Rescuing Positive Freedom from Neo-Republican Attack

Autores
Seleme, Hugo Omar
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This paper is structured into three sections. First, I will make a stylizedpresentation of the Berlinian matrix and freedom as non-domination as Pettitunderstands it. I aim to show that if one intends to present non-domination as aconception with elements borrowed from positive freedom, then it is necessary tounderstand positive freedom in terms of control-indeed Pettit has begun to present freedom as non-domination in terms of control. Once positive freedom is thus understood, a new type of positive freedom, hidden until now, emerges. Second, I will show why Pettit´s reasoning that freedom as non-domination is morally more attractive than populist positive freedom does not apply to this new type of positive freedom. Pettit has been successful in presenting a distinguishable conception of freedom as non-domination, but he has not offered any arguments to show that it is morally preferable to the type of positive freedom I present. Third, I will explain why freedom as institutional control is morally preferable to freedom as non-domination.
Fil: Seleme, Hugo Omar. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales. Centro de Investigaciones Juridícas y Sociales; Argentina
Materia
Positional Freedom
Domination
Self-Government
Institutional Control
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/69742
Acceder
id CONICETDig_917ccc03e84f09f6bfbbf50221561458
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/69742
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Rescuing Positive Freedom from Neo-Republican AttackSeleme, Hugo OmarPositional FreedomDominationSelf-GovernmentInstitutional Controlhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5This paper is structured into three sections. First, I will make a stylizedpresentation of the Berlinian matrix and freedom as non-domination as Pettitunderstands it. I aim to show that if one intends to present non-domination as aconception with elements borrowed from positive freedom, then it is necessary tounderstand positive freedom in terms of control-indeed Pettit has begun to present freedom as non-domination in terms of control. Once positive freedom is thus understood, a new type of positive freedom, hidden until now, emerges. Second, I will show why Pettit´s reasoning that freedom as non-domination is morally more attractive than populist positive freedom does not apply to this new type of positive freedom. Pettit has been successful in presenting a distinguishable conception of freedom as non-domination, but he has not offered any arguments to show that it is morally preferable to the type of positive freedom I present. Third, I will explain why freedom as institutional control is morally preferable to freedom as non-domination.Fil: Seleme, Hugo Omar. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales. Centro de Investigaciones Juridícas y Sociales; ArgentinaAustralian Society of Legal Philosophy2015-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/69742Seleme, Hugo Omar; Rescuing Positive Freedom from Neo-Republican Attack; Australian Society of Legal Philosophy; Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy; 40; 6-2015; 93-1141440-4982CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ajlph40&div=3&id=&page=info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:32:32Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/69742instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:32:32.673CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rescuing Positive Freedom from Neo-Republican Attack
title Rescuing Positive Freedom from Neo-Republican Attack
spellingShingle Rescuing Positive Freedom from Neo-Republican Attack
Seleme, Hugo Omar
Positional Freedom
Domination
Self-Government
Institutional Control
title_short Rescuing Positive Freedom from Neo-Republican Attack
title_full Rescuing Positive Freedom from Neo-Republican Attack
title_fullStr Rescuing Positive Freedom from Neo-Republican Attack
title_full_unstemmed Rescuing Positive Freedom from Neo-Republican Attack
title_sort Rescuing Positive Freedom from Neo-Republican Attack
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Seleme, Hugo Omar
author Seleme, Hugo Omar
author_facet Seleme, Hugo Omar
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Positional Freedom
Domination
Self-Government
Institutional Control
topic Positional Freedom
Domination
Self-Government
Institutional Control
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This paper is structured into three sections. First, I will make a stylizedpresentation of the Berlinian matrix and freedom as non-domination as Pettitunderstands it. I aim to show that if one intends to present non-domination as aconception with elements borrowed from positive freedom, then it is necessary tounderstand positive freedom in terms of control-indeed Pettit has begun to present freedom as non-domination in terms of control. Once positive freedom is thus understood, a new type of positive freedom, hidden until now, emerges. Second, I will show why Pettit´s reasoning that freedom as non-domination is morally more attractive than populist positive freedom does not apply to this new type of positive freedom. Pettit has been successful in presenting a distinguishable conception of freedom as non-domination, but he has not offered any arguments to show that it is morally preferable to the type of positive freedom I present. Third, I will explain why freedom as institutional control is morally preferable to freedom as non-domination.
Fil: Seleme, Hugo Omar. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales. Centro de Investigaciones Juridícas y Sociales; Argentina
description This paper is structured into three sections. First, I will make a stylizedpresentation of the Berlinian matrix and freedom as non-domination as Pettitunderstands it. I aim to show that if one intends to present non-domination as aconception with elements borrowed from positive freedom, then it is necessary tounderstand positive freedom in terms of control-indeed Pettit has begun to present freedom as non-domination in terms of control. Once positive freedom is thus understood, a new type of positive freedom, hidden until now, emerges. Second, I will show why Pettit´s reasoning that freedom as non-domination is morally more attractive than populist positive freedom does not apply to this new type of positive freedom. Pettit has been successful in presenting a distinguishable conception of freedom as non-domination, but he has not offered any arguments to show that it is morally preferable to the type of positive freedom I present. Third, I will explain why freedom as institutional control is morally preferable to freedom as non-domination.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/69742
Seleme, Hugo Omar; Rescuing Positive Freedom from Neo-Republican Attack; Australian Society of Legal Philosophy; Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy; 40; 6-2015; 93-114
1440-4982
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/69742
identifier_str_mv Seleme, Hugo Omar; Rescuing Positive Freedom from Neo-Republican Attack; Australian Society of Legal Philosophy; Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy; 40; 6-2015; 93-114
1440-4982
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ajlph40&div=3&id=&page=
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Australian Society of Legal Philosophy
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Australian Society of Legal Philosophy
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846781937460445184
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares