hebets, Eileen A. BEHAVIORALSKILLS COMPENSATORY TRAITS MATE CHOICE PLASTICITY SENSORY BIAS SENSORY DRIVE SEXUAL SELECTION SIGNAL INTERACTIONS |
title_short |
Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes |
title_full |
Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes |
title_fullStr |
Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes |
title_sort |
Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Hebets, Eileen A. Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí Abdallah, Abdallah Griger, Seth McGinley, Rowan Starrett, James Bond, Jason E. Bern, Mitch |
author |
Hebets, Eileen A. |
author_facet |
Hebets, Eileen A. Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí Abdallah, Abdallah Griger, Seth McGinley, Rowan Starrett, James Bond, Jason E. Bern, Mitch |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí Abdallah, Abdallah Griger, Seth McGinley, Rowan Starrett, James Bond, Jason E. Bern, Mitch |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
BEHAVIORALSKILLS COMPENSATORY TRAITS MATE CHOICE PLASTICITY SENSORY BIAS SENSORY DRIVE SEXUAL SELECTION SIGNAL INTERACTIONS |
topic |
BEHAVIORALSKILLS COMPENSATORY TRAITS MATE CHOICE PLASTICITY SENSORY BIAS SENSORY DRIVE SEXUAL SELECTION SIGNAL INTERACTIONS |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Mate choice is posited to explain the evolution and maintenance of numerous secondary sexual traits, including ornamentation. This study explores the role of ornamentation in the mating success of two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent ornamentation. Mature male Schizocosa crassipalpata lack ornamentation while males of its closest living relative, S. bilineata, express both dark pigmentation and foreleg brushes. Following phenotypic manipulations of foreleg ornamentation – i.e. adding ornamentation in the form of dark pigment to non-ornamented males (S. crassipalpata, Aim 1) and removing ornamentation in varying degrees from highly ornamented males (S. bilineata, Aim 2 – shaving brushes; Aim 3 – shaving brushes and painting over dark pigment in vibration present/absent environments) – we found no evidence that ornamentation alone improves male mating success in either species, regardless of the vibratory signaling environment. In both S. bilineata experiments, however, higher courtship rates resulted in higher mating success, suggesting selection for courtship performance. Furthermore, females were more likely to turn, a presumed receptivity display, in response to males that courted at a higher rate. Also, similar to findings in another relative (S. stridulans), we found indications that ornamentation may function to ease a male’s reliance on courtship performance – i.e., at low courtship rates, only ornamented males can secure a mating. Our phenotypic manipulations also influenced courtship behavior in S. bilineata. Shaved males began courting earlier and courted more often over a longer time than intact males, yet ultimately acquired similar matings. This increased courtship effort likely compensated for reduced ornamentation. Finally, the vibratory environment appears crucial for female–male dialogue in S. bilineata, as vibratory absent environments resulted in increased female attacks and decreased male courtship rates. Together, our data suggest that S. crassipalpata females do not possess a preference for ornamentation and that S. bilineata females do not use ornamentation alone in mating decisions. Instead, our results are consistent with a hypothesis that ornamentation in Schizocosa evolved, and is likely maintained, due to its interactions with dynamic movement displays (i.e. leg movements), which can themselves be plastically altered based on the signaler’s phenotype as well as the signaling environment. Fil: Hebets, Eileen A.. Universidad de Nebraska - Lincoln; Estados Unidos Fil: Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal; Argentina Fil: Abdallah, Abdallah. Universidad de Nebraska - Lincoln; Estados Unidos Fil: Griger, Seth. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos Fil: McGinley, Rowan. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos Fil: Starrett, James. University of California at Davis; Estados Unidos Fil: Bond, Jason E.. University of California at Davis; Estados Unidos Fil: Bern, Mitch. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos |
description |
Mate choice is posited to explain the evolution and maintenance of numerous secondary sexual traits, including ornamentation. This study explores the role of ornamentation in the mating success of two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent ornamentation. Mature male Schizocosa crassipalpata lack ornamentation while males of its closest living relative, S. bilineata, express both dark pigmentation and foreleg brushes. Following phenotypic manipulations of foreleg ornamentation – i.e. adding ornamentation in the form of dark pigment to non-ornamented males (S. crassipalpata, Aim 1) and removing ornamentation in varying degrees from highly ornamented males (S. bilineata, Aim 2 – shaving brushes; Aim 3 – shaving brushes and painting over dark pigment in vibration present/absent environments) – we found no evidence that ornamentation alone improves male mating success in either species, regardless of the vibratory signaling environment. In both S. bilineata experiments, however, higher courtship rates resulted in higher mating success, suggesting selection for courtship performance. Furthermore, females were more likely to turn, a presumed receptivity display, in response to males that courted at a higher rate. Also, similar to findings in another relative (S. stridulans), we found indications that ornamentation may function to ease a male’s reliance on courtship performance – i.e., at low courtship rates, only ornamented males can secure a mating. Our phenotypic manipulations also influenced courtship behavior in S. bilineata. Shaved males began courting earlier and courted more often over a longer time than intact males, yet ultimately acquired similar matings. This increased courtship effort likely compensated for reduced ornamentation. Finally, the vibratory environment appears crucial for female–male dialogue in S. bilineata, as vibratory absent environments resulted in increased female attacks and decreased male courtship rates. Together, our data suggest that S. crassipalpata females do not possess a preference for ornamentation and that S. bilineata females do not use ornamentation alone in mating decisions. Instead, our results are consistent with a hypothesis that ornamentation in Schizocosa evolved, and is likely maintained, due to its interactions with dynamic movement displays (i.e. leg movements), which can themselves be plastically altered based on the signaler’s phenotype as well as the signaling environment. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/260375 Hebets, Eileen A.; Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí; Abdallah, Abdallah; Griger, Seth; McGinley, Rowan; et al.; Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ethology; 3; 8-2024; 1-18 2813-5091 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/260375 |
identifier_str_mv |
Hebets, Eileen A.; Oviedo Diego, Mariela Anahí; Abdallah, Abdallah; Griger, Seth; McGinley, Rowan; et al.; Courtship performance, not ornamentation, predicts mating success in two sister-species of wolf spider with divergent phenotypes; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ethology; 3; 8-2024; 1-18 2813-5091 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fetho.2024.1460323/full info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fetho.2024.1460323 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846083307667718144 |
score |
13.22299 |