The Luminosity Profiles of Brightest Cluster Galaxies

Autores
Donzelli, Carlos Jose; Muriel, Hernan; Madrid, J. P.
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
We have derived detailed R-band luminosity profiles and structural parameters for a total of 430 brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs), down to a limiting surface brightness of 24.5 mag arcsec−2. Light profiles were initially fitted with a Sersic’s ´ R1/n model, but we found that 205 (∼48%) BCGs require a double component model to accurately match their light profiles. The best fit for these 205 galaxies is an inner Sersic model, with indices ´ n ∼ 1–7, plus an outer exponential component. Thus, we establish the existence of two categories of the BCG luminosity profiles: single and double component profiles. We found that double profile BCGs are brighter (∼0.2 mag) than single profile BCGs. In fact, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test applied to these subsamples indicates that they have different total magnitude distributions, with mean values MR = −23.8 ± 0.6 mag for single profile BCGs and MR = −24.0 ± 0.5 mag for double profile BCGs. We find that partial luminosities for both subsamples are indistinguishable up to r = 15 kpc, while for r > 20 kpc the luminosities we obtain are on average 0.2 mag brighter for double profile BCGs. This result indicates that extra-light for double profile BCGs does not come from the inner region but from the outer regions of these galaxies. The best-fit slope of the Kormendy relation for the whole sample is a = 3.13 ± 0.04. However, when fitted separately, single and double profile BCGs show different slopes: asingle = 3.29 ± 0.06 and adouble = 2.79 ± 0.08. Also, the logarithmic slope of the metric luminosity α is higher in double profile BCGs (αdouble = 0.65±0.12) than in single profile BCGs (αsingle = 0.59±0.14). The mean isophote outer ellipticity (calculated atμ ∼ 24 mag arcsec−2) is higher in double profile BCGs (edouble = 0.30 ± 0.10) than in single profile BCGs (esingle = 0.26 ± 0.11). Similarly, the mean absolute value of inner minus outer ellipticity is also higher in double profile BCGs. From a subsample of 24 BCGs, we found strong evidence that extra-light at intermediate radii in double profile BCGs is related to the presence of a faint stellar envelope. Similarly, from another subsample of 12 BCGs we also found that extra-light is related to star formation. On the other hand, we did not find differences between these two BCG categories when we compared global cluster properties such as the BCG-projected position relative to the cluster X-ray center emission, X-ray luminosity, or BCG orientation with respect to the cluster position angle.
Fil: Donzelli, Carlos Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; Argentina
Fil: Muriel, Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; Argentina
Fil: Madrid, J. P.. Swinburne University of Technology; Australia
Materia
Galaxies: clusters: general
Galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD
Galaxies: interactions
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/279094

id CONICETDig_92d0c58905a67fab54fd03e79878328a
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/279094
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The Luminosity Profiles of Brightest Cluster GalaxiesDonzelli, Carlos JoseMuriel, HernanMadrid, J. P.Galaxies: clusters: generalGalaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cDGalaxies: interactionshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.7https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1We have derived detailed R-band luminosity profiles and structural parameters for a total of 430 brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs), down to a limiting surface brightness of 24.5 mag arcsec−2. Light profiles were initially fitted with a Sersic’s ´ R1/n model, but we found that 205 (∼48%) BCGs require a double component model to accurately match their light profiles. The best fit for these 205 galaxies is an inner Sersic model, with indices ´ n ∼ 1–7, plus an outer exponential component. Thus, we establish the existence of two categories of the BCG luminosity profiles: single and double component profiles. We found that double profile BCGs are brighter (∼0.2 mag) than single profile BCGs. In fact, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test applied to these subsamples indicates that they have different total magnitude distributions, with mean values MR = −23.8 ± 0.6 mag for single profile BCGs and MR = −24.0 ± 0.5 mag for double profile BCGs. We find that partial luminosities for both subsamples are indistinguishable up to r = 15 kpc, while for r > 20 kpc the luminosities we obtain are on average 0.2 mag brighter for double profile BCGs. This result indicates that extra-light for double profile BCGs does not come from the inner region but from the outer regions of these galaxies. The best-fit slope of the Kormendy relation for the whole sample is a = 3.13 ± 0.04. However, when fitted separately, single and double profile BCGs show different slopes: asingle = 3.29 ± 0.06 and adouble = 2.79 ± 0.08. Also, the logarithmic slope of the metric luminosity α is higher in double profile BCGs (αdouble = 0.65±0.12) than in single profile BCGs (αsingle = 0.59±0.14). The mean isophote outer ellipticity (calculated atμ ∼ 24 mag arcsec−2) is higher in double profile BCGs (edouble = 0.30 ± 0.10) than in single profile BCGs (esingle = 0.26 ± 0.11). Similarly, the mean absolute value of inner minus outer ellipticity is also higher in double profile BCGs. From a subsample of 24 BCGs, we found strong evidence that extra-light at intermediate radii in double profile BCGs is related to the presence of a faint stellar envelope. Similarly, from another subsample of 12 BCGs we also found that extra-light is related to star formation. On the other hand, we did not find differences between these two BCG categories when we compared global cluster properties such as the BCG-projected position relative to the cluster X-ray center emission, X-ray luminosity, or BCG orientation with respect to the cluster position angle.Fil: Donzelli, Carlos Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Muriel, Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Madrid, J. P.. Swinburne University of Technology; AustraliaIOP Publishing2011-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/279094Donzelli, Carlos Jose; Muriel, Hernan; Madrid, J. P.; The Luminosity Profiles of Brightest Cluster Galaxies; IOP Publishing; Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series; 195; 2; 8-2011; 1-170067-0049CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0067-0049/195/2/15info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1088/0067-0049/195/2/15info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-02-26T10:22:46Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/279094instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-02-26 10:22:47.277CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Luminosity Profiles of Brightest Cluster Galaxies
title The Luminosity Profiles of Brightest Cluster Galaxies
spellingShingle The Luminosity Profiles of Brightest Cluster Galaxies
Donzelli, Carlos Jose
Galaxies: clusters: general
Galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD
Galaxies: interactions
title_short The Luminosity Profiles of Brightest Cluster Galaxies
title_full The Luminosity Profiles of Brightest Cluster Galaxies
title_fullStr The Luminosity Profiles of Brightest Cluster Galaxies
title_full_unstemmed The Luminosity Profiles of Brightest Cluster Galaxies
title_sort The Luminosity Profiles of Brightest Cluster Galaxies
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Donzelli, Carlos Jose
Muriel, Hernan
Madrid, J. P.
author Donzelli, Carlos Jose
author_facet Donzelli, Carlos Jose
Muriel, Hernan
Madrid, J. P.
author_role author
author2 Muriel, Hernan
Madrid, J. P.
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Galaxies: clusters: general
Galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD
Galaxies: interactions
topic Galaxies: clusters: general
Galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD
Galaxies: interactions
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.7
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We have derived detailed R-band luminosity profiles and structural parameters for a total of 430 brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs), down to a limiting surface brightness of 24.5 mag arcsec−2. Light profiles were initially fitted with a Sersic’s ´ R1/n model, but we found that 205 (∼48%) BCGs require a double component model to accurately match their light profiles. The best fit for these 205 galaxies is an inner Sersic model, with indices ´ n ∼ 1–7, plus an outer exponential component. Thus, we establish the existence of two categories of the BCG luminosity profiles: single and double component profiles. We found that double profile BCGs are brighter (∼0.2 mag) than single profile BCGs. In fact, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test applied to these subsamples indicates that they have different total magnitude distributions, with mean values MR = −23.8 ± 0.6 mag for single profile BCGs and MR = −24.0 ± 0.5 mag for double profile BCGs. We find that partial luminosities for both subsamples are indistinguishable up to r = 15 kpc, while for r > 20 kpc the luminosities we obtain are on average 0.2 mag brighter for double profile BCGs. This result indicates that extra-light for double profile BCGs does not come from the inner region but from the outer regions of these galaxies. The best-fit slope of the Kormendy relation for the whole sample is a = 3.13 ± 0.04. However, when fitted separately, single and double profile BCGs show different slopes: asingle = 3.29 ± 0.06 and adouble = 2.79 ± 0.08. Also, the logarithmic slope of the metric luminosity α is higher in double profile BCGs (αdouble = 0.65±0.12) than in single profile BCGs (αsingle = 0.59±0.14). The mean isophote outer ellipticity (calculated atμ ∼ 24 mag arcsec−2) is higher in double profile BCGs (edouble = 0.30 ± 0.10) than in single profile BCGs (esingle = 0.26 ± 0.11). Similarly, the mean absolute value of inner minus outer ellipticity is also higher in double profile BCGs. From a subsample of 24 BCGs, we found strong evidence that extra-light at intermediate radii in double profile BCGs is related to the presence of a faint stellar envelope. Similarly, from another subsample of 12 BCGs we also found that extra-light is related to star formation. On the other hand, we did not find differences between these two BCG categories when we compared global cluster properties such as the BCG-projected position relative to the cluster X-ray center emission, X-ray luminosity, or BCG orientation with respect to the cluster position angle.
Fil: Donzelli, Carlos Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; Argentina
Fil: Muriel, Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; Argentina
Fil: Madrid, J. P.. Swinburne University of Technology; Australia
description We have derived detailed R-band luminosity profiles and structural parameters for a total of 430 brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs), down to a limiting surface brightness of 24.5 mag arcsec−2. Light profiles were initially fitted with a Sersic’s ´ R1/n model, but we found that 205 (∼48%) BCGs require a double component model to accurately match their light profiles. The best fit for these 205 galaxies is an inner Sersic model, with indices ´ n ∼ 1–7, plus an outer exponential component. Thus, we establish the existence of two categories of the BCG luminosity profiles: single and double component profiles. We found that double profile BCGs are brighter (∼0.2 mag) than single profile BCGs. In fact, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test applied to these subsamples indicates that they have different total magnitude distributions, with mean values MR = −23.8 ± 0.6 mag for single profile BCGs and MR = −24.0 ± 0.5 mag for double profile BCGs. We find that partial luminosities for both subsamples are indistinguishable up to r = 15 kpc, while for r > 20 kpc the luminosities we obtain are on average 0.2 mag brighter for double profile BCGs. This result indicates that extra-light for double profile BCGs does not come from the inner region but from the outer regions of these galaxies. The best-fit slope of the Kormendy relation for the whole sample is a = 3.13 ± 0.04. However, when fitted separately, single and double profile BCGs show different slopes: asingle = 3.29 ± 0.06 and adouble = 2.79 ± 0.08. Also, the logarithmic slope of the metric luminosity α is higher in double profile BCGs (αdouble = 0.65±0.12) than in single profile BCGs (αsingle = 0.59±0.14). The mean isophote outer ellipticity (calculated atμ ∼ 24 mag arcsec−2) is higher in double profile BCGs (edouble = 0.30 ± 0.10) than in single profile BCGs (esingle = 0.26 ± 0.11). Similarly, the mean absolute value of inner minus outer ellipticity is also higher in double profile BCGs. From a subsample of 24 BCGs, we found strong evidence that extra-light at intermediate radii in double profile BCGs is related to the presence of a faint stellar envelope. Similarly, from another subsample of 12 BCGs we also found that extra-light is related to star formation. On the other hand, we did not find differences between these two BCG categories when we compared global cluster properties such as the BCG-projected position relative to the cluster X-ray center emission, X-ray luminosity, or BCG orientation with respect to the cluster position angle.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/279094
Donzelli, Carlos Jose; Muriel, Hernan; Madrid, J. P.; The Luminosity Profiles of Brightest Cluster Galaxies; IOP Publishing; Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series; 195; 2; 8-2011; 1-17
0067-0049
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/279094
identifier_str_mv Donzelli, Carlos Jose; Muriel, Hernan; Madrid, J. P.; The Luminosity Profiles of Brightest Cluster Galaxies; IOP Publishing; Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series; 195; 2; 8-2011; 1-17
0067-0049
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0067-0049/195/2/15
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1088/0067-0049/195/2/15
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IOP Publishing
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IOP Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1858305678747107328
score 13.176822